KSigkid |
02-23-2009 04:55 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaemonSeid
(Post 1783164)
I don't think there is any way that a film maker can do a film on this subject and come out of this totally unbiased.
|
No...but I think that if she interviewed a larger cross-section of people, she could have gone a long way towards making it a more meaningful documentary. It would have taken more time, and would have made for a longer film, but I think those are sensible trade-offs when someone is marketing their product as a intelligent piece on the election. It doesn't have to be the length of a Ken Burns project, but there's some space between those extremes.
There's always going to be some bias, as you said...there's bias in the interview subjects, bias in the order that those subjects are presented, bias in the questions asked, and bias in the way the film is cut. I think, though, that a good documentary filmmaker (like a good journalist) finds ways to limit that bias to the extent possible.
|