What is scary, is the Robotrons thsat go to these type of Schools and beleive in this type of Dogma?

Maybe being a Liberated Person, I just Feel This Way?

Now, Forced to Go, I can Understand!:D

What is scary too, is enough People go there to keep them Open?

Thank God, I am Semi Normal!:cool:

LSAT?
 

Don't know for sure what LSAT is, nor do not know what it has
to do with g.p.a., but understand now it is used to evaluate those
who intend on entering the second-oldest profession.
My...how many other angry ladies read this site? Perhaps you
oughta go out and have a good nite with a Sig Ep. He'll tell you when you're done...
Maybe if you'd concentrate on helping out your respective outfits
your time would be better spent. Even after all these years, I
find there's more hay down than we can put up. Can you sift thru
all this? Also, after reaching 65, I think some of us oldies can be
given some poetic license on grammar. We have paid our dues,
and as regarding ebonics, ax me.

The LSAT is the Law School Admission Test. You need to take it to go to most law schools in North America (I think Quebec is the only jurisdiction in North America that doesn't require it.). Your LSAT results, along with your GPA determine whether you'll be admitted to law school or not.

Re: LSAT?
 

Good God, you continue to amaze me.

Re: LSAT?
 

Just because you're older doesn't mean that you can just "not use" the rules of grammar. IT HELPS PEOPLE UNDERSTAND what you're trying to say. You know, if you are constantly going to try and claim superior intelligence over people, maybe you should proving it by posting things that people don't have to read twice to comprehend.

Oy - this place is bizzare... I'd heard about it before, but I just explored their website. Daily room inspections? Yikes! What do they go through everyone's stuff to look for DVD's or CD's? It seems ridiculous to me!

But that aside, as it's personal preference, the thing that pisses me off is their art gallery. They have several masterpieces and get public funding for it (the only public funding they receive) but have NO interpretation. No artist, no date, no title, no medium, no provenance, no guide are provided, other than to let patrons know that these works aren't scripturally correct and Catholicism is evil. My God, they have paintings by Peter-Paul Rubens, Anthony Van Dyck, Lucas Cranach the Elder, Paolo Veronese and Tintoretto, major masterpieces. And they don't even tell people who they're painted by. This creates a problem for scholars trying to get information about those works. If they can't be bothered to get the history right and look at it within a proper context, it makes me wonder if they even take any steps to conserve them, or if they're just going to discolor and flake until they're nothing but bits of canvas. :mad: Masterpieces have no place in a place that isn't going to appreciate them for what they are, for their place in art history, and the period that produced them. Ending rant now and stepping off the soapbox.

Another strange thing was in the Admissions Counselor section. They ask favourite "bible character". To me, character implies a fictional person. If they're taking the bible as verbatim truth, shouldn't it be "biblical figure"? Probably being too fussy about word choice, but it just doesn't seem right. [Oxford English Dictionary doesn't say one way or another as to the necessity of a character being fictional].

Re: LSAT?
 

I have good nights with a SigEp on a regular basis, and he happens to practice your esteemed profession. Thank you for your concern about my romantic life.

Some of the things said on this site never cease to amaze me.

Now back to studying for that test that gets me into the 2nd oldest profession in the world...

Re: more rules
 

This sounds just like my Pentacostal monster in law. (her quote): "There is no such thing as Christian rock or Christian rap"

Whateva...it comes in all genres

Glitter, baby
 

'course it could just be that you are not keen enough to
understand all this....

Re: Glitter, baby
 

Hey, leave SigEp out of your squabble.

Re: Glitter, baby
 

Could be, but I doubt it. :D

Re: Re: Glitter, baby
 

I think he's just jealous he's too old to take me out. :p

Re: Sig Ep, sorry
 

I can't believe I'm getting involved in this...

But, honestly, Erik, you're HOW old? Most people in your age range (like, oh, say, my grandparents) would not a) stoop to belittling insults to a female 1/3 of their age and b) if so, refer to them as "hoggers" or "losers".

And I really don't think there is an overage of "angry women" on GC. I think there are a lot of women who have been taught that we don't HAVE to be treated like crap, nor is it okay for a man to talk down to us. But hey, that's just my theory on the matter. If that makes me angry, awesome.

-Nikki, the angriest woman in North America

I heart Nikki.


And I would have to agree that there is no surplus of angry women on GC . . . if anything, I think most of them aren't angry enough.

But I would think that, wouldn't I? ;)