GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   The Obama Infomercial (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=100766)

Senusret I 10-29-2008 08:04 PM

The Obama Infomercial
 
You know what?

This shit's scary.

CrackerBarrel 10-29-2008 08:08 PM

You see McCain's quote in Miami today about how he would never delay the start of the world series by a half hour to make American's watch an infomercial?

And I think this may backfire. It's more than a little propaganda-y, and doesn't do anything to hide that fact.

Senusret I 10-29-2008 08:13 PM

I could care less about the world series, but I acknowledge that I may be in the minority about that. Right now, I can't even recall what I do watch on Wednesday nights.

But it's clearly propaganda (which all of these things are), and it is blatant. It REALLY disturbs me.

I'm voting for him because he most closely aligns with my values, but I just really have a suspicion that I'm going to end up in a camp with a pink triangle on my chest if I ever disagree with him.

KSUViolet06 10-29-2008 08:15 PM

This is quite weird, and I can't put my finger on why it is. I could be wrong, but I seriously don't recall any other candidate doing a half hour infomercial.

On a funny note, I was watching Michelle Obama on Leno. She was talking about the kids, and said that one of the girls overheard her talking about the air time Barack had purchased. She said that her older daughter came in and asked if "Daddy's commercial was going to interrupt Hannah Montana because that's way more important than Daddy being president."

I loled a teeny tiny bit at this, so I hope it was meant to be funny.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1737656)

I'm voting for him because he most closely aligns with my values, but I just really have a suspicion that I'm going to end up in a camp with a pink triangle on my chest if I ever disagree with him.


DaemonSeid 10-29-2008 08:19 PM

How do you delay something that

1. Was already delayed anyways

2. I believe was scheduled to start at 8:30...

Yeah..McCain's quote was a bit whiney at best.

Hey Sen...

If Bush can interrupt TV for free and ramble on for about an hr. over some BS then this isn't scary.

Katmandu 10-29-2008 08:21 PM

Not the first time this has been done. Ross Perot bought a half hour on most of the networks in '92, and I know at least one other candidate in my lifetime bought a half hour block in the week before the election.

Senusret I 10-29-2008 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSUViolet06 (Post 1737658)


I loled a teeny tiny bit at this, so I hope it was meant to be funny.


It was meant to be absurd, and we can laugh at the absurd, even if it's not "funny" per se.


Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1737659)
Hey Sen...

If Bush can interrupt TV for free and ramble on for about an hr. over some BS then this isn't scary.

I get that.

What scares me is that Obama doesn't NEED this to win.

What scares me is that this man may look like me, but he is not me. He is close, but no Senusret.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Katmandu (Post 1737661)
Not the first time this has been done. Ross Perot bought a half hour on most of the networks in '92, and I know at least one other candidate in my lifetime bought a half hour block in the week before the election.

I just wanted to acknowledge this. With Perot, I understand (and I think I remember). He NEEDED that time to share his message.

Obama doesn't need it...it's just....weird....

jitterbug13 10-29-2008 08:41 PM

McCain needs to stop hating. His acceptance speech caused the first NFL game of the season to start early. And if it didn't rain like cats and dogs in Philly Monday, the World Series would probably be over.

KSigkid 10-29-2008 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1737656)
I could care less about the world series, but I acknowledge that I may be in the minority about that. Right now, I can't even recall what I do watch on Wednesday nights.

But it's clearly propaganda (which all of these things are), and it is blatant. It REALLY disturbs me.

I'm voting for him because he most closely aligns with my values, but I just really have a suspicion that I'm going to end up in a camp with a pink triangle on my chest if I ever disagree with him.

It didn't bother me all that much. I think it was going a bit overboard, and the concept was a bit odd to me, but other than that it didn't bother me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1737659)
How do you delay something that

1. Was already delayed anyways

2. I believe was scheduled to start at 8:30...

Yeah..McCain's quote was a bit whiney at best.

