Siggy says it all.

Re: Sure is Quiet!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

GOD help U.S.

Re: Sure is Quiet!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Nah you probably won't here too much..folks can dish out the rhetoric...but they can't take it.

Keep it up and you'll have folks (that probably don't even serve God) telling you how to be a Christian and questioning your allegiance to your race.

...

Re: Who's Gloating?
 

Keep it up Icon and you'll be just as popular as me LOL.. I got folks chasing down my quotes and taking them to other forums....and some wonder why I have a fan club ;)

People better stop playing with God..saying they're praying when they're not...or they may be praying..but they're praying for things contrary to whats in his word...calling others un-Christian when they don't know the first thing about Christianity...God doesn't like people messing with his children ;)

But Icon,
what on earth are u talking about with saying one alpha man is responsible for 45 million murders????

While you state that "we" cannot question your Christianity, you are not in the position to question ours.

I have a hard time listening to people who claim to be Christians, but who do not act Christ-like. Yes, Bush is against abortion and same-sex marriage. So am I. Are those the only two things that define being a Christian? Is he in fellowship with other believers? Are his other policies Christ-like? I do not know about the first part, however, the last part say no.


So, some beliefs are more important than others when deciding if a person is moral. Just trying to get this straight.

Ok, what does voting Democrat have to do with race??? I vote Democratic for other reasons. Frankly, I care about people. I guess I feel the 'other' morals are important.

Re: Who's Gloating?
 

I understood all of your rhetoric except this right here.


What the ____ are you talking about?

Re: abaici
 

Hello Iconoclastic(Minister Fred Hatchett),

I am thinking about buying your book.

But if I may ask...how come you are so morally strict and on your website (www.dontgogreek.com) on the "forum" and "guestbook" sections you have pop-ups such as "Waiting to Flirt"???

Re: abaici
 

Yes I curse but you fill in the blank with whatever word you were thinking of.

You still didn't answer the question or were you calling John Kerry an Alpha?

Re: abaici
 

Again, I stated that I am pro-life. However, my question is how is abortion MORE wrong than sending OUR children to fight an unjust war. Why does that one overshadow all of the other characteristcs and beliefs that Christians hold?

Bush and his ilk fight tooth and nail to end abortion. That proves that they respect life? If they respected life, they would continue to advocate for children. They would not cut money for programs that help produce happy and healthy children.

Re: Re: abaici
 

Do not be deceived. God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, he will also reap. For he who sows to the his flesh will of the flesh reap corruption, but he who sows to the Spirit will of the Spirit reap everlasting life.
Galatians 6.7

I quoted the above scripture to not to engage in a full fledged debate of the Bible..but to say that folks can keep on using God's grace as an excuse to sin...or repentance as a way to justify their actions if they want..but that indeed is between an individual and God...he knows your heart...

On judgment day..if you can look God in the face and be proud of the fact that you voted for a man that is in favor of killing little babies in the name of "choice"...and a man that thinks marriage or a union between a man and another man is ok...then more power to you...that indeed is between you and God

Re: Re: abaici
 

Sending grown men and woman..that signed up to be in the Armed Forces..whether they agree with the cause or not..to war..is quite different than protecting the right for an innocent child to be born into this world.

And as far as this overshadowing the beliefs that Christians hold..I guess it just depends on what is important to an individual. I could not in good conscience vote for a person that in any way shape or form validates the union of a man and a man..or a woman and a woman. God destroyed a city for it in the OT and he specifically says in the NT that its not acceptable. Now to some "christians" this isn't important...but too many..it is VERY important. And the fact that a person values a woman's choice over the life of an innocent child is more than enough to overshadow other "issues".. for some. BUt again..if one doesn't hold these values near and dear to them...I could see how it wouldn't matter to them.

Re: Re: abaici
 

No, he was going there by dissing the late great Thurgood Marshall, who rest his soul, was an Alpha. Ya know the one who did NOT write the Roe v Wade decision (the late great Justice Harry Blackmun, rest his soul, wrote the decision...I thank my lucky stars for that man)

(Yes I am a flaming AGNOSTIC PRO CHOICE sistah and damn proud of it!)...yes I said the word damn! :D

But of course he won't go there and mention that he busted his butt arguing the Brown v Board of Education ruling! :rolleyes:

For someone who kicked his Greek affiliation to the curb, it is interesting he loves to hang around here :rolleyes:

Re: Re: Re: abaici
 

I'm aware that these men and women signed up willingly (well, let's just go with that shall we). However, do you think it's right to send people into fight a preemptive war? Do you think it's fair to send them in when there's been little to no evidence to support it.

Again, since people are not understanding, I am against abortion and gay marriage. However, I do not understand why these two issues overshadow all of the other evil things that are being done. I'm sorry, Republicans do not have a trademark on morality. I do not appreciate, nor do I think it's accurate to paint all Democrats as heathens. How many Republicans who pay lip-service to being Christians have paid for other people's abortions or came out as homosexuals?

Kerry is/was not pro gay marriage. If you watched the debates, you would have heard him clearly say that he felt that marriage was between a man and a woman.

To Iconoclastic: I know that after I post this, you will make a million nasty, un-Christ-like posts about me but I won't read them so don't waste your time.

I think that you have some points that are Biblically sound and are in accordance with what I believe however, the way that you present yourself on this message board and others is despicable. There is a way to show people the true light.

Ephesians 4:15 says that we should speak the truth in love. The way that you spread the message unfortunately tarnishes the message that you are trying to send.

