![]() |
Shelf Life of Women?
I guess this question would be directed at AKA_monet and others with medical training, but at what age does reproductive ability for women begin to decline?
At what age are women at their reproductive peaks? |
I seem to recall from bio that reproductively speaking most women peak in their mid 20s. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but we're born with a set amount of eggs (which always seemed wierd to me). After 30 they start to go stale, so to speak.
|
oh james,
you aren't worried about that already, are you? xoxo |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Isn't james the guy that lost his junk? Where is it?
Drolefille....do your project! |
I just had to say LOL at the title of this thread!
I did a double-take when I first saw it... :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Women in the 40's have an all out loss of ovulation, anovulation, roughly in their late 30's and ends in mid-40's. However, depending on the woman, biological aging, and a variety of factors, etc. women could have children long after menopause. We are talking Biblically speaking. It doesn't mean it is impossible, but highly unlikely. I don't think it is the depletion of eggs. Humans females have some 1 million eggs prior to birth. It is thought that ovums are produced that way for evolutionary protection with least energy usage--i.e. food consumption, etc. Most women secrete 1 ovum per month roughly starting at 9-14 years old. If said female starts her menstruation at 10 and continues until 40, it would never account to loss of all 1 million eggs. (I'll let the stats folks calculate). The decline may have to do with unsupported endometrium if there is no problem with ovulation. It may also have loss of hormones that also decline as humans age. If a woman ~40 year old want her own genetic children, she needs to consider vitamin and female organ supplements, and good health prior to pregnancy pursuits. Some women are lucky and do not need all of the boosting. Most are not. I hope that answers your questions. How come you are asking? |
I once heard in Human Bio that your "peak" time for having kids is between 17-25. During that time, your egg quality is at its best. After that, it decreases exponentially every year.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
p.s. classic Earp post on p.6, not sure I get the "grape juice" part, tho'... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No pressure or anything. lol
Quote:
|
It is generally accepted that once a woman hits 30, she needs to seriously consider either having children immediately or [in today's world] freezing her eggs as the ability of the body to spontaneously abort eggs with 'problems' is much less accurate.
|
Quote:
Stop scaring the young women on this board. Most of the women I know had children well into their 30s, don't go rushing to get a bun in the oven because the timer clicks to the big 3-0 if it's not where you are in your life at the moment... |
I've definitely seen 40 more often as the "make a baby now or never" age. Even if fertility starts to decline before that the more genetic issues seem to jump around 40 (for guys AND girls btw. Old sperm is as bad as old eggs when it comes to things like Downs Syndrome.)
|
Human eggs are hard to freeze... Sorry for the pun, but human eggs do not freeze like other mammals. Human sperm and embryos freeze "okay", but after 20-30 years, the functionality can be questionable. But human eggs, well they charge $20K+ to freeze them...
|
Quote:
|
I've been reading a lot about reproductive technology, and this seems to be the basic jist:
18-25: the "peak" of fertility 25-29: a small decline in fertility, but the odds are still greatly in your favor to conceive naturally within a year 29-35: fertility stays stable 35-40: steep decline in fertility 40-up: small chance of conceiving your first child naturally at this age It seems to be that if you start having kids earlier rather than later, you can continue to have children much later. The women in my family have had kids up into their 40s, but they started around 25-26. The ones who start trying at 35 or older seem to have the most problems. I won't lie, this is all kind of scary to me. I'd like to start a family sooner rather than later for a few reasons (health, energy, and I'd actually like my kids to have grandparents who can hang out with them), but there might be a lot of hysteria on both sides. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Isn't that like, a semester's worth of classes? Using your "logic," I should be completely fluent in Italian and an expert on Modern Architecture. Sit down and shut up, 'cause you don't know what you're talking about. |
Quote:
ETA: And in particular, the research that results in the dictate that women need to have children "immediately" once they turn 30... |
Quote:
As for me, I'm having my first child at the age of (gasp) 39, and I can tell you the eggs were fresh, and not frozen. |
I'm 23 and single and let me tell you that I'm not running out and having a baby at 30 (unless I'm married by then) simply because "it's generally accepted" that I do so.
I think it just depends on the individual, I know that fertility does decline after 30, but not so much that it can't happen. My mom had my youngest brother at 35, and they hadn't even been trying for 6 months when she got pregnant. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
FantASTic... I have more than 15 credits in biology, I have at least as many in chemistry. Interestingly enough, biology doesn't deal with things like women's fertility, anatomy does. So your credits (and mine) mean jack squat. |
"Shelf life" indeed. I am a woman, not a carton of milk.
|
I think everyones already responded much clearly then I ever could, but I just wanted to say your title made me laugh out loud. I pictured a person sitting on a shelf in Kroger with an expiration sticker across their forehead.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.