GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   RNC Convention (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=56294)

lifesaver 09-01-2004 10:26 PM

RNC Convention
 
Ya'll, Zell Miller is INSANE.

How do ya'll from Georgia live with this cat? Items from his speech:

If Bush has a spine of Tempered Steel, why did he run and hide in Nebraska (after reading to elementary schoolers) on 9/11.

If hes such a fab-o commander-in-chief, where's Osama? Seriously, how hard is it to catch a 6'6" arab on dyalasis?

War on Terror? GWB has taken a sympathetic world and turned it against us.

The republicans arent partisan? Come on! Two words: Tom Delay.

Who do I trust to deal with terror? GWB if we want more. Hes not catching the terrorists, he's breeding new ones.

Glad to see that Dick Cheney could come out of his 'fradey hole' long enough to give his speech.

I consider myself to be republican. At least I used to.

DeltAlum 09-01-2004 10:33 PM

Re: RNC Convention
 
Quote:

Originally posted by lifesaver
If Bush has a spine of Tempered Steel, why did he run and hide in Nebraska (after reading to elementary schoolers) on 9/11.

I'm not a Bush fan at all, but the reason for going to Nebraska was a joint one due to the security and communications available there.

With the situation in turmoil, nobody is going to allow a President to fly into the eye of the storm.

At least that one isn't fair.

AGDee 09-01-2004 10:36 PM

I concur.

Bush did make public statements, etc that day and in the days after 9/11. We don't need to put our President directly in harm's way and we had no idea what else was going to happen that day. I commented at the time to some co-workers (and my mom) that I found it odd that we didn't hear one single solitary public statement from Cheney at that time. My mom said (she dislikes Bush even more than I do) "Cheney is too busy running the country to say anything". She thinks Cheney is the real head honcho and that Dubya is just a figurehead!

Dee

Rudey 09-01-2004 11:05 PM

Re: RNC Convention
 
I am confused Andy. I didn't see his speech but Zeller said that Bush was hiding and it's Bush's fault for not finding Osama?

-Rudey


Quote:

Originally posted by lifesaver
Ya'll, Zell Miller is INSANE.

How do ya'll from Georgia live with this cat? Items from his speech:

If Bush has a spine of Tempered Steel, why did he run and hide in Nebraska (after reading to elementary schoolers) on 9/11.

If hes such a fab-o commander-in-chief, where's Osama? Seriously, how hard is it to catch a 6'6" arab on dyalasis?

War on Terror? GWB has taken a sympathetic world and turned it against us.

The republicans arent partisan? Come on! Two words: Tom Delay.

Who do I trust to deal with terror? GWB if we want more. Hes not catching the terrorists, he's breeding new ones.

Glad to see that Dick Cheney could come out of his 'fradey hole' long enough to give his speech.

I consider myself to be republican. At least I used to.


KSig RC 09-01-2004 11:49 PM

Re: Re: RNC Convention
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
I am confused Andy. I didn't see his speech but Zeller said that Bush was hiding and it's Bush's fault for not finding Osama?

-Rudey

no, that was andy editorializing against what zeller said.

Rudey 09-01-2004 11:55 PM

Re: Re: Re: RNC Convention
 
Quote:

Originally posted by KSig RC
no, that was andy editorializing against what zeller said.
Look at that.

Anyway, Andy it's hard to respond to every generality you've made :(

-Rudey

lifesaver 09-02-2004 01:48 AM

Re: Re: Re: Re: RNC Convention
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
Look at that.

Anyway, Andy it's hard to respond to every generality you've made :(

-Rudey

Thats ok. I'm not looking for responses. Just posting my opinions on what I saw tonight...

Rudey 09-02-2004 02:06 AM

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RNC Convention
 
Quote:

Originally posted by lifesaver
Thats ok. I'm not looking for responses. Just posting my opinions on what I saw tonight...
You need one of them special hugs.

-Rudey

Kevin 09-02-2004 09:10 AM

Re: RNC Convention
 
Quote:

Originally posted by lifesaver
Ya'll, Zell Miller is INSANE.

