GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   AIG after-bailout party (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=100189)

exlurker 10-07-2008 07:53 PM

AIG after-bailout party
 
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5973452&page=1

Excerpts from much longer story posted ^:

Less than a week after the federal government committed $85 billion to bail out AIG, executives of the giant AIG insurance company headed for a week-long retreat at a luxury resort and spa, the St. Regis Resort in Monarch Beach, California, Congressional investigators revealed today.

Two AIG CEOs testify to Congress about their use of taxpayer bailout money."Rooms at this resort can cost over $1,000 a night," Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) said this morning as his committee continued its investigation of Wall Street and its CEOs.

AIG documents . . . show the company paid more than $440,000 for the retreat, including nearly $200,000 for rooms, $150,000 for meals and $23,000 in spa charges.

"They're getting their pedicures and their manicures and the American people are paying for that," said Cong. Elijah Cummings (D-MD).

"This unbridled greed," said Cong. Mark Souder (R-IN), "it's an insensitivity to how people are spending our dollars."



Hmmm, a Republican and a couple of Democrats -- all three expressing some form of outrage or at least aggravation. Oh, that's right; they're House members, so presumably all up for (re-)election.

Benzgirl 10-07-2008 08:05 PM

Hmmmm....
ex BF is CEO of one of their divisions. Need to give him a call.

texas*princess 10-07-2008 08:18 PM

that is f---'d up.

LeslieAGD 10-07-2008 09:00 PM

I was just about to post this article. It really is sickening and wrong.
Weren't there any kind of provisions to the bailout to prevent this behavior?

Kevin 10-07-2008 10:16 PM

$440K isn't even really a drop in the bucket, but I do get the moral outrage part. This will go down as one of history's biggest P.R. blunders.

AGDee 10-07-2008 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeslieAGD (Post 1728381)
I was just about to post this article. It really is sickening and wrong.
Weren't there any kind of provisions to the bailout to prevent this behavior?

After the bailout, yes, but this was just before (nit picking, yes, but I'm sure that's how these idiots justify it).

They weren't the only ones either.. Lehman didn't get bailed out, but this is under investigation:

Congress heard that less than a week before Lehman became the United States' largest ever bankruptcy, the company was still funnelling millions to departing executives as "golden handshakes".

The bonuses were being paid out at the same time the company was pleading for the US Treasury to give it a taxpayer-funded lifeline.

I'd post a link, but it's in every major paper IN THE WORLD! The first hit that came up was an Australian news site. The second was from the UK.

DaemonSeid 10-07-2008 10:22 PM

i need to sell another bucket

texas*princess 10-07-2008 10:34 PM

DS - did you get the $ for the other bucket you sold?

KSig RC 10-07-2008 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1728397)
$440K isn't even really a drop in the bucket, but I do get the moral outrage part. This will go down as one of history's biggest P.R. blunders.

Yeah, agreed - it's stupid and shows how out of touch executives can be, but it's a rounding error at the end of the day. Let's hope the PR/outrage helps prevent future mistakes, but I don't really have much faith in that.

ADqtPiMel 10-08-2008 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by exlurker (Post 1728358)
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5973452&page=1
Hmmm, a Republican and a couple of Democrats -- all three expressing some form of outrage or at least aggravation. Oh, that's right; they're House members, so presumably all up for (re-)election.

The only one who's in an even remotely competitive race is Souder (and will almost certainly win -- an incumbent in a heavily Republican district). Waxman is an institution and Cummings won by something like 98% in 2006.

I'm the first to call Congresscritters on their bullshit -- but this financial crisis is the first time I've ever seen anything approximating real human emotion in these hallowed halls.

srmom 10-08-2008 11:02 AM

Quote:

I'm the first to call Congresscritters on their bullshit -- but this financial crisis is the first time I've ever seen anything approximating real human emotion in these hallowed halls.
I'll agree to that. It's a scary time and they all know they're being watched.

I think the "PR blunder" is absolutely despicable, just goes to show that not only Congress is out of touch. Obviously, the high muckety-mucks just don't get how angry and upset us little folk are. I mean come on - manacures, pedicures and facials to the tune of tens of THOUSANDS of dollars. Basically, WE, the taxpayers paid for their wonderful weekend of relaxation and pampering... UGGGGH!!:(

Kevin 10-08-2008 01:36 PM

In other news, while violence is never the answer, on some level, this seems like a little bit of justice:

http://consumerist.com/5060063/lehma...ed-in-the-face

Lehman Brothers CEO Got Punched In The Face


Dick "It Wasn't My Fault" Fuld, the CEO of bankrupt investment bank Lehman Brothers, (seen here being heckled after testifying on Capitol Hill) was apparently punched in the face while working out in Lehman gym on the Sunday following the bankruptcy, according to CNBC's Vicki Ward.

srmom 10-08-2008 02:05 PM

While I'm not a proponent of violence, reading that story gave me immense satisfaction!!;)

These guys should be pariahs - publicly shunned by all!!!

CrackerBarrel 10-08-2008 02:10 PM

Part of the blame certainly lies with the CEOs, but they are being blamed more than they should. A big part of the problem was systemic risk in the way mortgage-backed securities were being handled. The part of the blame that does lie on the CEOs is because of the structure of the compensation in the financial industry. Annual bonuses were based on short term gains which are most easily acheived by taking on long term risk. But short term gains excite people and that's why the bonuses were being awarded for it, just they were getting those short term gains without looking to the long-term and cyclical markets, like what effect a housing downturn (which was obviously coming at some point, just a matter of time) would have if they hadn't moved mortgage-backed securities out of the portfolio before it came.

srmom 10-08-2008 02:24 PM

Crackerbarrel, that's exactly what happened at Enron too, and trust me, Jeff Skilling is now not only a pariah, he's also in prison. It's unfortunate for his family, they are great, but he steered the ship straight into the rocks with the - front end bonuses paid for risky ventures scheme, which caused all the traders to leap before they looked!!! It is a corporate mentality that comes as edicts from the top - produce and get bonuses, doesn't matter if the end product is junk, just make the deal...

I remember sitting with his wife at a ball game during the fiasco, and she was assuring me that it was just a situation of a "rush on the bank", that if people had maintained confidence, everything would have been fine. In reality, it was a "house of cards" just waiting to collapse. Same problems with the risky investments now.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.