![]() |
I know this is going to be some mess but...
I cannot resist asking why the Founder's Day of Delta Sigma Theta is Jan 14th and Zeta Phi Beta Jan 16th. I know Zeta is probably because Delta beat them to the 14th but I think that this was intentionally malicious towards a certain org founded on Jan 15th.
I know you may erase this but that will just reinterate my theory. |
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
|
Re: Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
|
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
Theoretically, IMO, having a founding date is parallel to a woman's due date and giving birth most times in the area of the date that the doctor gives her. Just like the woman/doctor had no control in when the baby is born, our founders were not IMO "MALICIOUS" with the founding dates. I mean COME ON!:rolleyes: 5 of the 9 organizations are founded in January but I am sure nary a one of them were trying to "take someone else's date".:rolleyes: Once again, LMAO. **I split this thread because I thought it was in poor taste to go in our HAPPY FOUNDER'S DAY THREAD. If anyone else cares to address this question, feel free. FOUNDING DATES for Divine Nine Orgs in FOUNDING ORDER: December 4, 1906 January 15, 1908 January 5, 1911 November 17, 1911 January 13, 1913 January 9, 1914 January 16, 1920 November 12, 1922 September 19, 1963 |
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
You really must not have been thinking logically when you made this statement!!!!! :rolleyes: |
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
|
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
|
Interesting Thread I will say that much. Definitely not anything malicious about the founding dates of the organizations of the Divine Nine..coincidence maybe but definitely not maliciousness.
|
And this is why I asked...I felt that some people would be touchy about this question but if it is such coincidence then why all the hoopla. Malicious may have been a strong word to use but I certainly don't see why the date just HAD to be before Jan. 15th. The fact that it was three different years does'nt make a point in my opinion.
The orgs on my campus have made a point of celebrating Founder's Day and I felt this question was a relevant one for such reason. It was brought to my attention in a private message that organizations have deadline dates o submit certain information. I was aware of this but was not aware that this was standard during the time of the creation of the Divine Nine orgs in the early 1900s. As far as everyone getting their feathers all ruffled, well that just goes to show it may be more to it than you are willing to admit.:rolleyes: |
Quote:
First of all EVERY ORGANIZATION celebrates their FOUNDERS DAY so what was your point?!?! This does not happen on just your campus but campuses and chapters (collegiate and alumnae) world wide. Second of all the "HOOPLA" that you are referring to is really not all of that. The first few responses helped you correctly identify the dates of the organizations you are accusing of "maliciously" making their FOUNDERS DAY close to the AKAs Founders Day. :rolleyes: Now in the interest of maintaining PEACE on this board, if you have further questions about the "maliciousness of founding dates",:rolleyes: :rolleyes: please ask someone on your campus. You know FACE 2 FACE. :eek: As far as applications being given deadlines, that happens all the time. For example, you applied to college right?!!? Or you file taxes every year?!?! Now I don't know about you, but I had "DEADLINES" to submit my applications and my taxes. That being said, once I turned the applications in and filed my taxes, I had to wait for the corresponding colleges and IRS to respond. THE RESPONSE, APPROVAL, ACCEPTANCE, REFUND happened on the RESPECTIVE OFFICES' own timeline. Hence, drawing a parallel here since I was not around in 1908, 1913 or 1920, I am postulating that once the respective FOUNDERS of aforementioned organizations filed their paperwork, they had to WAIT FOR APPROVAL and once APPROVAL was given, that date (OUT OF THEIR HANDS) was henceforth and FOREVER MORE their FOUNDING DATE. **special note, my caps are emphasis**:cool: |
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
Endroad, what EXACTLY is your theory and why is it irrelevant that the 3 orgainzations in question were founded in different years? |
Hello Sisters,
It's been a while since I posted over here. How yall doing? Since winter weather has finally kicked in and I am "snow-bored" I thought I would say hello and also say, "the date in January? what difference does it make? " I just think it wonderful that it happened when it did, whether its 1908, 1913, or 1920. CrimsonTide I am appreciating your responses. I must also say that I am glad that my Sorority's month is November.:p |
Quote:
|
I have a theory everyone.................................... that is SOMEONE is trying just a little too hard to be a suck up .
