GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Sorority Recruitment (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=217)
-   -   Indiana University 2014 Recruitment (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=136816)

pinkmama 01-20-2014 05:30 PM

It's on Tuesday so tomorrow

arrowlady 01-20-2014 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kchaptergphib (Post 2256519)
My own thoughts, after being a membership advisor at 2 other schools and attending a third; take them with as much salt as you will:

I really want to take everyone from the (housed) house corp boards at IU and shake them. Seriously, alumnae, make some better decisions for the health of the entire system! There is no good reason to set quotas so artificially low. None. You can figure out a way to keep your physical house afloat with fewer than 75% of your members living in, I promise you.

Yes, there will still be many women who will have to take a chance on chapters they felt they didn’t yet connect, it will still be competitive to get spots in most chapters, but hopefully the number of women receiving bids will be in a greater proportion to the number of women starting the process.

The housed vs unhoused chapters is a tricky dynamic at any school, and is made even worse by IU’s silly bed quota system and culture of exclusivity. In the end, women have to decide if they would rather be greek for life (without a house for four years) or not greek at all.

And the Rho Gamma who told her group that they should rank the unhoused chapters last because they have to take everyone should be ashamed of herself and be reported. NOW. As a Rho Gamma you should be impartial, you should not make blanket statements about how to rank, and you should not perpetuate falsehoods that “those chapters have to invite everyone back.” It’s just ridiculous, and NOT TRUE.

Continued luck to all the PNMs, actives, alumnae and parents. And put pressure on your respective groups. I agree with AXORushAdvisor, that I would never want a daughter of mine to experience IU rush, and would not want to send my money that way, either. When alumnae women who are already deeply involved with membership in their organizations are actively dissuading other women from participating (or, actively telling them to participate at a different school instead), you know your campus needs to make some changes. I don’t care if it’s your “tradition” or “culture,” or it “works for the actives.” Sorry Hoosiers, but it’s getting to the point that you’re embarrassing yourselves. And I worry about the damage you’re really doing by having decades of higher disappointment levels than are necessary. I do understand there is disappointment in everyone’s recruitment experience, but IU does things to set itself up for more problems. Your NPC recruitment is diseased, in my diagnosis. We all know that just because something’s always been done a certain way, that does not mean it’s always been done the correct way.


yes...

And to the mom's of the IU girls, I am sorry for the emotional rollercoaster your girls are on. It is tough at any school for the most part, but IU is the craziest recruitment out there. What I can't understand is why the two un-housed sororities are not making plans to become housed so that all IU greeks get the same experience.

KDCat 01-20-2014 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kchaptergphib (Post 2256519)
My own thoughts, after being a membership advisor at 2 other schools and attending a third; take them with as much salt as you will:

I really want to take everyone from the (housed) house corp boards at IU and shake them. Seriously, alumnae, make some better decisions for the health of the entire system! There is no good reason to set quotas so artificially low. None. You can figure out a way to keep your physical house afloat with fewer than 75% of your members living in, I promise you.

Yes, there will still be many women who will have to take a chance on chapters they felt they didn’t yet connect, it will still be competitive to get spots in most chapters, but hopefully the number of women receiving bids will be in a greater proportion to the number of women starting the process.

The housed vs unhoused chapters is a tricky dynamic at any school, and is made even worse by IU’s silly bed quota system and culture of exclusivity. In the end, women have to decide if they would rather be greek for life (without a house for four years) or not greek at all.

And the Rho Gamma who told her group that they should rank the unhoused chapters last because they have to take everyone should be ashamed of herself and be reported. NOW. As a Rho Gamma you should be impartial, you should not make blanket statements about how to rank, and you should not perpetuate falsehoods that “those chapters have to invite everyone back.” It’s just ridiculous, and NOT TRUE.

Continued luck to all the PNMs, actives, alumnae and parents. And put pressure on your respective groups. I agree with AXORushAdvisor, that I would never want a daughter of mine to experience IU rush, and would not want to send my money that way, either. When alumnae women who are already deeply involved with membership in their organizations are actively dissuading other women from participating (or, actively telling them to participate at a different school instead), you know your campus needs to make some changes. I don’t care if it’s your “tradition” or “culture,” or it “works for the actives.” Sorry Hoosiers, but it’s getting to the point that you’re embarrassing yourselves. And I worry about the damage you’re really doing by having decades of higher disappointment levels than are necessary. I do understand there is disappointment in everyone’s recruitment experience, but IU does things to set itself up for more problems. Your NPC recruitment is diseased, in my diagnosis. We all know that just because something’s always been done a certain way, that does not mean it’s always been done the correct way.

