GreekChat.com Forums

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Chit Chat (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=185)
-   -   Yankee Girl Survives First Year at Southern University (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=134309)

angels&angles 05-19-2013 02:48 PM

My grandfather (from WV for what it's worth) always ordered iced tea and then poured--I swear--6 full sugar packets into it. It always made me feel kinda gross to watch him.

NutBrnHair 05-19-2013 03:04 PM

Don't even get me started on the horror of chicken salad that contains dark meat.

IndianaSigKap 05-19-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 2217740)
Ha!
Sweet tea is NOT just tea with sugar. Sometimes the unknowing will suggest that you "just put sugar in your tea". That is not sweet tea.

You have to sweeten the tea while it is HOT in order to have the sugar melt and disperse evenly. If you just stir sugar into cold tea you do not have a consistent sweetness, and you end up with white gunk in the bottom of the glass. Yuck. That is tacky.

We don't like tacky in the South. :D

Speaking of tea, a few years ago, I attended a convention at USC and fell in love with South Carolina! Over the course of the weekend, I know I drank my weight in tea. A colleague and I were so enamored with it that we asked the restaurant how they made it. They told us that they make simple syrup and use the syrup in the tea. I made it at home and it was just the same. The server told us that she adds lemon juice to the simple syrup at home to flavor it.

amIblue? 05-19-2013 05:33 PM

We always boil our water, add the sugar to the water, then add the tea bags. So I guess that's the same as making tea with simple syrup, but I never thought of it that way.

AOII Angel 05-19-2013 06:39 PM

This Southerner cannot stand sweet tea. It's like maple syrup. I'll take unsweetened tea with a packet of sweet and low any day of the week.

Old_Row 05-19-2013 07:22 PM

I do not know how I missed all of this discussion! It is hilarious!

Miss AOPiAngel, we might have to take away your southern card! Loving sweet tea is like loving the baby Jesus!

AOII Angel 05-19-2013 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old_Row (Post 2217769)
I do not know how I missed all of this discussion! It is hilarious!

Miss AOPiAngel, we might have to take away your southern card! Loving sweet tea is like loving the baby Jesus!

LOL...my husband doesn't like it either. I grew up with sun tea made with Luzianne tea. Just made some today. No one in my family made it sweet or drank it sweet. Healthier anyway. :D

clemsongirl 05-19-2013 07:51 PM

Ooh, another Southern/Northern difference I just thought of-collegiate sports versus professional sports. In the North, pro sports are the only sports as far as most people are concerned. I'm a die-hard Red Sox fan, but I could not care less what the local collegiate baseball team does or doesn't do, and I don't particularly care about Clemson's team either. Southerners are all about the college sports, even if they never went to that college-there were oodles of drunken fans at away football games who liked to harass the band that probably had never set foot on campus when it wasn't a Saturday.

This applies to high school sports too-I went to one football game in high school even though I love football, because in addition to our 0-32 losing streak that spanned three seasons it just wasn't important whether we won or lost on Friday when the Patriots were going to play that Sunday. I saw a Georgia high school playoff game being televised in a restaurant when I went out to dinner with my boyfriend and his family, and I was astounded that anyone would care enough to watch it. I'm sure it helps when your school team is mildly competitive at the least, but I have a feeling that a team with the same skill level (or lack thereof) down South wouldn't have gotten laughed at and booed at the homecoming pep rally every year.

I suspect several factors play into this one-a greater population density and number of big cities in the North that beget more professional sports franchises, colder weather that prevents teams from practicing as much or fans from attending as many games, culture differences that place more of an emphasis on sports being a ticket out of a small town, etc.-but I can only speculate.

ASTalumna06 05-19-2013 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clemsongirl (Post 2217772)
Ooh, another Southern/Northern difference I just thought of-collegiate sports versus professional sports. In the North, pro sports are the only sports as far as most people are concerned. I'm a die-hard Red Sox fan, but I could not care less what the local collegiate baseball team does or doesn't do, and I don't particularly care about Clemson's team either. Southerners are all about the college sports, even if they never went to that college-there were oodles of drunken fans at away football games who liked to harass the band that probably had never set foot on campus when it wasn't a Saturday.

This applies to high school sports too-I went to one football game in high school even though I love football, because in addition to our 0-32 losing streak that spanned three seasons it just wasn't important whether we won or lost on Friday when the Patriots were going to play that Sunday. I saw a Georgia high school playoff game being televised in a restaurant when I went out to dinner with my boyfriend and his family, and I was astounded that anyone would care enough to watch it. I'm sure it helps when your school team is mildly competitive at the least, but I have a feeling that a team with the same skill level (or lack thereof) down South wouldn't have gotten laughed at and booed at the homecoming pep rally every year.

