GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Entertainment (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=205)
-   -   Tom Cruise & Katie Holmes (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=66020)

KillarneyRose 06-24-2005 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sugar and spice
Ask GeekyPenguin about True Love Waits.
Or ask Kristen Veyshtieksntuusjtyeeuyrjnvazier or whatever the hell her last name is.












oh geez, that was rude of me.

starryeyed 06-24-2005 04:15 PM

the tom cruise vs. matt lauer thing is on msn's videos. GOSH! HE'S A FLIPPIN FRUITCAKE!

33girl 06-24-2005 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KillarneyRose
Or ask Kristen Veyshtieksntuusjtyeeuyrjnvazier or whatever the hell her last name is.












oh geez, that was rude of me.

TRACY YOUR PICTURE IS IN THE DICTIONARY UNDER FRICKIN AWESOME. :D

kddani 06-24-2005 05:56 PM

see, i'm telling you guys, everytime something dies down, he does something else crazy to get back on the front page. Just recently... proposed in Paris... few days later got the water squirted at him... now he acted like a total idiot this morning. There's no such thing as bad PR in his camp. It's all perfectly strategized and timed

starryeyed 06-24-2005 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kddani
see, i'm telling you guys, everytime something dies down, he does something else crazy to get back on the front page. Just recently... proposed in Paris... few days later got the water squirted at him... now he acted like a total idiot this morning. There's no such thing as bad PR in his camp. It's all perfectly strategized and timed
Good point, but bad press isn't necessarily helping his career.

kddani 06-24-2005 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by starryeyed
Good point, but bad press isn't necessarily helping his career.
Not hurting it either though. What person hasn't heard of the War of the Worlds movie now?

starryeyed 06-24-2005 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kddani
Not hurting it either though. What person hasn't heard of the War of the Worlds movie now?
True, but what director would want to shoot a movie with Cruise after his erratic behavior? Also he's losing fans-after the Brooke Shield's mess you couldn't PAY ME to ever watch another of his movies. Does anyone else feel this way or am I just weird?

ZTAngel 06-24-2005 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kddani
Not hurting it either though. What person hasn't heard of the War of the Worlds movie now?
Or Batman Begins.

I guarantee this publicity...errrrr....love affair is over by the time both their movies hit DVD.

FSUZeta 06-24-2005 07:37 PM

killarneyrose, my husband was a navy pilot and he and several of his squadron mates were(and still are) hot! and tom cruise ruined it all when he opened his mouth and gave interviews. what an arrogant s.o.b. he is. imho, too many actors and actresses get above themselves and feel that they can enlighten us(the ignorant, unwashed masses)on whatever they want to speak about. someone should get some duct tape and shut the boy up!

ps-and thank you for the snarkywood link. how hilarious!!

midwesterngirl 06-24-2005 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lady Pi Phi
Either Tom is gay or asexual, or this is all for publicity like everyone has been saying. Although, neither one would surprise me.
Did you ever see the episode of the Simpsons where Selma marries Troy McClure to boost his career and cover up his weird fish fetish? That is what comes to my mind when I think of the TC/KH relationship.

I have read quotes where Katie talks about how she used to have Tom Cruise posters on her wall when she was a kid and dreamed one day of marrying him. Kelly Preston said the exact same thing about John Travolta,yet another Scientologist. I have also heard rumors that the Nicolas Cage /Lisa Marie Presley ended because he wouldn't convert. The whole Scientology doctrine is just bizarre.

FSUZeta 06-24-2005 08:03 PM

has anyone else commented on katie holmes escort on the european tour who is a scientology member? reminds me of old shows where someone falls prey to a cult and then the victim is always under the watchful eye of cult members. creepy!!

James 06-24-2005 10:13 PM

You are wierd lol.

His personal life doesn't effect his screen performance for me. And I am not a Tom Cruise fan.