Say it with me... "parlor fees."

Each sister who is living out is charged a parlor fee that covers meals at the house and use of the house facilities.

pinksequins 01-20-2014 05:41 PM

I am envisioning Regina George as that Rho Gamma. Even the initials match .....

BadCat25 01-20-2014 05:51 PM

Bitching about IU recruitment on GC will do zero good so why not bitch to the people who are ultimately responsible, the Board of Trustees. You can send an email to all trustees at one time at bdot@indiana.edu and don't tell me they are powerless to change the system.

cinder1965 01-20-2014 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KDCat (Post 2256526)
Say it with me... "parlor fees."

Each sister who is living out is charged a parlor fee that covers meals at the house and use of the house facilities.


KDCat, I am a housing corp board member for my chapter and I was about to say the same things.....all together ladies: Parlor fees. That is exactly what we do with some 20 members; we have a full house and a new member class initiated right now. Yes, we have to manage it and make sure our house is always full and the members understand we must have a full house to have live outs....but this is NOT brain surgery. We can offer many living options for many different member situations.

This IU situation is reaching ridiculous levels now.....

stbemtpynest 01-20-2014 06:47 PM

The IU PNMs got a document with 2012-13 PHA Chapter Financial Obligations. All but three of the housed sororities also list "Live-out charges - Dues, fees, parlor fees, etc.", which implies those sororities allow some actives to live out. So now I'm more confused than ever about the bed-quota system if at least 16 housed sororities allow actives to live out. Am I misunderstanding the Financial document?

cinder1965 01-20-2014 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stbemtpynest (Post 2256539)
The IU PNMs got a document with 2012-13 PHA Chapter Financial Obligations. All but three of the housed sororities also list "Live-out charges - Dues, fees, parlor fees, etc.", which implies those sororities allow some actives to live out. So now I'm more confused than ever about the bed-quota system if at least 16 housed sororities allow actives to live out. Am I misunderstanding the Financial document?

Every sorority is different, but even if you have established the fees, it doesn't mean you have to allow live outs. At least with my chapter, it isn't approved just because a member wants to. There are specific processes to go through to get a live out approved. Maybe most chapters at IU simply don't approve them.

DeltaBetaBaby 01-20-2014 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cinder1965 (Post 2256541)
Every sorority is different, but even if you have established the fees, it doesn't mean you have to allow live outs. At least with my chapter, it isn't approved just because a member wants to. There are specific processes to go through to get a live out approved. Maybe most chapters at IU simply don't approve them.

Chapters that officially don't allow live outs may allow live-outs for reasons like medical issues that prevent someone from living in or marriage, which is to say, things so rare they really don't affect rush/bed quota, but the policies exist anyway.

cinder1965 01-20-2014 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby (Post 2256548)
Chapters that officially don't allow live outs may allow live-outs for reasons like medical issues that prevent someone from living in or marriage, which is to say, things so rare they really don't affect rush/bed quota, but the policies exist anyway.


Yep. The Purdue chapters allow live outs if the house is full. Usually is because we use the RFM method (or whatever mits called) so most seniors live out. Our Panhel just raised total quota again so 10 houses have to do spring recruitment to pick up a few girls to meet it so we often need girls to live out.

Dtjb 01-20-2014 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mom64 (Post 2256472)
Indiana is a HUGE school. As an incoming freshman you spend a good portion of your first semester becoming friends with those living on your floor/quad/neighborhood and classes. These are by majority freshman as well. There were little if no pre-recruitment activities, so little chance to get to know people who will vouch for you.

I believe that everything happens for a reason and that my daughter will be just fine. I also believe that sometimes processes need to be reevaluated for the good of everyone. I think that Indiana's rush process needs to be rethought.

Again, all can vent as much as they want but I attended Indiana, participated in the process, and had a fabulous Greek experience. It's an amazing school qnd a great Greek system regardless of the process. I went thru rush not having any connections and not being a legacy and it worked out great for me. I'm tired of hearing all the negative. Sounds to me like unless "all get a bid" it's not going to be fair to the moms. There's nothing special about some thing that everyone can just get. If that's how Alabama does it then it must not be all that special to be in a house and I question how close a "house" of 200 women could be if they take these enormous pledge classes. Furthermore, if there's anyone out there that would think an IU cheerleader would not have a better chance of getting a bid to a house regardless of being present, is living in a dream world. Activities/ resume matter and that will gain big points for houses recruiting girls. I get parents hurt for their kids, but much of what I'm reading is the mentality of "everyone should get a trophy and everyone should get a prize and everyone should win" which is proving to be not very real-world. Lots of competition out there...not everyone is going to get in. That doesn't make the process unfair, it makes it competitive.

