GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Entertainment (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=205)
-   -   Too Fat for 15 (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=115093)

NinjaPoodle 08-01-2010 01:43 PM

Too Fat for 15
 
On the Style Network. Anyone gonna watch besides me?

Related article with video:
'Too Fat For 15' Documents Teens' Fight Against Obesity
by Nadine Cheung

http://www.jsyk.com/2010/07/29/too-f...ainst-obesity/
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.jsyk.com/...teen072810.jpg

Drolefille 08-01-2010 01:47 PM

Probably not, more because of time than anything, but I now feel bad for having the "All you can Eat in Vegas" show on in the background right now.

33girl 08-01-2010 02:13 PM

That boy is 15? His face doesn't look like he's over 10. Maybe it's just that particular photo.

FleurGirl 08-02-2010 12:10 PM

That girl in the pink sweatshirt really isn't fat... Neither is the girl on the far left...
Those kinds of shows just make me sad. :(

DrPhil 08-02-2010 12:18 PM

Hideous airbrushing in that photo.

DrPhil 08-02-2010 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleurGirl (Post 1962172)
That girl in the pink sweatshirt really isn't fat... Neither is the girl on the far left...

They are both overweight ("fat" just sounds mean).

Different perceptions of what overweight is, particularly in certain communities, is one reason why there is such an obesity problem. People need to consult medical advice including BMI and family history of issues such as diabetes instead of going based on people's opinions. I have seen some huge people in the Black community who are considered big boned, phat, or average (because everyone in their family or community is 50+ lbs overweight). It is really saddening and children are always going to mirror what the adults do, hence this show.

What's also interesting to me is how being overweight was a sign of wealth (or just nonpoverty) generations ago. It is now a sign of poverty and race disparities when looking at it based on population demographics; and it's a sign of an unhealthy and overfed industrialized nation when looking at the population at large (no pun intended).

Alumiyum 08-02-2010 01:00 PM

Of course being drastically overweight can cause health problems, but I wish more attention was paid to healthy living in general. A person who is generally accepted to be thin or average can still be incredibly unhealthy. My metabolism started slowing down a couple of years ago and I finally started trying to eat right and exercise, but before that a doctor told me I was on the border for getting diabetes, my percentage fat was extremely high, and that I desperately needed to be doing cardio and quit the caffeine. I was 5'4" and around 105 pounds. Not skinny, but what I consider to be thin. Definitely not overweight. I'm about ten pounds heavier now with a much healthier percentage of that being muscle and my eating habits are (mostly) better, but I've got tons of friends that are probably just as unhealthy as I was two years ago, and they fit into a size 2. Point being you don't HAVE to be overweight to be incredibly unhealthy.

I hope these kids get a fair shake. Sometimes these shows are cruel in how they edit the footage.

33girl 08-02-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962181)
What's also interesting to me is how being overweight was a sign of wealth (or just nonpoverty) generations ago.

Isn't that the truth. Google Lillian Russell - she was considered one of the most beautiful women in show business. Nowadays she'd be lucky to be Bea Arthur's stunt double, regardless of her acting chops.

DrPhil 08-02-2010 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 1962224)
Isn't that the truth. Google Lillian Russell - she was considered one of the most beautiful women in show business. Nowadays she'd be lucky to be Bea Arthur's stunt double, regardless of her acting chops.

Good point.

Painfully awesome corset.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Russell_II.jpg
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Russell_4.png

tld221 08-02-2010 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962177)
Hideous airbrushing in that photo.

them superimposed on a grassy picture-esque background is uberfail.

And i wish i had cable to watch this.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962181)
What's also interesting to me is how being overweight was a sign of wealth (or just nonpoverty) generations ago. It is now a sign of poverty and race disparities when looking at it based on population demographics; and it's a sign of an unhealthy and overfed industrialized nation when looking at the population at large (no pun intended).

truth.org/wordson

DrPhil 08-02-2010 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tld221 (Post 1962289)
them superimposed on a grassy picture-esque background is uberfail.

And look at the faces of the 2 Black girls in the back.


Quote:

Originally Posted by tld221 (Post 1962289)
truth.org/wordson

I hate that I went to truth.org.

tld221 08-02-2010 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962290)
And look at the faces of the 2 Black girls in the back.