I suspect several factors play into this one-a greater population density and number of big cities in the North that beget more professional sports franchises, colder weather that prevents teams from practicing as much or fans from attending as many games, culture differences that place more of an emphasis on sports being a ticket out of a small town, etc.-but I can only speculate.

I think it's definitely because a lot of southern states don't have professional sports teams, and some of the cities that do have teams don't have all of the major 4 sports covered.

Boston, New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Detroit, Cleveland, etc. all cover 3 or 4 of the major leagues - NFL, NHL, MLB, and NBA. In some cases, they have two teams for just one sport. And then you look at an area like New England, where all of the Boston teams really "represent" and have fans from 6 different states.

Then you look at states like Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, etc. that don't have any professional teams across the entire state, or they have very few. And then there are some large cities that you would expect to have at least one team (Austin, TX, I'm looking at you!) that have none. College sporting events are the only ones to attend.

And yes, the focus on high school sports in the south is huge compared to the north. I must say, I had NO IDEA how big football was here in TX until I got here. I drove by a football stadium and asked my bf, "Which college is that?" He told me that it was, in fact, a high school stadium. And that's not the only one around here that's enormous.

clemsongirl 05-19-2013 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASTalumna06 (Post 2217784)
I think it's definitely because a lot of southern states don't have professional sports teams, and some of the cities that do have teams don't have all of the major 4 sports covered.

Boston, New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Detroit, Cleveland, etc. all cover 3 or 4 of the major leagues - NFL, NHL, MLB, and NBA. In some cases, they have two teams for just one sport. And then you look at an area like New England, where all of the Boston teams really "represent" and have fans from 6 different states.

Then you look at states like Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, etc. that don't have any professional teams across the entire state, or they have very few. And then there are some large cities that you would expect to have at least one team (Austin, TX, I'm looking at you!) that have none. College sporting events are the only ones to attend.

And yes, the focus on high school sports in the south is huge compared to the north. I must say, I had NO IDEA how big football was here in TX until I got here. I drove by a football stadium and asked my bf, "Which college is that?" He told me that it was, in fact, a high school stadium. And that's not the only one around here that's enormous.

Plus there are a lot more smaller liberal arts colleges up North where athletics is not a focus and not important, versus the South where you can have one or two large state schools that absolutely dominate the local culture and consequently the sports in-state, i.e. USC and Clemson. The number of colleges Massachusetts manages to cram into such a small state (and it's not even the whole state because there is no Massachusetts past Worcester:p) always astounds me.

The stadium that marching band practiced at before the bowl game this year was gigantic, and it was only a high school stadium as well! I was amazed that so much money would be devoted to a facility that only gets used for one season out of the year, but it's not my money to spend. Marching band is equally huge in the South-when I went to band camp this past summer and told people that I had never marched before because we had no marching band at my high school, I got looked at like I had three heads.

AGDee 05-19-2013 09:38 PM

You find a lot of people into college football up here. Then again, our "pro" football team is crap and has been for a very long time. And marching band is huge here too.

I live in a pretty small suburb near Detroit and the high school football games are pretty much attended by the whole town. I said something to some band parents this year about missing going to football games and they said I should still come. It doesn't matter if I don't have a football player or a kid in the band- all kinds of people go who don't have kids on the field in some capacity. It was NOT like that where I grew up.

amIblue? 05-19-2013 09:45 PM

You need to leave Tennessee off that list. Nashville has the NFL and NHL. Memphis has the NBA.

You also need to leave Oklahoma off that list because they're in the Midwest.

shirley1929 05-19-2013 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217793)

You also need to leave Oklahoma off that list because they're in the Midwest.

And OKC has an NBA team...

Munchkin03 05-19-2013 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217793)
You need to leave Tennessee off that list. Nashville has the NFL and NHL. Memphis has the NBA.

You also need to leave Oklahoma off that list because they're in the Midwest.

But aren't those relatively recent additions?

shirley1929 05-19-2013 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munchkin03 (Post 2217808)
But aren't those relatively recent additions?

The Tennessee Titans were established (moved from Houston) in 1997, I believe...I may or may not still be bitter about it. So, if you consider 15 years "relatively new", then yes.:p

ASTalumna06 05-20-2013 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217793)
You need to leave Tennessee off that list. Nashville has the NFL and NHL. Memphis has the NBA.

You also need to leave Oklahoma off that list because they're in the Midwest.

I said...

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASTalumna06 (Post 2217784)
Then you look at states like Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, etc. that don't have any professional teams across the entire state, or they have very few.

