Duke Lacrosse Accuser--SHE'S BACK!
 

5 years after falsely accusing three Duke lacrosse players of sexual assault, and only a year after trying to pull a Left-Eye (RIP) on her man, the stripper is back--for stabbing her current boyfriend!

http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/9377710/

My questions are as such:

1. What man would date this woman?!
2. What woman moves her kids in with a man after only months?!
3. Why in the world does she think these blue contacts are flattering? We are not fooled.
4. Didn't Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton offer to pay for her college education so she wouldn't have to strip?

Good thing for her she's in NC. She'll probably get probation and MAYBE some court mandated anger management...depending on how crazy she is at trial.

I remember the epic Race War that resulted from the Duke Lacrosse scandal. It was good stuff, especially all the crow that had to be eaten when it turned out to be a scam.

Speaking of NC and Race wars...NC has implemented sentencing affirmative action. If you are a black male and can statistically prove that more black men received the death penalty than another gender/race, you can't be given the death penalty, no matter how guilty you've been proven. Fun addition: the way it's written allows the defendant to twist the stats in many different ways: his gender/race, victim's gender/race, combo of the two...

Oh man...I have greenish-hazel eyes, as do both of my parents and my sister, along with a good chunk of my father's siblings. Not all of my cousins, however, have "the family eyes." So, many of them have tried to make up for it with green, blue, and purple contacts. They always look stunned. :eek: Like that, actually.

Do you mean for a particular crime, or in general?

I'm still holding down my hurl over the sharing contacts thing. BLEEEEEAAAAAAHHHHH

She'll get a slap on the wrist. NC punishing criminals is a joke. I can barely read the paper because I get so angry. This woman deserves to be locked up for life but that definitely won't happen here.

And don't even get me started of the affirmative action sentencing. I can think of few things more outlandish and unjust.

I think it mainly applies to murder & the death penalty, but I've read about cases where weasel lawyers have managed to loophole it for other things as well.

Her "boyfriend" has died and now she will probably face a murder charge.

"She was charged with attempted murder and arson but found guilty last December of three counts of child abuse, injury to personal property and resisting a public officer. She was sentenced to 88 days in jail, which she had already served while awaiting trial."

88 days? So right about NC laws.

She probably got lucky....with this new racial law, she can probably get less time, if she gets any at all.

No, the law you're referring to only applies to people who have received the death penalty. "Using" it successfully means life imprisonment instead of the death penalty.

Well, she's been sentenced, 14 to 18 years:

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/20...enced-14-year/

Why on Earth did she take the stand? Did anyone follow this closely? I can't see anything possibly good come from putting someone with that history on the stand.

I don't think most people followed this closely. She can go to hell.

I remember the Duke Lacrosse GC Race Wars. Those were some fun times. I had a back and forth with MysticCat in which he respectfully and quite maturely told me to kiss his attorney-jurisprudence-ass (my words, not his). LOL.

I wasn't following it, but the article came up in my news feed during Thanksgiving. Figured I'd pass it on.

That was one of the last Epic Race Wars. We've had a few since then but I feel like the early aughts were rife with race wars on the Internet.

Let's just say this case appeared to be a constant nightmare for the succession of defense attorneys.

Me?! I recall nothing of the sort!

:p

ETA: Wait a minute here. I just went back and read that thread. I didn't find any exchanges between you and me, but I did find one post where I said "I think DSTChaos is right" and one message where you said "I think MysticCat is right." So just what are you trying to pull here? That's what I would like to know, thank you very much.

LOL. Was there more than one thread? I recall a back and forth with some of the GC legal eagles but that could've been another topic.

The GC race war is comparable to the non-Internet race war that happened during the Duke lacrosse nonsense.

There was only one of any length that I could find—it was the one where macallan opined on the possibility of race riots in Durham. Good times. I do miss macallan.

I do have some vague recollection of another GC Race War thread where there was some back and forth. But you and I can go at it now, if you want to. :p