GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Dating & Relationships (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=206)
-   -   Physical appearances you refuse to date. (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=80301)

nate2512 03-17-2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791469)
I don't understand what is dishonest or unrealistic about the belief that a person should be judged on their character and merit and not on their attire. I think that is quite realistic.
What is unrealistic is believing that you wont be judged based on what you wear. You will. You'll also probably be judged based on your skin color, gender, hair style etc. at some point. It isnt right, but it happens.

We "kids" do wonder why people react to us the way they do because most of you should have been through the same thing. When you were a kid your parents thought the way you dressed was unappealing, but you liked it. Same thing with kids these days. Nothing new under the sun. The weird thing about it is that you cant teach an old dog new tricks, but it seems that some old dogs cant remember the tricks they were taught when they were young. This is why while new dogs are wondering why they're back at the pound old dogs are wondering why they never left.





My dislikes:
1. Ugly hands.
2. Long hair
3. Height issues
4. Ugly lips
5. Pigeon toed guys

What the fuck?

VirtuousAce 03-17-2009 06:50 PM

I don't like greasy s-curl dudes

LttleMsPrEp 03-17-2009 06:57 PM

I can't date someone freakishly tall or really short 5'9 - 6'2 is my preferred range. Bad teeth, bad breath, greasy hair, and obesity are also major deal breakers for me.

PrettyBoy 03-17-2009 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791469)
What is unrealistic is believing that you wont be judged based on what you wear. You will.

I agree.

RU OX Alum 03-17-2009 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791469)
I don't understand what is dishonest or unrealistic about the belief that a person should be judged on their character and merit and not on their attire. I think that is quite realistic.
What is unrealistic is believing that you wont be judged based on what you wear. You will. You'll also probably be judged based on your skin color, gender, hair style etc. at some point. It isnt right, but it happens.

We "kids" do wonder why people react to us the way they do because most of you should have been through the same thing. When you were a kid your parents thought the way you dressed was unappealing, but you liked it. Same thing with kids these days. Nothing new under the sun. The weird thing about it is that you cant teach an old dog new tricks, but it seems that some old dogs cant remember the tricks they were taught when they were young. This is why while new dogs are wondering why they're back at the pound old dogs are wondering why they never left.





My dislikes:
1. Ugly hands.
2. Long hair
3. Height issues
4. Ugly lips
5. Pigeon toed guys


dude, good responce

DrPhil 03-17-2009 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791469)
What is unrealistic is believing that you wont be judged based on what you wear.

That's our point.

We don't live in la-la-land so someone talking about what "should" is unrealistic and dishonest, in most settings. We all know about "should."

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791469)
When you were a kid your parents thought the way you dressed was unappealing, but you liked it.

Not true. My parents did not have an issue with the way my siblings and I dressed. We wore the popular 80s and 90s hip hop trends. However, the hookers and thugs themes never resonated with us so we didn't partake in them.

We aren't simply typing about styles of dress and whether people find them pleasing to the eye. It has already been established that we aren't just typing about that. We're typing about the meaning behind looking like a hoodlum and those who confuse that look with being "hip hop." Or whatever excuse otherwise good kids are using these days.

I.A.S.K. 03-17-2009 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nate2512 (Post 1791517)
What the fuck?

LOL. If he's shorter than me its an issue. Im 5'3. If he's extremely tall (like 7'3) its an issue. I cant be literally at my mans side. With my head right next to his hip. Talk about some weird wedding pics.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1791595)
That's our point.

We don't live in la-la-land so someone talking about what "should" is unrealistic and dishonest, in most settings. We all know about "should."

It may be a difference in opinion on the matter, but should is not unrealistic and dishonest. At one point slaves "should" have been free. At one point black people "should" have been given equal rights. The things that should be typically arent unrealistic and dishonest. They are difficult to get people to go along with because they require a change of the status quo. Its much easier to think of all boys in baggy pants as thugs regardless of their character because you've been doing it for years (and you're conditioned to do so). Its much more difficult to not be judgmental and lump people into groups. Imagine if you had to suddenly assess each person on their character and merit regardless of what they're wearing. God forbid! The horror!
Not true. My parents did not have an issue with the way my siblings and I dressed. We wore the popular 80s and 90s hip hop trends. However, the hookers and thugs themes never resonated with us so we didn't partake in them. <---- Did the thug style resonate with a lot of others? Was it very common? Did a lot of others wear it and buy into it? If they did then you and your siblings were not the norm/average. Thus you arent the you I am refering to. I probably should have been specific to say that when I said you I meant the people who followed the popular trends during their youth that were unpopular to their parents/adults.