Basically, for example, if you live in the Memphis area and don't like basketball, you're SOL in terms of professional sports.

And I know Oklahoma isn't "in the south".. but I wasn't being picky about that.

ASTalumna06 05-20-2013 12:09 AM

Here ya go!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...rts_franchises

amIblue? 05-20-2013 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ASTalumna06 (Post 2217813)
I said...



Basically, for example, if you live in the Memphis area and don't like basketball, you're SOL in terms of professional sports.

And I know Oklahoma isn't "in the south".. but I wasn't being picky about that.

Yep, Memphis is SOL just like the people in San Antonio and Shreveport and damn near every other city down here except for Atlanta, Miami, Dallas, and Houston.

If you're not going to be picky about the entire point of the thread, why don't you also include states that are franchise-free or with only a few franchises like the Dakotas, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Hawaii to make your point?

naraht 05-20-2013 07:26 AM

But by far the State with the most people and no Pro sports team is Virginia. 12th most populous with 8 million people. Least populous state with a pro sports team? That would be Utah at 34th with the Utah Jazz.

MysticCat 05-20-2013 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Munchkin03 (Post 2217808)
But aren't those relatively recent additions?

That's what I was thinking. North Carolina has one NFL team and one NBA team -- both in Charlotte, which probably makes them somewhat irrelevant in the eastern and far western parts of the state -- and one NHL team in Raleigh, which makes it somewhat irrelevant for the western and far eastern parts of the state.

But they came along relatively recently. College sports -- especially basketball -- were very big long before the pro teams came along. Not everybody is a Panthers or Bobcats or Hurricanes fan. But most people have a college team they root for and often are rabid about.

naraht 05-20-2013 09:13 AM

I think prior to 1995 ish that the only culturally *southern* cities with any pro sports teams were Dallas, New Orleans and Atlanta (I'm not counting St. Louis, Houston, Tampa or Miami as culturally southern).

APhiRattlerGal 05-20-2013 09:55 AM

lol this is awesome :)

amIblue? 05-20-2013 10:19 AM

Interesting article about being "ethnically southern" from Outkick the Coverage. I've copied and quoted the pertinent text, which is in the middle of the post. Link to follow.

Quote:

David R. writes:
"Slive and Skipper mentioned the 'SEC' chant at football games (specifically the BCS Championship Game in January) and how it highlighted the pride we take in our conference during the SEC Network press conference. While true, as an Arkansas fan, I have to ask how long is it acceptable for the non-Alabamas, Floridas, LSUs, and/or Georgias to do this chant when we play out of conference or bowl games? I love being in the SEC, but at some point the rest of us are sort of living on the accomplishments of other schools. The proper analogy is that Alabama, LSU, and Florida are the awesome life-of-the-party members of the good frat who get all the ladies while Vandy, Kentucky, and Mississippi State are the weird guys with no friends who got a bid because their dads were members. Oh, and Auburn is the guy who helps everyone cheat on their exams. Hey-oh!"
Yeah, this is a good and valid question that I get versions of all the time.
The sad truth is that all SEC programs aren't created equal. So there's definitely some reflected glory involved in the chant. But the bigger issue is that the SEC chant isn't really about sports at its core, it's cultural.
Let me explain.
First, let's begin with the simplest explanation I can give for why the SEC chant exists -- it's because the South is an ethnicity for many Southerners. In particular, no white person in the South thinks of themselves as part of a specific ethnic group. People aren't Irish or German or British or Italian or Polish or Russian or any other European background, we're just Southern, that's our ethnicity. (Many black people also feel this way as well, it's why I've argued for Pan-Southernism in the past. Pan-Southernism refers to the fact that many Southerners instinctively root for the Southern person or team if they have no other rooting interest).
I noticed this for the first time when I went away to college in Washington, D.C. and immediately felt a kinship with any person who was from the South. I was from Nashville, it's not like Nashville and Birmingham or Atlanta or New Orleans or Charlotte are next door geographical neighbors, but when I'd meet someone from these cities, I immediately felt like I knew them, like we had something in common. They felt the same way. Honestly, every person who lives outside the South right now and is reading this knows exactly what I mean. You crave meeting other Southerners. That's because we we were all ethnically Southern.
Then I married my wife, who is from Detroit, where most white people still identify themselves based on their European background. My wife is half German and half Italian. When we started dating and I visited her family up there they asked me where my family was from. I'd never been asked this before -- we'd been Southern as long as I could remember, that was our ethnicity.
So people from the South feel as if we share a kinship with other Southerners in a way that other regions of the country don't.
Being Southern is our ethnicity.
Second, the South was a perpetual underdog for much of our history. We lost a war, we had lots of poor people, the rest of the country looked down on us, as a group we were the castoffs who weren't given respect. This extended to sports too where we always felt our teams were looked over.
Then, what happened?
Air conditioning.
Air conditioning is the SEC's oil.
It changed everything.
Suddenly everyone wanted to move here, our cities boomed, our land values exploded, our populations soared.
We weren't the underdogs anymore, but we still felt like the underdogs.
At its root the SEC chant comes from two causes: 1. the fact that all Southerners feel we share something in common and 2. the underdog mentality.
You root for the Southern team, the one you feel a kinship for because Southern is your ethnicity.
When you think of the SEC chant as more rooted in the culture of the South than the sports of the South, winning is only a part of it.
http://www.outkickthecoverage.com/al...rk-edition.php

