![]() |
Quote:
Now after the treatment they recieved how many are going to be now? Culturally the shaming that they or their family endured has to be avenged if they are to save some face... or on another level they now have a personally beef with the coalition. |
Quote:
-Rudey |
One point I think many of us (myself included) don't give enough credence to is the import of our actions. This is not a Holy War...yet. We are fighting "terrorists". Yet, with each innocent that is killed or maimed, anger grows and Muslims unite. Nationalities are of course important, but weigh that against religion and it is dwarfed. We must avoid any actions that unify Muslims (with the blessings of our enemies) against us, in my opinion. I do think we are OK-JUST "OK" at this point, but if missteps and foul conduct continue to surface, we will go from the fire straight into the frying pan.
There are many different religions in this world. A warrior nation defined by religious beliefs is frightening to me. The Top Dozen Organized Religions of the World Religion: Members: Christianity 2 Billion Islam 1.2 Billion Hinduism 785 Million Buddhism 360 Million Judaism 17 Million Sikhism 16 Million Baha'i 5 Million Confucianism 5 Million Jainism 4 Million Shintoism 3 Million Wicca .7 Million Zoroastrianism .2 Million |
Quote:
|
Quote:
-Rudey |
Quote:
The closest modern history has seen to a war based on religion is one between Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, whose ideologies were pseudo-religious. |
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you or do you not?
Quote:
Hmmmm, America is supposed to be "morally-superior" (according to rumsfeld) than any other nation. America, after all, stands of democracy ..right? well, let the soldiers keep violating BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS of POWs...while they smile for the camera. After all, this is war. KTSnake, if you look at the timeline, you will notice that the abuses of Abu Guraib occured BEFORE the beheading (which I absolutely, and without condition condemn), so your premise is way off. I think leadership in this country is corrupt (starting from the Bush and Co...all the way down to the Military). I sure hope that all people responsible will be prosecuted for their war crimes. My heart goes out to all the abused and raped Iraqi men and women, as well as those bombed at their own wedding. KTsnake, look at the pictures again. Do not tell me its justified! No one, criminal or not, deserves to be smeared with shit, made to eat pork and drink wine (knowing fully well its againt thier religion), beaten, tortured, raped and humiliated like that. How sick can they GET? |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you or do you not?
Quote:
-Rudey |
Rudey,
The feeling is mutual ;) How about you chew on that! |
Quote:
-Rudey |
IT WASN'T A WEDDING!
|
Re: Do you or do you not?
Quote:
|
Re: Re: Do you or do you not?
Quote:
-Rudey |
Quote:
First they claimed that military aircraft on patrol recieved hositle fire, and they responded with deadly force. Next it comes out that they had been monitoring the location as a crossing point for foreign fighters, and an attack was made to exploit favourable conditions. Next we here that it was a planned attack involving ground and air forces, to neutralize the threat posed by foreign fighters. FOX News reports one side, Al Jazerra reports the opposite... the truth is most likely in the middle. Sure the site could have been a site used by foreign fighters crossing into Iraq, but that doesn't mean that any gather of people is related to that activity. In a war were intelligence relys on "native" intel. then local feuds and personal power plays may be made (see Chibali).... any mistake can be extremely dangerous to the public perception (whether justified or not) of the coalition forces, and therefore care must be taken in any action taken; unfortunately the sharp option is too often chosen by the US forces (which is what the latest leaked Brit memo expressed concern over). |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.