33girl 01-20-2014 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kchaptergphib (Post 2256519)
I really want to take everyone from the (housed) house corp boards at IU and shake them. Seriously, alumnae, make some better decisions for the health of the entire system! There is no good reason to set quotas so artificially low. None. You can figure out a way to keep your physical house afloat with fewer than 75% of your members living in, I promise you.

But they can't keep their house afloat if women don't join because they don't want to be part of a chapter that bucks a system. This is kind of like telling a chapter at Ole Miss "This whole wearing dresses on game day thing is stupid and costs too much for dry cleaning. Stop doing it." or telling a chapter at {insert frilly rush school here} that excessive rush decorations are ridiculous and need to be discontinued immediately. Those things would negatively affect rush numbers, I'm sure.

A culture change like this has to be a decision that ALL the chapters make together. Either that, or one of the most exclusive chapters has to decide to make the change and show that they still have the close sisterhood.

BadCat25 is right, the trustees of the university are the ones who need to change this. That way, the headquarters of the sororities can pretend they're aghast that their rights as independent organizations are being taken away (even though they will all be doing a Myposian Dance Of Joy) and avoid having alumnae or actives yelling at them.

The problem is, from what everyone has posted, the university LIKES that the Greek system is such a mess since that keeps it from getting stronger. This is where it comes down to $$$. Parents, do as AXORushAdvisor did, and vote with your checkbook. Too bad it will take a couple thousand of you to make a dent.

suzy88 01-20-2014 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dtjb (Post 2256550)
Again, all can vent as much as they want but I attended Indiana, participated in the process, and had a fabulous Greek experience. It's an amazing school qnd a great Greek system regardless of the process. I went thru rush not having any connections and not being a legacy and it worked out great for me. I'm tired of hearing all the negative. Sounds to me like unless "all get a bid" it's not going to be fair to the moms. There's nothing special about some thing that everyone can just get. If that's how Alabama does it then it must not be all that special to be in a house and I question how close a "house" of 200 women could be if they take these enormous pledge classes. Furthermore, if there's anyone out there that would think an IU cheerleader would not have a better chance of getting a bid to a house regardless of being present, is living in a dream world. Activities/ resume matter and that will gain big points for houses recruiting girls. I get parents hurt for their kids, but much of what I'm reading is the mentality of "everyone should get a trophy and everyone should get a prize and everyone should win" which is proving to be not very real-world. Lots of competition out there...not everyone is going to get in. That doesn't make the process unfair, it makes it competitive.

Thank you for informing most of the women on this forum that there sorority experience wasn't special because their college made a practice of finding a home for most young women who wanted to participate.

Griffins&Quills 01-20-2014 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzy88 (Post 2256554)
Thank you for informing most of the women on this forum that there sorority experience wasn't special because their college made a practice of finding a home for most young women who wanted to participate.


2nd!
And Dtjb, talk to the kids at Alabama. Pretty sure their rush is damn competitive, and they still have a system that functions.

33girl 01-20-2014 08:20 PM

As I've stated before, this begins with a northern vs southern thing. For the most part, northern schools will have 20 chapters of 100 rather than 10 chapters of 200. IU of course takes it to the extreme.

Titchou 01-20-2014 08:35 PM

I have no clue how this got slanted to house corporations being an issue. If there are 100 beds in the house and 100 members or 300 members, there are ways to insure the house is filled. That argument holds no water.

The problem is that Greek life is very popular these days. So the number of PNMs goes up. Other schools have learned how to accomodate that - note the number of new Greek villages and the explosion of houses at Alabama, etc. Indiana refuses to adapt. That's the bottom line. Their President needs to step in if PH won't do it on their own.

TAMUAlphaPhi 01-20-2014 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dtjb (Post 2256550)
Again, all can vent as much as they want but I attended Indiana, participated in the process, and had a fabulous Greek experience. It's an amazing school qnd a great Greek system regardless of the process. I went thru rush not having any connections and not being a legacy and it worked out great for me. I'm tired of hearing all the negative. Sounds to me like unless "all get a bid" it's not going to be fair to the moms. There's nothing special about some thing that everyone can just get. If that's how Alabama does it then it must not be all that special to be in a house and I question how close a "house" of 200 women could be if they take these enormous pledge classes. Furthermore, if there's anyone out there that would think an IU cheerleader would not have a better chance of getting a bid to a house regardless of being present, is living in a dream world. Activities/ resume matter and that will gain big points for houses recruiting girls. I get parents hurt for their kids, but much of what I'm reading is the mentality of "everyone should get a trophy and everyone should get a prize and everyone should win" which is proving to be not very real-world. Lots of competition out there...not everyone is going to get in. That doesn't make the process unfair, it makes it competitive.

