![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
On how many campuses is this really an issue? It sounds like it is mainly the SEC. I know for sure that it hasn't been a problem at any of the chapters I've supervised (Northeast region, primarily). If most of the northern chapters get 2 or 3 legacies going through recruitment, they are thrilled. While I can see some value in NPC having a round table discussion about the issue at those campuses, I would see it mainly as a brainstorming type session. Unless they did toss around the idea of legacy additions, the rest of it is ultimately up to each GLO to deal with. Does every GLO change their whole legacy policy because of a few chapters? I think maybe educating the membership that some campuses have more legacies than quota would ease the hurt feelings at least. |
I think "free legacy" quota would be an even better reason to blindly cut legacies of other chapters.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Kappa's legacy definition is sisters, daughters, granddaughters and great granddaughters. "All other relatives are considered to have special ties to Kappa but are not recruited as a legacy." |
Quote:
ADPi's legacy policy includes sisters, daughters, granddaughters and great-granddaughters. Being adopted doesn't matter. If a pnm was adopted into a family, she is part of that family and entitled to the legacy status. Steps can be a little tricky. Our general policy is to consider them legacies but leave it up to the individual Chapters to make their own determination on a case by case basis. The vast majority of the time we consider them legacies, but every once in a while a unique situation pops up. Here's an example I believe I've shared on GC before but it's worth repeating. A few years back we had an active whose father married a woman with a daughter in a whirlwind courtship the previous year. The active barely knew the woman or her daughter and she didn't like them at all. The pnm step sister didn't tell the active step sister she was going through Recruitment. The pnm reported on her registration form that she was a legacy through the active and had alums write recs identifying her as such without the active's knowledge. The active came to me and asked that she not be considered a legacy. After getting approval from a higher up, we abided by the active's wishes. |
Quote:
|
Kappa Alpha Theta considers daughters, sisters, granddaughters and great-granddaughters as legacies. Steps are considered legacies if the initiated family member considers them to be.
|
Quote:
These legacy policies weren't as much of a problem when a great many women going to college dropped out of school after 1-2 years to marry - their spots opened up and there were plenty of women to fill them. Nowadays that's very rare. We're in the 00s and using policies from the 50s. And I agree with SoCalGirl, a "free legacy" policy would make the cutting of legacies from their non-legacy group even worse. |
I don't think free legacies would be a particularly good policy, but why do you think it would make the cutting of other groups legacies worse?
(If your group wants her, they want her whether or not she's a legacy elsewhere; if they don't want her, what difference will it make to them that she can be "free" someplace else? I'm not trying to be a smarty pants; I'm just missing something. Are you thinking that all other groups would assume that she'll go the legacy chapter whether they really are her first choice or not?) Personally, a GLO could have a form letter that included data from the high number of legacy chapter and the legacy policy that those chapters could send back to whoever sent the legacy form as soon as they received it. It could basically say in raw form: We're delighted to learn of your legacy coming through recruitment, and we look forward to meeting her. We have not yet begun to evaluate potential new members, but we wanted to give you a clear understanding of the challenge that our chapter faces regarding legacies. We understand the unique role they can play in the overall richness of life as an XYZ, but in the last few years, we've had 83, 102, and 78 legacies participate in recruitment while quota has been around 50. We will follow the XYZ legacy policy throughout our recruitment, but we wanted all members with legacies to be aware that it will be impossible for all of them to be placed in our new member class. Please encourage your legacy to keep an open mind about recruitment at our university; we have many excellent chapters for your legacy to join in should she not find a home in XYZ. And a similar letter could be from campuses which have to cut a significant number of legacies a year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
rec. letters
Some of you are kidding yourselves by thinking that elevating yourselves to chapter advisors local alumni chapter officers will make a difference when your daughter/other relative legacy goes through. If you are talking large Southern schools, it will not mean beans. You all know that some chapters have configured themselves as all "Old South", etc.
I can speak of a girl who had personal letters from BOTH the current president and former president of her mother's sorority. (And I am speaking of a huge national.) Her mother had actually helped found a chapter of her GLO at a local college and was currently main advisor. Add to that that the chapter at the school the girl was attending had a field rep. there to help them because that particular group had "ended up 3rd choice on too many girls 1,2,3 choices in final parties. The girl in questions had nearly 1400 SAT, tons of activities, was beautiful and articulate, had been a deb at a Junior League ball, etc. BUT---she was FROM TOO FAR NORTH!! S0--ladies--if letters and calls from your own national don't guarantee an invite back to prefs., nothing else you can do will. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.