GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   News & Politics (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=207)
-   -   Imus Still in Hot Water (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=86232)

shinerbock 04-12-2007 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1428678)
Because there isn't one.

Unintentionally hilarious post of the day.

OOhsoflyDELTA#9 04-12-2007 05:26 PM

CBS plugged the pull on this fool so thats that!!!

Unregistered- 04-12-2007 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OOhsoflyDELTA#9 (Post 1428841)
CBS plugged the pull on this fool so thats that!!!

For some reason, I see a career for him at Sirius.

shinerbock 04-12-2007 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OOhsoflyDELTA#9 (Post 1428841)
CBS plugged the pull on this fool so thats that!!!

Blackmail works.

DSTCHAOS 04-12-2007 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OTW (Post 1428844)
For some reason, I see a career for him at Sirius.

I agree.

AGDee 04-12-2007 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DSTCHAOS (Post 1428683)
As most of us have. But just because people are murdered doesn't mean that violent crimes like rape and assault should be ignored.

The "nappyheaded hoe" part was bad enough but he had to go the extra mile with his "jiggaboo vs. wannabe" reference. That shows that he not only knows what he was saying but that he wanted to make sure it was controversial enough to make some people laugh and others cringe.

I wasn't saying that we should ignore this. I think we need to apply the same standard across the board.

I personally haven't listed to Imus in well over a decade and didn't realize that he wasn't still in the "shock jock" business, because he very much was a "shock jock" when he was being carried by a local Detroit radio station. I think that all shock jocks have said things this bad or worse. His business was offending people for a long time. There are a lot of shock jocks who are making a living by being offensive. If one is fired for it, then all of them should be.

It was his producer that made the "jiggaboo vs. wannabe" reference and who, in fact, started the conversation, but nobody is slamming him at all. I find that odd too. Shouldn't they be equally responsible here? Held to the same standard? I hope that he has been fired also.

From what I've read, particularly on Wikipedia, he has been an equal opportunity offender. Some excerpts:
Don Imus’ behavior has often drawn the attention of the press. He famously called Rush Limbaugh "a fat, pill-popping loser" and Lesley Stahl a "gutless, lying weasel." His exchange of insults ("fat pig") regarding his show’s former news reader, Contessa Brewer, made news as did Brewer's response ("cantankerous old fool"). When Tucker Carlson brought up Brewer on the program in 2005, Imus hung up on him, calling him "a bowtie-wearing pussy." Some of his targets have not been so prominent, and his attacks often display a more vindictive quality; see Controversies.

Imus has repeatedly referred to Arabs as "ragheads."[8] He has berated many female newsreaders, most recently Contessa Brewer, which caused her to leave the show. After she left the show, Imus went on a tirade, saying, “With that fat ass she’s got, she wouldn’t be one of ‘em,” (a beautiful woman). Imus said on the air, "That skank has to spend three hours with makeup in the morning." The tirade was also tied to comments that were overheard of Contessa's calling Imus “a cantankerous old fool” at a dinner in a restaurant in 2005, when she was still newsreader.[9]

It goes on and on. He probably should have been fired a long time ago.

Conskeeted7 04-12-2007 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSig RC (Post 1428630)
Yeah, definitely - and while we're at it, we can leave poverty issues to the poor, hunger issues to the starving, etc. We're definitely not all in this together, when it comes to fighting off century-old stereotypes and embedded racial issues.

These issues are not comparable at all. I still cannot believe that white people cannot understand why the connotation when they use 'racial slang' is different than when used by people of the same race. Since apparently most white people are not willing to acknowledge that difference, evidenced by their continued attempts at incorporating it into their dialogues, the best solution for white people is to just leave that language alone. This is especially true since there's such a negative outcry when it's used. Why keep trying? Why worry about it? Why all of a sudden is white America so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other? I'm not buying the double standard crap. White people don't use that kind of language for any positive reason. Who are we really kidding here?

jon1856 04-12-2007 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1429006)
These issues are not comparable at all. I still cannot believe that white people cannot understand why the connotation when they use 'racial slang' is different than when used by people of the same race. Since apparently most white people are not willing to acknowledge that difference, evidenced by their continued attempts at incorporating it into their dialogues, the best solution for white people is to just leave that language alone. This is especially true since there's such a negative outcry when it's used. Why keep trying? Why worry about it? Why all of a sudden is white America so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other? I'm not buying the double standard crap. White people don't use that kind of language for any positive reason. Who are we really kidding here?