I'm offended on so many levels -- particularly for all the sorority members/alumnae who endured those sorority experiences that are "nothing special."

I don't think I've seen anyone in this thread advocate for a system where every PNM gets what they want or even just finds a place. What I see is women who are struggling with a system that places a significantly lower percentage of PNMs than others.

After days of debate, I still haven't heard a compelling explanation of why a system that works on almost every other campus won't work at IU. Lack of off-campus housing options adds an interesting complication, but the students who don't participate in Greek life (either by choice, because they just aren't a good fit for Greek life or because they were "victims" of IU's low quotas) seem to make it work.

Maman 01-20-2014 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 33girl (Post 2256551)
BadCat25 is right, the trustees of the university are the ones who need to change this. That way, the headquarters of the sororities can pretend they're aghast that their rights as independent organizations are being taken away (even though they will all be doing a Myposian Dance Of Joy) and avoid having alumnae or actives yelling at them.

How can the admissions committee and the BOT not realize that this established 'recruitment process' diminishes their accepted applicant pool? It also impacts their Autumn Fund from Alumni.

Hoosierxgirl 01-20-2014 08:37 PM

Maybe this is the wrong time to bring this up but I've been thinking today about what adding 20-30 more women to my pledge class would have done to my experience. I'm sure it would've been mostly positive - more women to get to know, more diversity, etc. Then I started to think about all the logistics - risk management, planning events, etc. Even silly things like chapter meetings. Where would we put another 70-100 girls (if each pledge class was increased)? Would it be responsible to have our risk management chair and Exec board in charge of another 100 women? Some of the chapters at IU are already some of the largest chapters of their respective GLO - I just wonder if the current infrastructure of our chapters would be able to support a dramatic increase in membership. I guess it would be done over time but I think these are considerations that need to be made. I'd be lying if I didn't acknowledge that a lot of resistance to change at IU is because of the exclusivity factor of recruitment - if you happen to make it through the Games, you consider yourself a survivor and expect the same selection process of future pledge classes.

Like I said before, I know how heartbreaking this process is. It's not fair but I also don't know how much else can be done to expand the current size of chapters under a quota system.

cinder1965 01-20-2014 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titchou (Post 2256562)
I have no clue how this got slanted to house corporations being an issue. If there are 100 beds in the house and 100 members or 300 members, there are ways to insure the house is filled. That argument holds no water.

The problem is that Greek life is very popular these days. So the number of PNMs goes up. Other schools have learned how to accomodate that - note the number of new Greek villages and the explosion of houses at Alabama, etc. Indiana refuses to adapt. That's the bottom line. Their President needs to step in if PH won't do it on their own.


So agree, I stated earlier...we have live outs and have had no problem keeping our house filled. The housing corp board has to manage it and make sure all of the numbers add up, etc. but as I said before, it is NOT brain surgery.

TriDeltaSallie 01-20-2014 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dtjb (Post 2256550)
Again, all can vent as much as they want but I attended Indiana, participated in the process, and had a fabulous Greek experience. It's an amazing school qnd a great Greek system regardless of the process. I went thru rush not having any connections and not being a legacy and it worked out great for me. I'm tired of hearing all the negative. Sounds to me like unless "all get a bid" it's not going to be fair to the moms. There's nothing special about some thing that everyone can just get. If that's how Alabama does it then it must not be all that special to be in a house and I question how close a "house" of 200 women could be if they take these enormous pledge classes. Furthermore, if there's anyone out there that would think an IU cheerleader would not have a better chance of getting a bid to a house regardless of being present, is living in a dream world. Activities/ resume matter and that will gain big points for houses recruiting girls. I get parents hurt for their kids, but much of what I'm reading is the mentality of "everyone should get a trophy and everyone should get a prize and everyone should win" which is proving to be not very real-world. Lots of competition out there...not everyone is going to get in. That doesn't make the process unfair, it makes it competitive.

Well, that pretty much sums up what most of us have come to believe about the attitude of women in the IU Greek system.

Why any woman who wants to be Greek would ever consider IU is beyond me. There are SO MANY excellent schools with strong Greek systems... Why in the world would you subject yourself to this?

