![]() |
And it's possible that a high percentage of the people they were making exceptions for weren't ending up with bids, so they could see they were setting them up for bad results maybe.
|
basically it's legal discrimination
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
LOVE this response! :) |
Quote:
I honestly think it's better off with the cut off at 2.5, for the exact reason you stated. At a school like Ole Miss I can bet that the girls who were grade exceptions weren't getting bids anyway and that it was just a waste of the girls' time and mioney. |
Quote:
But social and service GLOs are the ones who should be careful how they handle certain students, because they are mainly non-academic orgs turning down students for academic reasons. Learning disorders, ADD, Asperger's or whatever are defined as disabilities. Depending on the school, students with disabilites can have a variety of accomodations, including GPA or grade exceptions. Most GLOs have anti-discrimination policies. Disibilities can be included, it depends on the organization (which I believe is the majority). If a GLO denies a disabled student's rights (granted by the disability office), that could get them in trouble. They won't get thrown in jail of course, but it could get them a civil suit. Again it really depends...the specific disability, how the school accomodates them, if the student even notified his/her school about the disability, specific school and student org policies, greek life policies, GLO policies, and how the student is treated. |
Quote:
Disability law doesn't require that you have no standards for people with disabilities just that you make reasonable modification for them. If the students were receiving modifications in their classes, why would they need to be held to a lower academic standard in terms of GPA? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But none of the sororities wants to come out and say "we don't want anyone with learning disableties to join" so they made an NPC rule basically saying the same thing |
Quote:
In any event, as you've described it, it's not discrimination based on disability. No organization would be saying "we're not taking her because she's got this disability." They're not taking her because she doesn't meet academic qualifications. As others have noted, if there really is a disability requiring accommodation, then that should already have been taken into account by the school. Not all standards = discrimination. Quote:
A GPA is without question individual merit and has nothing to do with "the group, class, or category to which that person . . . belongs." I'm sorry, but I think it's just plain silly to suggest that having a GPA requirement is merely to keep people with learning disabilities out of sororities. That doesn't even pass the straight face test. |
I'm sorry for butting in again, but when did learning disabilities automatically = dumb? I think some of you are assuming that. And, I don't think that is the case at all, that LD = dumb. Sure, some students may have to work harder because of their LD, but that does not make them dumb.
And, I don't see where this is discrimination. It is a standard. The sororities know how demanding being an active can be, whether you are talking about NPC, NPHC, MCGLO - greek life demands your time. If the student can not handle the demands of school and greek life, then that student needs to focus on school. Besides, from what I've learned on these boards, it seems that girls who want to go to Ole Miss know if they want to be in a sorority or not, so then they should know that they need to have a high GPA to particiapte in recruitment. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.