X girl,

I'm sorry I brought you into this, but I'm just saying what I feel about the current situation. I'm not apologizing for my views, nor do I expect you to either. I respect that you have your own opinion and your reasons. I do disagree that Bush doesnt care about children. I understand you have your reasons, but I feel that he is would be a great role model to the children of this country. At least he will bring more integrity to the office than the Bill C. Administration. He is a family man and he is human. I just feel that Bush is more of a modest man than Gore. I dont really see how Bush is bad for our country in terms of race relations. I believe he would bring some great vision, reform and growth to the education system in our country too. Despite what Al Gore and his party thinks. I want to add that my dads family is from Northern California and that I lived there for a brief time after I finished school. I voted for Dan Lungren. Unfortunately he lost, but I do agree that California has some real problems. I suppose every state does. However, I dont think that they should necessarily spend less money, but I do think they need to make major reforms in that area. They do need to spend more money on Education and Rehabilitation. Although there are always going to be people that pose a safety risk to the community that can not be reformed. Whether it be rehabilitation or incarceration. I am speaking from experience(correctional officer and psych counselor) both in Ca. and in Va. I resent your comparison between Bush Jr. and Nixon. Again, I want to say that I do respect you have your own opinions.




[This message has been edited by kmullini (edited November 18, 2000).]

As many as it takes to get Gore elected - which has been the point all along. I know the LAW mandates the recount, but the LAW also mandated that 5pm Tuesday was the deadline. All we've heard since is suit after suit to keep the counting going. At the beginning of all this a lot of Gore supporters were saying it was a conspiracy set up by Jeb Bush...if anything, the recount has been a conspiracy by the democrats. They want to keep counting until they can change enough votes to say Gore is the winner. If the law clearly stated the recounts were due at 5pm Tuesday, then they should have been in. Our paper headlined a bunch of people holding up "Sore/Loserman 2000" signs - it was pretty funny, but sad none-the-less because of what it represents.

kmullini-
Bush, a former drug user and alcoholic, is a better role model for children? http://www.greekchat.com/forums/ubb/confused.gif

I, for one, am ready to find out who the president is going to be. From what I've heard from the media, whoever is elected is not going to be able to do much in office. At this point they are going to just have to lay low and do minimal work. Not make any sudden changes and basically keep the country as it's going now. If that's true, it doesn't really matter who's president.

I want to touch base about this electorial college thing again. First, my opinion is, it should be done away with. Living in a rural state (west virginia) I hear so many people complain about doing away with it "if they do away with the electoral college--then we will never see another presidential candidtate in this state." That's a good argument. BUT--all of you worried about this, I don't know about the statistics in YOUR state, but in mine I do. This was a close presidential election--obviously--so each candidate made a visit to WV 3 times. I think that's a record. Anyway, the only reason they came here was because they KNEW it was going to be tight. Last presidential candidate to visit WV before this election? John F. Kennedy!!!!! It's not like presidential candidates vist our state ANYWAY so it doesn't MATTER if they don't come here, it's not like all that many did in the first place!

Ok, on ANOTHER note, I have more info on the presidents elected in a year ending in 0. It's called 'the X factor'. Tucumpsa (indian--I don't remember how to spell) put a curse on the presidential election process--so to say. Any president elected in a year ending in 0 will die in office. After looking through one of Bryan's many history books, we found that every president elected in a year ending in 0 HAS died in office--except Reagan--and an attempt was made. So again, maybe we should have been electing a Vice President instead of a President! I thought I'd just add a bit more info for those of you wondering.

Thanks Iowa http://www.greekchat.com/forums/ubb/smile.gif