GreekChat.com Forums
Page 4 of 9 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GreekChat.com Forums (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/index.php)
-   Greek Life (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Sprite Step-Off Update: ZTA and AKA to share 1st place (https://greekchat.com/gcforums/showthread.php?t=111784)

UGAalum94 02-27-2010 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by agzg (Post 1901727)
It's reaching me and I still don't give a damn. I'm only here for the trainwrecks.
this made me truly laugh out loud.

SWTXBelle 02-27-2010 10:00 PM
An Olympic Hijack!
 
All of this discussion reminds me of some of the discussions regarding the "folk dance" part of the Olympic ice dancing competition. The Russians and their "aboriginal" dance were the most covered aspect, but there were several, um, interesting interpretations. Personally, I would have liked to see each country stick to an interpretation of their native dances - although that brings up the question of what qualifies as a "native folk dance".

So what is the determining factor that decides what is or is not an illicit appropriation of a cultural event, be it dancing or something else?

When should a group feel flattered, and when should they feel used or unvalued?

DrPhil 02-27-2010 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWTXBelle (Post 1902248)
All of this discussion reminds me of some of the discussions regarding the "folk dance" part of the Olympic ice dancing competition. The Russians and their "aboriginal" dance were the most covered aspect, but there were several, um, interesting interpretations. Personally, I would have liked to see each country stick to an interpretation of their native dances - although that brings up the question of what qualifies as a "native folk dance".

So what is the determining factor that decides what is or is not an illicit appropriation of a cultural event, be it dancing or something else?

When should a group feel flattered, and when should they feel used or unvalued?
I like how you tied this all together! You present some tough questions. It's almost a trial and error and you err on the side of caution. You want to be respectful but you don't want to tread so lightly that you are TOO politically correct. It can get so complicated that you almost don't want to be bothered with doing tributes--sometimes we can appreciate things without having to become a part of those things.

I commented about the aboriginal dance in the Olympic thread. I think the costumes received more criticism than the routine itself. Is that correct? I think tributes are good (when people acknowledge that they are taking something from somewhere else), but I think there can be a thin line between doing a tribute and bordering on mockery. The facial expressions and costumes for the Russian couple are a good example of that thin line.

Along those lines, there are things that I can get away with with my friends and acquaintances who are in other GLOs that I wouldn't necessarily be able to get away with with members of their GLOs who don't know me. So, I can understand why a BGLOer would think it's cool to teach some non-BGLOers on their campus some steps. I can also understand why some non-BGLOers would think to adopt these things on their own without knowing the informal (and formal, in some instances) protocol regarding it, and that can include finding steps and claiming them as their own. Not erring on the side of caution may not have mattered so much locally because they could "get away with it," but it mattered when the shows were seen by others. Things change with a wider and more diverse audience (read: more BGLOers who may be familiar with stepping, familiar with those particular steps, aren't easily impressed, don't know what ZTA is, and/or don't care about the dynamics at the ZTA's campus that lead to this.

It is also important to remember that, as with the Sprite step-off discussion, for all the person who are "offended" (for whatever reasons), there are people who aren't and don't see what the big deal is.

IlovemyAKA 02-27-2010 10:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902208)
Really. When I first heard unity stepshow I thought that the AKA's at the U. of Arkansas were sponsoring a unity stepshow where both NPHC and other greeks participated in together (stepping together)
My Alma mater held a unity show each year, and that's how it was presented. An NPHC frat & NPC sorority would step together and an NPHC sorority and NIC frat would step together. Each org would also incorporate something of their own. For example, Alphas may teach Alpha Taus a simple step, then the girls would incorporate a dance routine of their making.

rhoyaltempest 02-27-2010 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1902239)
To the bolded black point:
It is actually quite realistic for "our*" subcultures to be exposed to the culture at large without the expectation that the members of the culture at large will want to participate. Especially when "our" particular subculture has historically been demonized, disrespected, disregarded, and (attepted to be) discarded by many members of the culture at large. Its not like you see "mainstream" people trying to join in the black church and/or black religious traditions. There are far too many facets of "our" subculture that it would be realistic to expect mainstream folks not to want to participate in. One of the main indicators of their lack of desire to participate is the fact that they do not join D9 orgs en masse. Another is the fact that most often they do not come to the D9 and ask to be taught to step or any other part of D9 tradition and culture. There generally is no expectation that any subculture must contribute to the culture overall in order to survive. It is actually historically the opposite. Thats why your argument makes little sense to me.

To the bolded red point:
Im going to have to agree with Rhoyaltempest that you missed her point.
The American "melting pot" image is a farce. We're not culturally inclusive when and where it is most important. Our laws and our governing isnt culturally inclusive enough for us to even hint that we're a melting pot. Rhoyaltempest didnt suggest insulation of traditions or cultures. She wanted to know, quite validly, why people of a specific culture (D9 Greeks and realistically Black people) extend themselves to include others in a culture they seem to have little to no interest in.

Its like recruiting a pro baseball player to play pro soccer with the knowledge that he can never play for your soccer team. Yeah, he could do it, but its not his sport and he expressed absolutely NO interest in doing it. Why would you spend time trying to teach him soccer and make him interested? What value do you get out of it? Especially when him playing soccer (and not for your team) dilutes and misplaces the value of your team's players. By teaching him soccer you've now made your league a free for all that has lost its spirit and purpose. What was once a sport of love and high intangible value is now just another commercialized item up for sale.

