Originally Posted by shinerbock (Post 1334139)

I cannot even begin to describe how terrible this analogy is. You've listed isolated events, some of which don't even participate in violence (the huge majority of white supremacy groups). You're comparing these to large and well funded organizations who do plan and carry out attacks on innocent people. The Oklahoma City Bombing had nothing to do with the people they were attacking. I believe they've even claimed that they had no real intention of harming the victims. The crime was intended to be against the government. How is that comparable to attacks which target civilians solely because of their faith or belief? Its not. As for the hijackings, I guess a couple guys not threatening any passengers and not harming anyone is comparable to cutting the throats of pilots and passengers and proceeding to fly planes into buildings filled with people. My bad.

Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin (Post 1333947)

No, they just burned them alive instead. So much better!

Nancy Grace is a "law reporter" as well, but that doesn't mean she's not a bumbling idiot.

Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin (Post 1333947)

Nancy Grace is a "law reporter" as well, but that doesn't mean she's not a bumbling idiot.

Originally Posted by valkyrie (Post 1334273)

LOL @ Nancy Grace. She's an example of "Those who can, do. Those who can't, report, if by "report" we mean go on endless biased rants about evil, evil defendants."

That said, I have no idea what law reporters have to do with this thread.

Originally Posted by blueangel (Post 1333925)

You're right.. I lied about being a law reporter. I've never been in broadcasting.. and I'm actually an astronaut!

Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin (Post 1334338)

blueangel brought up her status as a "law reporter" to seem more credible.

This is my favorite law reporter. What's yours?

Originally Posted by Taualumna (Post 1333956)

When it was revealed that Catholic priests had been molesting children for years and years, many Catholics were upset about it, and demanded an apology. When radical Muslims were blowing up airplanes or doing other inappropriate things, few Muslims spoke up. Why is that?

Originally Posted by blueangel (Post 1333733)

Yes, there has been violence on Muslims, just as there has been violence on Buddhists, Christians, and Jews. Are you saying there are Christian, Buddhist or Jewish cells and training camps which are organized against Muslims? Are you denying there are no Muslim cells, networks and training camps organized against non-Muslims?

Originally Posted by valkyrie (Post 1334429)

I was totally trying to make fun of her for doing that. I was very subtle because I didn't want to get reported, you know, like you'd get reported in second grade.

I really like the Pacific Reporter.

Originally Posted by MysticCat (Post 1333959)

Actually, what I'm noticing is how you've been responding to everyone except Opi the last day or so. Opi has "answered" your questions by explaining to you that your "quotes" were bogus and that you were therefore operating under an erroneous assumption all along. No response?

Originally Posted by blueangel (Post 1334502)

I'll be responding.. just doing more reading. I'm checking her allegations. Astronauts do that, you know! :)

Originally Posted by PM_Mama00 (Post 1334507)

Ok why don't we just stop lying here. You're not researching to check her allegations, you're researching to find your newest lie to use so that you look like your posts are legit.

You are just

Originally Posted by blueangel (Post 1334521)

I agree there are plenty of hate groups.. there's even one right here on Greek Chat! :)

The organizations you mention are not organized with cells in virtually every part of the world. When looking at the scope of the Islamic Terrorists who have declared a Jihad-- they look like mosquitos in comparison.

Originally Posted by GeekyPenguin (Post 1334525)

So only being organized in the west means that it's okay? :rolleyes: