| SWTXBelle |
07-02-2020 01:19 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by AOII Rose
(Post 2476617)
Sure, AOII could have given members more of a heads up or officially involved the overall membership more in the writing of this policy. If my sisters are unhappy with this change in policy, I’d encourage them to make it known to AOII members and the fraternity. I believe that we can have a respectful discussion (from all sides) within our fraternity’s membership.
Anyone is certainly entitled to discuss their opinions, and it’s great that you (and I’m sure many others in this thread) know AOIIs. However, I don’t see the point of attempting to speculate on the collective will of a membership that one is not a part of. I would give your organizations the same respect. If you know an AOII who is unhappy, encourage her to approach her sisters about this.
|
Given the hostile treatment I've seen given to members of organizations who have disagreed with policy changes they had no "head's up" nor were they consulted about, I totally understand if they don't feel like their concerns are considered valid and they don't want to subject themselves to abuse. If their opinion wasn't taken into consideration before implementing the policy, why would it matter afterwards? Is there any chance the policy would be rescinded?
What one NPC group does may influence what others do, especially if it reaches the level of being considered for a Unanimous Agreement. As to speculating on collective will, refusal to enumerate how members were included can be expected to be interpreted as they were not. If AOII members tell us they were not consulted, they will be taken at their word. "Oooooo it's a secret" is fine and dandy, but optics matter.
* ETA - Note that I don't expect to know what is in the document - the issue is who was consulted.
If Gamma Phi were to do the same, I'd expect my panhellenic sisters to take notice, too.
|