It is called going main stream.
I do not like, enjoy, or think very highly of the anti-women, the anti-cop, the anti-law, the pro-drug messages et al I see and hear in many of todays music. And who is making these songs?????:eek: :mad: :( And I am NOT talking per se about the music companies.
And where is the "good" Rev on this issue? Hummm.....

shinerbock 04-13-2007 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1429006)
These issues are not comparable at all. I still cannot believe that white people cannot understand why the connotation when they use 'racial slang' is different than when used by people of the same race. Since apparently most white people are not willing to acknowledge that difference, evidenced by their continued attempts at incorporating it into their dialogues, the best solution for white people is to just leave that language alone. This is especially true since there's such a negative outcry when it's used. Why keep trying? Why worry about it? Why all of a sudden is white America so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other? I'm not buying the double standard crap. White people don't use that kind of language for any positive reason. Who are we really kidding here?

I agree, white people shouldn't use that language, any of it.

delph998 04-13-2007 12:08 AM

Imus got fired. The End.

PM_Mama00 04-13-2007 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1428510)
I personally don't believe that many, if any at all, white adults can honestly say they do not know the difference between an offensive comment and one that is not. I think it's a total cop-out for any adults to say they should be allowed to use offensive language just because others may say it.

I believe that white people who use offensive language and then use rap/black people as a reason for it are just making excuses. Don't worry about why black people/females use that language. Just know that you can't. Leave that other issue for the black people to deal with. Since when did white people become so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other?

This 'double standard' talk is pure nonsense to me.


Then I never, ever want to hear the word honkey or camel jockey out of a black person's mouth ever again. And don't worry why they shouldn't use it. Let us white people and Arabs worry about it. :mad:

_Opi_ 04-13-2007 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1429006)
Why all of a sudden is white America so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other?

Because it's the latest trend to excuse the racist tendencies of some white tv/radio personalities.

I'm glad that idiot is out of job.

macallan25 04-13-2007 12:46 PM

Imus = Sirius + multi-million $$ contract.

He isn't going to be out of a job for long.

macallan25 04-13-2007 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM_Mama00 (Post 1429150)
Then I never, ever want to hear the word honkey or camel jockey out of a black person's mouth ever again. And don't worry why they shouldn't use it. Let us white people and Arabs worry about it. :mad:

I agree with what you are saying. The funny thing is though....I really don't give a shit if it happens. If some random black guy wants to call me a honkey or a cracker....then so be it. Congratulations. I certainly can find better things to do than start a huge hoopla over it. Chances are the guy is some ghetto fabulous thug who I'll probably be paying to wash my car soon.

Smite me.

PiKA2001 04-13-2007 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1429006)
Why all of a sudden is white America so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other? I'm not buying the double standard crap. White people don't use that kind of language for any positive reason. Who are we really kidding here?

I don't think any language of that sort is used in a positive way, unless calling your wife a ho is considered classy in the black community. I'm sorry, you can't own a word or stop just certain people from using a word, especially when it's everywhere around you, from music to movies, to overhearing it in the malls and even in school. You can't expect white people to forget that these words exist if blacks won't stop using these words as well.

macallan25 04-13-2007 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1429006)
Why all of a sudden is white America so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other? I'm not buying the double standard crap. White people don't use that kind of language for any positive reason. Who are we really kidding here?

So you are effectively saying that black people use terms like ni*ger, bitch, ho, etc. in a positive way? Right, right, right.

KSig RC 04-13-2007 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1429006)
These issues are not comparable at all. I still cannot believe that white people cannot understand why the connotation when they use 'racial slang' is different than when used by people of the same race. Since apparently most white people are not willing to acknowledge that difference, evidenced by their continued attempts at incorporating it into their dialogues, the best solution for white people is to just leave that language alone. This is especially true since there's such a negative outcry when it's used. Why keep trying? Why worry about it? Why all of a sudden is white America so concerned with the language that blacks use toward each other? I'm not buying the double standard crap. White people don't use that kind of language for any positive reason. Who are we really kidding here?

