KSigkid |
02-22-2006 05:59 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by kkg83
it's not just them that believe in a tiered system. LIFE is all about tiers, haven't you realized that by now? my top tier sorority aside, it is my top tier undergrad and the fact that i am attending a top tier graduate school next year and will certainly attend a top tier law school in the future that is going to ensure my success. there is no possible way that you can say that someone who goes to a bottom tier school - or even a school at the bottom of the first tier - can be anywhere NEAR as professionally successful as someone attending an ivy. someone from a crappy school that succeeds (and yes, that's what bottom tier schools are to those of us who bust our asses to work hard and get good grades and go to good schools) is the exception, NOT the rule.
-edited for a typo
|
The problem you get into is, what makes up the tiers? Are you talking specific rankings, like U.S. News and World Report, etc.? Once you get beyond schools like the Ivy's, U. of Chicago, MIT, Williams, Swarthmore, and a few others, how do you make distinctions between schools? What about things like Northwestern's and Syracuse's journalism programs, or BU's public relations program, or the film programs out in California? how about schools with reputations in other professions? You have to at least admit that there is quite a bit of gray in this, right? You can go right on down the line, to grad and law schools with very good local reputations (i.e. there are top law firms in Boston that hire from Suffolk).
I'm not going to defend my own personal intelligence/credentials on a public board, as I'm pretty secure in my own merits, but if you have problems with my "low tier" opinion, feel free to pm me.
|