I'm not in a sorority so if what I'm about to say makes no sense or is irrelevant please correct me. Fraternity rush is quite different obviously. But to me, as an outsider, it seems like:

a) This isn't really a widespread problem, I can't imagine a chapter would make several members check up on all the random transfer PNMs (particularly at a large school) when there is so much else to do at rush for the almost non-existant chance that somebody is trying to pull this off.

b) I would think that the girls currently rushing would be able to catch it...I know that at my campus, which is a competitive campus not in the South, girls pretty much stalk the PNMs going through rush as soon as they get their applications doing everything from reading their Facebook walls and profiles to see if there are "problems" (ie slutty comments or drug references) and doing "pre-rankings" based on academics, involvement, talents, etc. If a girl is transfering they try to find out how she carried herself at that former school. (They shouldn't have really told me all that to be sure but it gets out). I would think that if a girl was initiated before at another school a simple Facebook search or word-of-mouth would reveal it, but then again maybe I'm wrong.

So in your case, if the campus Panhellenic wanted too, you might be able to add to the recruitment release a release for transfer students and information about membership as well?

It's interesting how much it varies from campus to campus. At the school that won't release any information from the student file, I guess the only way a future employer can verify information about an applicant is by getting a transcript sent. (I doubt many employers verify extracurriculars anyway, but I never really thought about how people could completely make up everything on the first resume other than the GPA, but I guess at that campus, they could. )

Well, if they already do the stuff listed in part B, they already do check out the transfer students, so it might not be that much more time consuming to do it formally.

Just out of curiosity, if a girl were shut down her profile completely, would all her previous tags, comments, and wall posts also disappear immediately or would she have to go through one by one?

(The amount of background screening that groups try to do at some of the really big rushes is really pretty amazing to me. Especially with their network of alums, for some groups, I think, in the south especially, there are rarely any unknowns on the final bid list. )

If a girl shut down her profile you couldn't search for her tagged pictures, comments and wall posts, but if you looked at, let's say, her friend's profile you could see pictures that her friend tagged of her, comments she made on her friend's wall, etc. (and trust me, I know girls that will go to that extreme to find the dirt on PNMs). It's also as easy as calling up a girl you may know from that girl's hometown/high school and being like, "Did she volunteer in high school? Is she well-liked? Sleep-around? Good grades? etc."

I am also amazed by the "pre-recruiting" these girls do...it really amazes me. My friend was telling me last night (admittedly in breach of membership selection secrecy, but that's a whole other story) that the recruitment team will go over EVERY single PNM's application and school history (and there are usually like 800 of them) and then flag those with recommendations, legacies, connections (if they already know girls) and those with stellar academics, involvement, talents, volunteerism, leadership, etc. and then focus on those rushees during formal rush.

In my fraternity, we admittedly do a lot of "pre-recruiting" as well (ie, looking up guys from our hometowns, having alumni compile lists of stellar rushees from their hometowns, etc) but the amount of work we do is nothing compared to the sororities. Sorority rush just fascinates me (at least at the really competitive schools).

Last year the Phi Mus at a large school called one of my AOII daughters, who's at another school, to find out the background on a PNM. She knew one of the Phi Mus, a girl who had gone to a different high school, and was really surprised that members of a different sorority would call her. They wanted to know if it was true that this girl had done some really wild stuff. I have also gotten calls from numerous other sororities about PNMs, although mostly to find out about the girls in general. One sorority at a nearby school called my oldest daughter and me to ask if one of their legacies whom we'd worked with was the wack case they'd heard. (Yep, she slapped one boss and scored another one with her fingernail.:eek: )

There's a lot of intersorority help going on around the South, even though gossip would have you think that each group is out to annihilate the others. Most sororities will warn the others if they know about a PNM who's got serious problems.

It's done differently on many campuses. Each University has to decide for itself, how much information it is willing to disclose to any student organization, regarding a student's file, and has to weigh that with any potential liability issues that may pop up.

Our school has adopted disclosing information on a "need-to-know" basis, but that doesn't necessarily include everything that a student is willing to sign away.