*note: As I am not D9 my use of "our" refers to black culture overall (because I've pondered the same question as it pertains to black culture) and to the aspect of D9 orgs as they are a part of black culture.
Okay, I appreciate everyone's comments (especially the one above since he clearly gets what I'm asking) but only "deepimpact2" has given an answer to the question: "why is it that we (Black folks) feel the need to give away/share our traditions?" meaning why do we seek others out to teach and involve them in what we do almost exclusively?

For example, as an undergrad I attended 2 VERY predominately white colleges in PA. (5-6 hours a part; PA. is a big state) and in both cases, White greeks thought stepping was cool and some even attended the annual NPHC stepshow, but none of them (as far as I know and the Black campus community was small and tight) ever asked to be part of the stepshow or for anyone to teach them any steps. I am going to confidently assume that this is the case at most predominately white colleges where BGLO's exist. Most are fine admiring what we do from a distance. So why then, do we feel the need to introduce them to something that we are supposed to hold dear, especially when they are not greatly interested?

Deepimpact2 says it's because we (as in some of us) are showing off. What do you say?

DrPhil 02-27-2010 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902265)
Okay, I appreciate everyone's comments (especially the one above since he clearly gets what I'm asking) but only "deepimpact2" has given an answer to the question: "why is it that we (Black folks) feel the need to give away/share our traditions?" meaning why do we seek others out to teach and involve them in what we do almost exclusively?

For example, as an undergrad I attended 2 VERY predominately white colleges in PA. (5-6 hours a part; PA. is a big state) and in both cases, White greeks thought stepping was cool and some even attended the annual NPHC stepshow, but none of them (as far as I know and the Black campus community was small and tight) ever asked to be part of the stepshow or for anyone to teach them any steps. I am going to confidently assume that this is the case at most predominately white colleges where BGLO's exist. Most are fine admiring what we do from a distance. So why then, do we feel the need to introduce them to something that we are supposed to hold dear, especially when they are not greatly interested?

Deepimpact2 says it's because we (as in some of us) are showing off. What do you say?
Don't nobody gotta answer your question. :p I'll answer it in BGLO and stepping terms because that's all I have patience for right now.

From my experiences, I think it's more along the lines of "some of my bestfriends are AKAs, Deltas, etc." :) That creates a level of comfort that makes some people want to get off the sidelines and participate themselves. That level of comfort is reciprocated and is matched with the need to show off by teaching something. "I'm so damn skilled that I can teach NPCers how to do the damn thang."

Rant/

The bottom line isn't that different than when BGLO sororities are taught BGLO frat steps. You express interest in something with the potential to learn so you go to your friends or acquaintances to see if they will teach you. (it has also worked the other way around with a BGLOer going to a non-BGLO and asking if they are interested in learning) And, as with sororities doing frat steps, it often works in theory but not in practice. I can think of many times when frat members have said "whoa...are they doing our (insert step), who taught them that" or "when are they going to stop doing our isht." It was cute, cool, and funny at first (I have also seen BGLO frats teach NPC sororities steps) but it can go too far. You feel like you have to remind people that it isn't THEIRS and they now need to get their own. But, once you release the steps and essentially give permission to do them, you can't control where it goes. You can't control what they do with the steps (they might perfect it and perform it tighter than you do :p), whether they teach them to someone else, whether they deny you taught it to them, or whether they walk around bragging like "we're real tight with XYZ and they approve of everything we're doing."

/Rant

KAPital PHINUst 02-27-2010 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1902239)
To the bolded black point:
It is actually quite realistic for "our*" subcultures to be exposed to the culture at large without the expectation that the members of the culture at large will want to participate. Especially when "our" particular subculture has historically been demonized, disrespected, disregarded, and (attepted to be) discarded by many members of the culture at large. Its not like you see "mainstream" people trying to join in the black church and/or black religious traditions. There are far too many facets of "our" subculture that it would be realistic to expect mainstream folks not to want to participate in. One of the main indicators of their lack of desire to participate is the fact that they do not join D9 orgs en masse. Another is the fact that most often they do not come to the D9 and ask to be taught to step or any other part of D9 tradition and culture. There generally is no expectation that any subculture must contribute to the culture overall in order to survive. It is actually historically the opposite. Thats why your argument makes little sense to me.
What you don't realize is that if anything, there is more inclusiveness between the cultures now more than ever before because the younger generations have been born into a more inclusive society that shares each other's cultures, and thus they become much more acclimated and thus prone to sharing elements of each other's culture, something that can't be said with prior generations (Gen X, Boomers, etc.).

In all fairness, part of the reasons why "mainstream" people aren't joining the NPHC orgs "en masse", is because "we" have strong reservations about voting them in. There's been many on-line discussions on this topic, and I've had my share in in-person discussions on this subject. Granted, this is far from being the only reason, but it is part of the reason. But I've noticed over the past few years there has been a bigger interest in the mainstream on aspects of our culture and their wanting to be involved in it. So I see what you're saying, but a lot of what's been developing has be a slow gradual process over the past 5-10 years, so it could be too subtle for you to notice on a grand scale.