How do ya'll from Georgia live with this cat? Items from his speech:

If Bush has a spine of Tempered Steel, why did he run and hide in Nebraska (after reading to elementary schoolers) on 9/11.

If hes such a fab-o commander-in-chief, where's Osama? Seriously, how hard is it to catch a 6'6" arab on dyalasis?

War on Terror? GWB has taken a sympathetic world and turned it against us.

The republicans arent partisan? Come on! Two words: Tom Delay.

Who do I trust to deal with terror? GWB if we want more. Hes not catching the terrorists, he's breeding new ones.

Glad to see that Dick Cheney could come out of his 'fradey hole' long enough to give his speech.

I consider myself to be republican. At least I used to.

Zell was a little off the hook.

I kept thinking, "Zell, tell us what you really think."

Anyhow, if you listened to Cheney's speech, it gives the RNC position on almost all of the Kerry-favoring statements you raised.

Love_Spell_6 09-02-2004 09:37 AM

i thought smoke was going to start coming out of zell's ears LOL...he really hurt john kerry...people can say he was mad..or he's a flip flopper..whatever..but what he said was major..

DeltAlum 09-02-2004 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Love_Spell_6
i thought smoke was going to start coming out of zell's ears LOL...he really hurt john kerry...people can say he was mad..or he's a flip flopper..whatever..but what he said was major..
But, was anyone watching? I wish I still got "overnight" ratings daily so I could answer that question. One of the reasons the networks aren't doing full coverage of the conventions anymore is that most of the American public just don't care. That is particularly true in these days when the conventions are so highly produced and controlled.

moe.ron 09-02-2004 10:16 AM

Quick question, did Zell Miller questioned Max Cleland's patriotism once?

ETA: Or am I thinking of somebody else?

Rudey 09-02-2004 10:50 AM

Let's not forget Zell introduced Bill Clinton at a DNC convention. Zell's views on defense are maybe more in line with Clinton's and Bush's - not Kerry.

-Rudey

adduncan 09-02-2004 11:04 AM

Re: RNC Convention
 
Actually these responses are pretty easy........

Quote:

Originally posted by lifesaver


If Bush has a spine of Tempered Steel, why did he run and hide in Nebraska (after reading to elementary schoolers) on 9/11.
SOP in any major attack is to protect the leadership so they CAN continue to lead. Did you want Bush to go straight to NYC or DC and possibly get killed? No wait, I think I know the answer to that....


If hes such a fab-o commander-in-chief, where's Osama? Seriously, how hard is it to catch a 6'6" arab on dyalasis?
Very, when you are not as familiar w/ the terrain as people who have lived there for 20 years and there are several tribes protecting him, usually w/ "playing possum" techniques to sneak people and supplies around. The other issue is that the USA tries to prevent collateral damage, and those mofos know it. When you're disguising your troops as civilians, or hiding arms in places of worship, you're creating a no-win situation for the other guy - and they know it.


War on Terror? GWB has taken a sympathetic world and turned it against us.
Sympathetic in word only, never in deed. No big loss, IMHO.

The republicans arent partisan? Come on! Two words: Tom Delay.
So what? At least the Republican party is willing to tolerate discussion of hot-button special interests right on the convention floor. The Democrats censor any dissenters from their party line. IMHO, that's much worse.

Who do I trust to deal with terror? GWB if we want more. Hes not catching the terrorists, he's breeding new ones.
Only terrorists breed more terror. It's a choice and an organized effort. If GWB was the only one at fault, why did the terrorists kidnap FRENCH journalists??? You'd think the French would be their buddies.

Glad to see that Dick Cheney could come out of his 'fradey hole' long enough to give his speech.
Just because someone doesn't go out and mug for cameras every other hour doesn't mean he's hiding. Sometimes people do their jobs without calling a press conference. I'll keel over if the "Internet Generation" ever understands this topic.


I consider myself to be republican. At least I used to.