Did you not read the rest of my post?

I don't support whites using the language, nor do I support cries of "double standard" - I do, however, think your 'best solution' is actively detrimental to the efforts of intelligent people to actually help with racial inequality in this country.

However, I also buy DSTChaos's point re: average intelligence . . . so there's that, I guess.

Tom Earp 04-13-2007 02:21 PM

Jason Whitlock, a Black writer for the Kansas City Star brought a very good point about this!

If Imus is brought to task by Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson, then why are they not made to apologize to the members of the Duke Lacross team that they made a bit to do about?

They can raise all kinds of stink but it never rubs off on them as they are a couole of pious people!:mad:

So, where is their apology to the young me of Duke?

macallan25 04-13-2007 02:58 PM

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/statica...icle55179.html

The Imus Lynch Party: Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted: April 13, 2007
1:00 a.m. Eastern

"In the end, it was not about Imus. It was about us.

Are we really a better country because, after he was publicly whipped for 10 days as the worst kind of racist, with whom no decent person could associate, he was thrown off the air?

Cards on the table.

This writer works for MSNBC, has been on the Imus show scores of times, watches Imus every morning, and likes the show, the music and the guys: the I-Man, Bernie, Charles and Tom Bowman.

And Imus is among the best interviewers in our business. Not only does he read and follow the news closely, he listens and probes as well as any interviewer in America. Because he is a comic, people mistake how good a questioner he is.

(Column continues below).........

DSTCHAOS 04-13-2007 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM_Mama00
Then I never, ever want to hear the word honkey or camel jockey out of a black person's mouth ever again. And don't worry why they shouldn't use it. Let us white people and Arabs worry about it.

I agree with the bolded but that goes without saying for many people who think that some words are unnecessary in the first place.

Regarding the rest, nonwhites who used those words never wondered, or remotely cared about, why they shouldn't use it. If confronted with the inappropriateness of those words, they wouldn't use "well, THEY say it" as an excuse as many nonblacks tend to do with us. Instead those individuals would probably say they are paying whites back for years of oppression and/or don't give a damn and hope you choke on your hurt feelings.


Quote:

Originally Posted by macallan25 (Post 1429205)
The funny thing is though....I really don't give a shit if it happens. If some random black guy wants to call me a honkey or a cracker....then so be it. Congratulations. I certainly can find better things to do than start a huge hoopla over it.


Because those words don't have a history of oppression behind them. If whites were called those names while being denied service at restaurants, denied jobs or hanging from trees, you would probably feel differently or at least understand why other whites feel differently than you do.

I always found those words inappropriate but that's based on a general bigotry and humanity argument that has nothing to do with racism or discrimination. If whites want to call each other whatever, that's whites' business and doesn't mean I should do the same. The same logic applies to nonblacks trying to mock whatever they see or hear some blacks do or say to each other (I still say some things should be kept AMONGST each other, if kept at all).

DSTCHAOS 04-13-2007 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGDee (Post 1428869)
It was his producer that made the "jiggaboo vs. wannabe" reference and who, in fact, started the conversation, but nobody is slamming him at all. I find that odd too. Shouldn't they be equally responsible here? Held to the same standard? I hope that he has been fired also.

Producers tend not to make off-hand comments on their own. It isn't their show--they are mostly behind the scenes for a reason. Perhaps Imus created the climate for such jokes and kept it going instead of letting it be known that such comments will not be tolerated.

Quote:

Originally Posted by AGDee (Post 1428869)
From what I've read, particularly on Wikipedia, he has been an equal opportunity offender.

Not a particular good source for complete info on this topic. There is an article out now that discusses how Imus supposedly hired someone to do "N**** jokes."

So he used to be an equal opportunity offender until he went too far with some groups. Not just making fun of PEOPLE/political figures but making jokes that have the potential to target and/or offend groups of people (such as Jews, blacks, some argue even Christians). Those groups have every right to complain. Most didn't, a Christian group/viewers did, and that was their choice. That doesn't stop the ball from rolling for those who did complain.

Anyway, not much discussion is needed from here. MSNBC, CBS, and the corporations have spoken.

Tom Earp 04-13-2007 05:47 PM

Still does not give Al and Jessie Carte Blanch to make accusations and ruin peoples same rights no matter what does it?