Quote:
[Rhoyaltempest] wanted to know, quite validly, why people of a specific culture (D9 Greeks and realistically Black people) extend themselves to include others in a culture they seem to have little to no interest in.
Two things: (1). Is that really the case now or has that historically been the case and things are just now taking a noticeable turn? (2). The same could be said for the mainstream extending themselves to us including them in their culture. To imply that this issue is a one-way street sounds really really far-fetched.

We do ourselves a disservice when we think we have a corner on giving everything away to other cultures, and the mainstream is just being fat, selfish, and stingy by not giving anything back.

So yes, I do and have see Rhoyaltempest's point, I just think that her point comes off as somewhat myopic as to whether that is really, truly, and fully the case.

KAPital PHINUst 02-27-2010 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1902273)
The bottom line isn't that different than when BGLO sororities are taught BGLO frat steps. You express interest in something with the potential to learn so you go to your friends or acquaintances to see if they will teach you. (it has also worked the other way around with a BGLOer going to a non-BGLO and asking if they are interested in learning) And, as with sororities doing frat steps, it often works in theory but not in practice. I can think of many times when frat members have said "whoa...are they doing our (insert step), who taught them that" or "when are they going to stop doing our isht." It was cute, cool, and funny at first (I have also seen BGLO frats teach NPC sororities steps) but it can go too far. You feel like you have to remind people that it isn't THEIRS and they now need to get their own. But, once you release the steps and essentially give permission to do them, you can't control where it goes. You can't control what they do with the steps (they might perfect it and perform it tighter than you do :p), whether they teach them to someone else, whether they deny you taught it to them, or whether they walk around bragging like "we're real tight with XYZ and they approve of everything we're doing."

/Rant
Basically...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mNSLTwPobFE

'Nuff said

DrPhil 02-27-2010 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902274)
What you don't realize is that if anything, there is more inclusiveness between the cultures now more than ever before because the younger generations have been born into a more inclusive society that shares each other's cultures, and thus they become much more acclimated and thus prone to sharing elements of each other's culture, something that can't be said with prior generations (Gen X, Boomers, etc.).
This is a common exaggeration. It's like having $5 in the bank, depositing $2, and then running around preaching about how better off you are now because God has given you a lot of $$$$$. "More inclusiveness" is a relative measure that is based on perception of where we've come from. If your point of reference is a society where there are separate drinking fountains or there are damn near zero minorities professors at most universities then, sure, you'll WOW at how inclusive society is now.

This is still an extremely racially segregated society. Americans' routine activities are still conducive to things like low interracial marriage; low interracial violence; and predominantly (insert race and ethnicity) schools, religious institutions, and neighborhoods. All of these are among the proxies in research that measure the level of racial and ethnic integration in societies.

So, all of that extends to how culturally inclusive America is now. I hear 14 year olds talking about how they have friends of various races AT SCHOOL but most of these kids aren't friends when they go home. I also hear these very same kids talk about how they have to "act different" when they around people of different races for a number of reasons. Same shit, different toilet.

I.A.S.K. 02-28-2010 12:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902265)
Okay, I appreciate everyone's comments (especially the one above since She clearly gets what I'm asking) but only "deepimpact2" has given an answer to the question: "why is it that we (Black folks) feel the need to give away/share our traditions?" meaning why do we seek others out to teach and involve them in what we do almost exclusively?
It was a good question. I sometimes forget that my s/n is gender neutral. lol.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902274)
What you don't realize is that if anything, there is more inclusiveness between the cultures now more than ever before because the younger generations have been born into a more inclusive society that shares each other's cultures, and thus they become much more acclimated and thus prone to sharing elements of each other's culture, something that can't be said with prior generations (Gen X, Boomers, etc.).

In all fairness, part of the reasons why "mainstream" people aren't joining the NPHC orgs "en masse", is because "we" have strong reservations about voting them in. There's been many on-line discussions on this topic, and I've had my share in in-person discussions on this subject. Granted, this is far from being the only reason, but it is part of the reason. But I've noticed over the past few years there has been a bigger interest in the mainstream on aspects of our culture and their wanting to be involved in it. So I see what you're saying, but a lot of what's been developing has be a slow gradual process over the past 5-10 years, so it could be too subtle for you to notice on a grand scale.



Two things: (1). Is that really the case now or has that historically been the case and things are just now taking a noticeable turn? (2). The same could be said for the mainstream extending themselves to us including them in their culture. To imply that this issue is a one-way street sounds really really far-fetched.

We do ourselves a disservice when we think we have a corner on giving everything away to other cultures, and the mainstream is just being fat, selfish, and stingy by not giving anything back.

So yes, I do and have see Rhoyaltempest's point, I just think that her point comes off as somewhat myopic as to whether that is really, truly, and fully the case.
To the black point:
Im Gen. Y so I see this all the time.

To the bolded:
Are there really that many "mainstreams" at rush for D9 orgs? I didnt know that there where. From all accounts I've ever gotten there arent large numbers of them at any D9 rushes.

To the questions:
1. It is really the case now.
2. I dont think anyone said it was a one way thing. I would wonder why random white people were trying so hard to bring clogging to the D9 if they were. They're not. There is generally no other cultural group so ardously and actively trying to share of itself as Black culture.
To the blue point:
Idk. No one here has expressed that sentiment. But culturally I think we're okay without whatever the mainstream has added. Especially since the cultures that have contributed the most to our own have not been mainstream.

ladygreek 02-28-2010 01:32 AM
I find the turn of this discussion to assimilation and inclusiveness very interesting.

