Whether you call it pimps & hos, naughty schoolgirls and principals or what have you, I'll say one thing: there are mixers that I would trust some fraternities with that I would not trust others. It's one thing to have a "naughty" mixer with the guys you hang out with 24/7 that are practically your brothers and another to have something like that with guys that you're more unsure of. I mean, the guys who have seen me in sweats and no makeup are going to understand that it's all just a costume. The ones who are meeting me for the first time in "tart wear" are a different story.

And I have to say, at the risk of sounding like an old fart, I've seen girls in bars wearing things that we would have considered dress for a pimp/ho mixer.

33girl - I so love reading your turn of phrases.

And from the 'for what it is worth' department. My sister-in-law's chapter had a Pimp & Ho party with a twist. Everyone was in drag with the men dressed as the prostitutes and the women dressed as the pimps.

An easy way to avoid the issue of who to bid for such an event if you are a fraternity is to have it as an open party at the end of sorority rush week, which is usually a week or two before fraternity rush...you invite all the guys you are thinking about rushing and every girl you can think of, make it outside and only brothers are allowed in the house, it makes people dress to the weather and it relieves the stress of randoms in your house...we have done it for two years running and it is the most popular party at USF every year.

Re: Is a "Pimps and Ho's Party" disrepectful???
 

I, like a few other folks on this thread, would never see my sorority sponsoring such an event (nor would I attend one in my college days). It seems way too irresponsible to the community that we service.

Don't be affriad to do something because it isnt PC. Thats crap

Don't be afraid to use spellcheck or correct punctuation, either ;)

<---- Refraining from making a WV joke. It's SO difficult as a native Pittsburgher to hold back.

I don't even know if PC-ness is the issue here.

You know, I've gone out on the weekends in attire that would be perfect for a pimps and hoez party. I own crap that allows as much as possible to hang out.

Would I go to one? Of course I would. Still, I'd go as Sandy, not an AGD. It's just something that I wouldn't want to attach my letters to. My letters don't just belong to me -- and if someone else wants to throw one, be my guest...just as long as it's not AGD.

To The Pittsburgher: I am from western PA as well and yes I am a bad speller and typer

PS: Pitt sucks at basketball

I concur.

You have to keep in mind that whether its being "that girl" at a party or being elected Student Government president, EVERYTHING that you do reflects back on your letters; whether you are wearing them or not. Even though you don't party in your breasted letter shirt, people still know who you are and which GLO you represent. They associate every action that you take with your letters.

----

There was a Pimps 'n Hoes party, a CEOs and Office Hoes, a Golf Pros and Tennis Hoes, and a Dirty Doctors and Naughty Nurses party at my school this year.

I went to all four and had a great time. So did my sisters, and friends from other sororities and my room mate and other GDI's all of whom attended without being offended. I don't think that these parties disrespectful to anyone.

In my opinion, only when people are condemned for trying liven up their social lives and spice up their parties with a little creativity does attendance of one of these parties become a blackmark on a GLO's letters.

We had worst mixers then Pimp and Ho, i think people are getting way to caution on what they do. I feel we are all students having fun. I mean they do have limits, but "Gangsta Bro and Hoodrat Hoes" was one of our funniest mixers

Can I ask why anyone is attending a party where she'd be considered one of the "hoes" and is finding this funny? Last time I checked being a hoe wasn't a good thing. And for the wannbe pimps and ganstas among you, maybe because you aren't apart of the culture most associated with these archetypes then it doesn't seem like a big deal to you. But you are glorifying a HORRIBLE segment in society that does an injustice to itself and the women involved. Then again I'm not disrespecting my Founders by engaging in such behavior so knock yourself out.

"Gansta Bros and Hoodrat Hos"
:eek: :eek: :eek:

This thread is a prime example of the importance of art and music programs in our public schools because apparently creativity skills are no longer being developed.

And that's keeping it easy to swallow. I won't even touch the other implications :rolleyes:

I don't feel that this represents my culture. It is only negative if you feel it is negative. We come up with these theme, not to disrespect people, but we do it because they are funny themes that people can dress up for. People don't want to be pimps or be hoes, they dress up like them because it is like halloween. You dress up like something your not and have a good time

The people who want to attend these parties will go all out with costumes and have fun. Those who object won't attend. If the majority aren't attending, that's a sure sign your social chair is way off-course with her event ideas from the chapter's wants.

Also, if your social advisers signed the forms and approved this thing, it's a go.

As an alum, I think it isn't representing the Greek System in the best light, and there are other creative dress-up themes that are just as fun. However, I'm not gonna lie that the collegian that I was had a blast at these parties, whether they were approved socials under an assumed name or a party at someone's house off-campus.

A lot of current college student love the theme-- you get to dress all wild and racy-- what college student doesn't experiment with that at some point? I think that's an unconscious effect of dress-up mixer/socials.

So to summarize-- I get why college students love these parties, but as an older graduate I understand why it might be a good idea not to have them.