And that Rho Gamma better be reported. I cannot believe she would say something like that.

Actually, I can. This is Indiana, a school I have really lost respect for over the past few years. (No offense to the few women on here from IU who recognize the problems at their school, but wow. What a mess.)

DeltaBetaBaby 01-20-2014 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoosierxgirl (Post 2256565)
Some of the chapters at IU are already some of the largest chapters of their respective GLO

:confused:

I...can't think of a single chapter for which that is true.

Dtjb 01-20-2014 08:49 PM

It just makes no sense to me. Everyone wants every girl to get a bid? Where does that happen? Second, I'm defending the idea that something that is competitive is not easy and not always unfair. Does everyone get THE job? Does everyone get into pt school, or the graduate program they want? No-it's competitive, selective, and makes something more desire able and something special. If you want to read it as "I don't think your experience was special" then that's your choice. But it is real life. If all that matters is everyone gets a spot then girls have to go somewhere where they just sign up and get assigned a spot. If there are 2,000 girls and 2,000 spaces it still wouldn't happen bc moms are saying their daughters don't want the unhoused chapters bc they're not "good enough" and yet they want a place for everyone. What they are saying is they want every girl to get what they consider to be a "good house". Well, if they think it's a "good house", chances are so do lots of other girls and so it's competitive and harder to get in. If it wasn't would their daughters want to be in it so badly? If every freshman that decided they wanted to be an ABC, could easily just sign up and become one would it be coveted? I just don't get the mentality of "all girls should get in if they want". That's unrealistic and impossible anywhere for anything.

carnation 01-20-2014 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoosierxgirl (Post 2256565)
I'd be lying if I didn't acknowledge that a lot of resistance to change at IU is because of the exclusivity factor of recruitment - if you happen to make it through the Games, you consider yourself a survivor and expect the same selection process of future pledge classes.

:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(::mad:

Maman 01-20-2014 08:55 PM

Are all the Alabama housing costs subsidized by the university, fully supported by national, or do the current members bear the burden of the cost? Specifically questioning about the newly built houses.

Checking back through IU history via the internet and it seems that one of the larger 'housed' sororities didn't meet quota.

There seem to be plenty of questions about the IU process.

SWTXBelle 01-20-2014 09:01 PM

Looking in vain for "every girl should get a bid" quote from "everyone" . . .

TennisMom 01-20-2014 09:05 PM

IU BOT
 
Thanks to whomever posted the IU Board of Trustees email address. Here is an excerpt of an email I just sent them.

I am sharing my daughter’s experience with you for one reason. Despite how impressed I’ve been by the KSB and the genuine friendliness and helpfulness of every person I’ve ever spoken with at IU I will share the following message with EVERY prospective young woman I can - DO NOT ENROLL AT IU-Bloomington if you think you MIGHT want to be in a sorority. The process is brutal and a crap shoot. Had I known how limited the number of bids are relative to girls going through recruitment I never would have encouraged my daughter to attend IU. I was not in a sorority but through research I’ve learned that IU’s recruitment process results in far more heartbreak than other other school with comparable PNMs.

Is being in a sorority a right for every college girl? Of course not and you can have a wonderful college experience without being a sister (I’m proof of that!). However, what I do expect from a university is that it will implement processes and procedures that are designed to maximize the opportunities. Providing more sorority housing and changing current recruitment processes would be steps in the right direction. But, until I see evidence of this happening I will be a vocal “BEWARE” voice to any prospective female student. It may be too late for my daughter but I will do my best to alert others to the likely misery awaiting them at IU.


P.S. And while it's not in my excerpt...my email does mention that my daughter is a TWO-TIME casualty of IU recruitment. Even with high grades, strong campus involvement and friends in sororities the process did not end differently this year. I am incredibly proud of my daughter for her resiliency and strength. She understands this isn't the end of the world and other opportunities are available. It's a shame though since other schools seem to have better processes.

HQWest 01-20-2014 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoosierxgirl (Post 2256565)
Maybe this is the wrong time to bring this up but I've been thinking today about what adding 20-30 more women to my pledge class would have done to my experience. I'm sure it would've been mostly positive - more women to get to know, more diversity, etc. Then I started to think about all the logistics - risk management, planning events, etc. Even silly things like chapter meetings. Where would we put another 70-100 girls (if each pledge class was increased)? Would it be responsible to have our risk management chair and Exec board in charge of another 100 women? Some of the chapters at IU are already some of the largest chapters of their respective GLO - I just wonder if the current infrastructure of our chapters would be able to support a dramatic increase in membership. I guess it would be done over time but I think these are considerations that need to be made. I'd be lying if I didn't acknowledge that a lot of resistance to change at IU is because of the exclusivity factor of recruitment - if you happen to make it through the Games, you consider yourself a survivor and expect the same selection process of future pledge classes.