*warning, long rant*

While I did grow up under segregation, it was toward the end when attempts were made to integrate. Notice I did not say desegregate. IMO desegregation is the premise behind separate but equal. While integration plays itself out as together but unequal.

Desegregation would have meant the preservation of one's culture, yet with equal treatment and access to the greater society. We would be a delicious, colorful, healthy salad bowl, not a melting pot.

Integration is just another way to say "if you want what I have, then you must be just like me. But wait that is not entirely possible because your skin color will always be different. So we will just play along and throw you a few bones to keep you at bay."

Personally I always wanted desegregation, because I love being Black and all that entails--good and bad. Others wanted integration. Thus the contention.

In my job, the org (League of Women Voters Minneapolis) bemoans the fact that it can't seem to diversify its membership. But what I have seen is a lot of lip service (which I do think folx are sincere about,) but no real desire to put in the work to truly understand what other races need to be comfortable in the org. Why? Because it would take them out of their own comfort zone. That is where inclusiveness is failing in our society.

So no, I am not one to say WOW look how far we have come, considering the number of years it has taken. Because everyday I feel the frustration of how are we going to get where we really need to be. I do know it won't happen in my lifetime, regardless of the outcome of the last presidential election.

KAPital PHINUst 02-28-2010 01:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1902282)
This is a common exaggeration. It's like having $5 in the bank, depositing $2, and then running around preaching about how better off you are now because God has given you a lot of $$$$$. "More inclusiveness" is a relative measure that is based on perception of where we've come from. If your point of reference is a society where there are separate drinking fountains or there are damn near zero minorities professors at most universities then, sure, you'll WOW at how inclusive society is now.
Good point. Heck I remember when I opened my first savings account as a 12 y/o kid and put $15 in the bank ($30 - $35 adjusted for inflation). As a kid accustomed to having only about $2-$4 (or less) at any given time, I thought I was ballin'. Or as Curly of the Three Stooges once said, "$500? That's almost a million."

Quote:
This is still an extremely racially segregated society...
I don't know about extremely segregated, but I do know that sometimes, we can be as complicit in having a racially segregated society as the mainstream. Again, it's not a one-way street.

KAPital PHINUst 02-28-2010 02:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1902286)
To the questions:
1. It is really the case now.
2. I dont think anyone said it was a one way thing. I would wonder why random white people were trying so hard to bring clogging to the D9 if they were. They're not. There is generally no other cultural group so ardously and actively trying to share of itself as Black culture.
To the blue point:
Idk. No one here has expressed that [it is a one way thing]. But culturally I think we're okay without whatever the mainstream has added. Especially since the cultures that have contributed the most to our own have not been mainstream.
Maybe not explicitly, but definately implicitly. And with it being a two way thing it weakens Rhoyaltempest's argument. And it further confirms my point that we all have a duty to contribute to our society as a whole, not merely our own subculture. Which as my chapter's community service committee chairman, is the platform of my administration, and is so expressed via the service projects I present to the chapter for a vote. My rationale is that we don't get our "feeding" merely from our subculture, but from our society as a collective.

DrPhil 02-28-2010 02:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902312)
I don't know about extremely segregated, but I do know that sometimes, we can be as complicit in having a racially segregated society as the mainstream. Again, it's not a one-way street.
Okay, replace "extremely" with "very."

Of course it is a two-way street, however, whites have more power to make all of this happen on a larger scale than minorities do. The things that Blacks try to be exclusive about (as evidenced in this thread) don't mean a damn thing in the larger scheme of things. Segregation is intentional and unintentional, and by choice and by force (i.e. most people don't build their own neighborhoods or choose the zoning for the schools).

KAPital PHINUst 02-28-2010 02:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladygreek (Post 1902302)
So no, I am not one to say WOW look how far we have come, considering the number of years it has taken. Because everyday I feel the frustration of how are we going to get where we really need to be. I do know it won't happen in my lifetime, regardless of the outcome of the last presidential election.
The last presidential election outcome and what we expect(ed) to come as a result is [going to be] a sham. For a number of reasons, we all, black, white, or otherwise, are going to be in for a very rude awakening. So essentially, the last presidential election will have little or nothing to do with it.

DrPhil 02-28-2010 02:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902315)
Maybe not explicitly, but definately implicitly. And with it being a two way thing it weakens Rhoyaltempest's argument. And it further confirms my point that we all have a duty to contribute to our society as a whole, not merely our own subculture. Which as my chapter's community service committee chairman, is the platform of my administration, and is so expressed via the service projects I present to the chapter for a vote. My rationale is that we don't get our "feeding" merely from our subculture, but from our society as a collective.
Everyone knows this. No one was talking about only contributing to their own subculture or not being "fed" by the larger American culture. We're all learned adults who didn't get the bulk of our social norms and accomplishments from a shack located in the Black community.