Whatever

-add

Love_Spell_6 09-02-2004 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DeltAlum
But, was anyone watching?
Probably not...but for the somewhat informed citizens..they'r definitely catching the headlines today..

cutiepatootie 09-02-2004 12:20 PM

Did Michael regan speak yet? wasn't it last night? i missed it and wanted to hear what he had to say...i thought there would of been buzz ont he mrning news about his speech last nigth ....but that Zany crazy zell stole the show

Rudey 09-02-2004 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cutiepatootie
Did Michael regan speak yet? wasn't it last night? i missed it and wanted to hear what he had to say...i thought there would of been buzz ont he mrning news about his speech last nigth ....but that Zany crazy zell stole the show
In Arkansas do they speak a different version of English?

-Rudey

cutiepatootie 09-02-2004 01:45 PM

Anyone other than RUDEy tell me if Reagan addressed the convetion last night and what he spoke about?

Rudey 09-02-2004 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cutiepatootie
Anyone other than RUDEy tell me if Reagan addressed the convetion last night and what he spoke about?
It's good that Bill Clinton, a Democrat, spoke English properly even though he was from Arkansas.

-Rudey
--And it was a video.

The1calledTKE 09-02-2004 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by moe.ron
Quick question, did Zell Miller questioned Max Cleland's patriotism once?

ETA: Or am I thinking of somebody else?

No that was Bush, Sonny Purdue and Saxby Chamblis. Miller still had democrat leanings in views then. But when Republicans won more seats than usual and won the Governor position in Georgia for the first time since the Civil war, Zell became a Republican that calls himself a Democrat. He didn't run for re-election because he probably would have gotten voted out because of his switch. Sonny and Saxby are in a low point of popularity because of Georgia's economy and Sonny not bringing back the old Georgia flag like he promised so he could get to votes to win.

Rudey 09-02-2004 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The1calledTKE
No that was Bush, Sonny Purdue and Saxby Chamblis. Miller still had democrat leanings in views then. But when Republicans won more seats than usual and won the Governor position in Georgia for the first time since the Civil war, Zell became a Republican that calls himself a Democrat. He didn't run for re-election because he probably would have gotten voted out because of his switch. Sonny and Saxby are in a low point of popularity because of Georgia's economy and Sonny not bringing back the old Georgia flag like he promised so he could get to votes to win.
OK all joking aside want to tell me why you're saying Miller is a Republican now? He is strong like defense just like Lieberman. Lieberman however is a strong Democrat and was considered the most centrist Democrat since Clinton. People say that sometimes about Lieberman. They will probably soon say it about Ed Kotch also.

-Rudey

The1calledTKE 09-02-2004 05:07 PM

Having lived in the state he is from and he represents I know his voting on issues has shifted from "liberal" to a conservative that leans to the left. If you look at his record as governor his views and votes on certain issues has changed. Economic policy, defense and education to name a few. Granted he was always big on defense since this is a big defense state because of the many milatary bases we have here. His stance on it has gotten tougher. Maybe 9/11 caused that. I really think because the political tide changed in the state after the 2002 election he switched his views. I don't think he will ever switch parties since he has been with the Democrats so long. But as a congressman he is consistantly one of the only or very few that vote along the republican party line. And has often voted against "democrat issues" There was a article in the AJC awhile back showing how much his voting has changed since 2002. If I can find the article online I will post it.

Rudey 09-02-2004 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The1calledTKE
Having lived in the state he is from and he represents I know his voting on issues has shifted from "liberal" to a conservative that leans to the left. If you look at his record as governor his views and votes on certain issues has changed. Economic policy, defense and education to name a few. Granted he was always big on defense since this is a big defense state because of the many milatary bases we have here. His stance on it has gotten tougher. Maybe 9/11 caused that. I really think because the political tide changed in the state after the 2002 election he switched his views. I don't think he will ever switch parties since he has been with the Democrats so long. But as a congressman he is consistantly one of the only or very few that vote along the republican party line. And has often voted against "democrat issues" There was a article in the AJC awhile back showing how much his voting has changed since 2002. If I can find the article online I will post it.
OK I'd like to read it. But do you understand what I'm saying about Lieberman? People had said the same stuff about him. Heck they said McCain was a Democrat. That's phooey if you look at their voting records.

