Ummm DSTCHAOS is on my ignore list and I don't talk to her so I don't know what you're talking about. I'm sure she's fine with that as well though. Another mistake by you, a "teacher".

Again, remember when you attacked a Catholic because you thought he wasn't Catholic?

Again, remember when you said non-Catholics can't speak?

Again, remember how you forgot how you used to be a non-Catholic?

-Rudey

The best liars mix a little bit of truth in every lie to make it easier for some to swallow. You are an excellent liar.

Twisting my words wont make me change what I *actually* said.

Now go back to getting your negative attention from the Kazo folks. Better yet, get some medication for the borderline personality disorder you suffer from.

Let me provide quotes for you since you edited your post:

Remember when you essentially said a Catholic wasn't Catholic and used the words "if you're not Catholic"?

Remember when you essentially said non-Catholics can't speak
and used the words "Being inspired is great, but if you're not Catholic, let's not try to teach what any pope has allegedly taught"?

And let me guess, next you'll deny converting to Catholicism right?

You also probably forgot how many people, including several Catholics, were upset by what you said and how you changed your post huh?

And again, I have Kazo people on ignore and haven't spoken to any and both they and I are fine with that. Are you going to lie and make up anything else?

-Rudey

I doubt anyone was "upset". Like you, there are certain folks who like to zero in on someone to attack, so they did. I doubt it was a moral outrage.

If you have Kazo people on ignore, why did you reply to their posts so often?

It is just so *cute* how you are obsessed with my life! I could spell out all the details for you, but that would ruin your little treasure hunting fun. Go ahead, what else can you find out that isn't readily obvious? Im' proud to be your latest obsession (after DSTCHAOS, RA Cooper, and BGLOs.)

See you in your dreams!
;)

Read my post earlier.

Read the quotes I put earlier of your words.

Read the posts earlier about how Catholics were upset and how you even changed your posts.

Read how you have me on ignore in another thread and look how you can't stop talking to me.

You're not too good at making accusations when your words are quoted and you've edited your posts. But keep replying to a guy you have on ignore because I'm sure someone might believe you at some point haha.

-Rudey

You're still cute! You must be sitting by the computer just searching out every post I ever wrote. (I guess you didn't think that I am perfectly capable of changing my mind of who I ignore...) Do you have my posts memorized? Did you copy and paste them to a double-secret file on your hard drive? Do you read my posts every night before bed to remember every single word? Do they keep you up at night?
I've head that being stalked is scary, but I think this is just adorable!

Kisses!

LOL so when people quote you in this thread you accuse them of memorizing your posts and side-step the truth. OK.

-Rudey
--adduncan sits in her highchair next to IowaStatePhiPsi

You were, at the least, excessively hypocritical in your earlier dealings with cashmoney, and MULTIPLE Catholics derided you for your insular thinking. Or were they all wrong, as well?

Here's a hint: parts of what cashmoney said were correct in spirit, if not detail. Why deny that the church has had problems? That's what you're doing by denying others the ability to comment on the actions of possibly the largest, most influential organization on the planet. It's a joke.

The passing of the Pope is a worldwide event - the position is amazingly influential, much more so than most world leaders. The gestures, statements, and edicts coming from the papacy have strong influence on the lives of most Americans, even non-Catholics. Look outside - the flags fly at half-mast, and rightly so.

John Paul II, while not necessarily 'liberal' as Americans would define the term, certainly did well to push positive and important action in the Church, and saw it through some rough times - I respect the man a great deal, he handled a massive position with grace and steadfastness to his religion, even if I disagree with many policies in specific. His passing is truly an event, and not just for you, duncan, but for everyone. The next Pope will have the same immense influence, and as such it is necessary, nay important, for even non-Catholics to pay attention. You can cut on Rudey all you want, but you're strawmanning (and as a teacher, you should know that you're doing it, and it's intellectually dishonest).

-RC
--again, I present for you: Galileo (forgiven in 1981, nihil obstat/imprimatur granted in 2004 if my memory serves . . . original findings in 1615, and everyone can discuss this)

Who's sidestepping now????
There are just some days when you need a little offbeat fun. Since "inappropriate" is in the eye of the beholder, today is your day.

If I was just as obsessed, I could track down each and every post you made, pick out the parts that emphasize your mental weaknesses, and paste them as I please. But that's not fun for me today.

Go ahead and insult me. It's nothing new, nothing you don't do to anyone else if it suits you. It doesn't change the day I'm having or how I live my life. It also doesn't change what my friends think, or most importantly, what *I* think. So what have you really accomplished?

Umm keep up with the accusations of people insulting you when it was you that insulted others and you that keeps doing so by saying I now have "mental weaknesses". It's great that people quoted your posts so even though you changed them they can read them and judge for themselves, like they already did.

-Rudey
--It's like watching Oprah: "My friends still love me"

1) My initial post was an *opinion* - that thing we're supposed to have without reprisal. If you don't like it, no problem, but you climbed all over me about it, just like your buddy Rudey. I also said it was coming from a very emotional state, but that didn't matter to you, did it?

2) Gallileo? The best example you can come up with of a "problem" is over 400 years old.

3) I'm not going to take instruction on how to post on a bulletin board from someone who calls himself "kind of a dick".

You can harrangue me all day, kiddies. I'm not changing what I think because I'm entitled to think what I do. What are you going to accomplish?

You're not going to change what you think but you edited your post LOL

-Rudey
--Keep insulting me about my mental weaknesses now hahaha

Changing a post does not equal changing what I think.

I should have done this earlier! Getting the adrenaline out is great!

Hey Rudey, what else are you going to pin on me today? This one thread is pretty limited.

Apparently I got much more out of my BU education than you did, Ms. Duncan - now put on the conical cap:



- opinions are still subject to the rules of hypocrisy and proper discussion/respect for others

- emotional response is a very poor excuse.

No, that's not even close to the best example, but it's a pretty blatant one that is non-offensive to most - and the 400-yrs-old part is the PROBLEM, not the excuse.

I'm sure you can come up with the best example - hint: it started in the 60s, and was systematically covered up until a few years ago.

Do you, ace, but you were being "completely a dick" earlier - irony is beautiful.

Hmmmmmm......let's see the results of this post.....

Has it scared me away from GC?

No.

Have I changed any of my opinions on this thread or others?

No.

Has it intimidated me so much that I need to hide from these detractors?

No.

Is it possible to discuss any of the points brought up in any kind of academic detail on this board?

No.

So what exactly did your post accomplish, RC? If throwing insults and rude comments around makes you feel better, then I hope you got what you wanted. But it's not coming from me.