Like I said before, I know how heartbreaking this process is. It's not fair but I also don't know how much else can be done to expand the current size of chapters under a quota system.

I have to say I am starting to get a little peeved at people saying the sisterhood isn't as good because of bigger pledge classes. So yeah - some of our families are bigger, doesn't mean you love your sisters less or have less love to go around. :confused:

Come on down any time and we can show you how logistics works. You don't have one person in charge of putting together events - you have a committee. Then you aren't dependent on just one person who could get sick the day before recruitment.

You don't have formal at a tiny hotel or in the student union, you have it at a event center, the Fox Theater, or the country club like a benefit or a fundraiser. We don't drive places, we take a bus.

We get it. You like exclusivity, and you like looking down your noses at people. (BTW - Texas A&M, U. Texas, The Ohio State, Penn State, Florida - are all bigger than IUB AND have flourishing Greek life AND they rank higher too.)

Titchou 01-20-2014 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maman (Post 2256572)
Are all the Alabama housing costs subsidized by the university, fully supported by national, or do the current members bear the burden of the cost? Specifically questioning about the newly built houses.

Checking back through IU history via the internet and it seems that one of the larger 'housed' sororities didn't meet quota.

There seem to be plenty of questions about the IU process.

All Greek housing at Alabama is paid for by the group that owns it - room rent, parlor fees/living out fees, meals, etc. The individual group's budget has to pay the freight...including the mortgage. At schools where the U owns the housing, they still have to pay rent to the U - for instance, Willamette, NCSU, Auburn, etc, etc, etc. NO ONE gives us any housing!

Hoosierxgirl 01-20-2014 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeltaBetaBaby (Post 2256569)
:confused:

I...can't think of a single chapter for which that is true.

I can't claim this as a fact but it's something I heard when I went through recruitment (as in chapters claimed this fact). If they are not the LARGEST, they are certainly on the larger side. What I'm saying is that the physical houses themselves may not be conducive to holding a chapter meeting or sisterhood event for 200 women. (This is purely anecdotal on my end...we barely fit our current chapter in the dining room for chapter or formal dinners). I also think of all the things that we did that would not be doable with 100 additional women - the logistics, the time, the stress - all of it takes time away from studying, other activities, etc. Maybe it's doable - I don't know. I just think it's a point of consideration.

Quote:

Originally Posted by carnation (Post 2256571)
:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(::mad:

I'm not saying this is my view but it is certainly a popular view at IU.

Hoosierxgirl 01-20-2014 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HQWest (Post 2256577)
I have to say I am starting to get a little peeved at people saying the sisterhood isn't as good because of bigger pledge classes. So yeah - some of our families are bigger, doesn't mean you love your sisters less or have less love to go around. :confused:

Come on down any time and we can show you how logistics works. You don't have one person in charge of putting together events - you have a committee. Then you aren't dependent on just one person who could get sick the day before recruitment.

You don't have formal at a tiny hotel or in the student union, you have it at a event center, the Fox Theater, or the country club like a benefit or a fundraiser. We don't drive places, we take a bus.

We get it. You like exclusivity, and you like looking down your noses at people. (BTW - Texas A&M, U. Texas, The Ohio State, Penn State, Florida - are all bigger than IUB AND have flourishing Greek life AND they rank higher too.)

Whoa whoa whoa...I NEVER said anything about how good or bad a sisterhood would be. Big or small. In fact, I said the experience would be mostly positive.

I am saying that it would be a large adjustment and that the logistics would be harder to overcome for a system that isn't used to such large chapters (I tend to think 150 women is pretty large) I think we already do many of things you just described (event centers, buses, committees, etc.) as well.

I'm not saying it can't be done or it shouldn't be done. I'm just pointing out one little reason why suddenly switching to a quota system would be hard.

And again, I'm not turning my nose up at anyone. I'm pointing out a popular opinion that has been raised in my time at IU. I do not condone that opinion nor do I claim to hold it.

AZTheta 01-20-2014 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAMUAlphaPhi (Post 2256563)
I'm offended on so many levels -- particularly for all the sorority members/alumnae who endured those sorority experiences that are "nothing special."

I don't think I've seen anyone in this thread advocate for a system where every PNM gets what they want or even just finds a place. What I see is women who are struggling with a system that places a significantly lower percentage of PNMs than others.

After days of debate, I still haven't heard a compelling explanation of why a system that works on almost every other campus won't work at IU. Lack of off-campus housing options adds an interesting complication, but the students who don't participate in Greek life (either by choice, because they just aren't a good fit for Greek life or because they were "victims" of IU's low quotas) seem to make it work.

Because there is no compelling explanation. No reason. No evidence. No data.

The posts from Hoosierxgirl and Dtjb confirm what we know to be true. You guys at Indiana want it that way because you are elitist. "We survived, we are the chosen, we are going to perpetuate this system."

As for large - I don't think any of the Indiana chapters are 200+, and total at Arizona is 220 with many chapters at 250+. We've adjusted quite well. There is nothing special about having chapter meetings at a facility. Trust me. It works very well in an on-campus room with all kinds of electronics/technology at the actives' fingertips. And we've learned how to develop our sisterhood, thank you. You could ask us for tips on how to make it work. When we started growing by leaps and bounds, we reached out - to each other on campus as well as to other chapters across the country (think Arkansas, Ole Miss) who are large and who make it work for them.

I am appalled. Shame on you, Indiana actives. Please note I'm not singling out the two who've posted here.

Further, it is the Chapter's responsibility to see that the facility is filled. NOT the House Corporation Board's responsibility! The Chapter needs to figure out how they are going to fill the facility and from the sound of it, that won't be a problem.

Rhomom 01-20-2014 09:24 PM

"And the Rho Gamma who told her group that they should rank the unhoused chapters last because they have to take everyone should be ashamed of herself and be reported. NOW. As a Rho Gamma you should be impartial, you should not make blanket statements about how to rank, and you should not perpetuate falsehoods that “those chapters have to invite everyone back.” It’s just ridiculous, and NOT TRUE."

Said no Rho gamma ever.

Sorry for the length of this-and I have never posted before, but I have a different perspective--as an Indiana grad who went through the system 25 years ago and did not receive a bid, as the mother of twins who went through recruitment two years ago--one received a bid and one went bidless, and as a mother of a current rhogam, (who has been in tears continually for the past week), I am here to tell you that regardless of who you are, what your current status is (PNM, active, rhogam, mom), this process is brutal for everyone.

To moms whose hearts are breaking because this has been so difficult; I know how frustrated and angry you are--I lived it. But also know that there is not one current active who finds this anything but agonizing. They, like the PNM's have not eaten, have not slept and are absolutely disgusted by the process.

To the poster that said that taking more members makes it less special? That chapters should be exclusive? You are dead wrong--most of these ladies would do anything to be able to make this system more inclusive. Comments such as this serve to only perpetuate the perception of "mean girls". There may indeed be some of those as well, but they do not represent the majority of women in houses.

Regarding the unhoused chapters; I have never heard one negative comment from my daughter or any of her sisters, friends, or acquaintances. PNM's may be hearing that these houses are "less than" from each other, but they are NOT hearing it from current actives. In fact the Greek system has welcomed and supported the expansion--it can only strengthen the system.

And as far as a rhogam encouraging PNMs to rank unhoused chapters higher because they "take everyone"? I would carefully question the PNM who thinks she may have heard that comment. Based on what my daughter has said, and the absolute commitment of these young women to provide support and counsel to PNM's, it is much more likely that this was a comment generated from assumptions because a rhogam encouraged her group to not rank by perceived reputation.

Lastly, IU admissions has no control over the current system, nor does the administration, the board of trustees or the dean of students. Short of removing sororities from campus, their hands are tied. I know this because I am also an IU "employee". Believe me, we are bracing for unhappy students and parents, and are very, very tired of the way things are done. The only people that can change this is panhel, individual nationals and NPC.

UofISigKap 01-20-2014 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dtjb (Post 2256550)
...Sounds to me like unless "all get a bid" it's not going to be fair to the moms. There's nothing special about some thing that everyone can just get. If that's how Alabama does it then it must not be all that special to be in a house...

I respect your right to have an opinion, but I think you're confusing trophies for all vs. matching more women who had friends/connections/people pulling for them but missed the house-selected number cut bythismuch. Someone else posted earlier on that first cut is the same as last cut. The only difference is your house may have actually really wanted the woman first cut. I'm not saying take everyone, because I recognize that not every woman would feel comfortable in every house.

"It must not be all that special to be in a house in Alabama." Nooo, not everyone gets a bid in Alabama either, but they recognize that even their most coveted houses (by whatever standard you want to use) can, and do, take more women they want by using the same quota that the other chapters do. Is the system at Alabama still exclusive? Yes; we wouldn't have as many threads about southern recruitments, teas, letters of rec., etc... if just anyone could strut into their system.