-Rudey

The1calledTKE 09-02-2004 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
OK I'd like to read it. But do you understand what I'm saying about Lieberman? People had said the same stuff about him. Heck they said McCain was a Democrat. That's phooey if you look at their voting records.

-Rudey

Yes I see what you mean. People say that about them because sometimes they cross party lines on some issues. Miller crosses party line 90% of the time past the 2002 elections.

Rudey 09-02-2004 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The1calledTKE
Yes I see what you mean. People say that about them because sometimes they cross party lines on some issues. Miller crosses party line 90% of the time past the 2002 elections.
Funny since this is the man that was being considered as VP to run with Gore in the last election.

-Rudey

The1calledTKE 09-02-2004 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
Funny since this is the man that was being considered as VP to run with Gore in the last election.

-Rudey

Yep, but he still supported Democrat policies then.

Rudey 09-02-2004 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The1calledTKE
Yep, but he still supported Democrat policies then.
Well here's the thing though. Quite a bit of what he's supported has been supported off and on by Democrats, including Kerry. That is the frustrating part about Kerry.

Now let's say that Zell just hates Democrats now. Let's forget about how other Democrats vote and Zell's voting record. What caused him to hate Democrats?

-Rudey

The1calledTKE 09-02-2004 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
Well here's the thing though. Quite a bit of what he's supported has been supported off and on by Democrats, including Kerry. That is the frustrating part about Kerry.

Now let's say that Zell just hates Democrats now. Let's forget about how other Democrats vote and Zell's voting record. What caused him to hate Democrats?

-Rudey

All I can give you is a educated guess.
I don't think he hates Democrats or he would have switch parties. I think Zell is thinking of a politcal future. A state governement that was usually Democrats made a change in 2002. Zell goes were the politcal wind blows. He probably thinks it will get him a cabinet job if someone resigns or he can run for President in 2008 and have support from both parties. If he didn't run on a Democrat ticket he might get a vice pres offer from the GOP in 2008 just like Kerry might have tried with McCain.

lifesaver 09-02-2004 09:27 PM

Re: Re: RNC Convention
 
Quote:

Originally posted by adduncan
Actually these responses are pretty easy........

If Bush has a spine of Tempered Steel, why did he run and hide in Nebraska (after reading to elementary schoolers) on 9/11.
SOP in any major attack is to protect the leadership so they CAN continue to lead. Did you want Bush to go straight to NYC or DC and possibly get killed? No wait, I think I know the answer to that.... Dont pretend to know what I am thinking. And thats a pretty damn bold-ass statement to assume that just becasue I dont plan on voting for Bush means I want him dead (hmm, and people call Republicans extremists, I just dont know why...). Bush was the Governor of my state, remember? I worked on his 1994 campaign. I have met him. (provide me an email addy and I'll send you the pict.) Hes a great guy. I like him. Just not as president. As for the statement above. He could have showed much more leadership that day. I understand saftey protocols, but it will go down in history looking liek he ran.


If hes such a fab-o commander-in-chief, where's Osama? Seriously, how hard is it to catch a 6'6" arab on dyalasis?
Very, when you are not as familiar w/ the terrain as people who have lived there for 20 years and there are several tribes protecting him, usually w/ "playing possum" techniques to sneak people and supplies around. The other issue is that the USA tries to prevent collateral damage, and those mofos know it. When you're disguising your troops as civilians, or hiding arms in places of worship, you're creating a no-win situation for the other guy - and they know it.
Agreed, but thats not how they let him slip away. Many of the generals who were in charge of the operation in Afghanistan now openly admidt that their mistakes let Osama slip away into Pakistan. Specifically, to limit US casaulties, they let the Afghan Northern Alliance be the first into Kabul, The NA wasnt specifically interested in OBL. They were going after the leaders of the Taliband. And half-heartedly at that. In this window, OBL paid Mosque leaders in the border area for protection and not so quietly (convoys of 300- 600 vehicles) slipped into Pakistan. Military leaders now acknowledge that they should have secured the border areas first to seal them.