They are back stabing idiots who preach
goodness and are phonys!:rolleyes:

AKA_Monet 04-14-2007 12:56 AM

I'm off my meds...
 
I am sorry, I like this:

http://logo.cafepress.com/0/2357300.jpg

And you can purchase T-shirts >HERE<

I know folks are very sensitive and that's cool. But, there is a reason for everything and a wrinkled up shriveled dicked balleress old dude was NEVER gonna get with any ho, nappy or otherwise...

And that's cool if some luser who cain't cum even with Cialis in the backyard bath wants to bash Athletetic or Black Women. That's the reason his wife left his ass in the first place.

But overall, Imus will be aiight. You all know this was a set up and a plant.

Conskeeted7 04-14-2007 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KSig RC (Post 1429243)
Did you not read the rest of my post?

I don't support whites using the language, nor do I support cries of "double standard" - I do, however, think your 'best solution' is actively detrimental to the efforts of intelligent people to actually help with racial inequality in this country.

However, I also buy DSTChaos's point re: average intelligence . . . so there's that, I guess.

To be honest, I only skimmed your post...LOL...but I will go back and reread ;)

I don't think it's helpful to ignore the problem this type of language causes or what it represents when used by any race. However, just because that problem is not yet solved does not mean it's acceptable for White people to use it until we get it together on our end.

Conskeeted7 04-14-2007 02:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PiKA2001 (Post 1429229)
I don't think any language of that sort is used in a positive way, unless calling your wife a ho is considered classy in the black community. I'm sorry, you can't own a word or stop just certain people from using a word, especially when it's everywhere around you, from music to movies, to overhearing it in the malls and even in school. You can't expect white people to forget that these words exist if blacks won't stop using these words as well.

I don't think it's realistic to expect anyone to forget that this language exists. That alone, however, does not condone usage. I think those are two very different issues.

In the situations above (mall, movies, school, etc.), do you see White people using this language towards Blacks with a positive outcome? I never have. That is why I don't understand the need or desire to continue trying.

AKA_Monet 04-14-2007 02:27 AM

Sticks and Stones...
 
My boss often says folks can "say" what they want, look beyond that. What counts is their actions. But, my collegiate education said "word is bond" and "words are powerful, they are symbols of ideas" or "one word can change a persons life".

Again, we have GC racial stratification, which is an interesting outcome and concept here. No one really knows what one looks like except a few people around here. And most of us who decide to state what ethnic category we support (for today--that's a side issue). And we still are stratifying and not coming together toward working to change "processing errors".

Look, this cat, Imus, was thrown to the wolves. The reason he was, because MSNBC does not know how to get rid of him legally. He says something ignorant, then they have justification they need.

Yes, he'll probably get a Sirius show and make all the money we wants. So what really happen? Imus is not showing "remorse". He's doing the remorseful thing by speaking to the parents and the young ladies on the Rutgers team. But remorse? Remorseful for what he thought and said? No.

So why is a few stupid words and choice of language made this man take a media-public flogging?

C'mon, folks, this is a set up! Either he or MSNBC wanted out. That's the only way to explain it. Then he comes up looking redeemed so that "we" can us Jesus to view his salvation and forgiveness. Oldest trick in the book...

Am I upset he said it? Not really. It definitely does not pay my light bill.

Did he hurt these young ladies self-esteem? Maybe, because what he really was saying is they play like crap and he used mental images as to how.

But there is a deeper issue here and there has always, IMO, a denigration of women of African descent. And making ourselves look attractive even to our own men has been very difficult. Saying those words, "nappy headed ho", means on the street a woman who cannot take care of herself, usually a Black female prostitute who is on drugs.

And that is why the wolves were called out.

These bastketball players are not "black female prostitutes on drugs". They are all different kinds of backgrounds working very hard to go to college and play basketball. Now if they are not the BEST team, so be it. But, these young ladies did not deserve being called an implied definition of a "black female prostitute that is one drugs".

As far as rappers go, they have been told numerous times to be mindful of their "invocations". But that's another thread for a different day.

PM_Mama00 04-14-2007 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKA_Monet (Post 1429476)
I am sorry, I like this:

http://logo.cafepress.com/0/2357300.jpg

And you can purchase T-shirts >HERE<

I know folks are very sensitive and that's cool. But, there is a reason for everything and a wrinkled up shriveled dicked balleress old dude was NEVER gonna get with any ho, nappy or otherwise...

