![]() |
Am I the only one who is extremely grossed out by this story? Clicking on this thread grosses me out which is why I haven't posted. This woman just seems disgusting.
As for real topic, I feel like it has been discussed on GC before. Almost no medical procedures should be done without the patient's and/or family's consent. I see that as an issue of legality, ethics, and morality. That's a different issue as my disgust for this woman. Ideally, she would request to be sterilized or God would randomly do that for us. But, a waste of tax payer dollars and being a horrendous parent does not open the door for involuntary sterilization. Condoning that would open the door for something that has happened to "deviants" in the past and would become an unstoppable force when those in power are able to decide who should be involuntarily sterilized. |
Quote:
Octomom |
Quote:
I forgot to mention that bringing your own IUD is just strange and gross. I definitely don't think that makes sense. People can set doctors up for malpractice suits and all sorts of things if they bring in their own medical devices. Yikes. |
Quote:
|
I mean I get the part (now) what someone said earlier about purchasing and bringing your own devices, but it still seems like setting yourself up for 'fail' by doing so...sealed or not.
|
With technology, litigation, and "crazy" at the level that it is these days, I don't think people should be trusted to bring their own devices in what appears to be the original packaging.
Medications, perhaps. Devices, no. |
Not even meds.
|
Quote:
Some of these items are very expensive to stock and expire if not used (especially IUDs that contain medications) so hospitals may not choose to stock all forms. Hospitals often don't stock all medications as well. They have "formularies" that contain medications that their pharmacy committees have negotiated prices for that save them money. They do NOT stock all drugs so if you go to a hospital and your medication is not on the formulary, you can either take a similar medication or bring your own and take it. There is no giant mall of medical implants at these hospitals so if you need something that they don't carry, it is often easier for the patient to procure the item prior to surgery. For more high priced items, like orthopaedic hardware, the sales rep actually comes to the operating room with the implants and even shows the surgeon how to use them. When any item is brought in from outside and the item has been tampered with (and it is easy to tell if they have been) they won't be used. Hospitals, obviously, have procedures set in place to assure compliance and safety, but it would be pretty hard for a patient to sue the hospital or doctor if she/he tampered with the product. |
Quote:
Crazy people have done all sorts of things to set others up. Never heard of people harming themselves to accuse someone else of doing it? |
Quote:
(general) People may not intentionally mishandle things, but just out of ignorance not store it or handle it properly. Why should they know how to do that? They aren't medical professionals. And as DrPhil said, people will do lots of crazy things to get $$$. Finger in the Wendy's chili, anyone? |
I was gonna mention the Wendy's chili finger or the instances where people have whooped their own asses to get someone else in trouble.
|
Quote:
Yeah, but someone brings an IUD with a finger in it, and it doesn't get used. There is a big difference between having a person get a product and use it themselves and use it incorrectly and get a product and have it used by a medical professional. It is obviously not as big a deal as y'all seem to think since it does occur. The risk is no worse than prescribing a medication to a patient and have them take it incorrectly or inappropriately. Hell, nothing stops those kinds of patients from rubbing feces in their wounds if they want to claim malpractice...people aren't that crazy that often (it does happen, I do have stories, but it is REALLY rare!) There is inherent risk in the profession. Hospitals have lawyers and risk management people on staff thinking of how to avoid potential lawsuits, so the risk is pretty minimal. Quote:
|
eh...okay...we know that safety nets are only in place after there's proof of mishandling rather than suspicion of the potential for mishandling.
|
Box in a box or not, this concept still yucks me out, and I have a pretty high tolerance for yucky things.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.