MysticCat 05-20-2013 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naraht (Post 2217854)
I think prior to 1995 ish that the only culturally *southern* cities with any pro sports teams were Dallas, New Orleans and Atlanta (I'm not counting St. Louis, Houston, Tampa or Miami as culturally southern).

The Charlotte Hornets (NBA) were established in 1988 and stayed in Charlotte until they relocated to New Orleans in 2002.

AnchorAlumna 05-20-2013 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217864)
Second, the South was a perpetual underdog for much of our history. We lost a war, we had lots of poor people, the rest of the country looked down on us, as a group we were the castoffs who weren't given respect. This extended to sports too where we always felt our teams were looked over.

That's. It. Exactly.
And it's still true. Go over on another popular forum and do a search for any Southern state's name or even "Southern" and you'll find all kinds of disparaging remarks and our states held up for ridicule.

Another reason it's so hilarious to read those Q/A forums where potential new members ask, "I'm from the north and going to a big SEC school. Will I get a bid?"

shirley1929 05-20-2013 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naraht (Post 2217854)
I think prior to 1995 ish that the only culturally *southern* cities with any pro sports teams were Dallas, New Orleans and Atlanta (I'm not counting St. Louis, Houston, Tampa or Miami as culturally southern).

:mad:

What about San Antonio? Or is all of SOUTH Texas not "culturally southern"?

GTAlphaPhi 05-20-2013 11:35 AM

Does anyone else use the variation on "all y'all", "all a ya'll"? That is, "all of y'all".
I say both, but I've never actually seen it written out, so I guess it could be "all a y'all", "all'a y'all", or many other spellings.

naraht 05-20-2013 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shirley1929 (Post 2217867)
:mad:

What about San Antonio? Or is all of SOUTH Texas not "culturally southern"?

Well, I'd say you have degrees of "cultural southernness" in Texas. I mean no one is going to consider Beaumont anything by culturally southern, and no one is going to consider El Paso culturally southern.

To give you an idea, I consider Dallas culturally southern, but not Ft. Worth. I tend to go off the descriptions in "Nine Nations of North America" which has Houston as a border town between "Dixie", "The Breadbasket" and Mex-america. Given the degree to which the borders of Dixie have shrunk in Florida and Virginia in the 30 years since NNoNA has been published and what I have read about Houston poltics, I presumed the border had moved enough in Texas to move Houston slightly outside the definition.

SWTXBelle 05-20-2013 12:25 PM

I would say that Houston as a whole is not southern, but there are very strong enclaves of southerness.

OneHeartOneWay 05-20-2013 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217864)
Interesting article about being "ethnically southern" from Outkick the Coverage. I've copied and quoted the pertinent text, which is in the middle of the post. Link to follow.

http://www.outkickthecoverage.com/al...rk-edition.php

Random: I'm obsessed with Clay Travis and Outkick the Coverage. Have been following him from job to job for several years. If you like southernness (and can laugh at yourself if you are southern), particularly SEC football, you HAVE to read his book Dixieland Delight. And, you have to check his website fairly regularly, but definitely on Friday's when his "mailbag" comes out (where amiblue? pulled this).

amIblue? 05-20-2013 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naraht (Post 2217876)
Well, I'd say you have degrees of "cultural southernness" in Texas. I mean no one is going to consider Beaumont anything by culturally southern, and no one is going to consider El Paso culturally southern.

To give you an idea, I consider Dallas culturally southern, but not Ft. Worth. I tend to go off the descriptions in "Nine Nations of North America" which has Houston as a border town between "Dixie", "The Breadbasket" and Mex-america. Given the degree to which the borders of Dixie have shrunk in Florida and Virginia in the 30 years since NNoNA has been published and what I have read about Houston poltics, I presumed the border had moved enough in Texas to move Houston slightly outside the definition.