War on Terror? GWB has taken a sympathetic world and turned it against us.
Sympathetic in word only, never in deed. No big loss, IMHO. It is a big loss. History has proven time and again that a policy of American isolationism has negative consequences for the US. Sympathetic in word only? Think back to your US History class from college (Pre-Civil War). Remember that had it not been for the French (being sympathetic and supportive and all) we'd still be Brittish subjects.

The republicans arent partisan? Come on! Two words: Tom Delay.
So what? At least the Republican party is willing to tolerate discussion of hot-button special interests right on the convention floor. The Democrats censor any dissenters from their party line. IMHO, that's much worse. So what? What is that? The third grade playground debate strategy? You can do better than that. And yeah, hot button issues? Remind me, when was the debate on supporting/not supporting gay marrage scheduled for? I guess I missed that. Hell, I am impressed they have now allowed pro-choice Republicans to at least speak from the podium.

Who do I trust to deal with terror? GWB if we want more. Hes not catching the terrorists, he's breeding new ones.
Only terrorists breed more terror. It's a choice and an organized effort. If GWB was the only one at fault, why did the terrorists kidnap FRENCH journalists??? You'd think the French would be their buddies. NO, using YOUR flawed logic, YOU'D be the only one thinking the French were their buddies (because they didnt go to war with us). You are locked in that whole 'youre with us or against us' simplistic logic. Actually, France isnt a popular place with Islamic Millitants right now, especially with the recent action of the French Government banning the wearing of traditional islamic wear in public schools.

Glad to see that Dick Cheney could come out of his 'fradey hole' long enough to give his speech.
Just because someone doesn't go out and mug for cameras every other hour doesn't mean he's hiding. Sometimes people do their jobs without calling a press conference. I'll keel over if the "Internet Generation" ever understands this topic. Baby, I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man. I am not a part of the 'internet-generation' (I was 21 when they first created a graphical interface for www addresses). But youre right. That last one was just a cheap shot at Cheney. I dont like him much. I think he's a bully.

Whatever

-add


Rudey 09-02-2004 10:02 PM

Ummm no.

-Rudey

Rollergirl2001 09-02-2004 10:15 PM

How dare them! On the video before the President came out, they talked about 9/11. I mean we should not forget that tragic day and there are some people that admired the work of the President after 9/11, but the video is a slap in the face to most of the people who lost family members and friends.

Rudey 09-02-2004 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rollergirl2001
How dare them! On the video before the President came out, they talked about 9/11. I mean we should not forget that tragic day and there are some people that admired the work of the President after 9/11, but the video is a slap in the face to most of the people who lost family members and friends.
Kerry said it was OK. He support Osama and terror according to IowaStatePhiPsi.

-Rudey

adduncan 09-02-2004 10:55 PM

Quote:

Actually these responses are pretty easy........

If Bush has a spine of Tempered Steel, why did he run and hide in Nebraska (after reading to elementary schoolers) on 9/11.
SOP in any major attack is to protect the leadership so they CAN continue to lead. Did you want Bush to go straight to NYC or DC and possibly get killed? No wait, I think I know the answer to that.... Dont pretend to know what I am thinking. And thats a pretty damn bold-ass statement to assume that just becasue I dont plan on voting for Bush means I want him dead (hmm, and people call Republicans extremists, I just dont know why...). Bush was the Governor of my state, remember? I worked on his 1994 campaign. I have met him. (provide me an email addy and I'll send you the pict.) Hes a great guy. I like him. Just not as president. As for the statement above. He could have showed much more leadership that day. I understand saftey protocols, but it will go down in history looking liek he ran.


