GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Interesting & Civil discussion re: slavery from Greek Life is HERE (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=95036)

SWTXBelle 03-29-2008 11:36 PM

So - can we have an agreed on definition for slavery? I'm interested in what y'all have to say as far as how to define it.

breathesgelatin 03-29-2008 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moe.ron (Post 1626088)
Please come back to the original discussion.

Why? We're having a surprisingly civil and interesting discussion of these subjects.

SWTXBelle 03-29-2008 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moe.ron (Post 1626088)
Please come back to the original discussion.


There's really nothing to add to that - the vistors came, it all went well, and there was an additional bunch of brothers who seem to have come and visited with no problems.

Did you have something to add?

moe.ron 03-29-2008 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by breathesgelatin (Post 1626090)
Why? We're having a surprisingly civil and interesting discussion of these subjects.

Yeah, but the slavery issue and other stuff should be confined to the news politic forum.

The original discussion was about visiting other chapters.

Thank you.

SWTXBelle 03-29-2008 11:40 PM

In before the lock.:rolleyes:

nittanyalum 03-29-2008 11:44 PM

Interesting & Civil discussion re: slavery from Greek Life is HERE
 
Since the other thread looks like it's going to be locked, I'm cutting and pasting my last big post from there here, it was a response to SEC. Those that had posts after mine, feel free to also cut and paste here and let's continue the discourse. Man, god forbid we discuss real issues here and not just Rock of Love, huh? ...o'er the la-and of the freeeeeee.... :rolleyes: :mad:

--------- original post starts here ---------
Quote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by SECdomination http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/im...s/viewpost.gif
From the first link:
"Under laws enacted specifically to intimidate blacks, tens of thousands were arbitrarily detained, hit with high fines and charged with the costs of their arrests. With no means to pay such debts, prisoners were sold into coal mines, lumber camps, brickyards, railroad construction crews and plantations. Others were simply seized by southern landowners and pressed into years of involuntary servitude"

There is no further description of these laws in the excerpt. It just brings to light the mistreatment of prisoners after slavery was abolished. The Wall Street Journal is much more credible than most publications, but all the article talks about is the mistreatment and not the laws that put them in jail in the first place.
The slideshow didn't look that bad. Have you seen the movie "Cool Hand Luke"?
It "just brings to light the mistreatment of prisoners after slavery was abolished"???? Did you read the same article? Do you not get that what it's documenting is that even decades after slavery was abolished, the state and private enterprise continued to find and force ways to enslave african americans? The point was that since "slavery" was illegal, they would simply arrest them so they could call them "prisoners" and then justify the continued used of them as slave labor. And are you REALLY comparing the reality of this to the Hollywood depiction in a Paul Newman film???? Did you see the picture of the man tied around the pick-axe in the slide show? That was real.