Hey Sen...

If Bush can interrupt TV for free and ramble on for about an hr. over some BS then this isn't scary.

I think it's a different story when the President (no matter what party) is speaking, and when a candidate is doing it. Again, I don't have a problem with his doing the infomercial, but I think you're comparing apples to oranges when you're comparing Bush doing it and Obama doing it. It means putting aside your feelings about Bush and Obama, but from my point of view, I think of it purely as a candidate doing an infomercial/promotional feature versus the President speaking to the nation. When I look at it that way, the two things aren't comparable.

SWTXBelle 10-29-2008 10:08 PM

Here's my question - was the infomercial viewed by "undecided" voters, or was it an Obama lovefest, watched by those who are already true believers? I find it hard to believe that anyone - other than my mother, and that's a story all unto itself - is really undecided at this point in time. Am I totally wrong in thinking that? Surely someone gathered up viewer data for the program.

UGAalum94 10-29-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 1737706)
Here's my question - was the infomercial viewed by "undecided" voters, or was it an Obama lovefest, watched by those who are already true believers? I find it hard to believe that anyone - other than my mother, and that's a story all unto itself - is really undecided at this point in time. Am I totally wrong in thinking that? Surely someone gathered up viewer data for the program.

Oh, tell me about your mother. (imagine this said in a Dr. Freud voice if that makes it better). If you think it's a story, I know it's a probably a doozie of a tale. ETA: you've told some pretty great teaching stories; I didn't mean anything snarky.

tri deezy 10-29-2008 10:18 PM

I liked that that it wasn't negative about McCain's campaign at all. It was just about Obama, his policies, and issues that are on our minds. I don't even think I heard the word McCain mentioned once. I was swooning thinking about a change like this and how we'll finally be through with Bush so soon!

VAgirl18 10-29-2008 10:29 PM

Why did he pay for the infomercial when he could have given the money back to those who donated so they could give it to the people who really need it...you know, start practicing the spreading of wealth? :p

preciousjeni 10-29-2008 10:35 PM

Darn my no-tv-service-having-house. :mad: Is it online?

preciousjeni 10-29-2008 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAgirl18 (Post 1737717)
Why did he pay for the infomercial when he could have given the money back to those who donated so they could give it to the people who really need it...you know, start practicing the spreading of wealth?

Wellll...people gave him that money so that he could do it. :D

texas*princess 10-29-2008 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by preciousjeni (Post 1737724)
Wellll...people gave him that money so that he could do it. :D

yea that's what I was thinking... those people gave him money on their own free will. :confused:

And I think maybe this (the whole infomercial thing) hasn't been done because it's REALLY expensive... and he has a ton of money that was donated ... and the election is only a couple of days away... might as well use the money. Maybe no prior candidates thought about trying to do something like this before?

VAgirl18 10-29-2008 11:13 PM

Obviously his campaign doesn't need any more advertising. I'm a Republican and ready to accept that the Dems are going to be in the White House. I just saw no point in even having the infomercial when he could have just given the money back and said that other people could use it more. He should practice what he preaches..which is exactly what he does half of the time..preach.

VandalSquirrel 10-29-2008 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1737656)
I could care less about the world series, but I acknowledge that I may be in the minority about that. Right now, I can't even recall what I do watch on Wednesday nights.

But it's clearly propaganda (which all of these things are), and it is blatant. It REALLY disturbs me.

I'm voting for him because he most closely aligns with my values, but I just really have a suspicion that I'm going to end up in a camp with a pink triangle on my chest if I ever disagree with him.

If it comes to any camps get on a plane, train, or bus and I'll drive you into Canada. I could have you safely in Creston, BC in under four hours. Go get your passport ordered if you haven't already!

Leslie Anne 10-30-2008 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAgirl18 (Post 1737736)
I just saw no point in even having the infomercial when he could have just given the money back and said that other people could use it more. He should practice what he preaches..which is exactly what he does half of the time..preach.

