Quote:
I just want to remind you that the majority of the people in the states hit the hardest are some of the poorest people in our country. The news reports stated that many of them didn't even have cars. And for those that did have cars it didn't really help them much when they were stranded on the CLOSED interstates. I disagree with your assertion that they could just leave. For all intents and purposes these are society's throw-aways with few resources or support.
|
Until you change society it's not going to be any different. From the local gov't on up it's like that, and you can't blame Bush (which is the case in almost all instantces) for something that is a problem across the board and would be a problem no matter who is in office.
This thing is spread across something like 90,000 square miles. Does anyone even understand how large that area is? Even with 124,000 thousand Natonal guards that still a little over one soldier for every square mile. It's going to take time, especially because of the choked roads, lack of power and communication equipment, and the huge spike in crime. They have to work their way in, and the further they go in the worse it gets.
Quote:
When disaster hits, the autorities-who knew it was coming, should have had relief there immediately.
|
We knew the storm was coming...but did anyone think it was going to be this big. Sure there were people on both sides saying it was a catastrophe and other's saying it's just another storm. Looking back we can say "Yeah, we were warned." but you can't listen to the worst case scenario b/c you would always waste resources. Their risk analysis was off on this one, and caught LA (where the responsiblity for state safety lies) with their pants down.
Quote:
They should have BEEN THERE. and you point about people's mind set is well taken, you are clearly pro-government, but I am looking at the track record of facts.
|
Trust me, I am very anti-gov't, but I disagree with a lot of the articles going around. Right now it's simply reactions with no factual base to them. Just more knee-jerk political moves-people that don't like Bush see this as a way to do harm and are taking full advantage of it.
You are looking at the facts through hindsight, not through the foresight that we had at the time. Yeah, maybe a hurricane of this size was going to come eventually, but by the time it actually showed up on the radar it was too late. NO was running at a near deficit for a while and made the decision to not to beef up the leeves. (NOTE that this rumor of cutting the flood control budget is false. It was close to 60 million in 2005, and wasn't to be cut until 2006-so that had nothing to do with it)
Quote:
For goodness sake-when Fidel starts offering us help you know we are looking bad on the world's stage.
|
Fidel is making a political point. That's why he did it, to make us look like we can't handle it.
Quote:
So the next time you are in a flood or any other natural disaster, let's see how easily you are able to cast judgement. Does it matter really in the final analysis? Disaster hit. Relief should have been there sooner. Why should THOUSANDS of people die while the politicians play politics?
|
Huh....who are the ones playing politics? Kanye or those that are trying to get things done.
To answer your question, yes you do have to have people in charge down there to assess the situation. We didn't know what was going on down there, we didn't know what was needed, how much, or anything like that. The gov't of that state collapsed and that is where the problem lies. Those thousands of people wouldn't have died if those with local authority would have done their job.