![]() |
I would also argue that U of Arizona needs to open for expansion as the chapters quota for the last couple of years has been over 100 new members.
The problem though with UA is that a chapter MUST have a house, which obviously could be problematic for a chapter to come onto campus. Either way though, 100+ new member classes are insane. |
Quote:
The housing spaces themselves would be less of an issue for the University, being that each of the two buildings have a first floor that is not assigned to any particular group and have the same number of bed spaces. The issue I would see is that neither first floor of the building has the equivalent chapter space for a new group. I do believe the University plans to add more residence halls near the current sorority housing, and possibly in a similar style, but that's unlikely to happen in the next few years (they have already started construction on a new residence hall near the main sets due to a requirement for Fall 2015 that all incoming freshmen who don't live within a certain mile radius have to live on campus). I do not believe the groups are large enough that the chapter space itself is in danger of not being able to hold them—even though quotas have gone up a little, chapter total has not fluctuated much at all (that I can tell). |
Quote:
|
Missouri University of Science & Tech ('14 Q=41, '13 Q=23, '12 Q=27, '11 Q=27)
I honestly don't see us opening up for expansion in the next three years. Despite growing numbers and smaller spaces (Zeta had to do big sis reveal in the student union), there aren't enough girls to support a whole other chapter. Total is around 101 and only ChiO doesn't have to COB most likely. This school has just a small proportion of girls, so I see it unlikely to get a fourth NPC group soon. Our only NPHC sorority, Delta Sigma Theta, is dormant now that the only member graduated. Zeta does want a new house which if they get, I assume it will be built on their current property and that will solve their space issue. But otherwise campus is in a weird position with housing. The university closed down a hall complex and plans to demo and rebuild, and also to build on another plot of land. But this school is bad at getting buildings started being built, so it will be a couple of years at least until we see progress. Res Life was actually encouraging students to go greek so they'd have a real place to stay and alleviate space issues (in the closed complex one of the halls is up and running and another was reopened at the beginning of the year due to lack of room for students. Students were also placed in a hotel and in rooms in the traditional dorm that were originally study rooms) Since there is no space on campus, there has been a building boom in town and sophomores on up living off campus. There's not much, if anything, to build on anywhere near campus that would be good for a sorority (all three are within two blocks of campus). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
My little sister decided not to go through recruitment. She mentioned this because her NAU 100 teacher is a Tri-Delt, who said something to the class about sorority presentations. She thought it was happening in the spring. Maybe that is when colonization is occurring. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is no available land on campus to build. The fraternities are holding tight on their properties. The last two available lots were sold to Sigma Chi and Sigma Phi Epsilon, both of whom built very nice facilities last year. With no parking for the occupants. It's about parking lots, and real estate prices. An idea that's been bandied about is to buy a property on Park, just off campus, and build a high-rise and sell or lease floors to sororities and fraternities. There are at least three high rises off Park and Speedway now since your last visit to Tucson (ugly monstrosities, ruined the West University neighborhood). The problem is location, location, location. Being competitive at UofA means owning something on 1st or 2nd, between Mountain and Campbell (actually, Cherry for the sororities. AXO has struggled and part of the reason is the location of their house - east of Cherry, almost to Campbell. The PNMs don't like walking that far in the August heat, although they sure beat tracks to the fraternity houses that are around AXO). It would take a massive culture shift to accept alternative housing. In the meantime, the chapters are (seeingly) just fine with those huge NM classes. We shall see what the tipping point is, and when it comes, I'll be on the sofa with my soda and popcorn. |
^^^ is there room on your sofa for me?
|
As winter approaches here in the heartland, can I have the third spot on that sofa in the desert?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
To me, it seems like if certain groups had floors in a high rise, while others maintained their regular stand-alone houses, that kind of discrepancy could cause groups in the high rises to suffer with their facilities being perceived as less than the stand alone houses
|
Quote:
|
I think really cool high rise units would be, well, cool. But I'm a big city girl. I'm picturing a large chapter room looking out over campus with all the bells and whistles of a luxury apartment building, including gym, first floor retail, coffee shop, etc. While it wouldn't be traditional, if a couple sororities and fraternities took over an equivalent amount of square footage and had them done to the nines it could be really modern and eclectic.
|
Quote:
|
Oh I think it would be cool, I just think it could be a problem when ABC has the big, beautiful house all to themselves and XYZ just gets a floor in a building they have to share with a bunch of other groups.