I find it interesting that people often respond like you are when it is a Black people and white people discussion. When other racial and ethnic groupings (such as Native Americans, Asians, and Hispanics) talk about wanting to keep their traditions in house, people often say "that's great because you all have rich culture and traditions! It's great how you're able to contribute so greatly to our society and still maintain traditional ties!!!!!!" That undoubtedly has to do with differences in population sizes and the history of Blacks in America and Black-white racial dynamics.

KAPital PHINUst 02-28-2010 02:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1902316)
Okay, replace "extremely" with "very."

Of course it is a two-way street, however, whites have more power to make all of this happen on a larger scale than minorities do. The things that Blacks try to be exclusive about (as evidenced in this thread) don't mean a damn thing in the larger scheme of things. Segregation is intentional and unintentional, and by choice and by force (i.e. most people don't build their own neighborhoods or choose the zoning for the schools).
At the end of the day, it won't be a "black vs. white" matter. You see whites in power, but that's not the core issue. I see your points, but I really really think you're fighting the wrong battle(s). Because once the events unfolding comes to a climax, you're going to see a lot of whites in the same boat as we are. That is why you don't see me always siding with "us" on racially charged issues. Because I know that ultimately, it will all be a very moot point.

DrPhil 02-28-2010 02:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902323)
You see whites in power, but that's not the core issue. I see your points, but I really really think you're fighting the wrong battle(s). Because once the events unfolding comes to a climax, you're going to see a lot of whites in the same boat as we are. That is why you don't see me always siding with "us" on racially charged issues. Because I know that ultimately, it will all be a very moot point.
I'm not fighting any battle. We're typing.

Are you talking about the "end of days" or are you talking about people foregoing white privilege and group dynamics to align on class lines rather than race lines? The former will happen before the latter.

rhoyaltempest 02-28-2010 03:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladygreek (Post 1902302)
I find the turn of this discussion to assimilation and inclusiveness very interesting.

*warning, long rant*

While I did grow up under segregation, it was toward the end when attempts were made to integrate. Notice I did not say desegregate. IMO desegregation is the premise behind separate but equal. While integration plays itself out as together but unequal.

Desegregation would have meant the preservation of one's culture, yet with equal treatment and access to the greater society. We would be a delicious, colorful, healthy salad bowl, not a melting pot.

Integration is just another way to say "if you want what I have, then you must be just like me. But wait that is not entirely possible because your skin color will always be different. So we will just play along and throw you a few bones to keep you at bay."

Personally I always wanted desegregation, because I love being Black and all that entails--good and bad. Others wanted integration. Thus the contention.

In my job, the org (League of Women Voters Minneapolis) bemoans the fact that it can't seem to diversify its membership. But what I have seen is a lot of lip service (which I do think folx are sincere about,) but no real desire to put in the work to truly understand what other races need to be comfortable in the org. Why? Because it would take them out of their own comfort zone. That is where inclusiveness is failing in our society.

So no, I am not one to say WOW look how far we have come, considering the number of years it has taken. Because everyday I feel the frustration of how are we going to get where we really need to be. I do know it won't happen in my lifetime, regardless of the outcome of the last presidential election.
Why thank you for your "long" rant. I especially like the way you explained integration vs. desegregation. I am for desegregation also although that time has passed of course and I loved your "colorful salad" vs. melting pot explanation. I'll take a colorful salad any day.

Unfortunately this generation of African Americans (and I'm sure there are some exceptions) don't know who they are and really don't care to know.

In working with high school students and even the undergrads currently, I have discovered (and these are just my observations) that this generation is the "We are the world"/I just want to be like everyone else/I have no respect or regard for those that came before me (even though I'm standing on their shoulders)/ I don't really care to learn my history, that's the past/ it's not that serious (because nothing regarding the preservation of our culture is serious)...generation.

I.A.S.K. 02-28-2010 04:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1902324)
I'm not fighting any battle. We're typing.

Are you talking about the "end of days" or are you talking about people foregoing white privilege and group dynamics to align on class lines rather than race lines? The former will happen before the latter.
The former will happen TWICE before the latter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902323)
At the end of the day, it won't be a "black vs. white" matter. You see whites in power, but that's not the core issue. I see your points, but I really really think you're fighting the wrong battle(s). Because once the events unfolding comes to a climax, you're going to see a lot of whites in the same boat as we are. That is why you don't see me always siding with "us" on racially charged issues. Because I know that ultimately, it will all be a very moot point.
Whites in power isnt the core issue. White supremecy is the issue. Whites will never be in the same boat as we are. It's well known that if white folx get a cough black folx get Swine Flu and Pnemonia. I highly doubt that the fact that you think blacks and whites will one day be equal is the reason you sometimes side against blacks on racially charged issues. Because realistically if we're all going to be equals some day what harm does it do to side with your own?

I swear I've been hearing this same discussion of Assimilation vs. The Black Radical Tradition all over the net this week. And it has all been because of one step show. #irony

I didn't quote LadyGreek, but I fervently agree with her about desegregation. Intergration was not the best solution and it still isnt.

rhoyaltempest 02-28-2010 04:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by I.A.S.K. (Post 1902338)
The former will happen TWICE before the latter.


Whites in power isnt the core issue. White supremecy is the issue. Whites will never be in the same boat as we are. It's well known that if white folx get a cough black folx get Swine Flu and Pnemonia. I highly doubt that the fact that you think blacks and whites will one day be equal is the reason you sometimes side against blacks on racially charged issues. Because realistically if we're all going to be equals some day what harm does it do to side with your own?