We aren't simply typing about styles of dress and whether people find them pleasing to the eye. It has already been established that we aren't just typing about that. We're typing about the meaning behind looking like a hoodlum and those who confuse that look with being "hip hop." Or whatever excuse otherwise good kids are using these days.

I am well aware that style of dress particularly the "thug/hip-hop" style leads some people to believe that the person wearing it fits a certian stereotype. The issue is that some people (typically young people) believe that this should not be the case. What I wear does not define who I am. I make the clothes, the clothes do not make me. As such, people should be able to assess me for who I am and not for what I wear.
Will they? Probably not. Should they? Yes.


Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1790850)
I hate short women.

Heh!


...not really...


But...I have preferences.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1791501)
Rats...that rules me out...HAHAHHA

Your post above ruled you out. I stand at 5'3 thus you were ruled out for not having enough sense to know that short women are the best. Its short men you have to watch out for. lol.

DaemonSeid 03-17-2009 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791611)





Your post above ruled you out. I stand at 5'3 thus you were ruled out for not having enough sense to know that short women are the best. Its short men you have to watch out for. lol.


I guess I shouldn't short change you

agzg 03-17-2009 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1791613)
I guess I shouldn't short change you

Har-de-har-har.

I.A.S.K. 03-17-2009 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1791613)
I guess I shouldn't short change you

This wasn't funny...
Quote:

Originally Posted by agzg (Post 1791614)
Har-de-har-har.

...Until this. Lol.

And DS you're the one who'd be short changed. lol.

DaemonSeid 03-17-2009 10:09 PM

HEhehehe....!!

christiangirl 03-17-2009 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791611)
LOL. If he's shorter than me its an issue. Im 5'3. If he's extremely tall (like 7'3) its an issue. I cant be literally at my mans side. With my head right next to his hip. Talk about some weird wedding pics.

Dude, are we the same person? I'm 5'3" and just let a guy down for being too tall. I'm sorry, but 6 foot 9 is just not the business. My doorway's smaller than that! :eek:

DaemonSeid 03-17-2009 11:27 PM

you all must be afraid to climb up and enjoy the air...what, are you afraid of nosebleeds?

nate2512 03-17-2009 11:27 PM

Alright, I'm like 6'4" and apparently to some thats freakishly tall. I mean I suppose I can understand things out of peoples control being deal breakers. I don't do big lips, it doesn't happen.

christiangirl 03-17-2009 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1791657)
you all must be afraid to climb up and enjoy the air...what, are you afraid of nosebleeds?

I like climbing trees, not men (though I've seen a few who were well worth the climb;)).

DaemonSeid 03-17-2009 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nate2512 (Post 1791658)
Alright, I'm like 6'4" and apparently to some thats freakishly tall. I mean I suppose I can understand things out of peoples control being deal breakers. I don't do big lips, it doesn't happen.

Nothing wrong with big lips...

I.A.S.K. 03-18-2009 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christiangirl (Post 1791666)
I like climbing but it must be well worth the climb;).


Fixed that. lol. I aint scurred! 6'4" isnt that bad. Anything over 6'6" is just too much. I have a friend who is 6'1" tall and I will gladly refer any guy 6'6 and taller to her because I cant and I wont.

DrPhil 03-18-2009 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791611)
It may be a difference in opinion on the matter

Yes.


Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791611)
<---- Did the thug style resonate with a lot of others? Was it very common



With the thugs. When Naughty by Nature made prison jumpers cool, they didn't become a big trend for most of the teens. That trend was mostly popular in the 'hood and in videos. Not at school. I wasn't in the 'hood. There were some baggy trends like Kriss Kross that the kids followed. Adults hated that. But they didn't hate it because it was hoodlumish, aside from the pants hanging really low factor, it just looked dumb and unnecessarily rebellious. LOL.