Grades, there is a reason why a minimum GPA must be achieved. This benefits the college as well as the Greek Organization. Joining a Greek Organization involves a significant amount of a student's time, and we want to make sure that only those that can manage their time well, can take on additional responsibilities. School comes first, if you can't manage school, you can't join certain groups.

Our college, has a minimum GPA for all organizations. The organization is able to set it for themselves and set the bar higher (and we will help them in that verification process), but with us, if you are on academic probabation, you must terminate your membership, Greek or not.

The only exceptions are honor societies and scholarships, where a full transcript is needed in order to make award determinations.

Now, back to your question regarding someone being initiated into a sorority twice, and if it was in their file, could I say anything if asked.

If the situation at our school 8 years ago, repeated itself today, the answer would be no. The reason is, it doesn't fall into a "need-to-know" basis. It only benefits the Greek Organization...the school doesn't care one way or the other. Not disclosing it, doesn't raise any liability issues....disclosing it, if the student does not wish to disclose ALL of their previous organizations on their personal file, can raise a huge liability issue for the college.

I'm in no way saying that "this is the law"...it's not. This is just the way our University has chosen to handle student information.

Hum, I think the institution is mistaken in it's impression that the situation only benefits the Greek Organization. I tend to think that your institution has to believe that the overall effect of Greek Life on the university is beneficial or you would terminate your relationships with the GLOS. A healthy balance of the university helping the GLOs and the GLOs helping the institution would be good overall. If the university takes a only "what's in it for us" attitude, I think you'll have more problems between groups and that will spill over into campus life at large.

I can see the liability point on some level, but after a person appears listed as a member in a yearbook, it's hard to make a claim about privacy. There would be ways around the idea that you got the info. only from the confidential student file.

From an administrative point, we have to look at all student organizations the same. We can't pick and choose which ones we will protect the student's privacy on, and which ones we won't. It's an all or none deal. The only reason schools even have a Greek Advisor is because it tends to be the largest of all of the organizations, and it takes someone who has participated in the system on how it works. Other than the sheer numbers? They wouldn't bother with the staffing.

I cannot think of a single reason, how a couple of students every few years, that may initiate in in two NPC sororities, is going to destroy Greek Life as a whole at our University. In the instance that it happened at our school, more people knew that it happened rather than know who it happened with. Our school is so large these girls sometimes disappear between semesters and over the summer....they just don't re-enroll.

You make a good point regarding the yearbook, however, it has to be initiated by the students not by me. I cannot launch a campaign to apply the rules on the students that I know about. I have to be fair to all. I don't look for ways, "around the system"...we follow the rules that are handed down to me by my superiors, that is how I keep the lights on.

We have to consider all of the groups, not just Greek Organizations.

With us, even the yearbook isn't a good source. Less than 25% of the student population bother to show up to have their picture taken.

On student applications for recruitment, there is only one "status" classification: Your Class (Freshman, Sophomore, etc.). So unless a student mentioned it, you wouldn't know she was a transfer. She just puts down which class she is a member of. We participate in deferred recruitment, so Freshman have to be verified at completing a minimum of 12 semester hours in order to be considered "second semester" Freshman.

As far as my job is concerned, and my role in the process, I am not willing to put the University, or myself, at risk and gamble on whether or not someone can make a "claim" against the University.

You don't have to win a lawsuit in order to permanently tarnish a University's reputation, all you have to do is file one.

The OP asked about NPC sororities. There is an NPC unanimous agreement saying that once you join one NPC, you cannot join another.

It's not quite black or white for fraternities.

I'm sorry for not being clearer: it didn't mean that you personally should be looking in the yearbook, just that sometimes that things that the university is presenting as matters of privacy, aren't. And I wasn't thinking of the listing of individual students, but the listing of members on the GLO pages, which I imagine most GLOs do participate in, but maybe not at your campus. The college yearbooks I've looked at list members. They may not have every member, but a girl being listed on a group's page would be reason for further review to see if she had been initiated.