WTF they made a triple stuffed Oreo out of these kids! Way to go PR/ad execs.

The two white kids have the same facial expression. The girl in the middle, her stance is so unnatural.

Plus, I'm pretty sure no teenager has tied a flannel shirt around their waist after 1995.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962290)
I hate that I went to truth.org.

darn, i forget that truth.org is a real site, anti-smoking and all that.

FleurGirl 08-02-2010 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962181)
They are both overweight ("fat" just sounds mean).

I didn't say they weren't overweight, but I wouldn't really consider that "fat". And the show is called "Too Fat for 15". ;)
I wish these kids all the best, I hope they make some positive changes in their lives. Unfortunately I think a lot of these shows go too far and exercise some really unhealthy weight loss practices. Here's hoping it's not another one of those. :)

DrPhil 08-02-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleurGirl (Post 1962351)
I didn't say they weren't overweight, but I wouldn't really consider that "fat".

;)

Merriam-Webster:
fat
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): fat·ter; fat·test
1 : notable for having an unusual amount of fat: a : plump b : obese

I'm sure they are over 40% bodyfat and they are obese (which increases the likelihood of having high bodyfat, although smaller sized people can also have unusual amounts of bodyfat). If "fat" didn't sound so mean, I'd call them "fat." Perhaps they chose that show title because it gets more people's attention. :)

Alumiyum 08-02-2010 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962358)
;)

Merriam-Webster:
fat
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): fat·ter; fat·test
1 : notable for having an unusual amount of fat: a : plump b : obese

I'm sure they are over 20% bodyfat and they are obese (which increases the likelihood of having high bodyfat, although smaller sized people can also have unusual amounts of bodyfat). If "fat" didn't sound so mean, I'd call them "fat." Perhaps they chose that show title because it gets more people's attention. :)

BMI can be very inaccurate for people who are extremely athletic, but for the rest of us it's a fairly useful indicator. A reading of 20% for adult women actually falls very solidly in the healthy range. 25.0-29.9 is an overweight range, and you are considered obese at 30. For a 15 year old girl 18-26 is the healthy range I believe, so 20% would be very healthy. These kids are certainly 26+.

You can get your BMI from an instant internet table, but for "thin" people your doctor can get a little more complicated. I don't remember exactly what my doctor did to determine my body fat was out of proportion, but it was extremely high though my weight was in fact very healthy. This is why thin people who do not eat well or exercise can be "fat".

DrPhil 08-02-2010 07:30 PM

I meant to type "over 40%." That's a generalization and probably an exaggeration for some of the teens but the point is that they have an unusual amount of bodyfat and are overweight.

ree-Xi 08-02-2010 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleurGirl (Post 1962172)
That girl in the pink sweatshirt really isn't fat... Neither is the girl on the far left...
Those kinds of shows just make me sad. :(

The bottom line is that even though the girls you refer to may not look "that big", they are obese (according to an article based on the press release). It mentioned the weights of three of the younger kids - 210, 366 and 510. The other two (17 and 18) are "veterans" of the place that they are going to lose the weight, and I don't know their weights.

I'm not advocating an impossibly thin, size-0 standard. Yes, there are perfectly healthy people who are naturally thin, and those who attain smaller sizes through proper nutrition and appropriate exercise, but a lot of people try to get there via very unhealthy methods. But it also seems that things have headed in the opposite direction. People rationalize that just because they're not bigger than the "average woman", they're ok, when the "average woman" is technically overweight. And yes, you can be overweight and relatively healthy.

I applaud anyone who decides to take their health more seriously and make changes. That can mean something as drastic as losing 50 pounds, a commitment like a daily walking program, or simply deciding to eat lean meat instead of fatty cuts.

And lastly, I'm not saying that people need to hate their bodies. We just need to realize that the human body, though very complex, is a gift we get just one chance at using. When you think of it that way, and all the things it can do, you might just want to keep it around for as long as possible, and in the best condition possible.

Alumiyum 08-02-2010 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ree-Xi (Post 1962428)
The bottom line is that even though the girls you refer to may not look "that big", they are obese (according to an article based on the press release). It mentioned the weights of three of the younger kids - 210, 366 and 510. The other two (17 and 18) are "veterans" of the place that they are going to lose the weight, and I don't know their weights.