And that's cool if some luser who cain't cum even with Cialis in the backyard bath wants to bash Athletetic or Black Women. That's the reason his wife left his ass in the first place.

But overall, Imus will be aiight. You all know this was a set up and a plant.

See, sometimes I look like that picture. Actually today when I woke up, my hair looked exactly like that. But if I got that tshirt, it'd be insensitive. I often refer to my own hair as nappy, and I hear it used alot by whites. Never thought it was a bad connotation... just thought that it meant your hair was knotted or messed up.

On everything else.... cum means something different to people. So I'd appreciate you not using that type of language. Oh and "luser" is spelled "loser". You're a scholar. You constantly brag about being one on here, so spell your words right.

shinerbock 04-14-2007 11:54 AM

side note, Imus's wife is a significantly younger busty blond, if i recall correctly.

Munchkin03 04-14-2007 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM_Mama00 (Post 1429533)

On everything else.... cum means something different to people. So I'd appreciate you not using that type of language.

Oh and "luser" is spelled "loser". You're a scholar. You constantly brag about being one on here, so spell your words right.


Ummm, it looks like she used that word in its usual connotation.

Also, look who's talking, Miss Prejudism.

I am so uninterested in Don Imus and what he said.

shinerbock 04-14-2007 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munchkin03 (Post 1429584)
Ummm, it looks like she used that word in its usual connotation.

Also, look who's talking, Miss Prejudism.

I am so uninterested in Don Imus and what he said.

I agree with PM's comments, Monet's comments were pretty crass.

33girl 04-14-2007 03:37 PM

If Don Imus wasn't making ookabillion bucks a year, he would still be employed by CBS.

Also, I don't even want to get into the hilarity of Les Moonves getting high and mighty about morals or anything anyone says anytime anywhere.

Tom Earp 04-14-2007 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKA_Monet (Post 1429503)
My boss often says folks can "say" what they want, look beyond that. What counts is their actions. But, my collegiate education said "word is bond" and "words are powerful, they are symbols of ideas" or "one word can change a persons life".

Again, we have GC racial stratification, which is an interesting outcome and concept here. No one really knows what one looks like except a few people around here. And most of us who decide to state what ethnic category we support (for today--that's a side issue). And we still are stratifying and not coming together toward working to change "processing errors".

Look, this cat, Imus, was thrown to the wolves. The reason he was, because MSNBC does not know how to get rid of him legally. He says something ignorant, then they have justification they need.

Yes, he'll probably get a Sirius show and make all the money we wants. So what really happen? Imus is not showing "remorse". He's doing the remorseful thing by speaking to the parents and the young ladies on the Rutgers team. But remorse? Remorseful for what he thought and said? No.

So why is a few stupid words and choice of language made this man take a media-public flogging?

C'mon, folks, this is a set up! Either he or MSNBC wanted out. That's the only way to explain it. Then he comes up looking redeemed so that "we" can us Jesus to view his salvation and forgiveness. Oldest trick in the book...

Am I upset he said it? Not really. It definitely does not pay my light bill.

Did he hurt these young ladies self-esteem? Maybe, because what he really was saying is they play like crap and he used mental images as to how.

But there is a deeper issue here and there has always, IMO, a denigration of women of African descent. And making ourselves look attractive even to our own men has been very difficult. Saying those words, "nappy headed ho", means on the street a woman who cannot take care of herself, usually a Black female prostitute who is on drugs.

And that is why the wolves were called out.

These bastketball players are not "black female prostitutes on drugs". They are all different kinds of backgrounds working very hard to go to college and play basketball. Now if they are not the BEST team, so be it. But, these young ladies did not deserve being called an implied definition of a "black female prostitute that is one drugs".

As far as rappers go, they have been told numerous times to be mindful of their "invocations". But that's another thread for a different day.


Thank you very much for a great explanation!

If there are Blacks (Afro-Ameicans) who continually say these types of things then is it not expected for other races to pick up on it and use the same language?

If a Black Commedian such as Richard Pryor uses this type of word usage then why cannot others use it?

