![]() |
Division in America
Hey y'all, what do you y'all think about this topic? Do you think division among folks in this country is centered around race or class? (As in socioeconomic status or race)
|
I look at it more along the lines of privilege and oppression, which can involve race, class, and a whole lot more.
|
Quote:
|
^^^Ditto. IMO America is divided on so many fronts, the lines look like a rubber band ball.
|
Damn, we don't EVER have race wars anymore. :(
|
Quote:
|
I think it's between people who like blue cheese dressing and people who do not.
|
I still miss DrPhil.
|
I think the issue is still based on race, and that alone. A black dude can have money, his own business, be intelligent, have power, etc. and the same white dude who he thinks he's on the same level as will call him a "nigga" in a minute. We are still not looked at as being as equal as white folks.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
With that overly simplistic one sided "my perceived problems are the only ones that matter" line of thought I don't see the issue of "Division in America" ever going away. |
I agree with Sen.
Also, I see this post turning into an Oppression Olympics. http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-conte...lWT1qfkt17.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...0jkL9m4_8U71MA |
IotaGuy, you know better than this. This issue is not about racial slurs. You may never be called a racial slur in your life (to your face). But, systemic oppression does not disappear just because people are smiling at you. Systemic oppression does not require people to be overtly rude or demeaning. That is why social inequalities (all social inequalities, and not just the inequalities that individuals care about when playing the Ranking of Oppressions) will always exist. ETA: The existence of successful racial and ethnic minorities does not reduce the existence and impact of systemic oppression.
The emphasis on slurs, prejudice, the overt, and kumbaya is why "colorblindness" was attempted and the resulting "colorblind racism" is pervasive. The idea was that if we can pretend there is no such thing as race, ethnicity, culture, language, and other things that differentiate groups of people, that means that humans are all robots that look alike, talk alike, live alike, etc.. More accurately, this was the "whiteness of the world" in that white privilege allowed whites (in general) to pretend that they, themselves, do not have a race and ethnicity. Under colorblindness and colorblind racism, whites transferred this into pretending as though "I don't see race." I have heard whites say things like "I don't even notice your race...you're kind of white like me." Uh...no, bitch, do not turn me into a white person to make yourself feel more comfortable and don't equate "race and ethnicity" with "racism". They are not synonymous. Although inequalities are durable as long as there are visable differences across people, that doesn't mean that we need to be ashamed and afraid of certain differences. Race, ethnicity, culture, and language are social and cultural rather than biological but they are still "real." Things do not stop being "real" just because humans created them. And this fits into this thread somehow: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBus4gHF1FE |
Quote:
|
Thanks for your insight, AOIIAngel, and I agree. Whites definitely do have culture(s) and there is a privilege in being able to choose whether to acknowledge racial, ethnic, and cultural heritage. Being a power majority requires seeing whiteness as the standard and therefore "others" are different. The same applies to men who believe that only women have a gender, heterosexuals who only believe nonheterosexuals have a sexual orientation, and the list of power majorities-minorities goes on.
As for whites existing in a bubble, most racial, ethnic, cultural, language, religious, and other groups around the world are segregated by force (including government force and city planning committees that design where residential and businesses are placed in the cities) or segregated by choice. The average person in the United States, for example, has a family and friendship environment of people who look and behave as they do. Their work environment may be more diverse but there remain nondiverse work environments. I am a cross between W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington so I believe in both running into a neighborhood and saying "I'm here now, bitches" AND allowing people to separate themselves to the extent that their separation does not mean unfair advantages and unfair disadvantages. The latter is difficult to accomplish which is one of the many reasons the world is as it is. GC Race War Mode: Go to hell, AOIIAngel, I didn't read your post but I'm sure there is racism in there somewhere. You typed "white" and I can only imagine that you were saying something intolerant and insensitive. Booyah. Now what?! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...Op-q-ZsOE_NSc5 |
Quote:
Hell. I give up. I'll just go back to reading. |
It has been such a lovely, peaceful 10 months.... guess nothing is forever.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wait...did you only ask that because I'm a Black woman?!?!?! Oh nooooooooo!!! :eek: http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...k_2ILbsaSQ2ftA Nah lemme mosey onalong 'fo GCers likea thetalady gets butthurt over dese hurr piece-full race threds no longa bein' a piece-full. 'cause u wus jus a smilin' n a typin' fo' I shows up. I causes a stirrr fo' da piece-full race threds. Da piece-full folkses don needs no stirrr n no uproarings frum a me...no surrr. U all jusa mosey onalong nah...I's so sawry...I's so sawry.... |
;)
|
I read you GC race war part first and was thinking, WTF did I say? LOL...you're really trying hard. Where is my picture of Wilfred Brimley to go with you diabeetus? My husband is an endocrinologist so he gets a copy of Diabetes every month in the mail. I get no end of pleasure announcing he's got "Diabeetus." Oh the small joys of life. Back to your friendly GC race war.
|
Yay! Dr Phil is back :)
That is my only contribution to this thread. |
I rarely post on the forum, but found this topic and felt like contributing.
I recently took a Social Psychology course and learned that basically everyone has prejudices against people that are different from them and have unconscious biases. Implicit Association Tests (IATs) have demonstrated that we form biases based on race, gender, weight, socioeconomic status, age, etc. In this class, we got to create our own IATs and found that the average person, no matter how much they swear up and down that they aren't racist/discriminatory/biased, usually demonstrates a preference to their own race, gender, SES, etc. There are very few instances of people having an "opposite preference." I think that as hard as we try to deny our biases, we still have them. There are some arguments that our biases were formed as a way to "protect ourselves" from those who were different and potential threats when we were still a brand new species, and unfortunately those evolutionary biases grew and developed into prejudices and discriminatory behavior as we evolved. I think a possible reason for the many divisions in our country and other countries around the world is partially because it's been hardwired into our brains since the beginning of mankind that we need to protect ourselves from those who are different. Sorry if this post is redundant because it's such obvious information... Also I know my response is kinda off topic, but I wanted to say my piece... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.