I'm not advocating an impossibly thin, size-0 standard. Yes, there are perfectly healthy people who are naturally thin, and those who attain smaller sizes through proper nutrition and appropriate exercise, but a lot of people try to get there via very unhealthy methods. But it also seems that things have headed in the opposite direction. People rationalize that just because they're not bigger than the "average woman", they're ok, when the "average woman" is technically overweight. And yes, you can be overweight and relatively healthy.

I applaud anyone who decides to take their health more seriously and make changes. That can mean something as drastic as losing 50 pounds, a commitment like a daily walking program, or simply deciding to eat lean meat instead of fatty cuts.

And lastly, I'm not saying that people need to hate their bodies. We just need to realize that the human body, though very complex, is a gift we get just one chance at using. When you think of it that way, and all the things it can do, you might just want to keep it around for as long as possible, and in the best condition possible.

That goes for thin people, too. Thin people can be as unhealthy as fat people.

There are people that are naturally heavy and are still healthy, and there's a hard line to walk between reminding people that being very overweight can be dangerous and making people feel bad about themselves.

DrPhil 08-03-2010 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alumiyum (Post 1962476)
That goes for thin people, too. Thin people can be as unhealthy as fat people.

Did you type this disclaimer out of habit without reading ree-Xi's post to see that she already included that disclaimer in her post? ;)

If so, that's another reason why obesity will never stop being a problem in America and disproportionately in the Black community. People are so stuck in disclaimers and making sure no one feels bad about themselves. Yeah, let's make the AVERAGE PERSON (athletes are a small % of the population) believe that they can be 50+ lbs (technically) overweight and be perfectly healthy; and that we can't discuss obesity without also discussing how people can be thin or average size and unhealthy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alumiyum (Post 1962476)
There are people that are naturally heavy and are still healthy....

"Naturally heavy." If I had $1 for every time I heard that, especially from Black folks.

Either way, those people represent a very small % and they need to consult doctor(s) to ensure that they are REALLY heavy and healthy. Eating well (that includes the right kind of food and the right proportions--overeating health food and junk food is unhealthy) and exercising usually means that you will not be "heavy" in the sense that most people are overweight. The scale may be higher, especially when you build muscle mass, but your bodyfat composition and how your body looks and clothes fit will show that the person isn't overweight in the sense that we are talking about in this thread.

People get real unrealistic and dishonest when we talk about body image and weight. People pretend that their muffin top is a result of healthy and moderate eating and exercise. You don't have to want to lose weight for your body to reflect your healthy lifestyle.

Alumiyum 08-03-2010 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962584)
Did you type this disclaimer out of habit without reading ree-Xi's post to see that she already included that disclaimer in her post? ;)

If so, that's another reason why obesity will never stop being a problem in America and disproportionately in the Black community. People are so stuck in disclaimers and making sure no one feels bad about themselves. Yeah, let's make the AVERAGE PERSON (athletes are a small % of the population) believe that they can be 50+ lbs (technically) overweight and be perfectly healthy; and that we can't discuss obesity without also discussing how people can be thin or average size and unhealthy.



Those people represent a very small % and they need to consult doctor(s) to ensure that they are REALLY heavy and healthy. Eating well (that includes the right kind of food and the right proportions--overeating health food and junk food is unhealthy) and exercising usually means that you will not be "heavy" in the sense that most people are overweight. The scale may be higher, especially when you build muscle mass, but your bodyfat composition and how your body looks and clothes fit will show that the person isn't overweight in the sense that we are talking about in this thread.

People get real unrealistic and dishonest when we talk about body image and weight. People pretend that their muffin top is a result of healthy and moderate eating and exercise. You don't have to want to lose weight for your body to reflect your healthy lifestyle.

In fact, she said that people can become thin through unhealthy practices, not that they are in fact thin and unhealthy to begin with. It is easy for a thin person to judge a fat person, but thin does not automatically mean healthy.

I never said being 50 pounds overweight would be ok. I have family members that are around 20 pounds overweight with perfect blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar levels, etc. It is unlikely that the extra weight is from muscle mass, and they do not appear to be thin. They are probably healthier than I am, considering the holy hell I put my body through when I first got to college. Obviously, if someone is 50 or more pounds overweight they are probably unhealthy or are on a path to become unhealthy. That is a different argument that no one is disputing.

