Ahh... except for the removal of inspectors and the cessation of multi-national negotations with North Korea.

The 9/11 commission said that he was definitely stockpiling the resources to build WMD. He had every intention of doing so. Combine that with your assertion that he was eventually going to grow the gonads to challenge us down the road and we have justification to the Bush doctrine.

With WMD and this guy, you could count on invasions of Kuwait and Iran eventually. Possibly Jordan and Syria.

His army (for the region) was probably the strongest.

Wait a second. You posted, "there is no REAL proof that Saddam committed genocide as recently as 2001" and now you're agreeing with me? Is your name Sybil?

Excuse me clown were not Iran & Iraq @ war went those Iranians were killed.

You are still the fool, all those articles are doing is rehashing things Saddam did after the 1st gulf war. These people along w/the Kurds were hoodwinked by the U.S into trying to overthrow Saddam. When the U.S turned its back on these misguided souls, Saddam came down hard on them in the early 90s. This is more propaganda by America's only true ally (England) in this farce of a war w/Iraq.

Unless you can disprove that Iraq engaged in genocide in 2001, you stand as GC's newest moron who is intellectually incapable of dealing with facts. Congratulations!

For the record it was I who said that not Shortfuse....get a grip man.

Whatever. You still made a stupid statement (not surprising,) was proven to be wrong, and the best that you can do is call me a fool. What kamunitee colidge did u get yur edumacashun at?

Chump you haven't proved that Saddam engaged in genocide in 2001.

Just showing how easily it is to prove you wrong, speaking of education if you could read you would have seen it was I and not Shortfuse who made that post.

Good lord you're stupid. You said that genocide did not happen in Iraq in 2001. I provided highly credible citations, but you can't do the one simple thing to defend yourself. All that you have to do is provide one credible citation that refutes the genocide inflicted upon the March Arabs. That's all that you have to do. So simple.

You can't do it, because you're (once again) wrong. Don't get me wrong, I'm happy that you're posting here because I can use the laugh.

The sad thing is that you are a Baathist apologist. Today's equivalant of the Nazi sympathizers of long ago. "Oh, Sadaam wasn't so bad. Sure he killed over a million people, but that was long ago. He must have changed because I haven't personally seen him kill anyone lately, so it isn't true. In fact, before his regime was overthrown, Iraq was a wonderful nation. The Disneyland of the Middle East."

1. Speak English, you poor excuse for a bad education.

2. You said "Saddam and his forces couldn't even defeat Iran in eighties w/ the help of America. Saddam was just a loud mouth bully w/ no bite". You have no understanding whatsoever of the region because you are some stupid ignorant ape. He butchered one million Iranians; he had no bite?!? And then you act as if Iraq was just helped by America but then that doesn't acknowledge the aid that Iran received.

Man just shutup. It's great that Omega Psi Phi was cool with you being a preacher and yipping and yapping in their forum, but this ain't it. You are embarassing yourself.

-Rudey