I swear I've been hearing this same discussion of Assimilation vs. The Black Radical Tradition all over the net this week. And it has all been because of one step show. #irony

I didn't quote LadyGreek, but I fervently agree with her about desegregation. Intergration was not the best solution and it still isnt.
That's because a hot/controversial topic will bring up a whole lot of feelings and people who don't usually discuss these issues will take the opportunity to speak out. That's why I keep saying that the issues people have with the Sprite stepshow is not about the stepshow really at all.

deepimpact2 02-28-2010 09:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902337)
Unfortunately this generation of African Americans (and I'm sure there are some exceptions) don't know who they are and really don't care to know.

In working with high school students and even the undergrads currently, I have discovered (and these are just my observations) that this generation is the "We are the world"/I just want to be like everyone else/I have no respect or regard for those that came before me (even though I'm standing on their shoulders)/ I don't really care to learn my history, that's the past/ it's not that serious (because nothing regarding the preservation of our culture is serious)...generation.
I have seen this as well. Several of my Black students went so far as to say that they thought that celebrating Black History month was stupid because there was no white History month. Mind you they were taking on this argument from their fellow white classmates. so the Black students had begun cosigning on that argument saying that they weren't interested in learning about their history because "that's old stuff."

DrPhil 02-28-2010 11:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902337)
Unfortunately this generation of African Americans (and I'm sure there are some exceptions) don't know who they are and really don't care to know.

In working with high school students and even the undergrads currently, I have discovered (and these are just my observations) that this generation is the "We are the world"/I just want to be like everyone else/I have no respect or regard for those that came before me (even though I'm standing on their shoulders)/ I don't really care to learn my history, that's the past/ it's not that serious (because nothing regarding the preservation of our culture is serious)...generation.
I believe the ones who don't know and don't care ARE the exceptions (just like crime ridden neighborhoods tend to be overrun by the minority of the residents or visitors who are criminal).

These exceptions are clueless and blindly "we are the world-ish" because parents and school officials have FAILED them. This is why a strong family unit where kids are challenged to build knowledge and understanding is important, even if kids refuse to read those Black History books parents insist on buying. The way info is disseminated and received changes with each generation so adults need to get with the program.

Every generation calls the generations after it "the lost ones." It's just like how BGLOers who get a few years under their belt talk about "the confused youngins." That has always made REAL old school folks like ladygreek chuckle. :p

KAPital PHINUst 02-28-2010 06:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902340)
That's because a hot/controversial topic will bring up a whole lot of feelings and people who don't usually discuss these issues will take the opportunity to speak out. That's why I keep saying that the issues people have with the Sprite stepshow is not about the stepshow really at all.
For me, I think the core issue is that we too often assume the role of being a victim (always coming up with excuses, placing blame, and being in denial), instead of being a victor (taking ownership for our actions, being held accountable to such actions, and being made responsible for such actions). The poor sportsmanship expressed resulting from the Step Off (and even this discussion to some degree) makes this assertion very clear.

Personally, I am tired of being associated with those always wanting to be a victim. I'm seeking to be a victor, and I will associate with those who are victors, even if that means going against the grain. I wonder if that is why the Millenial generation has the so-called "we are the world" mentality. I wonder if Rhoyal had inquired to the students for exactly why they held the belief system that they do/did. We've come quite a ways from where we were 50-60 years ago, and people still aren't grateful for what progress has been made. That bothers me.

ladygreek 02-28-2010 06:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902453)
For me, I think the core issue is that we too often assume the role of being a victim (always coming up with excuses, placing blame, and being in denial), instead of being a victor (taking ownership for our actions, being held accountable to such actions, and being made responsible for such actions). The poor sportsmanship expressed resulting from the Step Off (and even this discussion to some degree) makes this assertion very clear.

Personally, I am tired of being associated with those always wanting to be a victim. I'm seeking to be a victor, and I will associate with those who are victors, even if that means going against the grain. I wonder if that is why the Millenial generation has the so-called "we are the world" mentality. I wonder if Rhoyal had inquired to the students for exactly why they held the belief system that they do/did. We've come quite a ways from where we were 50-60 years ago, and people still aren't grateful for what progress has been made. That bothers me.
Grateful? We should not have had to go through it in the first place.

LatinaAlumna 02-28-2010 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrPhil (Post 1902320)
When other racial and ethnic groupings (such as Native Americans, Asians, and Hispanics) talk about wanting to keep their traditions in house, people often say "that's great because you all have rich culture and traditions! It's great how you're able to contribute so greatly to our society and still maintain traditional ties!!!!!!"
In my experience, it's more like they tell us to "Take that -ish back to Mexico!" ORRRR they modify aspects of our culture to meet their own needs/interests/tastes (which can account for Taco Bell and "Cinco-de-Drinko" festivities, among other things). :)

ladygreek 02-28-2010 08:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LatinaAlumna (Post 1902461)
In my experience, it's more like they tell us to "Take that -ish back to Mexico!" ORRRR they modify aspects of our culture to meet their own needs/interests/tastes (which can account for Taco Bell and "Cinco-de-Drinko" festivities, among other things). :)
Minnesota has Reservations, thus the NA culture is well preserved here. But these Reses are in rural Minnesota and when NA who live in the Twins try to replicate their culture here they are often met with disdain, UNLESS it is the token attempt to show diversity. For example when having an event a company, nonprofit, or school may invite NAs to conduct a pow wow, or perform native dances, etc.

