![]() |
Has Qaddafi changed?
While he was renouncing terrorism, he was suspected of setting up the assassination of the Saudi Monarch to destabilize the region.
Terrorists don't change. His hands are bloody just like any other terrorists. http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/10/in...10LIBY.html?hp -Rudey |
Re: Has Qaddafi changed?
Quote:
I think at this point as far as Libya goes, the US is best off playing with the hand it's dealt. Pakistan, for example, while not being a model of democracy is much better for the US as an ally than as an enemy. I'm still on the fence about Libya. |
Re: Re: Has Qaddafi changed?
Quote:
Libya seems to be a lot of hot air but no action. However, that doesn't mean that we shouldn't keep an eye out on the situation. Qadaffi shows signs of some serious mental issues, as he has ever since he came into power. If you want to talk about flip-flopping, he's your man. Not to mention his treatment of foreign dignitaries isn't what you'd call gracious. :rolleyes: |
Re: Re: Re: Has Qaddafi changed?
Quote:
Saudi Arabia is our ally because they sell us oil. I think that's about it. |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Has Qaddafi changed?
Quote:
Now take the Saudis. I can easily call them bloody murderers. Even today they teach children in their Madrasas about how Americans are infidels. They breed murderers and hate. At the same time what would happen if the Saudi Royals were removed? Do you honestly think that extremism would not come to an end? What they need is to force these bloody rulers to stop inciting hate. They need to push them to granting more liberties - and then after the population has adjusted to these shifts and the extremist elements are liquidated, should they be pressured to take more of a ceremonial role. -Rudey |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.