My size 10 and 12 family members were far healthier than I (yes, they have been and are monitored by a doctor and are factually very healthy) when I was a 2, and are probably healthier than I am now at a 4, considering the damage I have done to myself (including at one point a diet of almost totally fast food, an addiction to milkshakes, and drinking about 3 times a week...not light beer, either...didn't gain a pound at the time, but there is no telling how many empty calories I was taking in a day...very, very, very unhealthy). The whole point is that BMI numbers are NOT a complete indicator of health, nor is weight. Someone who is on the top of the normal range or the bottom of the overweight range can be healthy. Someone at the bottom to middle of the normal range can be unhealthy. Obviously someone at the top of the overweight range and above is very likely not in good health and I haven't seen anyone argue that yet. No one has or is saying obesity is healthy or that it is ok and safe to be obese. The argument is that "fat" is a general term and doesn't always mean someone is one step from a heart attack. The "muffin top" doesn't by default mean someone is lazy or does not eat right, and the lack of one doesn't necessarily indicate an active person who has healthy eating habits.

DrPhil 08-03-2010 10:32 AM

The overweight and obesity epidemic is generally not about people who could lose 10-20lbs. These people are technically overweight but it is considered at the warning level of the weight index. I'm sure everyone has already seen the "underweight, normal range, overweight, obese" line graph/table before.

I'm talking about 50+ lbs overweight because that's what's generally considered obese and morbidly obese; and that can also include 20+lbs overweight. That's what the overweight and obesity epidemic is generally about because a large percentage of the population has far surpassed the warning level of 10-20lbs. The kids in this show are definitely over 20lbs overweight and are probably 50+lbs overweight.

So, if everyone agrees on overweight and unhealthy when it pertains to people who could lose more than 10-20 lbs, that's cool. :)

ree-Xi 08-03-2010 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alumiyum (Post 1962591)
In fact, she said that people can become thin through unhealthy practices, not that they are in fact thin and unhealthy to begin with. It is easy for a thin person to judge a fat person, but thin does not automatically mean healthy.

I never said being 50 pounds overweight would be ok. I have family members that are around 20 pounds overweight with perfect blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar levels, etc. It is unlikely that the extra weight is from muscle mass, and they do not appear to be thin. They are probably healthier than I am, considering the holy hell I put my body through when I first got to college. Obviously, if someone is 50 or more pounds overweight they are probably unhealthy or are on a path to become unhealthy. That is a different argument that no one is disputing.

My size 10 and 12 family members were far healthier than I (yes, they have been and are monitored by a doctor and are factually very healthy) when I was a 2, and are probably healthier than I am now at a 4, considering the damage I have done to myself (including at one point a diet of almost totally fast food, an addiction to milkshakes, and drinking about 3 times a week...not light beer, either...didn't gain a pound at the time, but there is no telling how many empty calories I was taking in a day...very, very, very unhealthy). The whole point is that BMI numbers are NOT a complete indicator of health, nor is weight. Someone who is on the top of the normal range or the bottom of the overweight range can be healthy. Someone at the bottom to middle of the normal range can be unhealthy. Obviously someone at the top of the overweight range and above is very likely not in good health and I haven't seen anyone argue that yet. No one has or is saying obesity is healthy or that it is ok and safe to be obese. The argument is that "fat" is a general term and doesn't always mean someone is one step from a heart attack. The "muffin top" doesn't by default mean someone is lazy or does not eat right, and the lack of one doesn't necessarily indicate an active person who has healthy eating habits.

I'm tired of participating in discussions and having to put up a bunch of disclaimers. I'm sorry that I didn't spell out the one you are referring to.

Yes, I realize that a thin person can be unhealthy. They can have "invisible" health problems like high cholesterol or triglycerides, be a closet smoker, yada yada yada. But being even 20 pounds overweight can increase your risk for Type-2 Diabetes, some cancers, arthritis, sleep apnea and asthma. Where you carry the weight is also an important factor (people who store fat in their middle rather on their hips/thighs are at an increased risk for heart disease). If you could possibly decrease those risks, it makes sense to try to do so, sensibly.

I am not judging anyone, and this is not a case of "it's easy for a thin person to judge a fat person". I have a complex medical history and at times, I have had to struggle to put/keep weight on. And yes, people would ignorantly say "I'd love to have your problem", even knowing that I was sometimes in a life and death situation.