Same with Hispanics/Latinos, S.E. Asians, etc. Funny though, they haven't asked AA to step. Maybe that will change now that Sprite has "discovered" it. :D

LatinaAlumna 02-28-2010 09:00 PM
^That reminds me of a Greek President's Council meeting I was at as an undergrad, where the NPHC groups were invited to "come step" at a supposed "all-greek" event. I recall the Sigma Gamma Rho President stating, "If you want us to be part of it, we need to be part of ALL of it--that means the planning, the workshops, the games, etc. You don't ask us to just come put on a show then leave."

And that never happened again!! ;)

rhoyaltempest 02-28-2010 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902453)
For me, I think the core issue is that we too often assume the role of being a victim (always coming up with excuses, placing blame, and being in denial), instead of being a victor (taking ownership for our actions, being held accountable to such actions, and being made responsible for such actions). The poor sportsmanship expressed resulting from the Step Off (and even this discussion to some degree) makes this assertion very clear.

Personally, I am tired of being associated with those always wanting to be a victim. I'm seeking to be a victor, and I will associate with those who are victors, even if that means going against the grain. I wonder if that is why the Millenial generation has the so-called "we are the world" mentality. I wonder if Rhoyal had inquired to the students for exactly why they held the belief system that they do/did. We've come quite a ways from where we were 50-60 years ago, and people still aren't grateful for what progress has been made. That bothers me.
I'm pretty sure your comments are appropriate for some argument related to the topic of Black culture today but IMHO your comments here just do not fit this discussion. I try to look at things from all sides whether I agree with things or not but I think you are so far on one side and so unwilling to see other sides, that you can't recognize when valid and legitimate points are made on other sides, points that have nothing to do with anyone playing the victim.

While I'm sure that some of the Sprite step off feelings (as displayed on other sites) stem from an "inherited" feeling of victimization, I certainly wouldn't conclude that those involved in this discussion here on gc (as well as many on other sites) are on some "victim" stuff because I'm certainly not. I'm very clear and very aware of this topic of victimization in the black community and the kind of person I am just doesn't allow me to play the victim in any way as I strive for excellence in everything that I do. My entire educational career (from grade school on) has been rooted in my experience at both predominately white and black learning institutions. Playing the victim is certainly not the way I excelled in both situations.

As for the kids that I work with from the inner city, they feel the way they do because they don't know anything about their heritage and don't know how beautiful they are. It's not their fault and I'm not blaming them. They are not being taught at home to love themselves and that's obvious by the things they say and do and the little value they place on their education.

Again, while I understand the whole "victim" argument, it is not appropriate in this discussion. We can certainly be concerned about the issues we're raising, disagree with you, and not be playing the victim.

KAPital PHINUst 02-28-2010 09:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ladygreek (Post 1902456)
Grateful? We should not have had to go through it in the first place.
Granted, but that's a moot point.

KAPital PHINUst 02-28-2010 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902520)
I'm pretty sure your comments are appropriate for some argument related to the topic of Black culture today but IMHO your comments here just do not fit this discussion. I try to look at things from all sides whether I agree with things or not but I think you are so far on one side and so unwilling to see other sides, that you can't recognize when valid and legitimate points are made on other sides, points that have nothing to do with anyone playing the victim.

Again, while I understand the whole "victim" argument, it is not appropriate in this discussion. We can certainly be concerned about the issues we're raising, disagree with you, and not be playing the victim.
Then why are we discussing why a black GLO lost a stepshow (the basis for your original question)? If what you say is true, what difference does it make? Why can't we be a good sport about it and keep it moving?

rhoyaltempest 02-28-2010 10:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KAPital PHINUst (Post 1902531)
Then why are we discussing why a black GLO lost a stepshow (the basis for your original question)? If what you say is true, what difference does it make? Why can't we be a good sport about it and keep it moving?
You know, a person can get exhausted just talking to you. I am tired and do not wish to go back to the beginning. If you care to, go back and read the posts and find the one where we moved on from the stepshow to a larger issue/question that I posed about the Black community. You are still on the stepshow and I am no longer thinking about the stepshow. At this point you may also be tired so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Log off and come back again tomorrow when you can remember the main point of this discussion.:confused:

ladygreek 03-01-2010 01:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902534)
You know, a person can get exhausted just talking to you. I am tired and do not wish to go back to the beginning. If you care to, go back and read the posts and find the one where we moved on from the stepshow to a larger issue/question that I posed about the Black community. You are still on the stepshow and I am no longer thinking about the stepshow. At this point you may also be tired so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Log off and come back again tomorrow when you can remember the main point of this discussion.:confused:
Smart move. Discussions with him always end up circular. They'll make you dizzy.

LatinaAlumna 03-01-2010 03:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhoyaltempest (Post 1902534)
Log off and come back again tomorrow when you can remember the main point of this discussion.:confused:
I have a new signature! It applies in so many threads!

xp2k 03-01-2010 10:19 AM
Without regard to history, or culture or whatever, I'd say Zeta won it fair and square. Their routine "borrowed" heavily, but I have a hard time saying they werent entertaining. They were semi-emotionless robots, yes, but they did put a lot into their routine. Sprite should have just left it at that and this probably would have died down by now.