Griffins&Quills 01-20-2014 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HQWest (Post 2256577)
I have to say I am starting to get a little peeved at people saying the sisterhood isn't as good because of bigger pledge classes. So yeah - some of our families are bigger, doesn't mean you love your sisters less or have less love to go around. :confused:

Come on down any time and we can show you how logistics works. You don't have one person in charge of putting together events - you have a committee. Then you aren't dependent on just one person who could get sick the day before recruitment.

You don't have formal at a tiny hotel or in the student union, you have it at a event center, the Fox Theater, or the country club like a benefit or a fundraiser. We don't drive places, we take a bus.

We get it. You like exclusivity, and you like looking down your noses at people. (BTW - Texas A&M, U. Texas, The Ohio State, Penn State, Florida - are all bigger than IUB AND have flourishing Greek life AND they rank higher too.)

This. All of this! I've just been following this thread, but I agree completely. My campus has 7 groups and our total is at 164 and we have more girls rushing each year and are taking larger pledge classes, further increasing total. We operate normally. People can choose to live in the house, or not. There is no required time to live in. Members get charged parlor fees. We meet for chapter in a lecture hall every week. We have events. We have formal at aforementioned large venues, and we take buses. Our Chapter Life handles the Risk Management issues. It's not Alabama, but it's competitive in it's own way. And further, my sorority, our sororities, are plenty close. I know the name and details of every single one of my sisters. More sisters doesn't equal less closeness. And a forced live-in policy also doesn't equal closeness. Everyone else manages to make it work. While I respect that I haven't experienced IU, the posters making blanket statements about well, pretty much every other school, also haven't experienced our cultures. Don't think your way is the only way. It's not.

cinder1965 01-20-2014 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AZTheta (Post 2256583)
Because there is no compelling explanation. No reason. No evidence. No data.

The posts from Hoosierxgirl and Dtjb confirm what we know to be true. You guys at Indiana want it that way because you are elitist. "We survived, we are the chosen, we are going to perpetuate this system."

As for large - I don't think any of the Indiana chapters are 200+, and total at Arizona is 220 with many chapters at 250+. We've adjusted quite well. There is nothing special about having chapter meetings at a facility. Trust me. It works very well in an on-campus room with all kinds of electronics/technology at the actives' fingertips. And we've learned how to develop our sisterhood, thank you. You could ask us for tips on how to make it work. When we started growing by leaps and bounds, we reached out - to each other on campus as well as to other chapters across the country (think Arkansas, Ole Miss) who are large and who make it work for them.

I am appalled. Shame on you, Indiana actives. Please note I'm not singling out the two who've posted here.

Further, it is the Chapter's responsibility to see that the facility is filled. NOT the House Corporation Board's responsibility! The Chapter needs to figure out how they are going to fill the facility and from the sound of it, that won't be a problem.

This.

HQWest 01-20-2014 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoosierxgirl (Post 2256582)
Whoa whoa whoa...I NEVER said anything about how good or bad a sisterhood would be. Big or small. In fact, I said the experience would be mostly positive.

I am saying that it would be a large adjustment and that the logistics would be harder to overcome for a system that isn't used to such large chapters (I tend to think 150 women is pretty large) I think we already do many of things you just described (event centers, buses, committees, etc.) as well.

I'm not saying it can't be done or it shouldn't be done. I'm just pointing out one little reason why suddenly switching to a quota system would be hard.

And again, I'm not turning my nose up at anyone. I'm pointing out a popular opinion that has been raised in my time at IU. I do not condone that opinion nor do I claim to hold it.

Mostly positive is by definition not positive.
And just because it is different then your experience does not mean it could not be as good or better.

pinksequins 01-20-2014 09:35 PM

Hoosierxgirl, I am sorry you have such a parochial view of the world that you haven't a clue how to manage alternate logistics or to even reach out to others who do. It's an amazingly useful life skill.

Tellingly and sadly, the Hoosier rationalizations are just that -- rationalizations -- not compelling reasons. It's very small thinking.

pinksequins 01-20-2014 09:37 PM

Rhomom -- you note that the actives are disgusted with the process. The good news is that they are the ones with the power to change it.

stbemtpynest 01-20-2014 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinksequins (Post 2256591)
Rhomom -- you note that the actives are disgusted with the process. The good news is that they are the ones with the power to change it.

^^^ This! I don't understand - if they are disgusted with the process then why is it still the process?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.