To say that ALL of the NPC groups are only concerned with Recruitment is a gross generalization that is not necessarily true. That is all that I am saying. I sincerely doubt that all of the national executive councils are foaming at the mouth for more members. I doubt very much that anyone on here knows every one of the NPC's members, and if you do, then more power to you. Again, it's statements like these that make our organizations look so superficial to outsiders.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Have some of the groups proposed getting rid of the quota/total system?

I agree that there are some NPC MEMBERS who could care less about numbers being huge - after all, everyone in an NPC sorority is an NPC member.

Did I say getting rid of quota and total? No. I just said that like NPHC groups, who care more about their sisterhood than about numbers, so, too, do many NPC organizations. No, I did not say they view recruitment in the exact same way. What I'm saying is that recruitment for all NPC groups is not necessarily just superficial. I hope that clarifies a bit more.

Amen.

ETA: I'll qualify that by agreeing that I agree with the statement in reference to large schools.

Definitely signature-worthy.

I don't think it's a question of "caring more." I think that when you bring in a large amount of women at the postgraduate level, as NPHC does, you don't have to be quite as concerned if the numbers of your collegiate chapters are smaller. If AI for NPC groups ever got as popular as NPHC graduate membership is, I'm betting the pressure on collegiate chapters to fulfill total and quota would lessen considerably, if not disappear altogether.

Agreed.

Perhaps their nationals should put forth a "rush weight limit" for members to adher to. :rolleyes:

LOL! ;)

You'd think that after several unsuccesful recruitments you'd get the hint and stop trying.

hijack-

That reminds me of a thread from years ago (I searched a little, but didn't find it) where someone was joking about there being a secret scale under the floor, and there was a total chapter weight that couldn't be exceeded, so membership selection was based on who could keep the chapter under the set limit. Anyone else remember that post?

-end hijack

I wonder if she ended up AIing.

Healthy weight is not subjective. There are guidelines published by many government and professional bodies. Motivating a sister to lose weight may be even better for her in the long run than motivating her to raise her GPA.

For the love of all things precious, please tell me you are kidding. I am gathering that you are!

No, she joined a colony her senior year. It's in honeychile's original post.

Or it may cause her to develop an eating disorder.

But hey, as long as rush goes well, that's what's important!

True--motivating is different from telling someone to stay away from recruitment altogether. Motivation is like: Hey, I'm going to the gym, want to come with me? I love our conversations! Being callous is like: Stay away from recruitment, because we don't want any new girls to think we're the oinkers because of you. :(

How about if you get together and move the "house treadmill" so it is sitting right outside the offending sisters room?

:eek:

OMG, what a neat non fat compared to fat people being wanted.:cool:

Would really want me want to be in a Female GLO!:o

Frumpy may not be for life. The point should be what can this girl do to help our Sorority!

Does she have more inside her than just the exterior trappings. Noooo, if no looks you suck attitude. To sad.:eek:

I am so sure that each poster fells drop dead gorgus of course!:p

Good luck in the future when your waist line is bigger than the IQ you think you have?:o

Earp. You outdid yourself sir.

You're completely missing the point.

Maybe they can "hide" women during rush, but then all of a sudden the sorority that had 50 skinny girls during the parties has 50 skinny girls and 20 fat girls at bid day.

If you were a new pledge, wouldn't you feel a little bit like someone was trying to pull the wool over your eyes?

Yes. If I were a new member, and all of a sudden I saw a bunch of girls who were mysteriously missing throughout recruitment, I'd probably wonder why they weren't around and if all the missing girls happened to be bigger than a size 6, then I'd downright get pissed...but that's just me. Obviously, everyone else would react differently.

I'm over 30, and it isn't just today's youth. SEC rush is a completely different beast than non-SEC rush. SECdomination was just telling it like it is. And while it isn't as nice and pc as we'd like it to be, at least she's telling the truth.

I'm not trying to say it's right. I'm just saying it's nothing new.

Why thank my friend!:)

What do you drink and what kind of Cigar do you desire.

Come visit KC, BBQ, toddies, and a fine smoke!:D

Oh well, it must be a girl thing from all of the swell feelings? Oh, FAT people do not have those from what I am seeing here!

I realize I come from one of the "larger" chapters, but in all honesty... recruitment is a blur. You maybe meet 10 women in the chapter during the week, and prob. only remember half of them. Come Bid Day, there are a lot of strange faces.

If it's as drastic as 30% of the chapter disappearing and reappearing on Bid Day, and those members looking drastically different than the rest, ok, that's weird. At that point I'd call shennigans.

But in a typical recruitment, there are several sisters who can be missing from the floor for several reasons: behind-the-scenes work, study abroad, medical, emergency, conflict with athletics/band, etc. I don't think anyone can legitimately feel cheated on Bid Day-- you still have a couple dozen sisters and a couple dozen new members to get to know.

As far as the heavier women in your chapter-- I don't think it's a weight issue-- it's an issue of how you carry yourself.

At the end of the day, recruitment is a very superficial process-- you are having the most basic surface conversations, after all. If you are bidded, you have a 6 week period (approx) to determine if you're in the right place or not. Granted, you may not have an opportunity to re-rush in the future, but you're not locked in if the sorority you thought you were joining turns out to be something else.