Sprite marketed this show to D9 orgs for participation, but surely they want as many people in the general public as possible to see this...and the general public doesnt care about which org traditionally does what...they just want tosee something exciting...and for 95% of the people who've never been to a step show before...the ZTA show was exciting...more so because they didnt think white girls could do it.

Sprite could care less about D9 history if its going to impede their marketing campaign...and thats one of the prices you pay when you lie down with corporations...they only see the $$$...

I loved the the AKA (Tau chapter) routine...but the most talked about move in their routine has been done by the IU Red Steppers for decades. Doesnt make AKA copycats.

Sprite messed it up this time, but it doesnt mean they cant do a better job next time. And they are giving away a lot of scholarship money.

D9 groups dont need the exposure...but until the final result of this competition, I'm sure most people enjoyed themselves.

I hope Sprite hosts another step show next year and I hope they invite everyone...black, white, asian, latino, martian...whatever...let everybody be involved, and make sure everyone is original.

I'm sure next year participants will up their game more. I know part of the problem this year was that Sprite didnt do a good job of letting people know the competition was going to happen. Some of the routines I saw that were at the regionals were hardly impressive.

deepimpact2 03-01-2010 10:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xp2k (Post 1902637)
Without regard to history, or culture or whatever, I'd say Zeta won it fair and square. Their routine "borrowed" heavily, but I have a hard time saying they werent entertaining. They were semi-emotionless robots, yes, but they did put a lot into their routine. Sprite should have just left it at that and this probably would have died down by now.

Sprite marketed this show to D9 orgs for participation, but surely they want as many people in the general public as possible to see this...and the general public doesnt care about which org traditionally does what...they just want tosee something exciting...and for 95% of the people who've never been to a step show before...the ZTA show was exciting...more so because they didnt think white girls could do it.

Sprite could care less about D9 history if its going to impede their marketing campaign...and thats one of the prices you pay when you lie down with corporations...they only see the $$$...

I loved the the AKA (Tau chapter) routine...but the most talked about move in their routine has been done by the IU Red Steppers for decades. Doesnt make AKA copycats.

Sprite messed it up this time, but it doesnt mean they cant do a better job next time. And they are giving away a lot of scholarship money.

D9 groups dont need the exposure...but until the final result of this competition, I'm sure most people enjoyed themselves.

I hope Sprite hosts another step show next year and I hope they invite everyone...black, white, asian, latino, martian...whatever...let everybody be involved, and make sure everyone is original.

I'm sure next year participants will up their game more. I know part of the problem this year was that Sprite didnt do a good job of letting people know the competition was going to happen. Some of the routines I saw that were at the regionals were hardly impressive.
Hmm you say "Zeta" won fair and square, but yet several things you said after that contradicts your point.

xp2k 03-01-2010 11:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1902641)
Hmm you say "Zeta" won fair and square, but yet several things you said after that contradicts your point.
of course they do if you take them out of context, for example:

Quote:
Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1902641)
Hmm you say "Zeta" won fair and square, but yet several things you said after that contradicts your point.
I said no such thing...

anyway:

I said Zeta won fair and square, as in they performed a routine and the judges voted it the best. As far as I know Zeta didnt bribe anyone...break another team's member's leg...or give someone food poisoning...

My point was that their show wasnt without flaws, but it was definitely competitive.

Plenty of performances in judged competitions WIN that arent perfect.

Ask anyone who's done figure skating, gymnastics, diving...even marching band...there's always that competition where someone wins with "ok" because they did ok very well rather than doing something new.

DrPhil 03-01-2010 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by deepimpact2 (Post 1902641)
Hmm you say "Zeta" won fair and square, but yet several things you said after that contradicts your point.
No because that comment was within the context of "Without regard to history, or culture or whatever....."

It is later that the poster picked back up on the context and discussed the issues with the show and the accusation of borrowed steps.

DrPhil 03-01-2010 11:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xp2k (Post 1902649)
of course they do if you take them out of context, for example:



I said no such thing...

I gotcha and, like you said, many of the viewers are oblivious to all of this and couldn't care less about the logistics and context.

Many people are still like "so what if the steps may've been borrowed and the routine may've been taught---they performed it and did quite well, flaws and all." I'd feel the same way if I didn't know all that goes into stepping and stepshows.

deepimpact2 03-01-2010 12:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xp2k (Post 1902649)
of course they do if you take them out of context, for example:



I said no such thing...

anyway:

I said Zeta won fair and square, as in they performed a routine and the judges voted it the best. As far as I know Zeta didnt bribe anyone...break another team's member's leg...or give someone food poisoning...

My point was that their show wasnt without flaws, but it was definitely competitive.

Plenty of performances in judged competitions WIN that arent perfect.

Ask anyone who's done figure skating, gymnastics, diving...even marching band...there's always that competition where someone wins with "ok" because they did ok very well rather than doing something new.
Yes, but that still doesnt explain how they scored well concerning creativity. If a show lacks craetivity, then I would argue that it was not "definitely competitive."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 PM.
Page 4 of 9 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.