You must have just skimmed the article, so let me pull some highlights for you: "were arbitrarily detained" ; "Others were simply seized by southern landowners and pressed into years of involuntary servitude."
"At the turn of the 20th century, at least 3,464 African-American men and 130 women lived in forced labor camps in Georgia"
"vivid accounts of the system's brutalities" ; "Wraithlike men infected with tuberculosis were left to die on the floor of a storage shed" ; "Laborers who attempted escape from the Muscogee Brick Co. were welded into ankle shackles with three-inch-long spikes turned inward -- to make it impossibly painful to run again. Guards everywhere were routinely drunk and physically abusive."
"hellish conditions at Chattahoochee Brick and other operations owned by Mr. English, a luminary of the Atlanta elite" ; "But by 1908, Mr. English -- despite having never owned antebellum slaves -- was a man whose great wealth was inextricably tied to the enslavement of thousands of men."
"The base of his wealth, Chattahoochee Brick, relied on forced labor from its inception"
"Once dried, the bricks were carried at a double-time pace by two dozen laborers running back and forth -- under almost continual lashing by Mr. English's overseer, Capt. James T. Casey. Witnesses testified that guards holding long horse whips struck any worker who slowed to a walk or paused"
"A string of witnesses told the legislative committee that prisoners at the plant were fed rotting and rancid food, housed in barracks rife with insects, driven with whips into the hottest and most-intolerable areas of the plant, and continually required to work at a constant run in the heat of the ovens."
"On Sundays, white men came to the Chattahoochee brickyard to buy, sell and trade black men as they had livestock and, a generation earlier, slaves on the block."
"after a black prisoner named Peter Harris said he couldn't work because of a grossly infected hand, the camp doctor carved off the affected skin tissue with a surgeon's knife and then ordered him back to work. Instead, Mr. Harris, his hand mangled and bleeding, collapsed after the procedure. The camp boss ordered him dragged into the brickyard and whipped 25 times. "If you ain't dead, I will make you dead if you don't go to work," shouted a guard. Mr. Harris was carried to a cotton field. He died lying between the rows of cotton."
"Guards there had recently adopted for punishment of the workers the "water cure," in which water was poured into the nostrils and lungs of prisoners. (The technique, preferred because it allowed miners to "go to work right away" after punishment, became infamous in the 21st century as "waterboarding.")"
"a 16-year-old boy at a lumber camp owned by Mr. Hurt and operated by his son George Hurt ... The teenager was serving three months of hard labor for an unspecified misdemeanor... "one of the bosses, up in a pine tree and he had his gun and shot at the little negro and shot this side of his face off"... The teenager ran into the woods and died. Days later, a dog appeared in the camp dragging the boy's arm in its mouth, Mr. Gaither said. The homicide was never investigated. Called to testify before the commission, Mr. Hurt lounged in the witness chair, relaxed and unapologetic for any aspect of the sprawling businesses."

Quote:

Originally Posted by SECdomination:
The second article was interesting. It had many more useful facts than the first. But I don't understand how you could hold servants against their will. Did officials look the other way because this was taking place in the south?
They weren't "servants", it was "debt slavery". From the article:
Quote:

...the peonage system -- which allowed farmers to use bogus debts and the threat of violence to keep workers on their land indefinitely -- hung over millions of African-Americans. ... Although the antebellum version of slavery had been unconstitutional for decades, there still existed no federal statute that made holding slaves a punishable crime.
Then came Pearl Harbor and suddenly everyone panicked that the (known) mistreatment of black Americans could be exploited against the U.S.:
Quote:

President Franklin D. Roosevelt expressed to advisors his worry that the mistreatment of blacks would be used in propaganda by Japan and Germany to undercut support for the war by African-Americans.
Quote:

Attorney General Francis Biddle shared the president's concerns with his top assistants. Mr. Biddle was informed that federal policy had long been to cede virtually all allegations of slavery to local jurisdiction -- effectively guaranteeing they would never be prosecuted.
Quote:

Mr. Biddle said that in an all-out war, in which millions of African-Americans would be called upon to serve, the U.S. government needed to take a stand: Those who continued to practice any form of slavery, in violation of 1865's Thirteenth Amendment, had to be prosecuted as criminals.
Five days after the Japanese attack, on Dec. 12, 1941, Mr. Biddle issued a directive -- Circular No. 3591 -- to all federal prosecutors acknowledging the history of unwritten federal policy to ignore most reports of involuntary servitude.
Quote:

In August 1942, a letter from a 16-year-old black boy arrived at the Department of Justice alleging that Charles Bledsoe -- the Alabama man who had received a $100 fine for peonage -- still was holding members of the teen's family against their will. Despite Mr. Biddle's strong directive, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover initially saw no need to pursue the matter. The U.S. attorney in Mobile, Ala., Francis H. Inge, was similarly uninterested.
"No active investigation will be instituted," Mr. Hoover wrote to Assistant Attorney General Wendell Berge.
But seven months into World War II, with the nation anxious to mobilize every possible soldier and counter every thrust of Japan's and Germany's propaganda machines, Mr. Berge directed Mr. Hoover to look further. ... "Enemy propagandists have used similar episodes in international broadcasts to the colored race, saying that the democracies are insincere and that the enemy is their friend," Mr. Berge continued.
So, ultimately, the federal government was forced to finally put teeth behind the 13th Amendment to the Constitution and protect black americans from any form of indentured servitude because of fear of bad P.R. during World War II. Oh, and because they needed them to fight for the U.S. in the armed forces, too.



