Philosophy question about Hume and Goodman?
 

Hi,

I'm having trouble answering this question. Any input would be helpful.

I am writing a philosophy paper in which I will compare and contrast David Hume and Nelson Goodman's positions on induction. More specifically, I need to explain how each find induciton to be an unjustifiable means to knowledge, and how their positions are similar and different.

I have the basic knowledge about the topic, but I would like to hear different perspectives from other philisophical intellects. Any info might be new to me, so any help would be highly apprectiated. Thanks.

DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK!!! MESSAGEBOARDS ARE NOT RESEARCH TOOLS!!!

And stop spamming while you're at it.

Odd that she would post this in the social forum, and not in academics.