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by ENDROAD
[B]And this is why I asked...I felt that some people would be touchy about this question but if it is such coincidence then why all the hoopla. Malicious may have been a strong word to use but I certainly don't see why the date just HAD to be before Jan. 15th. The fact that it was three different years does'nt make a point in my opinion. Endroad, I think you are trying to say that because the other groups were founded on days that happen to be before the 15th that they were trying to "one up" another organization. Hello, come on now..................... everyone knows that January 15th, 1908 came before January 13th, 1913. There can be no mistaking what came first so I don't see how you could say that the founding dates were done in a malicious fashion. Get a grip!:rolleyes: |
Endroad,
I think you are trying to say that because the other groups were founded on days that happen to be before the 15th that they were trying to "one up" another organization. Hello, come on now..................... everyone knows that January 15th, 1908 came before January 13th, 1913. .................................................. .................................................. ..... Virtuous, That is exactly what I was trying to ask. I did not mean for it to seem like I was putting anyone down. I felt my question was really legitmate due to the way the Founder's dates are arranged ignoring the years. I do not use the phrase "One Up" but that is the way I see it. The orgs on my campus even seem to try and do this to each other all the time both sororities and fraternities. Thank you for summarizing my intent. To Everyone.... As for face to face interaction, I have had this conversation, but my personal friendships are very important to me and when I saw that the greeks I asked ALSO seemed to be uncomfortable with this topic I just dropped it to save bond. Now I felt that I could receive an inpersonal answer here without hurt feelings. I guess I was wrong because one of the two PMs I did receive was just horrible. It was recommended that I apologize. I am willing to do so on the grounds that I had hoped you all would not take it so harshly. Therefore to the women of Delta Sigma Theta who took my post as an insult to yourselves personally or your organization, my apologies that was not my intent. :o |
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
|
Why are you reading so much drama into this Endroad? Most of the responses on this board have been to a. correct you on your dates, or b. question what exactly you are asking. I do not think that a request for you to clarify is hostile. I DO however think that your theory is a bit of a stretch.
Oh wait no, I'm forgetting the responses where people were expressing their amusement with this theory. Hardly complimentary, but not hostile either. None of us was present in 1913 or in 1920 and I do not particularly feel that we can really sit here and guess the intentions of the founders of DST or ZPhiB. As all three org's were founded at Howard however, I do not think it is a stretch to assume that the deadline theory is perfectly valid. As for the apparently hostile people who did IM you, you are sitting here in a rather brazen attempt at judging people's founders, what are you thinking is the response you will recieve? Why are you surprised? |
Quote:
|
hmmm...
idle hands...
|
i'm not a member of any one of these orgs, but...
Quote:
|
Let's start something
Quote:
|
Re: Let's start something
Quote:
LOL, again these are just jokes. |
:D LMAO, I GUESS IT IS PRETTY FUNNY WHEN YOU PUT IT LIKE THAT.
;) |
Now, you were supposed to keep it on the DL, Soror BlueReign!!
Quote:
:rolleyes: Back to the drawing board, TRSimon |
Re: Now, you were supposed to keep it on the DL, Soror BlueReign!!
Quote:
|
Too funny!
This thread has me crackin' up! WTH???!!!??? Some people just don't get it....:rolleyes:
|
Re: Re: Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
|
Quote:
The final founding dates were based upon finalization of the articles of incorporation with the government, something that no one was in control of once the documents were submitted. :confused: :confused: |
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Re: I know this is going to be some mess but...
Quote:
Steeltrap Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority Inc. 8-EXO-00 |
My Theories as to the Formation of this thread
Quote:
**sounding like Kirk Franklin** Someone ASKED A QUESTION:p 1. As Virtuous Erudite alluded to earlier, perhaps this was a way of seeking "brownie points". 2. Nothing else to do, no other topic to think of. 3. Idle hands 4. Desire to make a name for herself. 5. She is a philosopher and wanted to practice her philosophical prowess on GC. 6. She wanted to stir up friction among 3 of the 4 BGLO sororities. YOU BE THE JUDGE! |
Re: My Theories as to the Formation of this thread
Quote:
:p |
Re: My Theories as to the Formation of this thread
Quote:
I guess we foiled that plan....we are all UNIFIED in our CONFUSION as to what the point of this thread is? Am I wrong Sisterfriends? |
Re: Re: My Theories as to the Formation of this thread
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: My Theories as to the Formation of this thread
Quote:
You know I believe you all are right because when I saw her initial post, I did say WTH and some other things. "WTH" UNITY all up in here.:p Thanks EndRoad!!:cool: |
Re: Re: Re: Re: My Theories as to the Formation of this thread
Quote:
|
Therefore to the women of Delta Sigma Theta who took my post as an insult to yourselves personally or your organization, my apologies that was not my intent. :o [/B][/QUOTE]
I don't think anyone was insulted by your post at all. I think it was more on the lines that it didn't make any sense. To be honest when I read it I thought, what a dumb azz post. Maybe because you were stating wrong facts. (Go figure) But my knowledge is not everyones. I think you are trying to start some mess. I agree with the responses of my Sorors and Sisterfriends, but I guess I'm not so PC. :D |
Quote:
Now that it TOO FUNNY to me. It's funny to me because that sounds like some "chit" that I'd say to my husband. I'm going to just go ahead and lay off of this one, and excuse you for posting that ridiculous thread in the first place. I started wondering if you may be the "third cousin, twice removed" of CelestialBlues/Victoriasecret. (That was my theory behind the thread) To quote the phenomenal "crack-smokin', wife of the King of R&B", Whitney Houston...."Girl you may just wanna LAY LOW for a while on this one! |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.