Sororities to allow all female-identifying students to rush
 

Have any NPC groups established guidelines regarding this? If not, it will be interesting to see what happens (this particular case is at Brown University).

http://www.browndailyherald.com/2016...dents-to-rush/

Hm, I don't agree with this. I guess we'll see what their reactions and responses will be, because yes, I think each national organization will have one.

One more reason I am thankful Zeta is not at Brown.

Some might look at the situation from another perspective: would you or your NPC group shun or remove from membership any fully initiated member if she began identifying as a man, yet continued maintaining the high standards of your group.

And if each individual NPC group creates their own decision/policy statements on this issue, a fully-unified statement from NPC is not anticipated.

Do you mean you don't agree with her statement that national NPC groups defer to their individual chapters?

How on earth are the national hqs going to know anyway?

So I actually have some second-hand experience with this-a friend had two transgender women register for recruitment when she was Panhellenic president at a school very different from my own. The first girl dropped out before recruitment started, but the second was set on continuing and so the following things happened:

-Panhel prez had to call each of the national orgs on her campus (none of the ones at Brown) and ask what their specific membership policy was with regards to transgender women. Some said they would allow anyone who identified as female to receive a bid, while others said they would only allow biological women to join.
-Panhel prez had to inform the PNM that she would be cut by chapters she could not receive a bid from after the first round, same as if she didn't make a minimum GPA for some chapters but not others. She was never told which chapters could not take her.
-She did receive some invites but was eventually cut by all chapters-according to my friend she wasn't the most stellar PNM in terms of grades, involvement, etc anyways so it's not as though sororities were passing on an otherwise superstar PNM because of her biological gender.

If a woman is still legally male and has not changed her name legally the HQ might see an obviously-gendered name on their roster and ask questions.

I disagree wholeheartedly that the national orgs will just let Brown chapters do whatever they want. I applaud their move to inclusivity but it's wishful thinking on their part if there's any pushback whatsoever from their nationals to think they can keep a girl nationals won't allow and not run into trouble. Also incredibly silly that their Panhellenic president just assumed there's no way to know what nationals thinks. If she called them she would definitely have gotten answers, even if she didn't like them.

Each national org DOES set their own membership requirements. One would think that Brown Panhellenic would know this.

Crossing the female membership requirement line might open up our orgs to males identifying as males seeking sorority membership. I like the NPC sororities as they are now, founded by women for women.

There are plenty of females out there with male names....and there are names like Ashley and Evelyn that used to be exclusively male and are now female. Point being, unless they really wanted to dig into it they still couldn't tell. I think in today's climate digging obsessively would be more trouble than it's worth.

1. Transwomen are women.

2. Title IX does not govern individual membership policies. A sorority could welcome transwomen and still bar men from joining without any legal repercussion. Title IX allows schools to recognize social fraternities and sororities regardless of individual gender policies, as opposed to other types of GLOs, which are not exempt.

3. Social fraternities and sororities could welcome opposite-gender people if they wanted to and still not lose their right to determine their own membership. I know a woman who pledged an NIC fraternity as a male freshman and then transitioned to being a woman. As far as I know, she still maintains her membership.

Anyway, good for Brown!

https://www.campuspride.org/wp-conte...DOE-Letter.pdf
https://www.campuspride.org/wp-conte...s-Title-IX.pdf

Transgender women are women. Full stop.

Do they have XX chromosomes?

This is where I foresee there being more problems than anything else. I agree that trans women are women and I would support my organization welcoming them with open arms into membership! But my concern would be that, especially with all NPC membership selection processes being private, it could get into a very sticky situation. It would take one less-than-stellar PNM being dropped from recruitment to go on Twitter and say they were dropped for being trans before the entire Greek system was raked over the coals.

That's NOT to say that all trans PNMs would do that, but if someone did, I feel like it would be blown out of proportion and all Greeks would be made by the media to look like transphobic idiots when, in reality, we have membership standards we uphold for every PNM, cisgendered or transgendered. What's the solution? I'm not sure. And do I think this is reason enough to not allow trans students to participate in recruitment? No. I think we'd really have to work on making sure all PNMs feel welcomed to kind of avoid them feeling like they were singled out for being trans.

For scientific clarification:

The three ways of determining biological sex are chromosomes, gonads (penis, vagina, testes, ovaries, etc) and hormone levels. Some women have levels of testosterone that fall into the acceptable range for men but still consider themselves women, such as the case of South African track athlete Caster Semenya. Others, such as women with androgen insensitivity syndrome, have male gonads, but those gonads are undescended and their bodies cannot process testosterone. These women look, for all intents and purposes, like "biological" women but are chromosomally male and to some extent gonadally as well. There are even people with extra or fewer sex chromosomes than most, but the vast majority of these people fall into one social designation of gender or the other.

We don't peek down the pants of a PNM, demand their bloodwork before offering a bid for membership or require genetic testing because a woman is a woman if she believes herself to be one and presents herself as one, not if she passes some sort of biological checklist. Sex and gender are different concepts.

^^^Isn't this a determination of biological SEX, not gender?