Quote:

Originally posted by starryeyed
True, but what director would want to shoot a movie with Cruise after his erratic behavior? Also he's losing fans-after the Brooke Shield's mess you couldn't PAY ME to ever watch another of his movies. Does anyone else feel this way or am I just weird?

honeychile 06-24-2005 10:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kddani
Not hurting it either though. What person hasn't heard of the War of the Worlds movie now?
Some of us are just keeping the remote a bit closer!

I didn't like this nutjob before, but he's giving a bad name to nutjobs!!

Taualumna 06-24-2005 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kddani
Not hurting it either though. What person hasn't heard of the War of the Worlds movie now?
Yeah, but are people going to see it?

James 06-24-2005 10:35 PM

ITs a Spielgberg movie, with Tom Cruise. Its also a remake of a very famous story. ITs going o be the Top grossing movie of the weekend I am sure.

Quote:

Originally posted by Taualumna
Yeah, but are people going to see it?

kddani 06-24-2005 10:40 PM

to add to what James said, it also had the biggest budget of any movie ever made.

James 06-24-2005 11:02 PM

This is a really good post.

Quote:

Originally posted by sugar and spice
The problem is that that doesn't prove that his intention with Scientology was to make money. Sure, the quote about "If I needed to make money, I would just start a religion" is telling -- but it happened earlier in his life and he could have had a change of opinion. Unless he speciifically said, "I made up Scientology completely in order to make money," we don't really know what his intentions were. The quotes by anti-cult movement leaders in the article are interesting but not exceptionally valid given that -- as religioustolerance.org points out -- most people who study the mind don't believe that "mind control" is possible, and those ACM leaders are a small and biased minority. Sure, it seems quite possible that Scientology uses unscrupulous means to make money or uses its money less than wisely, but at this point, there are few religions that don't.

It's more likely that unstable individuals (hello Tom Cruise!) are attracted to "cult-like" religions that require very deep commitments -- and thus are more likely to have problems with emotional development, mood or personality disorders, tendency to commit suicide, et cetera. Correlation (of emotionally disturbed individuals and Scientology -- or any religious group/"cult") does not equal causation. The stories I've read from family members of Scientology members who killed themselves (or allegedly killed themselves) usually paint pictures of individuals who were very troubled long before they became Scientologists. I'm not a professional or anything, but one might guess that they sought out a very involved, family-like religion because they felt like they were missing something at home. The story that opens this article bears that out, with a family that had no clue anything was "off" about their son until after he ended up dead. Sorry, but I don't buy the idea that Scientology was his only problem.

Not to mention that almost every religion, if not every religion, has been created or co-opted for the purposes of some greedy (or lustful, or power-hungry, et cetera) leader on some level or another. Joseph Smith?* Come on now. No religion is pure.

I certainly think there many things wrong with Scientology, a motivated-by-money factor being one of them -- but as Rob implied, if we're going to define Scientology as a "cult" than you have to put the LDS church in the "cult" category as well, along with a number of smaller sects of Christianity (and come to think of it, larger ones as well). And I don't think any of those groups deserve to be portrayed in the same light as, say, the Branch Davidians or Solar Temple or the People's Temple or whatever. And I certainly don't think "brainwashing" per se is at play in any form that even the most mainstream religions don't also use.



* I'm sorry to keep picking on the Mormons, but they are one of the religions I've read about in the most depth and I see many many parallels between them and Scientology, for better or for worse.


lifesaver 06-24-2005 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kddani
What person hasn't heard of the War of the Worlds movie now?
I've onyl seen the previews, and am familiar with the story, but liked the movie the first time when it was Independence Day.

KillarneyRose 06-25-2005 09:21 AM

Have any of you ever seen a Steve Martin/Eddie Murphy movie called "Bowfinger"? It was out sometime around the turn of the century. Eddie Murphy is this huge movie star who doesn't make a move without consulting the leader of the scientology-like cult he's involved in. Oh, and he thinks aliens are coming to get him.

It's one of the most hilarious movies I have ever seen (but, sadly, I don't think many others saw it).

AOII_LB93 06-26-2005 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KillarneyRose
Have any of you ever seen a Steve Martin/Eddie Murphy movie called "Bowfinger"? It was out sometime around the turn of the century. Eddie Murphy is this huge movie star who doesn't make a move without consulting the leader of the scientology-like cult he's involved in. Oh, and he thinks aliens are coming to get him.

