![]() |
Were Confederate soldiers terrorists?
I don't think you can compare the Confederate states to Islamic terrorism.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/04/1...ex.html?hpt=C2 |
Terrorism is a tactic, not an ideology. The rationale is irrelevant, it could be something benign like fighting for one independence, but if the tactic used is terrorism, it's the method is wrong, but not the aim.
Now, the KKK was definitely a terrorist organization. Their brutal tactic in spreading fear is a text book definition of what is a terrorist organization. |
Ugh. This writer does not understand history nor military philosophy.
|
Quote:
As far as the author of the story that the OP linked to, his argument is very weak. The 3 things that he says are common to the Confederacy and Bin Laden/Taliban are very general and are grievances that are common to many groups, e.g German occupied Holland. To identify Confederate soldiers with Bin Laden, he had to find things that were unique to the 2 groups, which he didn't because he can't. |
i wonder what the british thought of our "patriots."
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
THIS...IS...SPARTA!!!!!!!
I didn't read the article but have a general statement.
It's all about frame of reference. Such dynamics and hypocrisy go back to the beginning of time--centuries before America even existed. A lot of things that are considered "patriotism" and "nationalism" by Americans are really just "terrorist" (or something else before terrorism was such an overused term) if viewed from a different lens. The problem is that America is so used to being the HNIC (Head Nation In Charge) and imposing its power and influence (usually by force rather than charisma) on other nations. This is one reason why every instance of another nation imposing its power on America has gone down in history. Sept. 11 was horrific and still saddens and outrages me. But, I also can't say definitively that America has never done a version of that to another country REGARDLESS of the supposed reason behind doing it. |
Quote:
|
When rebels win, it is a revolution. When rebels lose, it's a civil war.
I think the author is comparing oranges to apples. More Union soldiers fought in the Southlands than Confederates in the North. If you have to name a Confederate terrorist, it would be Moseby's Rangers, but when you consider Sherman, that's a stretch. |
Quote:
|
|
Sorry Vito, I love you to pieces, but I hate hate hate hate hate that definition of terrorism. This is why there are 800bajillion definitions - all of them are wrong.
But I agree with your point. |
If Sherman's soldiers didn't engage in terrorist tactics, then I don't know who did! And I totally agree about the KKK ...
|
"Confederates for their involvement in the Civil War -- which was based on the desire to continue slavery" ...That's what the whole civil war was about?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.