GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Sorority Recruitment (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=217)
-   -   again..senior rush!? (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=102866)

dancemodel6 02-02-2009 04:53 AM

again..senior rush!?
 
i go to school in southern California, i transferred to my school as a Junior from a community college...i got a bid to the #2 house i Pref-ed with but didnt join because the house wasnt for me. so i want to rush again at my school as a "senior", to see if i can get a bid to my #1 house i pref-ed with last fall. i dont think that i would get a bid to any other house because my school is relativly competative. i maybe be staying for an extra year to get a minor, so is that something i could mention during rush even if im uncertain...i know that many juniors got cut furing rush but i know a few girls that were 1 or 2 yrs older than me that were "junior status" got bids.
there is also another possibility that i will transferring again if things dont get better with my school (personal stuff)...but id probably rush there too if i transferred...

okay sorry i know this is a little confusing but i was just looking for some thought, opinions, im just nervous/scared

APhiAnna 02-02-2009 05:13 AM

I am pretty familiar with a couple schools in Southern California that could be considered "relatively competitive"...let me just say that for both of those schools, getting a bid as a junior is a hard accomplishment and getting a bid as a senior is downright impossible.

I'm not saying don't go through with it, I mean give it a shot, but are there any sororities doing COB? You might have a better chance there.

greekcheek 02-02-2009 08:22 AM

APhiAnna, which schools are you referring to? im thinking of rushing at UCLA as a junior and was curious if it was competitive or not

KSUViolet06 02-02-2009 08:42 AM

I'm going to a little honest here:

I wouldn't go through recruitment if you are rushing JUST to try and join that house you didn't join last year. That seems really closed-minded to me, and not likely to work anyhow. Just becaue you preffed a chapter last year, doesn't mean if you go through again, they'll invite you to pref a second time. Who's to say that they would choose a senior over other freshman/soph PNMs?

If you're going through as a senior, I think you need to be more open-minded to the other chapters on campus. A senior who only wants ONE house isn't likely to be successful.

My school is not a competitive one, and even here it was difficult for a senior to get a bid. I think that most of the senior PNMs who got bids were girls who had at least another year left AND had alot of friends in sororities.

APhiAnna 02-02-2009 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greekcheek (Post 1773730)
APhiAnna, which schools are you referring to? im thinking of rushing at UCLA as a junior and was curious if it was competitive or not

UCLA is competitive for a California school, but not nearly as competitive as USC. For UCLA, get recs because although they aren't the norm they would definitely help you.

From how I understand it, previously it was very difficult for a junior to get a bid. This year, for the first time, they had separate upperclassman quotas, so essentially they had a quota for freshmen and then an upperclassman quota (and to be fair I don't know if there was a separate one for sophomores and juniors, or just one overall). Because of that new quota system many juniors were able to pledge with minimal cuts. I do not know if they are sticking with that system or not...it gave them much bigger pledge classes than normal which was popular with some chapters and unpopular with others.

But the moral of the story is that especially if they keep the new quota system, you should not have that hard of a time. It is somewhat competitive though, so get recs, keep an open mind and definitely get some killer outfits (Los Angeles, and SoCal in general, usually means "classy with a touch of trendy").

KSUViolet06 02-02-2009 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by APhiAnna (Post 1773885)
This year, for the first time, they had separate upperclassman quotas, so essentially they had a quota for freshmen and then an upperclassman quota (and to be fair I don't know if there was a separate one for sophomores and juniors, or just one overall).

Typically, upperclassman quota includes sophs, juniors, and seniors. Basically those who are not freshmen. Generally, it's usually no more than 5% or so of quota.

Also important to note here (not for you APhiAnna, but to PNMs): just because there's an upperclassman quota at a school, doesn't mean that every soph, junior, or senior girl is going to get a bid. It does make things a little better because chapters can take on a few upperclassmen without decreasing the number of freshmen they can pledge.


APhiAnna 02-02-2009 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSUViolet06 (Post 1773891)
Typically, upperclassman quota includes sophs, juniors, and seniors. Basically those who are not freshmen. Generally, it's usually no more than 5% or so of quota.

That's the way it works at some schools, but that is not how it was done at UCLA. They took the number of PNMs that were sophomores, juniors and seniors and devised a separate quota for them. Meaning, if there were 10 chapters, 200 freshmen and 100 upperclassmen quota would be 20 freshmen and 10 upperclassmen. So, ON PAPER, juniors had just as much of a chance to receive a bid as did freshmen. Now I can't comment on if sophomores were favored more than juniors who were favored more than seniors, but all pledge classes (to my knowledge) had juniors.

greekcheek 02-03-2009 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by APhiAnna (Post 1773885)
UCLA is competitive for a California school, but not nearly as competitive as USC. For UCLA, get recs because although they aren't the norm they would definitely help you.

From how I understand it, previously it was very difficult for a junior to get a bid. This year, for the first time, they had separate upperclassman quotas, so essentially they had a quota for freshmen and then an upperclassman quota (and to be fair I don't know if there was a separate one for sophomores and juniors, or just one overall). Because of that new quota system many juniors were able to pledge with minimal cuts. I do not know if they are sticking with that system or not...it gave them much bigger pledge classes than normal which was popular with some chapters and unpopular with others.