I also wasn't thinking of strictly the very few students who try to join more than one group when I was commenting on the "what's in it for us" attitude; I was thinking about how ineffective that seemed to be as a leadership philosophy with Greek organizations. There's a lot that the Greek Life office really needs to handle that the only benefit to the university is the resolution or prevention of conflicts among the groups.

Other campus organizations deserve attention too, but I think it's rare that there are as many that feel they are in direct competition for members or status, etc. I suspect it's rare that they need as much supervision in terms of alcohol violations and housing issues.

It's rare, as far as I know, that as many other student orgs. have relatively powerful and wealthy national and international groups with lawyers.

Sure the cinema club may really hate sharing an office with the Objectivist society, but I'd be surprised if either were going to sue or get their alums to make a lot of noise with the fund raising folks.

The university, it would seem to me needs to handle the Greek groups well and pro-actively, so the junk doesn't blow up big.

I agree that the issue of girls joining twice isn't likely to be the think that causes the system to fall apart, but it's an area that might be important to the groups in which you've decided not to help them. In the long run, their believing that you aren't there to help them could be a big problem.

Oh, honey, that wasn't even a rude reply. She was just clarifying that the NPC was different. Please take the tone as straightforward and explanatory. You'd know if it was rude.

ETA: This is kind of putting words in your mouth again, OTW, and I apologize. But I couldn't help but think, Oh no, a rude reply would be much different.

I'm not appealing to you to release GLO membership, but surely this is no way to run a university: setting your standards based on not what is right or legal, but avoiding the filing of suits?

Sure, don't invite lawsuits, and I think that's what you are trying to do with the "need to know" policy, but really, with the number of sue happy crazy people in the world, things are going to stink really badly really quick if they learn that your are motivated mainly by avoiding suits and staying out of the press. Will any rule stand up to a challenge and the suggestion of getting a lawyer at your campus?

I apologize that I misunderstood your post.

You are correct, from a practical standpoint, I am very surprised with information technology, that there isn't a collaborative database, that simply lists a member's name, school, Greek organization, and their birthday.

More information is listed in the local phone book, so if I were working in National Headquarters, if they are concerned about privacy, that would be the argument I would use.

You are absolutely correct in the 'need to know' policy being used to temper our practices with a litageous (I probably didn't spell that right), society. You are right on the money with that one :)

There seems to be an astonishingly wide spectrum of university policies regarding Greek life. Different campus cultures demand different methods. I hope that what you are doing works well on your campus.

It would seem to me that confirmation of membership by name, date of initiation, and campus would be reasonably "safe," and although it seems to me that each campus could maintain this information and make it available if a student agreed to sign a waiver, maybe it does need to happen at the NPC level rather than the university Greek Life offices.

(I'm thinking of an additional form that a transfer student could fill out and send back to her previous office of Greek Life and Campus activities, so of like an activity transcript release, and the old campus verify she had never been a member at the old place.)

All of it may not be worth it in terms of the number of people who attempt to join more than one

There are just so many problems with this whole thing.

Clearly many colleges and universities simply won't bother with compiling all of the extracurriculars of every student. Whether or not someone tries to join two different NPCs means nothing to them. Even if they did keep the information, a student who was a member of an NPC at one school who knows they're transfering to another school without a chapter of their NPC or with a "weak" chapter that they don't want to affiliate with (and they plan on going through Recruitment again) simply won't sign a waiver to disclose their affiliation. Why would they?

My earlier response to the idea of a giant NPC database may have seemed flippant but I honestly believe it will never happen. An NPC group can't just hand over personal information about their members to someone else even if it's the NPC itself. Can you imagine how many thousands of irate women there would be? And I'm not talking about Social Security Numbers either.

I joined Kappa Delta not XYZ and as far as I'm concerned XYZ has no business having my personal information. NPC would have to pass a resolution in order to be allowed to compile that kind of information. Oh, and that would only entail contacting a few hundred thousand women and asking for their permission and receiving it. It will never happen!

You have tools today such as Facebook, etc. that we didn't have back when I was a collegian. These can help you with getting "the dirt" on PNMs. What it comes down to is doing your own leg-work. If you're really concerned about this issue then bring it up with your chapter and your advisors. There simply isn't going to be an easy solution here.