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791611)
Will they? Probably not.

Exactly.

And just as the way you dress doesn't make you, it doesn't make "blackness." This discussion began because he tried to speak on how "black people dress." We wouldn't have cared if he was just talking about himself or some folks.

I.A.S.K. 03-18-2009 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1791683)
Yes.


Okay, then.

it just looked dumb and unnecessarily rebellious. LOL.
Yeah.


And just as the way you dress doesn't make you, it doesn't make "blackness." This discussion began because he tried to speak on how "black people dress." We wouldn't have cared if he was just talking about himself or some folks.

I think it has become painfully obvious by now that this DeltaDevil guy is not the brightest highlighter in the pack. Thus for him to speak about blackness or how black people dress would not bring forth anything worthy of consideration. We all know that there is no one person who could define blackness so there's no reason to even engage in the ignorance that is this DeltaDevil boy. I didnt address his comment because as far as I was concerned he was talking about himself and his excruciatingly small sphere of existance and frame of reference. Since he's been told more than once to refrain from making comments of that nature again nothing more needed to be said about it. My issue was with the thought/opinion that the idea that people should be judged based on who they are and not what they wear was somehow dishonest or unrealistic. I did not agree with it and said so.

DaemonSeid 03-18-2009 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791777)
I think it has become painfully obvious by now that this DeltaDevil guy is not the brightest highlighter in the pack. Thus for him to speak about blackness or how black people dress would not bring forth anything worthy of consideration. We all know that there is no one person who could define blackness so there's no reason to even engage in the ignorance that is this DeltaDevil boy. I didnt address his comment because as far as I was concerned he was talking about himself and his excruciatingly small sphere of existance and frame of reference. Since he's been told more than once to refrain from making comments of that nature again nothing more needed to be said about it. My issue was with the thought/opinion that the idea that people should be judged based on who they are and not what they wear was somehow dishonest or unrealistic. I did not agree with it and said so.

Soooo.....uuuuuhhhh...if he dressed in a suit, it wouldn't help him any huh?

I.A.S.K. 03-18-2009 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1791789)
Soooo.....uuuuuhhhh...if he dressed in a suit, it wouldn't help him any huh?

Not at all. I happen to judge people based on their character. His appears to be seriously lacking some key components. He is illequiped to deal with me.

DrPhil 03-18-2009 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791777)
I did not agree with it and said so.

LOL

gooniegoogoo to you, too!

christiangirl 03-18-2009 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791681)
Fixed that.

Lol, quit puttin' words in my mouth!!!

deltadevil 03-18-2009 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791858)
Not at all. I happen to judge people based on their character. His appears to be seriously lacking some key components. He is illequiped to deal with me.

Hmmm whatever you say partner

I.A.S.K. 03-18-2009 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christiangirl (Post 1791937)
Lol, quit puttin' words in my mouth!!!

I was just reading between the lines. lol.


ETA: Dr.Phil..... lol.

WCsweet<3 03-19-2009 01:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaemonSeid (Post 1791657)
you all must be afraid to climb up and enjoy the air...what, are you afraid of nosebleeds?

No, lightning.

nikki1920 03-19-2009 04:48 PM

Let's get back to the lists!!

Add to mine:
no sense of humor
unable to debate
unable to support himself on his own
doesn't like kids

libramunoz 03-19-2009 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1791469)
I don't understand what is dishonest or unrealistic about the belief that a person should be judged on their character and merit and not on their attire. I think that is quite realistic.
What is unrealistic is believing that you wont be judged based on what you wear. You will. You'll also probably be judged based on your skin color, gender, hair style etc. at some point. It isnt right, but it happens.

We "kids" do wonder why people react to us the way they do because most of you should have been through the same thing. When you were a kid your parents thought the way you dressed was unappealing, but you liked it. Same thing with kids these days. Nothing new under the sun. The weird thing about it is that you cant teach an old dog new tricks, but it seems that some old dogs cant remember the tricks they were taught when they were young. This is why while new dogs are wondering why they're back at the pound old dogs are wondering why they never left.