And if anyone finds that unfair or horrible-- well, don't rush at those schools. It's not going to change-- you're trying to bring in 18-20 year olds as your members and you're trying to appeal to what's important to them. Sad as it sounds, while many are in it for the academics/sisterhood/service aspect, the look of a chapter can heavily influence someone of this age.

Those of us who are a little older may find the whole process silly or disturbing, but we aren't their target demo.

There are ways to "take one for the team" other than telling someone to not come to rush at all. From what I'm getting, the national consultant didn't even suggest kitchen duty or ask the women of the chapter what a good way to deal w/ this would be - she just said DON'T COME TO RUSH AT ALL.

And if this chapter IS ALREADY APPRECIABLY SMALLER THAN THE OTHERS, which apparently is the case, the rushees are going to notice that anyway. I'm sorry, but if anyone, national consultants or chapter officers or advisors, think the rushees won't notice this chapter has 80 girls while the other chapters have 200, they are too stupid to exist. That in and of itself is "different" enough to scare rushees away from the chapter, if we're operating on the principle that different = kiss of death.

Bottom line, if your chapter's numbers are a lot smaller than the other groups' to begin with, keeping the "image impaired" ladies away from rush isn't going to help your recruitment. You have to explain it in some way and it would be better to use your time thinking of a positive spin to put on that than figuring out who's skinny enough to rush and who is not.

Great post.

I still fail to understand why after decades and decades of this no one will even lift one finger to change it...one person can't do it, but a lot could. Probably not drastically. And probably not even in ten years. But EVENTUALLY the Greek system could become something that those of us that have (and had at 18) a value system that doesn't involve judging someone on nothing but their appearance won't be ASHAMED of. Because let me tell you...it does embarass me to be lumped in with the SEC crowd. It's not one that I in general want to be associated with. I support the values of the founders, the ideals of the organizations...but I don't support the current atmosphere. At all. Because it, based on what I've seen and heard, does not mesh in any way with what the organizations were founded for.

SECdomination, you make great points here, ones that us SEC women (and women from other competitive schools) will be able to totally grasp... and maybe even some women from non-competitive schools, too, who can realize the big gap between everyone-is-PC-and-nice-to-everyone recruitment and competitive RUSH. I get the idea that a lot of posters live in Fantasy Land where this isn't the way it is and they can't seem to understand that no matter how much we don't like it and don't think it's "nice," it's not going to change (at least no time soon). Women outside of competitive recruitments like to post about how it "should" be, but they haven't experienced it from the inside so it's hard for them to see how unchangeable these attitudes are on these campuses.

You make a great point here. If the chapter has 100 as opposed to another chapter's 150, one missing member might not be a huge deal because the chapter isn't THAT much smaller. But what if the chapter does have 80 when the others have 200? At a lot of schools, in-the-know PNMs are probably going in planning to cut this house after round one anyway, so it probably wouldn't help or hurt to have this member rushing people.

I'm surprised in the PC-ness that NPC is becoming, they don't make a rule that all sororities can only have as many rushers on the floor as the number of members of the smallest chapter on campus. That way PNMs aren't judging on size.

I think it would be going completely PC-overboard, but I can't say that I don't eventually see it happening.

Some schools already do this for activity days or the first Meet the Greeks type round - you can only have 15 or however many sisters at the table. Obviously, though, once you go to the next round you realize who has 20 and who has 95.

Unless you mean doing it for all of rush, and (depending on the group's voting rules) that might go against some groups' bylaws. That is - if everyone can only have 20 members rushing cause that's the size of the smallest chapter, the larger ones might only have 1/4 of their members who have met the PNMs. Either they wouldn't be able to vote anyone in or PNMs would have to be voted on sight unseen.

Yikes. Talk about a cluster#$%k.

Haha, we just figured only a girl would understand. ;)

Maybe that is the problem, High I am a Barbi and I should fit!


Or not!;)

Maybe small minds fit?:confused:

It's hard for people from outside a system to understand why it works the way it works. Since SECdomination really seems to get it and a lot of guys don't (because fraternity rush is so different), SydneyK and I assumed he was a chick. But I'm guessing he has a lot of friends in sororities and just has a good understanding of how things work in our recruitment.

Does this answer what you're asking? Your post makes very little sense.

folks, it is not just in recruitment. i distinctly remember reading an aol story a year or two ago that showed statistics on how overweight people are discriminated against in both hirings and promotions.

I remember reading a similar story where an executive said that he considered people who were more conventionally attractive for positions that involved in-person interaction with clients (while he didn't mind hiring people who were less attractive for positions where interaction was over the phone). Sad, and I can't relate because in my career weight and attractiveness aren't really issues, but I guess in some careers that is the way it is. I suppose I can't really comment on how unfair it is because I don't work in a field where it matters.

You're saying that your friends wanted to be pi chis because they just can't stand being at selection meetings any more?

Or are you saying that their chapters wanted them to be pi chis because they were fighting with the rest of the chapter at selection time?
________
TorrieLynn cam

Oh, I hear that all the time, especially that seniors fight to be counselors.