If hes such a fab-o commander-in-chief, where's Osama? Seriously, how hard is it to catch a 6'6" arab on dyalasis?
Very, when you are not as familiar w/ the terrain as people who have lived there for 20 years and there are several tribes protecting him, usually w/ "playing possum" techniques to sneak people and supplies around. The other issue is that the USA tries to prevent collateral damage, and those mofos know it. When you're disguising your troops as civilians, or hiding arms in places of worship, you're creating a no-win situation for the other guy - and they know it. Agreed, but thats not how they let him slip away. Many of the generals who were in charge of the operation in Afghanistan now openly admidt that their mistakes let Osama slip away into Pakistan. Specifically, to limit US casaulties, they let the Afghan Northern Alliance be the first into Kabul, The NA wasnt specifically interested in OBL. They were going after the leaders of the Taliband. And half-heartedly at that. In this window, OBL paid Mosque leaders in the border area for protection and not so quietly (convoys of 300- 600 vehicles) slipped into Pakistan. Military leaders now acknowledge that they should have secured the border areas first to seal them.


War on Terror? GWB has taken a sympathetic world and turned it against us.
Sympathetic in word only, never in deed. No big loss, IMHO. It is a big loss. History has proven time and again that a policy of American isolationism has negative consequences for the US. Sympathetic in word only? Think back to your US History class from college (Pre-Civil War). Remember that had it not been for the French (being sympathetic and supportive and all) we'd still be Brittish subjects.

The republicans arent partisan? Come on! Two words: Tom Delay.
So what? At least the Republican party is willing to tolerate discussion of hot-button special interests right on the convention floor. The Democrats censor any dissenters from their party line. IMHO, that's much worse. So what? What is that? The third grade playground debate strategy? You can do better than that. And yeah, hot button issues? Remind me, when was the debate on supporting/not supporting gay marrage scheduled for? I guess I missed that. Hell, I am impressed they have now allowed pro-choice Republicans to at least speak from the podium.

>>Who do I trust to deal with terror? GWB if we want more. Hes not catching the terrorists, he's breeding new ones.
>>Only terrorists breed more terror. It's a choice and an organized effort. If GWB was the only one at fault, why did the terrorists kidnap FRENCH journalists??? You'd think the French would be their buddies.
>>NO, using YOUR flawed logic, YOU'D be the only one thinking the French were their buddies (because they didnt go to war with us). You are locked in that whole 'youre with us or against us' simplistic logic. Actually, France isnt a popular place with Islamic Millitants right now, especially with the recent action of the French Government banning the wearing of traditional islamic wear in public schools.

>>Glad to see that Dick Cheney could come out of his 'fradey hole' long enough to give his speech.
>>Just because someone doesn't go out and mug for cameras every other hour doesn't mean he's hiding. Sometimes people do their jobs without calling a press conference. I'll keel over if the "Internet Generation" ever understands this topic.
>>Baby, I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man. I am not a part of the 'internet-generation' (I was 21 when they first created a graphical interface for www addresses). But youre right. That last one was just a cheap shot at Cheney. I dont like him much. I think he's a bully.

Whatever

-add
Thanks for reminding me why I don't get involved often w/ political discussions here. I don't care how passionate you get, but you took cheap shots at ME that were uncalled for. I won't argue your points because people eventually agree to disagree, but I will point out what parts of your posts were rude and make you look like a jerk:

"Bush was the Governor of my state, remember? I worked on his 1994 campaign. I have met him. (provide me an email addy and I'll send you the pict.) "

YOUR state???? If it weren't for a company relo, it would still be MY state too! You are NOT the only person who lives in Texas and definitely not the owner of it! And I worked on his campaign and met him as well. You don't corner that market either.

"So what? What is that? The third grade playground debate strategy?"

No, it is a challenge to uphold the validity of attack invoking Tom Delay.

"Remind me, when was the debate on supporting/not supporting gay marrage scheduled for? I guess I missed that."

I never said a debate was called. But the Log Cabin Republicans haven't been tossed out into the street either.

