Auburn U.: "this diversity-mad atmosphere"
 

From the campus newspaper:

why did Wes Williams, the vice president of Student Affairs, issue a statement the day of the court's decision on Grutter v. Bollinger saying the administration was reviewing the case, and may adjust Auburn's admissions policy?

Sure, Auburn could use diversifying. The University is predominately white, and the campus atmosphere reflects this. Diversity of ideas would challenge the norm, and diversity of customs and cultures would help develop the student body's moral and aesthetic appreciation.

But how could adjusting the admissions policy effect any change?

If Auburn lowered its standards any more, there wouldn't be any standards, and minorities still wouldn't come. Auburn is seen as a white college, and unless the University does something to change that perception, it always will be seen that way.

Instead of creating a superfluous admissions policy, Auburn needs to reach minority high school students. Let the black girl or the Hispanic boy know there is a place for them at Auburn.

Give every guidance counselor in the state information about the many programs at Auburn that cater to minority needs. Make sure every minority student knows about scholarships available to him or her.

Admissions policies need to become more rigid, not less.

Loosening Auburn's already slack guidelines is just the next step in the administration's ongoing apology to the black community.

Five years ago, did the University leadership even consider diversity? Not vocally. But throw a handful of drunken frat boys at a Halloween party and some bad publicity into the mix and suddenly the University is diversity crazy, committing itself to change in grand fashion (with statements to all major media outlets).

In its effort to save face, the administration has wasted large sums of money on centers and programs that don't promote much diversity, and changed the concept of diversity itself.

Diversity is no longer an ideal; it's an annoying survey professors make you take; it's a word SGA senators like to drop; it's a justification for axing two trustee nominations.

In this diversity-mad atmosphere, minority students are no longer ends in themselves, but means to a social end. The University wants to present itself as a leader in the academic world, and thinks diversifying the campus is the best (or easiest) way to accomplish this.

Williams actually said Auburn was "especially" committed to getting more black students, making the administrations intentions obvious.

Each black student is another pin on Auburn's proud chest, and you don't have to be white to be embarrassed by it.

Why should we care either way?

If indeed Auburn is trying to "diversify" its campus, why must the question of lower standards come into play?

Sounds like just an editorial piece to me

Why is this in Greek Life?

Maybe someone who attends Auburn can explain this better than I can, but I think I understand why. The summer before my senior year in HS, I attended a summer program at Auburn for minority students interested in the sciences (I'm not interested in the sciences at all, it was all-expenses paid and a great way to get out of the hellmouth I called a hometown then). Most of the kids were from Georgia, Alabama, or Florida, with a few people from Mississippi. None of us had any intention of going to Auburn (although most people were interested in the sciences). As far as I know, none are at Auburn.

I deducted this was why the blacks in my group did not want to go to Auburn, which is probably true for many others:
Auburn's strengths--the agricultural sciences and engineering--are also the strengths of two other schools which are much more attractive to blacks. One is Georgia Tech, in Atlanta. The other is Florida A&M. They were much more interested in going to those two schools (and Tuskegee and Alabama State) than Auburn, understanding that a HBCU or a school in a city with a thriving black community could be better for them than Auburn. It's okay, and it is no reflection on Auburn's quality as a university.

But as to why this was posted, come on: it's Hoosier, who loves to post things unrelated to Greek Life if it has a racial slant. :rolleyes:

I actually thought Auburn had a good engineering program... am I wrong?

It has a great program. It's just that the kids I was with wanted to go somewhere else.

I was thinking the same thing. I mean given Alabama's history, people are more likely to go to the schools that they are familiar with and wherever the majority of their friends go. I think Auburn's best bet would be to recruit students from out of state.