That's not how things work with campaign contributions. McCain won't be returning any of his unused funds back to the people who sent them either.

VAgirl18 10-30-2008 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leslie Anne (Post 1737770)
That's not how things work with campaign contributions. McCain won't be returning any of his unused funds back to the people who sent them either.

Candidates ARE allowed to give the money to charity or other campaigns as long as they aren't spending it for personal use. He should have donated the money to charity instead of buying the infomercial..it would have been better for his campaign.

AGDee 10-30-2008 05:29 AM

The laws vary by state. I looked it up last week because someone asked what happens to the extra money in one of these threads. It's insanely complex.

DaemonSeid 10-30-2008 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leslie Anne (Post 1737770)
That's not how things work with campaign contributions. McCain won't be returning any of his unused funds back to the people who sent them either.

or the 150,000 on Palin's wardrobe...for that matter the clothing either

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAgirl18 (Post 1737785)
Candidates ARE allowed to give the money to charity or other campaigns as long as they aren't spending it for personal use. He should have donated the money to charity instead of buying the infomercial..it would have been better for his campaign.

Look at it like this...it was aimed at undecideds and for those who STILL aqt this point 'don't know' what Obama's plans are if they watched should have a better idea now.

I thought if nothing else, it was a good idea without debate atmosphere or some kind of circus going on, know what his plans are.


Cracker, here is the exact quote I was looking for:

"It used to be that only rain or some other act of God could delay the World Series," he {McCain} said. "But I guess network executives figured an Obama infomercial was close enough."

The Obama campaign did not ask that the game be delayed, said a spokesman for Fox, which broadcasts the World Series.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/...cle/index.html

and after seeing what happened last night, the game would have been over on Monday anyways....not to mention is was one of the lowest rated World Series in recent history.

ThetaDancer 10-30-2008 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAgirl18 (Post 1737736)
Obviously his campaign doesn't need any more advertising. I'm a Republican and ready to accept that the Dems are going to be in the White House. I just saw no point in even having the infomercial when he could have just given the money back and said that other people could use it more. He should practice what he preaches..which is exactly what he does half of the time..preach.

It actually seems like you're not at all ready to accept this. You keep pressing a non-issue.

ThetaPrincess24 10-30-2008 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAgirl18 (Post 1737717)
Why did he pay for the infomercial when he could have given the money back to those who donated so they could give it to the people who really need it...you know, start practicing the spreading of wealth? :p

EXCELLENT point!!!

I have a question for those who thought it was scary and propaganda-ish--If you think that and are slightly worried then why are you still voting for that guy? There are other people running for president besides mcain and obama (they dont have a chance in hell but it's still your vote and your voice).

I'm just glad I was in choir practice at church instead of being at home. i was saved from watching that phoney.

ThetaPrincess24 10-30-2008 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VandalSquirrel (Post 1737752)
If it comes to any camps get on a plane, train, or bus and I'll drive you into Canada. I could have you safely in Creston, BC in under four hours. Go get your passport ordered if you haven't already!

Canada wont save you from him and his minions :)

summer_gphib 10-30-2008 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 1737706)
Here's my question - was the infomercial viewed by "undecided" voters, or was it an Obama lovefest, watched by those who are already true believers? I find it hard to believe that anyone - other than my mother, and that's a story all unto itself - is really undecided at this point in time. Am I totally wrong in thinking that? Surely someone gathered up viewer data for the program.

I think there are many "undecided voters" remaining. My husband and I have already voted, and we're still not sure we voted the right way. There are things we truly admire about both men, making it a very difficult decision for us (and I'm usually a stright party voter). There are pros and cons to both-- we admire and like McCain but detest Palin. We really think Joe Biden has a lot of experience, but we're not sure Obama can keep his promises, and has the experience needed.

So for us it was rough. We did break from our normal party and voted for McCain-- despite Palin, certainly not because of her. :o

Senusret I 10-30-2008 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThetaPrincess24 (Post 1737798)
EXCELLENT point!!!