ETA: Here's the post with the story links I'd put in the other thread:
SEC (and others that are interested): Please read: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1206...iews_days_only -- and be sure to watch the slideshow -- and: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1206...2:r1:c0.328393

breathesgelatin 03-29-2008 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 1626089)
So - can we have an agreed on definition for slavery? I'm interested in what y'all have to say as far as how to define it.

I appreciate your interest in this question, but I actually don't feel qualified to define it.

Actually I think this Wikipedia Template helps to give a sense of the numerous types of enslavement/involuntary labor. Also it creates a distinction between slavery and unfree labor... I actually think the Wikipedia definition of slavery is not too bad...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Slavery

nittanyalum 03-29-2008 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 1626094)
In before the lock.:rolleyes:

LOL. Me too.

I started another thread over in News & Politics if anyone wants to pick up their ball and go over there with me... :rolleyes:

http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/sh...ad.php?t=95036

SWTXBelle 03-29-2008 11:53 PM

And now back to your regularly scheduled scintillating discussion.

breathesgelatin 03-29-2008 11:54 PM

Here's my post in response to nittanyalum's post from the other thread:

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1626073)
They weren't "servants", it was "debt slavery".

The point being that slavery after 1865 was usually called by names other than "slavery" (for obvious reasons). In fact it was often called "servitude" or "captivity" or "emprisonment." Or they would even claim their slaves as family members and use that to justify the enslavement and the slaves' inability to leave. James Brooks's work makes this very clear, although he's working on very different forms of slavery in the southwest and not on the material you've brought up.

I'm willing to recognize that there is a semantic issue here, right? So the people who were enslaving in this period didn't call what they were doing slavery for a variety of reasons, but we can recognize that it was, in fact, slavery. We do this today pretty frequently. For example, we call child soldiers in Africa slaves even though their masters don't speak of them that way. I do think it's important, however, to recognize the difference in words and think about how differences in words affected the reality of people's lives... I do think language matters even if we want to constantly speak truth to power. Even if we all decided ultimately to call it "captivity" and not "slavery" (which James Brooks uses semi-interchangeably in his book), we can all recognize that it was a pretty great evil... I hope.

breathesgelatin 03-29-2008 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 1626102)
And now back to your regularly scheduled scintillating discussion.

FTW.

My sorority chapter (Pi Phi at W&L) used to host the Virginia Tech Pi Phis pretty frequently! It was fun! But our chapters had a lot in common! Yay Pi Phi!

AKA_Monet 03-30-2008 12:07 AM

:confused:

What is the point of making any of these statements? How do they benefit the proper GC community? They are just as incendiary as any other ignorant and asinine and puerile comments made from people whose lives need to interact more than just typing on a computer...

I feel rejected as a person and I feel attacked and abused.

breathesgelatin 03-30-2008 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKA_Monet (Post 1626112)
:confused:

What is the point of making any of these statements? How do they benefit the proper GC community? They are just as incendiary as any other ignorant and asinine and puerile comments made from people whose lives need to interact more than just typing on a computer...

I feel rejected as a person and I feel attacked and abused.

:confused:

I don't know where any attack was made. We've been discussing different forms of slavery.

nittanyalum 03-30-2008 12:32 AM

AKAMonet, I'm sorry, it didn't occur to me that anyone who hadn't been tracking the "Visiting Chapters" thread in the Greek Life forum would have NO IDEA where this thread came from.

Dive into that thread here: http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/sh...t=94834&page=8 and start reading forward ... the thread started off being about fraternity chapters visiting each other and then just started taking left turn after left turn. It turned into some pretty healthy discourse and I think has been surprisingly civil and educational (for the most part).