"Hell, I am impressed they have now allowed pro-choice Republicans to at least speak from the podium."

Thank you for proving the point that I made.

"Sympathetic in word only? Think back to your US History class from college (Pre-Civil War). "

The argument you could come up with is 200 years old? Not good enough, IMHO. And based on my (equally valid) opinion, these countries were not fighting for America as much as they were fighting *against* England. I think that's a big difference. That's opportunism, not true alliance or commitment.

"You are locked in that whole 'youre with us or against us' simplistic logic. "

Didn't you just tell me a second ago not to tell you how you think? Ditto here.

"Baby, I'm a 30 year old grown-ass man. "

Get something straight. I am NOT your "Baby". You may be a "30 year old grown-ass man" but when you flare up like you did in this post, it means NOTHING to this 35-year-old grown-ass woman.

And you think dedicated Republicans are extremists? Physician, heal thyself. I answered your arguments w/ valid opinions and answers, and you threw a tantrum w/ degrading comments. Take a chill pill. :mad:

Rudey 09-02-2004 11:18 PM

I think Lifesaver is wrong totally, but I still think this chick was rude to hiim :(

-Rudey

ZTAMich 09-02-2004 11:19 PM

I've loved the Convention this week. If I had someone to go with I would have gone down to the MSG area and checked out the crowds but that didn't work out. The 9/11 & after footage gave me chills....

Why didn't the major networks cover it like they did the DNC??

Rudey 09-02-2004 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ZTAMich
I've loved the Convention this week. If I had someone to go with I would have gone down to the MSG area and checked out the crowds but that didn't work out. The 9/11 & after footage gave me chills....

Why didn't the major networks cover it like they did the DNC??

See that's exactly how I feel. I just don't get it. I asked DeltAlum this and it had something to do with me being in Illinois. But I don't get why NYC wouldn't.

Hey is Kaitey Tong still on tv with Mr. G?

-Rudey

ZTAMich 09-02-2004 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
See that's exactly how I feel. I just don't get it. I asked DeltAlum this and it had something to do with me being in Illinois. But I don't get why NYC wouldn't.

Hey is Kaitey Tong still on tv with Mr. G?

-Rudey

You should have been here we could have gone to a bar nearby and watched it all unfold....
She's on the WB network (WPIX Channel 11) and I dunno about him...maybe he's still at WCBS. I'll see if I can find out on the station website. edited to add they are both on 11 now...
Do you remember Roz Abrahams from WABC? She's on WCBS now!

Tom Earp 09-02-2004 11:34 PM

:confused:


The Last Great President, Harry S. Truman.

Was thrown into to a situatin, took care of it, period. War over. Last war Won.

The1calledTKE 09-02-2004 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ZTAMich
I've loved the Convention this week. If I had someone to go with I would have gone down to the MSG area and checked out the crowds but that didn't work out. The 9/11 & after footage gave me chills....

Why didn't the major networks cover it like they did the DNC??

I think it all depends on your state and if it is a democrat or republican stronghold. Here I everytime i flipped the channel I saw convention coverage. I watched Arnold, the Bush twins, and Miller. I think only the Bush twins made a positive impact. Make the Bush family seem more "normal".

Rudey 09-02-2004 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ZTAMich
You should have been here we could have gone to a bar nearby and watched it all unfold....
She's on the WB network (WPIX Channel 11) and I dunno about him...maybe he's still on WCBS. I'll see if I can find out on the station website.
Do you remember Roz Abrahams from WABC? She's on WCBS now!

Roz was the Black chick right? I liked Mr. G. I thought UPN was the most awful network ever. I mean people talk about Fox...wait till they see UPN. Geez. Fox always has the hottest girls on during the noontime news show...i think one hosted the third wheel or some dating show on top of that.

My colleagues brought me back pins and tshirts and posters. I've watched the speeches and stuff but I really wish I could have seen it. I have a program actually and it looks very very cool. I hear the funding for this year was through the roof. The only problem was the security was so high that you had to get on special lists for every event.

-Rudey


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.