I have a question for those who thought it was scary and propaganda-ish--If you think that and are slightly worried then why are you still voting for that guy?

Because he still aligns with most of my values. McCain aligns with few.

ThetaPrincess24 10-30-2008 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1737805)
Because he still aligns with most of my values. McCain aligns with few.

A lot of folks out there I would say align with my values but that certainly doesnt mean they belong in the White House (or anywhere else in government) and wouldnt get my vote.

Senusret I 10-30-2008 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThetaPrincess24 (Post 1737809)
A lot of folks out there I would say align with my values but that certainly doesnt mean they belong in the White House (or anywhere else in government) and wouldnt get my vote.

But why would I vote for the OPPOSITE of my values? That would be stupid.

DaemonSeid 10-30-2008 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThetaPrincess24 (Post 1737809)
A lot of folks out there I would say align with my values but that certainly doesnt mean they belong in the White House (or anywhere else in government) and wouldnt get my vote.

That is why one must be well informed about the candidate that they vote for...you would vote for the person that relates best to you, it makes no sense to vote for someone who does not have your well being in mind.

AGDee 10-30-2008 08:56 AM

Can someone tell me what part of any political campaign is not propaganda? Campaigns ARE propaganda. The way things are set up, I can't blame a candidate for doing something like this. He's received the donations to be able to do it, so he might as well do it. People do keep saying that they don't "know" him, so this seems like a reasonable way for him to put himself out there for those too lazy to read his proposals on his web site.

I didn't watch the infomercial, didn't figure I needed to since I've read every document on his web site and my mind is made up. I had to clean out my DVR so I have enough room for both the Ghost Hunters marathon during the day tomorrow and the Ghost Hunters Live show on Halloween night. I have my priorities :)

DaemonSeid 10-30-2008 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGDee (Post 1737815)
Can someone tell me what part of any political campaign is not propaganda? Campaigns ARE propaganda. The way things are set up, I can't blame a candidate for doing something like this. He's received the donations to be able to do it, so he might as well do it. People do keep saying that they don't "know" him, so this seems like a reasonable way for him to put himself out there for those too lazy to read his proposals on his web site.

I didn't watch the infomercial, didn't figure I needed to since I've read every document on his web site and my mind is made up. I had to clean out my DVR so I have enough room for both the Ghost Hunters marathon during the day tomorrow and the Ghost Hunters Live show on Halloween night. I have my priorities :)

better to spend it on an informercial than to get found out later that it was spend on a weekend junket **koff** AIG

MysticCat 10-30-2008 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrackerBarrel (Post 1737651)
You see McCain's quote in Miami today about how he would never delay the start of the world series by a half hour to make American's watch an infomercial?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jitterbug13 (Post 1737670)
McCain needs to stop hating. His acceptance speech caused the first NFL game of the season to start early. And if it didn't rain like cats and dogs in Philly Monday, the World Series would probably be over.

Seriously. McCain so would have done this if he had the money to. It's silly to think otherwise.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Katmandu (Post 1737661)
Not the first time this has been done. Ross Perot bought a half hour on most of the networks in '92, and I know at least one other candidate in my lifetime bought a half hour block in the week before the election.

I thought I remembered other candidates doing this, but I was wondering if senility was kicking in.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGDee (Post 1737786)
The laws vary by state. I looked it up last week because someone asked what happens to the extra money in one of these threads. It's insanely complex.

This is a federal campaign, so it's governed by federal campaign finance law, not state laws.
Quote:

Originally Posted by VAgirl18 (Post 1737785)
Candidates ARE allowed to give the money to charity or other campaigns as long as they aren't spending it for personal use. He should have donated the money to charity instead of buying the infomercial..it would have been better for his campaign.