Thanks to medications and conscious meal planning, I am usually within the recommended weight range for my height and age. My doctors prefer me to be on the higher end of the spectrum, because A. I tend to lose weight very quickly when sick, and B. there is a correlation between lower body fat percentage and decrease in lung capacity. I take 5-7 medications on any given day just to help my body process food, and even then, I have a lot of pain, discomfort and nausea. Eating is honestly a pain in the a-- because my body doesn't naturally do the things it should with food. I have to think about it constantly.

I'm not saying this to complain, but to tell you that none of this is "easy" for me.

Alumiyum 08-03-2010 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1962600)
The overweight and obesity epidemic is generally not about people who could lose 10-20lbs. These people are technically overweight but it is considered at the warning level of the weight index. I'm sure everyone has already seen the "underweight, normal range, overweight, obese" line graph/table before.

I'm talking about 50+ lbs overweight because that's what's generally considered obese and morbidly obese; and that can also include 20+lbs overweight. That's what the overweight and obesity epidemic is generally about because a large percentage of the population has far surpassed the warning level of 10-20lbs. The kids in this show are definitely over 20lbs overweight and are probably 50+lbs overweight.

So, if everyone agrees on overweight and unhealthy when it pertains to people who could lose more than 10-20 lbs, that's cool. :)

Yes, you and I are talking about two different things.

Alumiyum 08-03-2010 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ree-Xi (Post 1962634)
I'm tired of participating in discussions and having to put up a bunch of disclaimers. I'm sorry that I didn't spell out the one you are referring to.

Yes, I realize that a thin person can be unhealthy. They can have "invisible" health problems like high cholesterol or triglycerides, be a closet smoker, yada yada yada. But being even 20 pounds overweight can increase your risk for Type-2 Diabetes, some cancers, arthritis, sleep apnea and asthma. Where you carry the weight is also an important factor (people who store fat in their middle rather on their hips/thighs are at an increased risk for heart disease). If you could possibly decrease those risks, it makes sense to try to do so, sensibly.

I am not judging anyone, and this is not a case of "it's easy for a thin person to judge a fat person". I have a complex medical history and at times, I have had to struggle to put/keep weight on. And yes, people would ignorantly say "I'd love to have your problem", even knowing that I was sometimes in a life and death situation.

Thanks to medications and conscious meal planning, I am usually within the recommended weight range for my height and age. My doctors prefer me to be on the higher end of the spectrum, because A. I tend to lose weight very quickly when sick, and B. there is a correlation between lower body fat percentage and decrease in lung capacity. I take 5-7 medications on any given day just to help my body process food, and even then, I have a lot of pain, discomfort and nausea. Eating is honestly a pain in the a-- because my body doesn't naturally do the things it should with food. I have to think about it constantly.

I'm not saying this to complain, but to tell you that none of this is "easy" for me.

I didn't realize you would take the post personally. I was making a general statement that thin people find it easy to judge fat people, and some do. None of us can pretend we haven't heard that attitude before. The entire point of using the example I did was that the family members that are technically overweight and several sizes larger than I are probably healthier than I am now and are certainly healthier than I was at size 2. None of them have been told they are at risk for Diabetes, and I have been told that, nor that their cholesterol or blood pressure isn't healthy for their age, and I have. One of them does do more cardio than I do, and probably more working out in general because I hate it and it's a struggle to make myself go three times a week. She's just not a small woman and probably never will be without extreme restrictions.

What I was arguing against is the assumption that overweight automatically means unhealthy and that thin people are by default healthier than overweight people. People that are not thin are not by default lazy or habitual burger eaters. Obviously your medical conditions are not caused by your lifestyle, however your situation an example of thin doesn't always mean "lucky" or "healthy". (Incidentally an old roomate of mine had a food allergy and described eating as you do and did get frustrated when people told her she was "lucky" for being thin because in fact it was directly related to how unpleasant it was for her to eat.)

rhoyaltempest 08-03-2010 02:07 PM

Also keep in mind that there is still so much the medical community does not know about our bodies and weight gain issues. There are studies being done that reveal that Type II Diabetes is genetic also (my doctor believes this as well) and that no matter how overweight/obese one gets, some folks will never develop the disease. Doctors are also exploring the idea that overeating and an affinity (or addiction) for sweets/carbs might be a symptom or precursor to developing the disease. The bottom line is that obesity is a complex physiological issue that goes beyond the popular "Just eat less" mantra and we need to have more compassion for everyone (especially the kids) and tackle these issues as a society, which means creating a healthier environment and better food industry practices for all. Studies show that where there are healthier practices, there are healthier people.