Not familiar with your source, but if it includes St Louis as "culturally southern" (see your earlier post), then I don't know how much stock I'd put in its definitions.

amIblue? 05-20-2013 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHeartOneWay (Post 2217887)
Random: I'm obsessed with Clay Travis and Outkick the Coverage. Have been following him from job to job for several years. If you like southernness (and can laugh at yourself if you are southern), particularly SEC football, you HAVE to read his book Dixieland Delight. And, you have to check his website fairly regularly, but definitely on Friday's when his "mailbag" comes out (where amiblue? pulled this).

He's a fun writer. Obnoxious at times, but I enjoy his perspective. Dixieland Delight is certainly a good read.

shirley1929 05-20-2013 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by naraht (Post 2217876)
To give you an idea, I consider Dallas culturally southern, but not Ft. Worth.

This is a mistake (my opinion)...Dallas is as culturally southern as Nebraska. Fort Worth is far more southern-acting than Dallas. Dallas the city =/= Dallas the TV show.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 2217881)
I would say that Houston as a whole is not southern, but there are very strong enclaves of southerness.

I would agree and tell you that the older neighborhoods (River Oaks, Heights, Memorial Park, etc...) are what would drive my opinion to believe that Houston is far more southern-acting than noted here. I suppose the same argument could be made for Dallas' older neighborhoods, but I still say it's too much of a midwestern melting pot to be considered "southern". Northern Oklahoma...

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217888)
Not familiar with your source, but if it includes St Louis as "culturally southern" (see your earlier post), then I don't know how much stock I'd put in its definitions.

Co-Sign

naraht 05-20-2013 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217888)
Not familiar with your source, but if it includes St Louis as "culturally southern" (see your earlier post), then I don't know how much stock I'd put in its definitions.

St. Louis is another border town, and an odd one at that. It is on the border between the Breadbasket (to its north and west) and Dixie (to its south and east), but East St. Louis belongs in the Foundry.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...inenations.PNG

ArtsyChick 05-20-2013 02:01 PM

I took a trip to San Antonio for a cousin's wedding... I definitely can't pull off the "y'all", I have no drawl! Nice trip for some warm weather, I love the Midwestern winter, but it snowed last week! It's supposed to be spring!

Oh, and the San Antonio river walk is gorgeous!!

ASTalumna06 05-20-2013 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amIblue? (Post 2217840)
Yep, Memphis is SOL just like the people in San Antonio and Shreveport and damn near every other city down here except for Atlanta, Miami, Dallas, and Houston.

If you're not going to be picky about the entire point of the thread, why don't you also include states that are franchise-free or with only a few franchises like the Dakotas, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Hawaii to make your point?

Because I don't take what's been posted in this thread as seriously as you do, I guess?

I used some states in the southern half of the US as an example. That's all. Sorry if I somehow offended you..

ASTalumna06 05-20-2013 02:16 PM

I would also argue that the distance between cities with professional sports teams is greater in the south than in the north. And the New England states like Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire are "cut off" from other major cities with sports teams and don't have one large college to rally around, so they follow the professional teams in Boston more than anything else.

HQWest 05-20-2013 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shirley1929 (Post 2217896)
This is a mistake (my opinion)...Dallas is as culturally southern as Nebraska. Fort Worth is far more southern-acting than Dallas. Dallas the city =/= Dallas the TV show.



I would agree and tell you that the older neighborhoods (River Oaks, Heights, Memorial Park, etc...) are what would drive my opinion to believe that Houston is far more southern-acting than noted here. I suppose the same argument could be made for Dallas' older neighborhoods, but I still say it's too much of a midwestern melting pot to be considered "southern". Northern Oklahoma...


Co-Sign

The best way to describe it is Dallas is a small piece of Chicago that drifted south and got lost. The Woodlands or Katy might be trying to be southern, but Houston isn't for the most part. Hang out in Atlanta for five minutes and you will see the difference.

Texas is its own country.

barbino 05-20-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArtsyChick (Post 2217899)
I took a trip to San Antonio for a cousin's wedding... I definitely can't pull off the "y'all", I have no drawl! Nice trip for some warm weather, I love the Midwestern winter, but it snowed last week! It's supposed to be spring!

Oh, and the San Antonio river walk is gorgeous!!

We went to San Antonio for our honeymoon (15 years ago this week!) and it is my favorite town. The River Walk is amazing. I have always wanted to move to SA, and we almost did at one point. To me, it's very "Tex-Mex" - a little bit of Texas & a little bit of Mexico combined.

srmom 05-20-2013 04:44 PM

Quote:

Texas is its own country.
Yes! Although with all the out of state plates lately, I think we are being invaded;)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.