Some people do get over board about who can say certain words and who cannot!:mad:

The two biggest Black Morons are Jessie and Al!:mad:

They Preach forgiveness but they are the first to wade into a fight and embarras many Afro-Americans and they still give money to them!

Ask Jessie how much money He is giving a month for an of wedlock child? Maybe $8,500.00 a month! Where is He getting this money? Say Rainbow Coalition! Is that cool?:confused:

Now, where is the apology to the members of the Duke Lacross going to be coming from and when!:mad:

Oh, golly lets step over this and sweep it under the carpet!:rolleyes:

It is not a one way street people it is a fact of life! DAH!:rolleyes:

macallan25 04-14-2007 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKA_Monet (Post 1429503)
Yes, he'll probably get a Sirius show and make all the money we wants. So what really happen? Imus is not showing "remorse". He's doing the remorseful thing by speaking to the parents and the young ladies on the Rutgers team. But remorse? Remorseful for what he thought and said? No.

Who are you to say he isn't showing remorse? The only person that is going to know if he truly is or not is him. For all that he has done since the incident, I'm interested to know why you feel you can consider him unremorseful for what he thought and said. I think he has made the effort. It's not like he pulled a Michael Richards and said he was "sorry and embarassed and blah blah blah" on Letterman.

shinerbock 04-14-2007 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by macallan25 (Post 1429663)
Who are you to say he isn't showing remorse? The only person that is going to know if he truly is or not is him. For all that he has done since the incident, I'm interested to know why you feel you can consider him unremorseful for what he thought and said. I think he has made the effort. It's not like he pulled a Michael Richards and said he was "sorry and embarassed and blah blah blah" on Letterman.

He'll have to kill himself before some think there is any veracity to his "remorse".

Munchkin03 04-14-2007 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shinerbock (Post 1429588)
I agree with PM's comments, Monet's comments were pretty crass.

I believe that they were pretty crass as well. PM, however, hasn't been the best in terms of language and word use either. I was simply calling out hypocrisy.

I am so tired of this story, and I was almost as soon as it came out. Here in NYC, that's seriously all I'm hearing about. Yawn.

And Earp, please put down the bottle. Please?

PM_Mama00 04-15-2007 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munchkin03 (Post 1429584)
Ummm, it looks like she used that word in its usual connotation.

Also, look who's talking, Miss Prejudism.

I am so uninterested in Don Imus and what he said.

I was being sarcastic. I don't really care how people write on here. As LoNg As ThEy ArE nOt TyPiNg LiKe ThIs. I just thought it was funny because she's always bragging about being a scholar.

AKA_Monet 04-15-2007 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PM_Mama00 (Post 1429805)
I just thought it was funny because she's always bragging about being a scholar.

First I know you don't give a damn about me and you could care less what I say or what I want to do. So, claiming to be so pious and examine me to a fault, well, that is silly.

As a result, I tire of some aspects of GC and maybe I have outgrown it here and need to leave. Hey, I have not problem with folks disagreeing with my thoughts. But to be disagreeable to be right. Okay. Whatever. Good Luck With That...

cheerfulgreek 04-15-2007 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AKA_Monet (Post 1429476)
I am sorry, I like this:

http://logo.cafepress.com/0/2357300.jpg

And you can purchase T-shirts >HERE<

I know folks are very sensitive and that's cool. But, there is a reason for everything and a wrinkled up shriveled dicked balleress old dude was NEVER gonna get with any ho, nappy or otherwise...

And that's cool if some luser who cain't cum even with Cialis in the backyard bath wants to bash Athletetic or Black Women. That's the reason his wife left his ass in the first place.

But overall, Imus will be aiight. You all know this was a set up and a plant.

Ya know, this topic is already bad enough, and if that's a real t-shirt, and someone (black or white) wears it in public, it's only going make the problem worse.

PiKA2001 04-15-2007 02:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Conskeeted7 (Post 1429498)
I don't think it's realistic to expect anyone to forget that this language exists. That alone, however, does not condone usage. I think those are two very different issues.

In the situations above (mall, movies, school, etc.), do you see White people using this language towards Blacks with a positive outcome? I never have. That is why I don't understand the need or desire to continue trying.

Coming from your posts you say that when blacks call each other nappy hoes it brings about a positve outcome? How so? I don't understand this train of thought.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.