But then a Greek Life mod came in and started making noise about shutting it down if it didn't get back to the OP, which was a distant memory by then.

So since our freedom of speech was hampered there ;), we scurried over here to the news & politics forum where the discussion could be continued, if folks wished. But I can see now how abrupt the posts coming in that were deep in the conversation over there would seem strange kind of coming out of nowhere over here. Sorry for the blindside!

nittanyalum 03-30-2008 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by breathesgelatin (Post 1626105)
FTW.

My sorority chapter (Pi Phi at W&L) used to host the Virginia Tech Pi Phis pretty frequently! It was fun! But our chapters had a lot in common! Yay Pi Phi!

LOL. :p

DaemonSeid 03-30-2008 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elephant Walk (Post 1625984)
That would be terribly difficult to prove. Thought isn't "exported." There is a root within the peoples which accept the theories so that once they are exposed to the theories, they expose the root. There is nothing new under the sun (as the Bible claimed and I think is true).

I know plenty about the race classifications in Brazil, I did an in-depth study on it for one of my classes. Fairly intresting, but it really doesn't prove anything we were talking about.

slight disagreement....thought can be exported...it's called 'media exposure'

DSTCHAOS 03-30-2008 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elephant Walk (Post 1626055)
A very typical, yet childish response. Very ladylike. Troll at another board instead of bothering us.

IRON-KNEE. IDIOT.

DSTCHAOS 03-30-2008 02:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1626100)
LOL. Me too.

I started another thread over in News & Politics if anyone wants to pick up their ball and go over there with me... :rolleyes:

http://www.greekchat.com/gcforums/sh...ad.php?t=95036

Can we have all of these posts moved there?

I would hate for people (like that idiot Elephant Walk) to come in at the tail end of what was an informative discussion and ask things that have already been covered.

DSTCHAOS 03-30-2008 02:16 AM

I think this discussion has lost its steam, anyway, and most of the "juicy" stuff has been covered.

Coincidentally, interesting discussions really only happen on GC as a result of a thread hijack. GCers seem to run away from threads that are created to discuss such things.

macallan25 03-30-2008 03:15 PM

Haha, I like how the apparent thread starter is me...........and how my OP says "You've lost it pal".

DSTCHAOS 03-30-2008 04:37 PM

Great title. :rolleyes:

BabyPiNK_FL 03-30-2008 04:43 PM

Unless this thread is regarding racial issues within Greek Life (let's not even go there this one is already annoying me), can you please move this to ChitChat or something?

DSTCHAOS 03-30-2008 04:48 PM

Directions for mods and super mods:

1) split thread
2) give new thread a better title (unless you're trying to be funny or an asswipe)
3) then move the new thread to the appropriate forum

barbino 03-30-2008 07:05 PM

I just read/skimmed 12/13 pages of this thread, and I am still searching for ...
a point (to this thread). Does it have one, or can we all agree to somehow give it one? I know that it has a subject or topic but a point seems to be elusive. :)

DSTCHAOS 03-30-2008 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbino (Post 1626336)
I just read/skimmed 12/13 pages of this thread, and I am still searching for ...
a point (to this thread). Does it have one, or can we all agree to somehow give it one? I know that it has a subject or topic but a point seems to be elusive. :)

This thread is a spin off from the Visiting Chapters thread. We veered to a more interesting topic after Elephant Walk made a "jewskin" jab.

However, there is certainly a point to the posts. If you really skimmed 12/13 pages, you should be able to get the point. Unless you're a sucky skimmer. It is fragmented but definitely an interesting discussion (similar to the topics covered in the "first sorority to demand equal rights" thread).

DSTRen13 03-30-2008 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by barbino (Post 1626336)
I just read/skimmed 12/13 pages of this thread, and I am still searching for ...
a point (to this thread). Does it have one, or can we all agree to somehow give it one? I know that it has a subject or topic but a point seems to be elusive. :)

I was under the impression it was a (rather spontaneously occurring) discussion/exchange of ideas on race and slavery. That is the point of the thread, at this point ... does it need to have some purpose beyond that?