The issue at hand was this young man that apparently lacked the sense to be both quiet and to use what sense a person should have.

However, IASK, people are judged by the first impressions that they give. It's just a matter of fact. People judge you when you first walk in a door whether it is a conscious or unconsious judgement, it just happens. Most people just either learn to put them aside and deal with the matter at hand or they allow their issues to transfer onto others in a covert or uncoverted manner. It just happens.

As far as the dressing style, when I was growing up, since I went to school in the country for the last 5 years of going to school, the kids dressed in a "country" manner. We went by the school dress codes. We dressed like kids in the late 80s and early 90s. As far as me, I dressed according to what I sewed and my parent was never "upset" or had any "issue" with the way that I dressed. Some would call it conserative and some wouldn't. However, being a big girl, I knew what looked good on me and what didn't, I knew what to sew for myself and what not to sew.

However, the issue is about making that first impression a decent one and not one that would have people wondering "WTF" was going on in their head that morning. And the typical impression of someone wearing a "thuggish" look is that they are a "thug," regardless of if they a brainaic or not.

christiangirl 03-19-2009 08:52 PM

I can't do an Oscar Proud head. The square-ish shaped head with dinner plate ears. Can't do it.

I also don't do impatience. In his attitude or body language. If you're always huffing or slouching like a little kid not getting his way, then you're out.

nikki1920 03-20-2009 03:18 PM

She said oscar proud!!! I am TOO THROUGH WITH YOU!!! lol

Then I'd have to counter with: I don't want anyone who is as delusional as Dijonay is regarding Sticky!! DIJONAY!!!! lol

christiangirl 03-21-2009 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikki1920 (Post 1792700)
She said oscar proud!!! I am TOO THROUGH WITH YOU!!! lol

Then I'd have to counter with: I don't want anyone who is as delusional as Dijonay is regarding Sticky!! DIJONAY!!!! lol

STICK-AAAAAAY! :D

I have always said my ex had "a head like Oscar Proud and teeth like Wolverine." :eek: I tried so hard to prove that looks didn't matter to me, but they do. Physical attraction has to be there if it's gonna work for me. If that makes me shallow, then fine. At least I'm not "Mrs. Proud."

deltadevil 03-21-2009 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinki kopi boi (Post 1792856)
One of the things I can't stand is a chick who doesn't have a good butt! She needs to have a nice amount of padding for plenty of spankings! If there is nothing to spank, I ain't dating her!

Wow:eek:

LΩVE 03-28-2009 11:48 AM

-Shorter than me (I'm 5'4", so haven't run into this issue yet) or too tall for me. (Most guys I've dated have been around 6 feet, and they have to stoop to kiss me, so for someone my size it's hard to date someone over 6'1" or 6'2".)
-Obviously makes NO attempt to be healthy. I don't have a supermodel body or washboard abs, but you can tell I work out regularly. I expect the same from a potential boyfriend. They don't need extremely defined muscles or even any very visible ones, they just need to be toned enough to look like they are in fact active.
-Bad hygiene.
-Any guy that is wearing make up or hair gel.
-Skinnier than me.
-Clothing that obviously hasn't been washed.
-Clothing that is thug, and overly label-obsessed wardrobes of any kind. I am also biased against extremely preppy dressers, but will consider it if they are able to branch out at times. I prefer guys that know when they need to look sharp but aren't obsessing over their clothing otherwise.
-Extremely overweight. Harsh, but there has to be physical attraction, let's face it.
-Obviously spray tans.

Little32 03-28-2009 01:47 PM

Bad teeth
Extremely overweight
Dirty nails
Unkempt hair (whatever he is rocking, it needs to be neat.)
Disgusting feet can be a deal breaker.

:thinking:

Hoodini 03-28-2009 08:50 PM

I like how some women think they have choices and can be so selective...until they slowly reach menopause...then desperation sets in...

LΩVE 03-30-2009 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoodini (Post 1795016)
I like how some women think they have choices and can be so selective...until they slowly reach menopause...then desperation sets in...

I've got a good 25 years to go, but regardless, I'm the kind of person that doesn't need a man (or anyone else) to be happy, and I'm damn glad.:D


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.