![]() |
AEPi chapter disaffiliates from National Organization
I had never heard of a chapter disaffiliating from the national organization before but it says it happened before on this campus.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Interesting comments:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And if it's "non-discriminatory and open to all" then why is there a problem? Doesn't make sense. |
watch;Would this last one mean it's possible there will be this AEPi local and an AEPi national on the same campus? The newspaper article sounded like everyone in the chapter was disaffiliating.
And if it's "non-discriminatory and open to all" then why is there a problem? Doesn't make sense. I agree. That does not make any sense at all. Just by reading their National Mission Statement and the article and comments by the local chapter, it seems to me that their National Org. is double-talking themselves with it comes to the recruitment of members. They welcome all men to seek membership, but they would rather have all their chapters have all Jewish members instead. Does anyone else reading that as well?:confused: |
I wouldn't say they want all Jewish men, I'd say they want a certain percentage (say greater than 60%). So if you've got a chapter that is 30% Jewish, while any single person could come in, regardless of being Jewish or not, that's fine, but a certain percentage of Jews is wanted...
|
Sad to say, I am not at all surprised. An incident happened at my school ~25 years ago where AEPi's nationals became concerned that the local chapter was drifting from its Jewish identity. The chapter was reorganized and almost every brother was told that he was no longer an active. Of the handful who were invited to remain (all of whom, naturally, were Jewish), all but one deaffiliated in solidarity with their other brothers. They formed a local fraternity, and, several years later, became a chapter of a different fraternity. The one brother who did remain worked with AEPi's nationals to recolonize the chapter, which happened almost immediately. I don't think they've had a single non-Jewish brother since - certainly they didn't while I was in school.
As an aside, I will say this about AEPhi, which also has a Jewish identity. We don't care what religion a PNM is, as long as she's ok with Jewish ideals. Best of luck to the men at Tufts. |
Quote:
|
I'm curious about any chapter having "long term goals."
I just have more questions after this article. |
Quote:
Quote:
I have to say it's unbelievable to me that the chapter functioned for years without I guess making it clear that it was founded on Jewish ideals just because that's so much part of their history. ADPi was founded on ideals from Christianity but we're also accepting of all religions. |
The AEPi chapter at Penn decided to go local a few years ago, but for reasons of risk management (or lack thereof): http://www.thedp.com/article/2012/04...ty_recognition. There's supposedly a new colony there, however.
Their national had reorganized the chapter sometime back in the late 1980s to make it more Jewish. It was surprising to find out about its history because when I was there, almost nobody was Jewish, and this at a school with a large Jewish population. The SDT chapter also underwent a reboot back then. |
Unorganized thoughts ahead:
I think it's important that organizations established for, and maintaining a continuing mission for marginalized/minority communities, maintain that character. All NIC/IFC fraternities are not the same, don't recruit the same, and shouldn't really be judged the same. I don't know how or why AEPi does the things it does, but I support their right to maintain their national identity. I wouldn't like a chapter of Alpha Phi Alpha that was composed based on local experiences rather than a national mission. I recognize this is not the case for many other fraternities that AEPi is frequently compared against. I also think what "whiteness" means in 2015 has something to do with why locally, some AEPi chapters don't feel the need to be Jewy (in the words of Sarah Silverman). |
Good points Sen and I agree that an organization has the right to preserve it's "identity" but at the same time I think it's a very old fashioned way of doing business and is extremely limiting to the chapters and to the fraternity on a national level. What was needed in 1930 may not be necessary in 2015 and I think they should lax some of those restrictions if they want to remain competitive in the conference.
|
PiKA2001:Good points Sen and I agree that an organization has the right to preserve it's "identity" but at the same time I think it's a very old fashioned way of doing business and is extremely limiting to the chapters and to the fraternity on a national level. What was needed in 1930 may not be necessary in 2015 and I think they should lax some of those restrictions if they want to remain competitive in the conference
Very good statement PiKA2001!!! ZBT:"BROTHERHOOD & BEYOND" |
Rudey had a good post on here years ago about AEPi being a Jewish fraternity rather than a Jewish interest fraternity like ZBT. I'd find it but my head hurts from the super bowl.
In answer to watch's question, this group of guys will probably call themselves Alpha Pi or something. Whether the natl recolonizes there depends on their perceived ROI. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.