I saw when she switched her legs (I saw them move and looked down to see what she was doing) and I didn't see her panties at all.:confused:

I LOVED IT!!!! :D I saw it on IMAX, but I think I should've seen in on a regular screen first; it was irritating to keep cocking my head to see the other side of the screen. I also have quite a headache because of all the scenes where things were spinning. But other than that, it did annoy me how much stuff was missing, but I loved what was there, too. The special effects were awesome and one of my favorite parts was the end when Harry is possessed. Voldy not being able to stay in Harry's body definitely deviated from what we all know the real reason is, but I thought Daniel did an excellent job being possessed, it was very convincing (though he never goaded DD into trying to kill him like he was supposed to).

Well I saw a big white triangle glare out from under the gray dress - don't know what else it could have been...Maybe you didn't notice b/c you weren't looking in that area? (And yes, I realize that means I was looking right at her crotch, but I swear I'm not a pedophile - it was just the right timing!!!! :o)

I saw it last night, and I actually really liked it. Maybe it was a benefit for me that it's been a while since I last read the book, because I didn't get angry about things that were changed or missing. I thought the special effects were good, and I actually had tears in my eyes when that thing happened to Sirius. Maybe after I read book 7, I'll go back and refresh my memory on book 5.

Hmm...well, I was looking at her legs, more around the knee area, so it's possible that I missed it...but I can't see her wearing white underwear with that dress. Black or gray would definitely be safer, but then again, she's just a teenager, she might not know that...

Okay, thinking about this way too much. Back to the thread. ;)

True...but I checked youtube and it's on there and people are mentioning it - so I'm not the only pervert who noticed...:p

I saw the movie today and for the most part I really liked it. Just a few pet peeves though...I'll leave spoiler space, just in case :)

s
p
o
i
l
e
r


s
p
a
c
e



1. I was disappointed that the howler was cut out. I loved that part of the book, but I understood why it was cut, I just wish it hadn't been.

2. Beyond annoyed with the whole Cho 'thing' and the DA. (highlight to read)That was so stupid that they had Cho out the DA, although MysticCat's reasoning does make sense

3. Siruis's death. Hated how it was written in the book (I expected something different, mainly because I read the books after movie #3 came out and Gary Oldman said in an interview that his character died in book 5, so I was expecting it, but more "grandiose"). Hated even more what happened in the movie. (highlight to read the following) Correct me if I'm wrong, wasn't Sirius fighting Voldemort in the book. What was up with Bellatrix doing the killing curse on him. That was beyond messed up. GRRR.

4. I was surprised that they didn't "show" Snape leaving Hogwarts and going "undercover" (whatever you want to call it) since that is HUGE in HBP. Him being undercover is the reason he agrees to the 'blood oath' (or whatever it was and I can't pull out HBP because it's back in some box in my gargage, otherwise I would. I should find it before Saturday).

ASUADPi :)

Point #3: It is correct in the movie - that's how it was in the book as well.
Point #4: Snape doesn't go into hiding or undercover after the scene at the Ministry - that's part of the sixth book, so that's probably when we'll see it :)

Actually, the reference to it is at the end of Goblet of Fire. In the hospital wing, after Snape showed Fudge the Dark Mark and Snape and Sirius reluctantly shook hands, Dumbledore said "'Severus . . . you know what I must ask you to do. If you are ready . . . if you are prepared.' 'I am,' said Snape," and with a "good luck" from Dumbledore, he left. Then at Spinner's End, Snape explained his failure to respond immediately to the Dark Mark by telling Narcissa and Bellatrix, "By waiting two hours, just two hours, I ensured that I could remain at Hogwarts as a spy . . . ."

So he is undercover all through both OoP and HBP, but no mention of it is ever made in OoP.

And polarpi is right -- Bellatrix killed Sirius in the book. Voldemort didn't appear until after Harry chased Balltrix up to the atrium.

Gracias!

I actually just found my books (hey it only took my five minutes, I figured it would take days with the amount of boxes in my garage :D)

I guess I have to read the ending of OoTP over again :)

I grabbed HBP, figured I'd read that again as well.

Thanks, MC - I guess I wasn't thinking of "undercover" in that manner :p

Ok, the movie itself (without reading the books) was good...

However, because I am a HUGE HP fan, I was incredibly disappointed. They left out so much, switched facts around (it wasn't Cho who rats out the DA, it was her friend!) and overall, thought they could have done a hell of a lot better.

Things I was mad about....

1. Cho being the snitch

2. Very little done about Occlumency and Snape...along with that, Harry didn't have a chance to really confront Sirius about it like he did in the book

3. I could have swore that Petunia got a howler this time around...what happened?

4. Ron and Hermoine becoming prefects

5. and someone said it earlier....Sirius' detah just didn't go over quite like it did in the book...it was done so.....casually....in the movie. Was kinda looking fo rthe same kinda impact like......maybe Obi Wan dying or Gandalf's 'death' in FotR ...u know?

Sigh...can't wait for midnight on 7/21/07

I saw the movie on saturday and I loved it.

I have to admit at first I didn't really enjoy, because there were a lot of things omitted from the movie. But as I discussed it more with mum (someone who has never read any of the books), it dawned on me that these movies are not really written for the book reader. They are written for those who have never read the books.

The non-reder is only interested in the jist of the story, not the intricate plot points that are in the book. They want the "Coles Notes" version of things. I understand this better now. Yes it's disappointing not to see certain things on the big screen, but they only have so much time.

My only complaint, and like many of you, is the little changes in plot, (i.e. Neville finding the room of requirement, or Cho telling on the DA) in the movie, did upset me, because they were not necessary.

But I think, from a story-telling standpoint in a movie, they probably are necessary.

Movies tell stories differently from books; if they had stuck to the book, the movie would have been at least 6+ hours long and boring because the style of story-telling is different.

Neville (or someone other than Dobby) had to find the Room of Requirement because otherwise, we would have had to go into the whole thing about how Dobby now lives at Hogwarts, something none of the movies has addressed so far. It's cleaner from a movie story-telling to let one of our established characters find the room, and here it coulf be used to develop Neville a little.

Likewise with Cho. As I said before, using Cho to tell on the DA prevents the need to introduce an additional character and provides a reason for Harry and Cho not to end up together without going into the additional Valentine's Day scenes and the like.

I think it would have been better for Harry to have found the room, becasue after all, it was Dobby who showed Harry the room. I don't think it was really necessary to have Neville find the room.

I disagree. It could easily have been "Marietta" who ratted them out. In the scene with with Umbridge giving the students the Veritaserum, one of them could have been Marietta. They wouldn't have to give her lines or really identify who she was. The readers of the books would have figured it out, and those who didn't read the books, would have figured it was just another student.