![]() |
I bet the answer is "no," unless your ritual robes have "Kappa Inc." on them. and the little "r" with a circle around it.
|
Quote:
The resolution when presented had some of the wording amended so I do not have the version that actually passed. I know there are other problems greater than this to focus on but I have seen some historic pieces from my sorority sold to people that have no idea the meaning the letters or symbols hold. I guess that affects me and I don't want to see my org lose the right to our letters (even though they are already shared by a national foreign service fraternity/sorority.) And yes, protecting marks is also a financial consideration--one that my org cannot afford to overlook. I appreciate that what some have said though--and I have a new perspective on this issue. |
Lease holds
Wow - there are more broken leases on pins than on apartments in NYC in 100 years! Each day since so many pins end up on ebay!
|
Re: Lease holds
Quote:
|
Didn't want to read this all the way through...sorry! But, I wanted to mention a little piece of knowledge that I have knocking around in the old brain.
I've been working A LOT with the estates of both my grandmother and my great aunt. This is my first experience with estates but has been a vivid one and I must say... The best thing for a family to do, honestly, is to bury the property with the member. While it is not unreasonable to bequeath a badge to another member, a chapter or return it to the national org, there's a lot of legal mess that ensues over even the tiniest thing. Avoid the mess, bury the badge! |
Quote:
Denise |
I don't see a problem with owning/collecting badges.
If it's not yours, you probably don't understand it. If you've somehow gotten into posession of a ritual book that explains it, you still don't understand it. I'd rather someone who was a member of that GLO have posession of it, but nobody put me in charge. I especially don't see the problem with me owning/collecting my own badge. I know and understand the meaning behind it. It has special meaning and beauty to me. And from a purely vain point of view, I could easily see having been initiated with mom's gold Alpha Phi pin and then getting my own white gold badge later. What, am I going to get rid of mom's badge just because I don't wear yellow gold? |
Re: Tommy may have 'em..
Quote:
Denise |
Quote:
The issue at hand is if you think it's OK to have badges from other groups. I would prefer others not to have ASA badges, but since they don't know what it means, it's just an odd shaped diamond to them.;) |
I don't think there is any thing intriniclly wrong with having other org.s badges. I have a badge of now defunct order of Kappa Phi from i think colgate or lafayette or something that ends with an 'e' but they became a chapter of Beta Kappa, which later merged with Theta Chi. If I had some one's badge I would mail it back to their HQ if they had one. But they don't have one. If I meet a brother from that chapter, I'd give it to him, b/c it is part of his chapter's and alma mater's history.
As for the Crossed Swords and Rattlesnake....if you don't know what it means, why wear it? Or even have it. I know that badges are pretty but there is a badge poster some where that has all of them so you could just look at that if it was an asthetic thing. |
Rattlesnake is cool though.
|
Quote:
|
closed?
golly, don't know where to put this, but at any rate, I found an old
box in the garage which had about 20 GLO pins and over 30 ritual books. I had not looked at them for years, Phi Alpha, ZAX, kai, and TKPhi and all that. Most of 'em smack of the Fellowcraft degree of the Masons. One way to induce narcolepsy is to sentence one to read all them things. |
Man, I'm just killing myself for missing that ritual collector thread. Stupid Valentine's Day!
You know, I would love to put myself up on a pedestal and say I'm well above the temptation to publicly smack someone in the face with things I may know about their ritual. But with SAETEX my fingers were itching. Actually itching! But I have tremendous respect for SAE, and of course my conscience wins out and I can't do it. I guess that's the lesson of many rituals - to recognize that we're imperfect people and even if we don't manage to live up to our high ideals today, we'll try again tomorrow. (Oh, and SAETEX, if you want to PM or email me, I'll be happy to give you privately the meaning of Phi Alpha - greek spelling, english translation, pronunciation, anything you want. Of course, first you'll have to prove you're a member yourself, but that should be easy for one so omniscient about all things SAE. Also, I might suggest you yourself spend some time thinking about Phi Alpha because you're not quite there yet). [sigh] Ahhhhh, that feels better. Oh, and so this post is on topic: You own your badge. Except for the ones that I own. wptw |
To follow up on a legitimate question from the now-closed thread:
Copyrights are based on public disclosure of the intellectual property you claim as yours. You cannot claim government protection of intellectual property without revealing its contents, at a minimum, to the government. And we know that no group would file its ritual with any government agency. Therefore, it's safe to say that copyright law would not cover any instance of an illicit published ritual. Hypothetically, groups could oblige their members to sign contracts (in addition to swearing oaths) promising to keep the ritual secret. This would be no different than the gag-rule contracts that are used when lawsuits settle, etc. If the member then revealed any secrets publicly, the member could be sued for breach of contract. But I don't think many groups do this, and at any rate, the penalties for breach of a non-economic contract like that could not be high, because the group probably could not show that it suffered a financial loss as a result of the disclosure. On top of all this, even if the ritual WERE copyrighted, it is considered fair use to publish excerpts of someone else's copyrighted work within a larger article analyzing the work. In other words, if the Washington Post got ahold of a copyrighted ritual, it would be legal for it to publish an article that stated, "The ritual takes about 45 minutes to recite...Phi Alpha means Friendship Eternal...pledges have to kneel" etc. So I wouldn't rely on using the law to keep your secrets private. You have to manage privacy issues on your own. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.