GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Entertainment (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=205)
-   -   Fahrenheit 9/11 (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=52761)

Kevin 06-30-2004 02:45 PM

What kind of camera did Moore use? In Bowling for Columbine, it looked like one of those Canon cameras. I was kind of surprised because those aren't really "pro" cameras (more "pro-sumer"). Sure, it's a tri-chip, but I don't think you can do as much with the lense, etc. Anyone know?

KSig RC 06-30-2004 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ktsnake
What kind of camera did Moore use? In Bowling for Columbine, it looked like one of those Canon cameras. I was kind of surprised because those aren't really "pro" cameras (more "pro-sumer"). Sure, it's a tri-chip, but I don't think you can do as much with the lense, etc. Anyone know?


dickhead imperialist republican jerkoff. go steal more oil.

-RC
--"The People is stupid." -A. Hamilton

Kevin 06-30-2004 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KSig RC
dickhead imperialist republican jerkoff. go steal more oil.

-RC
--"The People is stupid." -A. Hamilton

I wouldn't have to steal oil if those freakin' commie pinko Maoist nutjob Dems would open up ANWAR.

thermobryan 07-01-2004 04:24 PM

This is an amazing movie, i saw it yesterday. Its great how it shows the Bush/Bin laden ties....

Kevin 07-01-2004 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by thermobryan
This is an amazing movie, i saw it yesterday. Its great how it shows the Bush/Bin laden ties....
Are you serious?

PhiPsiRuss 07-01-2004 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ktsnake
those freakin' commie pinko Maoist nutjob Dems
They're not Maoist.

Rudey 07-01-2004 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PhiPsiRuss
They're not Maoist.
Bolshevik I believe.

-Rudey

Kevin 07-01-2004 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
Bolshevik I believe.

-Rudey

My mistake

LeslieAGD 07-08-2004 06:28 PM

Entertainment Weekly
 
Entertainment Weekly Magazine has a really good, five page interview with Michael Moore in its new July issue.

thermobryan 07-08-2004 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ktsnake
Are you serious?
yes sir. Watch the movie, you'll see the ties...and why we attacked Iraq and not BinLaden...

James 07-08-2004 08:42 PM

Thatsa good question. A lot of that stuff is cleaned up in post production though.

But yeah, it seems like digital lense options haven't quite caught up. OR at least thats thats what the traditional Directors of photography keep saying anyway.

Quote:

Originally posted by ktsnake
What kind of camera did Moore use? In Bowling for Columbine, it looked like one of those Canon cameras. I was kind of surprised because those aren't really "pro" cameras (more "pro-sumer"). Sure, it's a tri-chip, but I don't think you can do as much with the lense, etc. Anyone know?

KSig RC 07-08-2004 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by thermobryan
yes sir. Watch the movie, you'll see the ties...and why we attacked Iraq and not BinLaden...

sorry bro . . .

Moore's a dick. This site goes through the major and minor issues Moore either fabricates, omits, or shades to his advantage. And it's not republican shills, either . . .

Kevin 07-09-2004 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by thermobryan
yes sir. Watch the movie, you'll see the ties...and why we attacked Iraq and not BinLaden...
Holy crap! Our government led us astray! I should vote for someone who will be steady and honest and dependable. Sounds like John Kerry needs a new job.















(Please note in the above few lines the heavy use of sarcasm).

Kevin 07-09-2004 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by James
Thatsa good question. A lot of that stuff is cleaned up in post production though.

But yeah, it seems like digital lense options haven't quite caught up. OR at least thats thats what the traditional Directors of photography keep saying anyway.

I dunno. There is only so much that you can do in post production -- especially where color and camera work are concerned. Although AVID (a nice pro-sumer editing program) has some reallly sweet color correcing features, It doesn't seem to make up for a cheap camera. From what I've seen of his stuff, the camera work is OKAY. A few notches above the Blair Witch stuff because perhaps they used a tripod. If it was shoulder-shot, I think whoever did it did a pretty good job.

But from what I've seen of Moore, he's kind of partial to those little canon pro-sumer type cameras. The news guys say that they're just as good as the big thing, but you don't get the same kind of attention and respect from interviewees (I can attest to that). It's also nice to have enough battery juice to operate a halogen light if needs be.

I've shot on both, and I'm still a lean towards the digital cams.

thermobryan 07-09-2004 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KSig RC
sorry bro . . .

Moore's a dick. This site goes through the major and minor issues Moore either fabricates, omits, or shades to his advantage. And it's not republican shills, either . . .

I'm so glad that Republican Website showed the truth about the movie...thanks man...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.