GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Parents fight over baby's right to live (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=108441)

DaemonSeid 11-02-2009 12:24 PM

Parents fight over baby's right to live
 
London, England (CNN) -- A baby born with a severe birth defect put its parents on opposing sides in a British court Monday over whether to switch off the child's life support.

The mother sides with doctors and favors disconnecting the baby's respirator. The father took the case to the High Court in London to stop them.

They say the child's lungs fill with fluid every few hours -- giving him the sensation he is choking -- and that doctors must then use suction to remove the fluid, also causing the child to suffer.

The father took the case to court to stop them.

He says the baby can play and recognize its parents. His lawyers plan to show videos of the baby in court to demonstrate he responds to the world around himself.

The baby's parents are amicably separated, the father's lawyer said.

No one involved in the case can be named due to a court order protecting their privacy.

The baby, known as RB, is about one year old and suffers from congenital myasthenic syndrome, a rare genetic condition which means he cannot breathe on his own.

"It causes severe muscle weakness, feeding and respiratory problems, and the disease is progressive," the hospital said in a statement.

The hospital, which is part of Britain's National Health Service, says it is doing what is best for the child.

"Baby RB's case is a deeply tragic one," the hospital said in a statement. "We understand how difficult this legal process must be for both parents and RB's extended family and friends. However, all those involved in the care of RB are taking these steps because they consider it is in RB's best interests."

link


What say you, GC?

AOII Angel 11-02-2009 12:34 PM

What a horrible decision for both parents to have to make.

nikki1920 11-02-2009 12:39 PM

wow. :( That's a choice I wouldn't want to make.

agzg 11-02-2009 01:07 PM

Poor baby RB, and poor parents. That's a very tough choice to make.

DaemonSeid 11-02-2009 01:35 PM

But...the ultimate question is, kill him now or let the disease kill him.

Also in the article it does mention that they aren't sure which strain of this disease (congenital myasthenic syndrome,) the baby has and dependant on which, it can be treated.

I think my question is, has all options been exhausted and is it a matter of financial involvement that may be hindering his treatment?

JBaby1981 11-02-2009 01:50 PM

Only God knows...
 
This must be a horrible thing for the parents to go through but I believe in God and I know that its not over until he says so...I will keep this family and little RB especially in my prayers....

Kevin 11-02-2009 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1863193)
But...the ultimate question is, kill him now or let the disease kill him.

Actually, if they took him off the ventilator, the disease would kill him, not the parents.

It's a semantic difference, but not an insignificant one.

Jill1228 11-02-2009 02:46 PM

Quote:

The baby's parents are amicably separated, the father's lawyer said.
I bet it won't be amicable after this!

OMG, I wouldn't wish this choice on my worst enemy. That poor child :(

AOII Angel 11-02-2009 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1863193)
But...the ultimate question is, kill him now or let the disease kill him.

Also in the article it does mention that they aren't sure which strain of this disease (congenital myasthenic syndrome,) the baby has and dependant on which, it can be treated.

I think my question is, has all options been exhausted and is it a matter of financial involvement that may be hindering his treatment?

This is what I hate about this whole debate! Withdrawing life support is NOT killing a patient. It is NOT providing extraordinary support to prolong life that cannot be supported by itself.

And if this is England, I doubt financial issues are at all involved. They have universal health care which should cover this child. This has to do with deciding whether or not it is more cruel to treat this child or to end his treatment.

dreamseeker 11-02-2009 05:00 PM

this is terribly sad. i don't even want to offer an opinion on this one.

rhoyaltempest 11-02-2009 08:23 PM

This is a delicate situation but often times it's more about the parents than the children. Their emotions and the "I" in "I want my child to live" can sometimes stop them from making the best decision for the child. It's about the child's quality of life; it's not about the parents wanting to hold on. I wouldn't want my child to suffer until their death especially since there is no chance for them to improve.

rhoyaltempest 11-02-2009 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JBaby1981 (Post 1863199)
This must be a horrible thing for the parents to go through but I believe in God and I know that its not over until he says so...I will keep this family and little RB especially in my prayers....

I feel you but if a person will not survive once the machine is turned off, than God is saying that it's over and interfering in that when there is no chance for improvement is not right, to me.

DrPhil 11-02-2009 09:01 PM

Take him off the ventilator.

Keeping him on the ventilator is a selfish move for the parents.

nikki1920 11-16-2009 10:34 AM

The father has relented and agreed to take the baby off the ventilator. The baby died over the weekend, I believe.

eta: here is the story
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe...ies/index.html

AOII Angel 11-16-2009 02:03 PM

How heart wrenching. I wish them peace with this decision.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.