So then exempting them for that reason doesn't make much sense, does it? It makes plenty of sense

Drole, I don't know you, but you made me laugh out loud on this one.

Thanks for that after a crappy Monday!!

This is a little long, but it's an excellent analysis from a Wisconsin Teacher (a former high school English teacher of mine) who has continued to work, in his classroom, during the protests.

A Modest Rebuttal: http://blazing-night-527.heroku.com/

I found out something interesting the other day. I know the Dems are getting heat for leaving, but apparently there is no mechanism to filibuster, which is what a minority at the federal level would do to try to stop a vote they know they will loose.

Yep!

CNN (of all places) actually had a lovely little story about the history of legislative walkouts to avoid quorum. When Abraham Lincoln was in the state legislature, he apparently jumped out of a building in an attempt to prevent Democrats from reaching quorum. Learn something new everyday!

This is how I feel.

This is also how I feel.

This, why I was going to post.


So, I have lots of union experience. My husband was a union carpenter for 10 years before being accepted into the fire academy. He already in the Columbus fire union even though he's only a recruit. They excused the guys from class early today, so they could go protest in downtown C-bus. Not only am I a union "wife," but my job requires me to work with a LOT of union laborers and steelworkers. With that being said, and my agreement with the above posts, and what is going on in Ohio right now.... I think each union needs to be evaluated individually. If collective bargaining goes by the wayside for public employees, it will eventually affect the private sector (hubby's former job), and that will spell the end of all unions. I don't think union busting is the answer. It works in some situations. HOWEVER, IT IS GROSSLY ABUSED BY MANY! Union reform could save SOOOOO much money in the public sector. Getting rid of collective bargaining isn't a good enough fix. I can't even talk about my personal experiences at work, because I signed something saying I wouldn't.

However, I can say my husband would take a significant pay cut as a firefighter if the Ohio bill is signed. Yes, I'm biased, but I felt this way before; public safety employees should never have to take pay cuts. (What Cincinnati Police and Fire had to go through to keep their jobs this year made me ill, this city is so fucked up I'm glad we're moving). In Ohio, public safety employees cannot strike. They gave up that right as a part of collective bargaining 20+ years ago. But their system is very flawed as well. The Columbus assistant fire chief just retired with something like $200K+ in unused sick and vacation time. He then took the job of head fire chief in Cinci for a salary of $119K a year. SO much money could be saved if this ALONE were reformed. In the private sector, we have a "use it or lose it" policy. Why can't public union employees do that to save state and local budgets?

As for teachers, I'm fine with the average salary. I'm sure there are many who are overpaid, and I know there are many who are underpaid. Really, that's all I'll say, because I'm not looking to get into a fight with the teachers here. But my very qualified brother, who has his teaching degree, would happily take your job right now, even for only $34K a year. I think poor performing employees are protected by the unions, and really, their ass should be out the door.

My last thoughts... there is a factory in my hometown that has union employees striking right this second. The factory is permanently hiring "scabs." Friends of ours are leaving jobs at the mall and going to work for $15 an hour at this factory, and the factory management is training them all. http://www.sanduskyregister.com/news...kers21711aoxml Considering what the union workers are so upset over, and what they're striking over.... I think they deserve to be out on their ass if that's what it comes to. EVERYONE is making sacrifices right now to keep their jobs. Sacrificing a little bit in order to keep your employment is a must!!!!!!! No time and a half if you don't work 40 hours straight first? Tough shit! Be thankful you have a JOB! Because obviously, there are unemployed out there who would give anything to have those jobs, they don't care if they have to cross picket lines if that means a paycheck. I personally took a 20% pay cut at my last job in an effort to keep employed. It only worked for 3 months, and then I was laid off for 15 months. In this economy, everyone has to make sacrifices, union members included.

I totally agree.

What's perplexing is that union members have agreed to take the "pay" cut (really, a cut in benefits) and Walker is still not willing to negotiate.

Also interesting is the clause within the Senate Bill 11 that states that the Governor may fire any public employees involved in “concerted activities to interrupt the operations or services of state government” if the state were in a State of Emergency. (A state of emergency is, of course, declaired by the Governor). Consequently, if the bill passes, Walker has the power--without any system of checks or balances--to fire any public employee. This is something that (a) has nothing to do with balancing a budget and (b) is far too much power for any one man, especially when it extends to any public employee in the State, not simply the ones he hired.


Finally, Mr. Walker has attempted a similar move in the past, when he fired Milwaukee County courthouse security in the name of budget conservation. He hired a private security firm, Wackenhut, which turned out to be less than ideal (http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/90958499.html). Milwaukee County also ruled that "the county did not have a true budget crisis at the time and county officials failed to give the union representing the security guards an opportunity to make some alternative cost-saving proposals before laying them off" (http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/113212479.html), forcing the city to rehire the employees and pay all of their missed salary. This move cost the City of Milwaukee an additional $430,000, which is not something you want when fiscal conservation is the goal.

I want the state budget balanced as badly as anyone else. I want my kids to grow up in a fiscally secure environment and I want to have true job security when I return home. I just really don't think the budget or the safety of my state is what is going on here.

There is also apparently some clause in this bill that allows Walker to sell off state assets at pretty dirt cheap prices to certain corporate interests. I'm trying to find the link that details this part of the bill.

Wait - did we just compare factory workers to teachers? I mean, I think teachers are second only to old people in the "unnecessarily coddled" class, but ... I mean ...

Collective bargaining for state employees is a necessity - look at any of the half-dozen studies put forward in the media in the last month or so that show that state employees make significantly less than private-sector counterparts ... and now think that some of these (metermaids) are fungible, and some of these (teachers, firefighters) are absolutely not.

This isn't rocket science. The inefficiency isn't teachers, guys.

And more "union busting" tactics at the local level in Michigan. A local community has voted to lay off the entire fire department but the city attorney told local media that if they accept concessions, the lay offs might not happen. So, it's not just "we need to lay off some people" if concessions aren't made, it's "we need to get rid of the whole fire department". The only way this is totally budget related is if they want the whole department to work for free, so laying off the entire department makes no sense.

http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/news/region/...ire-department

Ha...so we'll just gp back to the old days of spitting on our house fires?

There is such a thing as volunteer fire departments. It's not unheard of around here for small municipalities to ax the fire department and/or police department budget. County sheriffs deputies then take over patroling that area, and the fire department goes to a volunteer, or looks to a neighboring department.

While many smaller or rural areas around here have volunteer fire depts with backup coming from larger cities, I've never seen a regular FD get fired.

You can't even put together a volunteer dept that fast. If that town goes through with it, then they better have a good backup plan.

So apparently someone called Scott Walker pretending to be David Koch and put the recorded conversation online. The site at which the conversation was originally posted crashed but I guess it can also be found here.

Anyone have any clue if that is real? It sounds exactly like Walker but I'm just hesitant to believe anyone's this dumb.

ETA: Walker's office confirmed it.