But the moral of the story is that especially if they keep the new quota system, you should not have that hard of a time. It is somewhat competitive though, so get recs, keep an open mind and definitely get some killer outfits (Los Angeles, and SoCal in general, usually means "classy with a touch of trendy").


That is so great. I really hope they keep that quota this year and the years to come...especially since schools like UCLA get so many transfer students, its only fair that they get equal opportunity to rush like freshmen do.

dancemodel6 02-03-2009 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSUViolet06 (Post 1773738)
I'm going to a little honest here:

I wouldn't go through recruitment if you are rushing JUST to try and join that house you didn't join last year. That seems really closed-minded to me, and not likely to work anyhow. Just becaue you preffed a chapter last year, doesn't mean if you go through again, they'll invite you to pref a second time. Who's to say that they would choose a senior over other freshman/soph PNMs?

If you're going through as a senior, I think you need to be more open-minded to the other chapters on campus. A senior who only wants ONE house isn't likely to be successful.

My school is not a competitive one, and even here it was difficult for a senior to get a bid. I think that most of the senior PNMs who got bids were girls who had at least another year left AND had alot of friends in sororities.

oh no no i know very well from the first time not to be closed minded at all, and i know i may not get invited back to the same house, i just know from my first through time that some houses are just more selective, so i am trying to make a guess to which ones i would luckly be invited back to .

dancemodel6 02-03-2009 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by APhiAnna (Post 1773710)
I am pretty familiar with a couple schools in Southern California that could be considered "relatively competitive"...let me just say that for both of those schools, getting a bid as a junior is a hard accomplishment and getting a bid as a senior is downright impossible.

I'm not saying don't go through with it, I mean give it a shot, but are there any sororities doing COB? You might have a better chance there.

i know a few houses did do COB last fall, but wouldnt i have to go through rush and drop out by pref night for COB?

Benzgirl 02-03-2009 11:35 AM

I went to a school that was not considered competitive. I don't know any house that took seniors.

nittanyalum 02-03-2009 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dancemodel6 (Post 1773708)
i go to school in southern California, i transferred to my school as a Junior from a community college...i got a bid to the #2 house i Pref-ed with but didnt join because the house wasnt for me. so i want to rush again at my school as a "senior", to see if i can get a bid to my #1 house i pref-ed with last fall. i dont think that i would get a bid to any other house because my school is relativly competative. i maybe be staying for an extra year to get a minor, so is that something i could mention during rush even if im uncertain...i know that many juniors got cut furing rush but i know a few girls that were 1 or 2 yrs older than me that were "junior status" got bids.
there is also another possibility that i will transferring again if things dont get better with my school (personal stuff)...but id probably rush there too if i transferred...

okay sorry i know this is a little confusing but i was just looking for some thought, opinions, im just nervous/scared

It sounds like you were fortunate enough to get a bid as a junior last year and if you were really interested in getting as much out of a "sorority experience" in college as possible, you would have taken advantage of that opportunity.

Honestly, it sounds to me like you aren't really looking for sisterhood, involvement, etc., but that you just want to "be" an "XYZ".

But hey, good luck anyway.

KSUViolet06 02-03-2009 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dancemodel6 (Post 1774282)
i know a few houses did do COB last fall, but wouldnt i have to go through rush and drop out by pref night for COB?

If you attend pref night and submit a final ranking card, you are not eligible for COB.

I will still say that if you are going through recruitment in hopes of becoming a member of this ONE particular sorority, you may be fighting an uphill battle.

What are the odds that this sorority, who invited you to pref last year as a junior, is going to invite you back again as a senior (whether you have years left or not)?


I still say you need to consider other chapters too, because this may not end up the way you planned.


APhiAnna 02-03-2009 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greekcheek (Post 1774207)
That is so great. I really hope they keep that quota this year and the years to come...especially since schools like UCLA get so many transfer students, its only fair that they get equal opportunity to rush like freshmen do.

I agree. It is interesting because at USC, which is their rival in many things (sports, academics, location, etc), sophomores never have a problem getting a bid for some odd reasons. Their rush is far more competitive than UCLA's, but I know so many people pledge the most competitive sororities on campus and say that an entire third of their pledge class is sophomores. UCLA, and Berkeley for that matter, never worked that way though (at least for the chapters with the highest return rates). The most competitive chapters would only take freshmen with the occasional legacy upperclasswoman.

KSUViolet06 02-03-2009 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by APhiAnna (Post 1774560)
I agree. It is interesting because at USC, which is their rival in many things (sports, academics, location, etc), sophomores never have a problem getting a bid for some odd reasons. Their rush is far more competitive than UCLA's, but I know so many people pledge the most competitive sororities on campus and say that an entire third of their pledge class is sophomores. UCLA, and Berkeley for that matter, never worked that way though (at least for the chapters with the highest return rates). The most competitive chapters would only take freshmen with the occasional legacy upperclasswoman.

That seems so odd to me. You'd think that it would be the other way around (especially with the recruitment numbers that USC gets).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.