And I also agree that the focus should be on healthier living for all - lots of thin folks are unhealthy, out of shape, and soon to develop diseases as well. My former personal trainer called this "skinny fat" and said that many of his clients had it. You can be realistic with people and express their need to lose weight (this coming from doctors and professionals) without singling them out and humiliating them. The only thing this will lead to for MOST, is depression, more overeating for comfort, and the repeat of a vicious cycle. Just look at those who are mordbidly obese. How many really want to live that way, no matter what they say? They are obviously having issues beyond their control.

Alumiyum 08-03-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1962764)
Also keep in mind that there is still so much the medical community does not know about our bodies and weight gain issues. There are studies being done that reveal that Type II Diabetes is genetic also (my doctor believes this as well) and that no matter how overweight/obese one gets, some folks will never develop the disease. Doctors are also exploring the idea that overeating and an affinity (or addiction) for sweets/carbs might be a symptom or precursor to developing the disease. The bottom line is that obesity is a complex physiological issue that goes beyond the popular "Just eat less" mantra and we need to have more compassion for everyone (especially the kids) and tackle these issues as a society, which means creating a healthier environment and better food industry practices for all. Studies show that where there are healthier practices, there are healthier people.

And I also agree that the focus should be on healthier living for all - lots of thin folks are unhealthy, out of shape, and soon to develop diseases as well. My former personal trainer called this "skinny fat" and said that many of his clients had it. You can be realistic with people and express their need to lose weight (this coming from doctors and professionals) without singling them out and humiliating them. The only thing this will lead to for MOST, is depression, more overeating for comfort, and the repeat of a vicious cycle. Just look at those who are mordbidly obese. How many really want to live that way, no matter what they say? They are obviously having issues beyond their control.

Very well said.

NinjaPoodle 08-11-2010 12:14 AM

So, did anyone watch it besides me?

pshsx1 08-11-2010 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 1961740)
That boy is 15? His face doesn't look like he's over 10. Maybe it's just that particular photo.

No, he's only 11. So you're very close!

They all range in ages.



Ninja, I just watched it. No complaints.

RaggedyAnn 08-11-2010 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FleurGirl (Post 1962172)
That girl in the pink sweatshirt really isn't fat... Neither is the girl on the far left...
Those kinds of shows just make me sad. :(

I watched one episode. The girl in the pink is 11 and over 200 pounds (I think 210). If I'm remembering correctly, the girl on the left has already been on campus for a while.

ree-Xi 08-11-2010 04:33 PM

I haven't watched it though I did watch a few episodes of "Huge". Nicky Blonsky's character has very few redeeming qualities. The writers haven't given the viewer much reason to care about her character. David Hasselhoff's daughter's character is a bit bland if not typical - the "pretty, blond" girl at (fat) camp. The camp administrator has a cliched back story, and it's too pervasive in the episodes.

I'll have to look for "Too Fat for 15" online.

AOII Angel 08-11-2010 05:15 PM

All this talk about thin people being as unhealthy as overweight people is a load of BS. Alumiyum, you were borderline DM2 mainly because of the luck of a genetic predisposition, not because of eating habits at 102 pounds. Being a little more fastidious helps, but without that genetic predisposition, you would not be DM2. Type 2 diabetes is a disease of the obese and a few groups of non-obese people with a genetic predisposition. There's not an epidemic of thin people with diabetes because they eat fast food and don't work out.

A telling study was done that showed followed four groups of people, thin people who exercised, thin people who did no exercise, obese people who exercised and obese people who did no exercise. The study clearly demonstrated that thin people had less health risks with or without exercise than obese people. Obese people who exercise did better than obese people who did no exercise, but they did NOT do better than thin people who did no exercise. As much as people would like to believe that you can be "healthy" as a normal weight person if you are obese, it is simplty not true. You can be close if you do the recommended amount of exercise, but lets be honest, how many people who are obese can and do participate in that much physical activity?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.