It's one of the most hilarious movies I have ever seen (but, sadly, I don't think many others saw it).

Hilarious movie..I saw it in the theater when it came out.

Scientology is odd. My mom used to work with them back when she was in the computer biz and sold them tons of computer equipment. She said they were very secretive and there were places in their compound type thing that you needed high security clearance to get in and access.

And the Tom and Katie thing, hey more power to them if they are really in love, but I think she's just a beard.

Lady Pi Phi 06-26-2005 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FSUZeta
has anyone else commented on katie holmes escort on the european tour who is a scientology member? reminds me of old shows where someone falls prey to a cult and then the victim is always under the watchful eye of cult members. creepy!!
Yep! I mentioned that earlier in this thread. Tom has hired a full time female minder for Katie.

Definitely creepy.

I still want to see War of the Worlds, but that's because I am a Spielberg fan. I could care less that Tom Cruise is in it.

I'd love to boycott all things starring Scietology members, but that means I can't watch any of my shows anymore like "That '70s show" and "Fat Actress".

starryeyed 06-26-2005 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ariesrising
Tom Cruise is a total joke. An arrogant, pompous ass, and I hope his career tanks and L. Ron Hubbard runs off with all his money.
:D I LOVE IT!

moe.ron 06-26-2005 03:53 PM

L. Ron Hubbard is with the aliens now.

33girl 06-26-2005 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lady Pi Phi
I'd love to boycott all things starring Scietology members, but that means I can't watch any of my shows anymore like "That '70s show" and "Fat Actress".
Who in That 70's Show is a Scientologist?

Oh and the LM Presley thing is so not true. I stole Nicolas Cage from her. :)

midwesterngirl 06-26-2005 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 33girl
Who in That 70's Show is a Scientologist?

Oh and the LM Presley thing is so not true. I stole Nicolas Cage from her. :)

Its Danny Masterson (Hyde).

sigmadiva 06-26-2005 11:24 PM

I think on the Today show tomorrow they are going to show Matt Lauer and Tom going at each other over the use of medication to treat psychological disorders. I've seen a clip of it and Tom looks tired and strung out.

midwesterngirl 06-27-2005 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sigmadiva
I think on the Today show tomorrow they are going to show Matt Lauer and Tom going at each other over the use of medication to treat psychological disorders. I've seen a clip of it and Tom looks tired and strung out.

I read a transcript and I could not believe it. To see that ignorant little moronic high school dropout pontificating to Matt about the use of anti depressants drugs just turned my stomach. If there were someone in need of said drugs it is certainly Tom.

AOIIBrandi 06-27-2005 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by AOII_LB93

Scientology is odd. My mom used to work with them back when she was in the computer biz and sold them tons of computer equipment. She said they were very secretive and there were places in their compound type thing that you needed high security clearance to get in and access.

Funny, My husband is in the shipping business and when we lived in Tampa he had to send a driver out to the Scientology Center in Clearwater. He said that when the driver came back he told my husband that he would NEVER do another delivery there again (very creepy, but don't have all the details).

Lady Pi Phi 06-27-2005 09:42 AM

The rumour in the paper this morning is that they are planning to start a family.

MysticCat 06-27-2005 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by sugar and spice
Not to mention that almost every religion, if not every religion, has been created or co-opted for the purposes of some greedy (or lustful, or power-hungry, et cetera) leader on some level or another. Joseph Smith?* Come on now. No religion is pure.

I certainly think there many things wrong with Scientology, a motivated-by-money factor being one of them -- but as Rob implied, if we're going to define Scientology as a "cult" than you have to put the LDS church in the "cult" category as well, along with a number of smaller sects of Christianity (and come to think of it, larger ones as well).

Certainly argeed that all religions can produce their loons and their exploiters.