I agree it would have to be all or nothing. I'm not familiar with the campus, but I feel like it's unlikely that groups would be willing to give up their houses. |
Quote:
|
True! I didn't even think of it that way
|
Quote:
It's gonna happen. It's a matter of time. Unless the pendulum takes a huge swing in the opposite direction, and the NM classes drop back down into the 50-60 range. Which they were five short years ago. |
Yeah, I'm talking a purpose built high rise, not just taking over 12 units of a building. Eeew, that would be doomed to failure. Think of the possibilities for that at NYU, DePaul, any of the urban schools with burgeoning Greek systems and absolutely no possibility of getting houses.
|
I get very irritated (beyond annoyed) with people who are hanging on to the past. After all, the earth is NOT flat. Seriously. I want to see this alternative greek housing concept take hold and catch fire. Let's be honest and truthful. Some of those older facilities need to be torn down and rebuilt. The plumbing is a nightmare. So is the electrical. The windows. The HVAC system. On and on and on. But noooooo. You have alumnae who are all invested in keeping it like it was when THEY were in school. Good grief, women. Get a life.
|
At Illinois, going back as far as my recruitment in the 90's, the big houses were a liability, because they brought a two-year live-in requirement with them at a time when campus apartments were booming. Who wants to live in a quad room with no A/C that your boyfriend isn't allowed to visit and fight over the six parking spots behind the house when you could live in a luxury apartment for a comparable cost?
But then again, Illinois is a far cry from the SEC. |
Quote:
|
I don't think it is just the alums who want to hold onto the tradition, there are plenty of girls who arrive on campus who think living in a big amazing mansion is going to be like something they see in the movies. Little do they know that they might be crammed into a tiny room (not the one they showed you on house tours day), it might have little daylight, and there will plenty of nights you get no sleep because someone is making lots of noise. The romance of all this wears off after a year... and after two years of being required to live in, you can hardly stand it.
But despite this, young women still want those big beautiful mansions. Campuses where you are only required/allowed to live in one year, have the best situation: You can have a taste of it, but you can also get the chance to live in an awesome apartment with a pool, your other greek friends, and you get to have guys in your room. When a campus has a requirement that people live-in for three years in their sororities, my advice would be to pick a different campus. I totally see the appeal of a dorm-style apartment, but when you are 18 and you see those amazing pictures of greek houses, that is far more tempting. For many young women, these sororities have living spaces furnished as nice or nicer than their parents homes. We need to remember that many young women picked these campuses because of the appeal of that actual sorority houses... chances are they aren't thinking about the condition of the plumbing, AC or what it is like to be in a cold dorm. |
URI
Quote:
Also, the only sorority on campus without a house (KD) took the largest NM class, so they aren't hurting for members based on lack of housing. Greek Life has never been consistent at URI, so I for one would like to see if this positive trend continues for a few years before adding another chapter. Besides, lots of sorority members like to live off campus after a year or two, so larger chapter size=more freedom in choice of living arrangements. |
Quote:
|
Can someone who has been in Waco more recently than I have tell us if their Panhellenic Building has space for additional sororities or just the current 8 chapters? Pledge classes in the 90s is ridiculous for that school.
For those not familiar with Baylor, they have an on campus Panhellenic building that contains private chapter rooms/suites designated for each group. Baylor owns the building but the groups decorate their own space how they see fit. There are no live-ins. If they add new chapters there would have to be something to accommodate these groups that is of equal comparison. Baylor is not the type of school where "different" would fly with the PNMs. |
Comrades,
Looks like they have 9, so one is available as it was previously KD's. http://www.baylor.edu/stacyriddleforum/ |
So with only 9 suites available, what happens when they add another group, and then need to expand again?
|
As ComradesTrue mentions, Baylor is very traditional (I attended 2 years in the 80s). I would assume if more than 1 group came on they would use the SUB or dorms like they used to for recruitment and chapter meetings before expanding. Sounds like their chapter sizes are closing in on Ole Miss and Arkansas territory.
If memory serves me, BU had chapters of KD, Sigma Kappa and DG at one time. I wonder if any are planning to recolonize? |
Is there any way they could build onto this building? I was hoping for a picture of it but didn't see one. Is there room near it to allow that?
Also, do they have anything resembling unofficial sorority houses off campus where sisters can live together? Or is this the sort of campus where you live on campus all 4 years? This whole concept of lodges at big Greek schools fascinates me. |
Quote:
http://www.baylor.edu/mediacommunica...ory&story=4495 On the second comment, several sororities and fraternities (usually owned by an older alum or a current student's parents) have informal houses or blocks of houses where members decide to live together. I don't know how many of them house large numbers of members, but I'd wager the answer is not many. I lived in a house of four, and knew plenty of others in similar houses. |
Quote:
I would also be VERY surprised if Sigma Kappa wanted on again this soon. |
Baylor quota was 78+6 optional juniors.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
SK at Baylor closed in 1994. Is 20 years considered soon for that campus? Just curious.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Okay. Makes more sense. I know memories can be long, but I wasn't sure.
|
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.