GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Greek Life (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Tri-Sigma Sorority (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=85655)

33girl 03-23-2007 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NutBrnHair (Post 1417715)
There is no "rule" and no group is going to be in "trouble" from NPC for any reference to a brother fraternity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTW (Post 1382050)
None of the sororities in the NPC have official relationships with fraternities. Doing so would jeopardize our single-sex status.

___

Kevin 03-23-2007 05:52 PM

Official...

Are you guys really that dense?

Unregistered- 03-23-2007 05:56 PM

Yeah, this thread OFFICIALLY got lame.

TSteven 03-23-2007 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTW (Post 1416231)
NO NPC SORORITY HAS AN OFFICIAL "BROTHER/SISTER" RELATIONSHIP WITH A FRATERNITY ON AN INTER/NATIONAL LEVEL. Sororities may have relationships on a campus by campus level, but no NPCs have an official relationship with a fraternity. Having one may jeopardize the single-sex status (according to what I've read).

The only official relationship I know of is Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc. and Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity, Inc. Members of the NPHC, they share a constitutional bond.

Maybe I'm missing something (wouldn't be the first time and I'm sure it won't be the last), but as far as I can tell, the constitutional bond between Zeta Phi Beta and Phi Beta Sigma has not jeopardized either of their single-sex status. Nor that or any other GLO for that matter. So why couldn't an NPC and NIC/IFC do something similar (legal and constitutional bound) as well?

UGAalum94 03-23-2007 07:48 PM

Did the thread get lame because Kevin demonstrated he's pretty much right?

Or is it because people are now going to have to debate the meaning of officially?

AOII_LB93 03-23-2007 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSteven (Post 1417194)

Side note: Do Alpha Epsilon Phi and Alpha Omicron Pi refer to themselves as the Barnard Duo? Or maybe the Barnard Babes?

No...and that is official.

Senusret I 03-23-2007 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga (Post 1417844)
Did the thread get lame because Kevin demonstrated he's pretty much right?


If it wasn't lame before..... :(

Unregistered- 03-23-2007 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Senusret I (Post 1417849)
If it wasn't lame before..... :(

Egg-fucking-xactly.

AlexMack 03-23-2007 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alphagamuga (Post 1417844)
Did the thread get lame because Kevin demonstrated he's pretty much right?

Or is it because people are now going to have to debate the meaning of officially?

No it's because Kevin hates homeless people and beats them up for change. That's why it's lame.

Kevin 03-24-2007 01:11 AM

Quote:

Did the thread get lame because Kevin demonstrated he's pretty much right?
Quote:

Originally Posted by centaur532 (Post 1417903)
No it's because Kevin hates homeless people and beats them up for change. That's why it's lame.

I think you have your answer.

AlexMack 03-24-2007 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1417930)
I think you have your answer.

And he also can't take jokes.

Kevin 03-24-2007 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by centaur532 (Post 1417965)
And he also can't take jokes.

Well, it's just not as hilarious to me as it is to you when people who don't know what they're talking about want to tell others that their organization's history and culture contravene some sort of rule or policy. Especially when they take such a rude/confident tone in doing so.

I have a decent sense of humor. It's just that for some reason, someone saying that I beat up homeless people isn't funny. Imagine that.

flirt5721 03-25-2007 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kevin (Post 1417719)
Why don't you refer to the active AXiD sister who made references to the explanation of this relationship in her new member manual provided by HQ. She then took some sort of quiz regarding history in which the question "Who is our brother fraternity?" was asked. It's page 4ish.

That should clear up your confusion.

During my NM period we did learn about the connection. Although not official, many member see the brother of Sigma Nu as brother. This is just something that each member feels. HQ supports the chapters in teaching NMs about the historical connection but many member like the thought of an unofficial brother fraternity. HQ never said that there was an offical connection. Also most members know that it is an unoffical connection but some don't care.

There is no Sigma Nu chapter at my school and I know that they are not our "brother" fraternity, but I still feel excitment and joy when I meet a brother of Sigma Nu. I guess that most members are just really greatful to them for all the help they gave our Founder.

Sock Puppet2 03-26-2007 01:16 AM

Kevin: 1 The usual bullies: 0

33girl 03-26-2007 09:32 AM

If Kevin hadn't shot his mouth off in the first place, this thread would have never had to "go there."

Sock Puppet: -7688463


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.