Much depends on how one is using the word cult. Originally, it simply meant a religious practice, like the cult of Apollo. Today (according to Wikipedia, and I think it is probably on point here): In religion and sociology, a cult is a group of people (often a new religious movement) devoted to beliefs and goals which may be contradictory to those held by the majority of society. Its marginal status may come about either due to its novel belief system or due to idiosyncratic practices that cause the surrounding culture to regard it as far outside the mainstream.

Some use a more restrictive definition, however. Again, per Wikipedia: In English-speaking countries since about the 1960s, especially in North America, the term cult has taken on a pejorative and sometimes offensive connotation. This largely originated with highly publicized cults which purportedly exploited their members psychologically and financially, or which allegedly utilized group-based persuasion and conversion techniques. These techniques may include "brainwashing," "thought reform," "love bombing," and "mind control" . . . . Due to the usually pejorative connotation of the word "cult", new religious movements (NRMs) and other purported cults often find the word highly offensive. Some purported cults have been known to insist that other similar groups are cults but that they themselves are not. On the other hand, some skeptics have questioned the distinction between a cult and a mainstream religion. They say that the only difference between a cult and a religion is that the latter is older and has more followers and, therefore, seems less controversial because society has become used to it.

By this second definition (involving emotional, intellectual or financial expoitation of members), I don't think the LDS Church can properly be called a cult. Scientology can.

In any event, "cult" is a loaded word that must be used carefully.

Rudey 06-27-2005 11:04 AM

Didn't Christianity start as a cult?

-Rudey

Quote:

Originally posted by MysticCat81
Certainly argeed that all religions can produce their loons and their exploiters.

Much depends on how one is using the word cult. Originally, it simply meant a religious practice, like the cult of Apollo. Today (according to Wikipedia, and I think it is probably on point here): In religion and sociology, a cult is a group of people (often a new religious movement) devoted to beliefs and goals which may be contradictory to those held by the majority of society. Its marginal status may come about either due to its novel belief system or due to idiosyncratic practices that cause the surrounding culture to regard it as far outside the mainstream.

Some use a more restrictive definition, however. Again, per Wikipedia: In English-speaking countries since about the 1960s, especially in North America, the term cult has taken on a pejorative and sometimes offensive connotation. This largely originated with highly publicized cults which purportedly exploited their members psychologically and financially, or which allegedly utilized group-based persuasion and conversion techniques. These techniques may include "brainwashing," "thought reform," "love bombing," and "mind control" . . . . Due to the usually pejorative connotation of the word "cult", new religious movements (NRMs) and other purported cults often find the word highly offensive. Some purported cults have been known to insist that other similar groups are cults but that they themselves are not. On the other hand, some skeptics have questioned the distinction between a cult and a mainstream religion. They say that the only difference between a cult and a religion is that the latter is older and has more followers and, therefore, seems less controversial because society has become used to it.

By this second definition (involving emotional, intellectual or financial expoitation of members), I don't think the LDS Church can properly be called a cult. Scientology can.

In any event, "cult" is a loaded word that must be used carefully.


MysticCat 06-27-2005 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
Didn't Christianity start as a cult?
Using the "classical" definition, Christianity certainly was a cult -- the cult of Christ (just as Judaism was the cult of YHWH). But classically speaking, cult and religion are basically synonymous.

Using the sociological definition I provided above, Christianity certainly could be called a cult in its first century -- "a group of people (often a new religious movement) devoted to beliefs and goals which may be contradictory to those held by the majority of society. Its marginal status may come about either due to its novel belief system or due to idiosyncratic practices that cause the surrounding culture to regard it as far outside the mainstream." Using this definition, Rome would have considered both Christianity and Judaism as cults.

I know of no evidence that would make the use of the third definition (the narrow, perjorative definition sometimes used in North America that implies brainwashing and emotional or financial exploitation) appropriate with regard to early Christianity.

Again, "cult" has become a loaded word. It needs to be used carefully, and probably with some explanation of the meaning intended.

Rudey 06-27-2005 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MysticCat81
Using the "classical" definition, Christianity certainly was a cult -- the cult of Christ (just as Judaism was the cult of YHWH). But classically speaking, cult and religion are basically synonymous.

