![]() |
Quote:
Pi Phi is considered by many to be a strong national sorority because there are a number of strong chapters in areas all over the country, not just in Texas or the South. The same with Tri-Delt. So while the OP may not have had the experience of a "top-tier" Pi Phi chapter (or any other GLO, for that matter) in her area, she should not have stated that it is a "surprise" to learn that Pi Phi or another GLO is considered strong. I found that kind of tactless. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Damn. I thought we had killed this thread.
|
Quote:
|
Tee hee.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
My point was that I didn't see any rule on here that prevented people from going back to interesting threads and making relevant comments. It's not like the thread was locked. |
You're new here, but just to add some insight, this topic has been discussed ad nauseum here on GC. If you search "top sorority nationally" "top tier" or any of those, there is alot discussion of it, and it just gets old (esp. when it gets brought up). That and you've posted like 4 times in a row on one topic.
|
Quote:
When I said it wasn't hard to guess most of the rest perhaps I could have worded it more carefully. However, if I had to guess six top sororities I already knew two of them. I knew Theta was a top group from reading about Jenna Bush pledging there. I knew from hearing about and discussing top chapters (as breathesgelatin mentioned in her own Pi Phi experience) that Tri Delta was strong at Texas. For wrong or right, panhellenic or not, I would have immediately guessed that Chi O and Kappa were two of the others. They are two groups that I automatically expect to be top groups. I also know from experience that they are not top groups on every campus. No sorority is top everywhere. But that is my personal perception of them based on both local and national experience. I expect them more often than not to be a top group. I won't get into the ins and outs of the other two guesses I would have made for fear of making even more people mad at me. :) Others here may have their own groups that they would automatically expect to be strong and that is fine. My very original point was that our perceptions are shaped by so many different experiences we have that we are all going to look at things differently. So that was the thought process behind the original comment. Hopefully that clears things up. :) |
I'm not going to quote you, but I'm going to tell you that we don't like to have these kids of posts here bashing chapters (whether what's posted is true or not). It's just rude and stupid. That, and you just sound like someone with "sour grapes." If all you're here to do is badmouth Auburn Pi Phi, then expect your posts to be deleted by someone (that and you need a hobby).
|
generation4grl, you are a treasure!
TigerPiPhi, there is a function called multi-quote that will allow you to quote multiple users in one post. Just press the icon with the quotation mark and the plus sign in the bottom left corner of the posts you want to quote. IMO there was nothing offensive in the OP's original comment about her perceptions of Pi Phi. Also, TigerPiPhi, if you'll re-read my post about my experience as a Pi Phi in Texas, I don't think that my original meaning has anything to do with your interpretation. The superficial stuff ISN'T being overlooked. It's just beyond these people's realm of possibility that someone could be a Pi Phi and not be old money or whatever. It's not happy-happy-joy-joy land. Finally, TigerPiPhi, discussion of national NPC reputations or tiers or whatever you want to call it pretty much always degenerates into a hot mess on GC; when a new poster revives a thread by posting a bunch on it, it's bound to raise some people's suspicions. I think you'll find this a welcoming place if you chill out and lurk a bit and figure out the vibe here. The End. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.