SAEalumnus 03-30-2008 08:21 PM

The threads from Greek Life and News & Politics have been merged and placed here.

nittanyalum 03-30-2008 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SECdomination (Post 1626158)
To be clear: I don't doubt that a lot of this happened- what we're talking about now, or in the other thread. What I believe is that the conditions and circumstances are blown way out of proportion- on both the general subject of slavery and the forced workers idea. What the agenda behind that is, I don't know. But I am so sick and tired of being the bad guy after I question these stupid "historical documentaries" and "history textbooks". If there were any publications that provided more than just speculation and horror stories, I'd be a lot more willing to put the argument to rest.

*sigh*

SEC, these accounts aren't just "speculation and horror stories", the accounts in these articles I posted talk about conditions in the 1930s and 1940s, for god's sake. There's no speculating about it. Your parents, well probably YOUR grandparents, but my parents for sure, were alive at that time.

But anyway, let's just KIM. I think DSTChaos is right, the thread's lost it's steam and if the last couple threads didn't make an impression on you that in any way budged your way of thinking, I don't know what will. And you're one of the more likeable "fratties" for me at this point, so I'd rather enjoy your posts on more frivolous topics and not keep getting frustrated by discussing issues we so clearly have deeply different opinions on.

Senusret I 03-31-2008 03:25 PM

Keep it moving.

nittanyalum 03-31-2008 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SECdomination (Post 1626797)
Deal. What's KIM?

Keep It Movin'. :D

DaemonSeid 03-31-2008 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1626799)
Keep It Movin'. :D

siiigh....in all the snarkiness...you would think he would know....







**disappearing back into the fog.....**

nittanyalum 03-31-2008 03:30 PM

I've been seeing "FTW" lately, what does that stand for?

DaemonSeid 03-31-2008 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1626809)
I've been seeing "FTW" lately, what does that stand for?

that depends

reverse of WTF showing confusion

F*ck the world

or


For the win...

YMMV....hehehe

DSTCHAOS 03-31-2008 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1626809)
I've been seeing "FTW" lately, what does that stand for?

I was going to ask the same thing.

"For the win?"

nittanyalum 03-31-2008 03:36 PM

Ahhhhhhh.... thank you.

DSTCHAOS 03-31-2008 03:37 PM

But this huge thread hijack was cool while it lasted. :)

jon1856 03-31-2008 03:37 PM

I have been lurking, on and off, so do not know if this has been brought up here yet:
Found this in this weeks copy of The Week (www.theweekdaily.com)
Slavery is not yet a relic of the past
E. Benjamin SkinnerLos Angeles Times
"Most people assume slavery was vanquished after the American Civil War, or after most countries outlawed it in the 19th century. “In fact,” said E. Benjamin Skinner, “there are more slaves today than at any point in history.” While an exact count is impossible, the U.N. says that 12 million to 27 million people today are forced under threat of violence to work for subsistence pay—at best. Even in the U.S., the government estimates that at least 50,000 people toil “in hidden bondage.” They include people such as Simone Celestine, a teenage Haitian refugee who was held in Miami as a domestic for six years, during which time she was beaten, rented to other households, and not allowed to attend school. In recent years, much of the effort to stamp out slavery has focused on the illegal sex trade. The reality is that more than 90 percent of modern-day slaves are not used for sex but rather as “low-value industrial tools” or indentured domestics. If we’re going to successfully fight the scourge of slavery, we need to start by being clear about what it is."

DaemonSeid 03-31-2008 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1626817)
I was going to ask the same thing.

"For the win?"

don't ask...I just work here.....even I said....WTF?

nittanyalum 03-31-2008 03:51 PM

I'm guessing the "For the win" is a "got the last word" kind of thing.

And one more, what's "ITA"?

DaemonSeid 03-31-2008 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nittanyalum (Post 1626849)
I'm guessing the "For the win" is a "got the last word" kind of thing.

And one more, what's "ITA"?

I assumed it meant 'In Total Agreement'


dont quote me on that tho...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.