Using the sociological definition I provided above, Christianity certainly could be called a cult in its first century -- "a group of people (often a new religious movement) devoted to beliefs and goals which may be contradictory to those held by the majority of society. Its marginal status may come about either due to its novel belief system or due to idiosyncratic practices that cause the surrounding culture to regard it as far outside the mainstream." Using this definition, Rome would have considered both Christianity and Judaism as cults.

I know of no evidence that would make the use of the third definition (the narrow, perjorative definition sometimes used in North America that implies brainwashing and emotional or financial exploitation) appropriate with regard to early Christianity.

Again, "cult" has become a loaded word. It needs to be used carefully, and probably with some explanation of the meaning intended.

What time period is early Christianity?

I mean listen, if the majority of people were scientologists and scientology existed before other religions, there wouldn't even be a discussion of people saying they were a cult.

And religion defies logic and reasoning often. It is about faith.

I don't understand the Christians that go around healing people by touch and profiting strongly just as I don't understand how Scientologists believe there is an alien attached to every human guiding him. Y'all can believe whatever you want but religion is about faith and all too often, the exploitation of the masses and the opiate of the mind.

-Rudey

33girl 06-27-2005 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
I don't understand the Christians that go around healing people by touch and profiting strongly
I don't consider those people Christians, I consider them charlatans (Benny Hinn et al).

Rudey 06-27-2005 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 33girl
I don't consider those people Christians, I consider them charlatans (Benny Hinn et al).
Christian evangelists have one of the most booming "entertainment" industries. Everything from their own television programming to movies and more. This isn't a small sliver of the community.

That's not saying that anyone is a charlatan. It's saying that the money is there and boy, oh boy, is business booming.

-Rudey

MysticCat 06-27-2005 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rudey
What time period is early Christianity?
I think probably anytime up to somwhere between 313 (the Edict of Milan) to around 382 (Theodotius' decree making Christianity the official, favored religion of the Roman Empire) would be considered the early Christianity.

Quote:

I mean listen, if the majority of people were scientologists and scientology existed before other religions, there wouldn't even be a discussion of people saying they were a cult.

And religion defies logic and reasoning often. It is about faith.

Without question, very true.

This is one reason I have tried to avoid characterizing Scientology based on its beliefs and have instead focused on some of its practices, which do bear some hallmarks of a "cult," as used in the very narrow sense -- particularly, the degree of control it seems to exercise over its adherants and the methods used to instill and maintain that control.

ZTAngel 06-27-2005 01:34 PM

Funny quote from Jimmy Kimmel:

Tom and Katie got engaged on Friday and, once again, the media somehow found out about it. If we promise to go see 'War of the Worlds,' will you please make this stop?

damasa 06-27-2005 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 33girl
I don't consider those people Christians, I consider them charlatans (Benny Hinn et al).
What's the name of the other guy that sells his "Holy Water" on the early morning religious infomercial? I think it's the same channel as Benny Hinn but I'm not sure. I just know I usually rise from bed to see some freak "healing people with the power of god" when he smashes them in the face and throws them to the ground!


I should try that, smash someone in the face and throw them to the ground and proclaim that I am healing them. Would it work?

Lady Pi Phi 06-27-2005 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by damasa
...I should try that, smash someone in the face and throw them to the ground and proclaim that I am healing them. Would it work?
It might, but you might want to find a few people to stand around and watch you do this. This way you can really claim you are a religious group and these people are your followers.

Rudey 06-27-2005 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MysticCat81
I think probably anytime up to somwhere between 313 (the Edict of Milan) to around 382 (Theodotius' decree making Christianity the official, favored religion of the Roman Empire) would be considered the early Christianity.

Without question, very true.

This is one reason I have tried to avoid characterizing Scientology based on its beliefs and have instead focused on some of its practices, which do bear some hallmarks of a "cult," as used in the very narrow sense -- particularly, the degree of control it seems to exercise over its adherants and the methods used to instill and maintain that control.

Was questioning of religion and its leaders encouraged and allowed in Christianity?

-Rudey


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.