No, assuming he wins, he should keep anything still left for the re-election campaign.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThetaPrincess24 (Post 1737798)
I'm just glad I was in choir practice at church instead of being at home. i was saved from watching that phoney.

You mean if you hadn't been at choir practice, you would have been forced to sit and watch him whether you wanted to or not? What ever happened to personal responsibility. :rolleyes:

And seriously. Phoney? I get it that people can disagree vehemently with him, but phoney? As opposed to McCain, whose seeming willingness to change his positions in order to attract votes just looks more and more *****ian to me all the time? (And can anybody tell me why the name of the legendary protagnotist who sold his soul to the devil in return for earthly power is replaced by *****?)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1737662)
He is close, but no Senusret.

There is only one Senusret. :cool:

Velocity_14 10-30-2008 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jitterbug13 (Post 1737670)
McCain needs to stop hating. His acceptance speech caused the first NFL game of the season to start early. And if it didn't rain like cats and dogs in Philly Monday, the World Series would probably be over.

I feel you Soror!! If McCain's campaign had the money, he would probably do the same thing (that $150, 000 could been of better use huh :rolleyes::p:D?). I could care less about the World Series though that is not an opinion shared by some, but there are more important things to be worried about than the delaying of a baseball game. Hatred is a hellava drug...

VAgirl18 10-30-2008 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThetaDancer (Post 1737796)
It actually seems like you're not at all ready to accept this. You keep pressing a non-issue.

No, I've accepted it. I'm questioning his practices. Just because I know he'll most likely win on Tuesday doesn't mean that I have to agree with his campaign practices.

VAgirl18 10-30-2008 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1737790)
or the 150,000 on Palin's wardrobe...for that matter the clothing either

No, but they WILL be donating the clothing to charity after the election. Double use is more effective than wasting.

ajuhdg 10-30-2008 01:02 PM

Anyway, your comment about being 'lableled' with the pink triangle, gave me a funny visual. It kind of made me wonder what'd he'd do to me. I've already warned that he's MUCH further left than he's admitted, and with all of this media talk, I bet he'll go and figure out all the people that voted against him and rope them out too.

I don't necessarily agree with McCain on everything, but the ones that we don't agree he believes those decisions (abortion, gay marriage, etc) should be left at the state level. This leads me to believe that he might have mixed feelings about it, thus letting the states decide would let some states have/do it and some states don't. Therefore, if someone wanted to participate in said activity, they could go to that state to do it. He doesn't want to outlaw it completely.

Everyone is voting based on their concerns, and I'll say it again, we need someone that's going to handle Iraq RIGHT, otherwise all the other issues will be moot.

VandalSquirrel: That is so sweet of you to smuggle people out. It's probably not necessary though, when Obama's done, we won't even recognize our country! (and I don't mean that in a good way!)

AGDee: WOHOO for Ghost Hunters marathons, and live Halloween shows!

GeekyPenguin 10-30-2008 01:04 PM

My dad took the dog for a walk last night during the informercial and said that almost everyone in the subdivision had it on their TVs. I was surprised to hear that.

I'm also enjoying the level of respectful political discourse in this thread. "Phoney" and "minions" come to mind.

ThetaPrincess24 10-30-2008 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAgirl18 (Post 1737891)
No, but they WILL be donating the clothing to charity after the election. Double use is more effective than wasting.

I dont get the wardrobe argument. Just about everyone on TV wears donated or borrowed clothing to advertise for someone. Hell models and actresses borrow dresses and jewels all the time on the red carpet and no one says anything. How is this any different? Because the RNC may have borrowed or purchased them? Bought clothes are going to charity and the donated ones are being returned. Her clothing argument is weak.

Sorry for being off topic.....

And to address someone else...obama changes his opinions all the time like any other politician. Dont accuse just McCain.

nittanyalum 10-30-2008 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin (Post 1737897)
I'm also enjoying the level of respectful political discourse in this thread. "Phoney" and "minions" come to mind.

Temper tantrums are at hand...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.