I am LMAO @ Senusret through this entire thread.

I know! I don't want to get on his bad side, or he will call me a hussy, lol! :p

Buttonz,
Seriously, I would follow ladygreek's advice and PM a member of the sorority involved.

I'm LMAO too. I've never heard anyone under 70 call a woman a "hussy". lol

Oh Rashid's been calling me a hussy for years now. It ain't all that bad. ;)

Personally, I would have a huge problem with this because of ritual and the loyalty we pledge; however, I think there's a difference between "frowned upon" and "policy" I would think that if SDT does not have a policy against a NPHC member joining than it will be difficult to revoke her membership. If the NPHC Org does not have a policy that a NPC women cannot affiliate than they too would have a difficult time revoking her membership.

Would I act upon this information if I knew it was more than just "frowned upon"? Yes. However, if I knew that there were no policies to deal with this issue I would move on.

:confused: :confused: :confused:

I hope this dual membership situation gets solved.

I still want to know what NPHC sorority. :D

Most NPHC orgs do have a policy.

What if it IS MY GLO (or WEND08's or jubilance1922's or TheEpitome1920's)? WE have a right to know. So, Buttonz, please take my Soror's advice and inform a member of the affected organization forthwith.

Thank you, and good night!





BTW, I didn't know GC was the place for moral support? I thought she was asking a question about a policy so that something could be done. If she needs moral support, thats what her girlfriends and sisters/sorors are for, NOT a messageboard. :rolleyes:

No offense, but what exactly are you going to do about it besides informing nationals/the chapter she joined? Buttonz is doing that anyway, and I would assume you can trust that your organization will do the right thing whether a member or a non-member tells them about it.
I can understand why you're curious, and why you would want to know if it was your GLO -we're all curious- but you don't have the right to know anything about this situation except what Buttonz tells you.

mccoyred said "inform a member of the affected national organization." She didn't say "inform ME if it's DST."

She meant "we" as in "my sorority as a national entity if it's us", not "we" as in "Delta Sigma Theta members who post on GC."

She was responding specifically to a post that was about GC members not having any right to know. I figured when she responded "If it's my GLO or *list of other GCers'* GLO WE have a right to know" that GC members were the referents of that we.

[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]I took eveyone's advice and PMed a member of XYZ./COLOR]

Why do some of you type stuff like this?

Buttonz has probably already either contacted someone's NHQ or PM'd a member of the NPHC sorority to let her make the next move. But since you're not in an NPHC sorority you don't have a "right" to question us. Or maybe you do, since we're all just posting on a message board. None of us are holding guns to anyone's heads. "Right?" Geesh......

You suck for not using text coloring to give us a hint. :D;)

She was probably stating that any member should be contacted, which is what Buttonz did after deciding not to contact a nhq.