I'm not disputing the Word with you but the way that you are trying to spread it is doing more harm than good. Beating people up and condemning them with your words is not beneficial and it is not Godly, AT ALL.

Re: Redefining
 

Hmmm freedom of religion and freedom FROM religion is a problem? I RESPECT others beliefs or lack thereof. (SOME people on this board have a PROBLEM with that). I don't shove my beliefs or lack thereof down other's throats

If that is a problem I sure as hell don't want or NEED to be cured!
hmmm weren't you bestowed with a scarlet B (as in banned) some time ago? I am SO flattered that you miss us! :rolleyes:

Oh yeah...I don't need to take your number, thanks! I am very happily married! :D

Re: Redefining
 

Well thanks for this information. I never knew this. :confused:

Re: margaret sanger
 

And pastuh the underlined is the reason why no one from this site calls you.

You could actually make some lucid and worthwhile points if you'd let the message speak louder than the so called prophet.

Are you pressing your agenda or the agenda of the God you serve?

Better yet when you clicked "Submit Reply" on that last one did you ask yourself, "Would Jesus Say This?"

Murder is murder, whether it is in the womb or overseas fighting for fictional weapons of mass destruction. Both Bush and Kerry were for the war in Iraq.

Re: Re: Re: Re: abaici
 

I do not consider this war pre-emptive..considering we had been attacked on the USS Cole, the World Trade Center, and 9-11...this is primarily where u and I..and many others will disagree. I think our past policies of not being on the offensive against terrorists (not limited to saddam and bin laden) were silly. And I would hardly say its little evidence being that ALL credible intelligence said the same thing at the time..and the Russian President personally called Dubya TWICE to tell him he had proof we were going to be attacked..so again....many look at what i've said and will still default to the same ol rhetoric bush lied people died...or we're ignoring the war on terror because we haven't caught bin laden...but I and the majority of people in America..disagree.

Also, I think its incorrect to assume that Christians that voted for Dubya ONLY voted on the basis of gay marriage and abortion. Of course those were important..but those were not the only reasons. I know you say you don't understand why these issues are that important..but again, it depends on what's important to you. And since when have Republicans painted Democrats as heathens? I think Dems have painted themselves that way. Dems want to be everything to everybody and hand out entitlements to make people happy. Everything is acceptable all in the name of tolerance and being progressive. I hope instead of attacking Republicans for the next 4 years, the Democratic Party takes a long hard look at what they really stand for. Dems/liberals pride themselves of being so tolerant...but its funny how INtolerant they are of those who look to God/Bible to guide their daily lives...:confused:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: abaici
 

Since Osama bin Laden and al Queda were linked to all of the incidents you list below, how in the world is a war on Iraq (which is costing more and more American lives and money :mad: ) a pre-emptive or responsive strike to terrorism? Oh yeah, you forgot the attacks on our embassies in Africa, bin Laden was linked to those too!

I know I'm late but...
 

:confused:

Re: I know I'm late but...
 

Don't worry about it BC06. It's like him telling me the purpose of my sorority. He really doesn't know jack.

Re: Someone already answered the question!
 

Like I said--you don't know jack.

Iconoclastic, what do you mean by "It's my passion for souls"?

Re: Someone already answered the question!
 

Go on and say whatcha gotta say bro. It's evident that God is using you in certain areas, so I say Keep on Keeping on. Many of my "Sorors" are in bondage to Delta, and only God can show them the way... I leave this scripture for you Iconoclastic


But avoid foolish disputes, genealogies, contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and useless.
Titus 3.9

All I can do is pray, pray, pray....

Oh did I forget to mention...PRAY!!!

GOD has the final say so over everything!!

:eek: :eek: :eek:

Somebody must have been bust in the head with a paddle for real. This has got to be the biggest crock of BS on GC. :rolleyes:

Edited to correctly identify site. ;)

Girl, this is GC!!

LOLOLOLOL

whew!

So, it is. My bad. Used to SG.

Now prob. Senusret I and I enjoyed the giggle. LOL!!!

Re: Read Your Bible and See!
 

No, Jesus would not use profanity. But he wouldn't use the words/names that you have on this board.

As a christian woman, you have insulted god by preaching hate. Jesus never was harsh on people and pushing an agenda as you are right now.

Sir, if you are gonna preach then preach don't take the "low" ground in your rebuttals. When you do, you only make yourself look falsely to those who don't know the right path--not neccessarily your path.

Your comments on this board is cementing an opinion of you. And you are not a true man of god nor a prophet! If you were, you would preach love and understanding not hate.

My two cents...

So did I. I hope it's cool to laugh at yourself around here, because I keep me in stitches. :D

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: abaici
 

The Iraq War is not pre-emptive strike. For a country to envoke pre-emptive strike, the country must feel an imenent threats by another country. The opposing country must present credible threats to the country or its allies. It must also show an intent to strikes the country. This will give legitimacy to the pre-emptive strikes. Does Iraq fulfil any of this criteria. No.

Iraq did not have the means to attack the United States. Its military is in dissaray and it has no missile that could even reach the UK, let alone the US. So, it does not have the means. As for Putin saying that he had information about Iraq wanting to do it, this is also the same Putin which was against the war. A senior inteligence agent in the US said that he was "not aware of any specific threat information we were told" about Iraqi activities before the March 2003 invasion. Putin also admitted that he has no evidence, whatsoever, that Saddam's regime has committed any terrorist acts.