![]() |
Re: Clarity
Quote:
Peace. :( |
Re: There are some critical points regarding this thread that must be addressed
Quote:
Peace. |
Re: Re: Clarity
Quote:
Reiki, the next time you feel the need to correct someone, please do it by PM. Somehow, I don't get the feeling you were trying to be helpful or offer constructive criticism. Instead, I feel as though you were trying to be smart and call my soror out and belittle her entire post for the misspelling of one word. And for that reason, I am offended. All: Please, get back on topic or the thread will be closed. |
Re: Re: Re: Clarity
Quote:
Peace. |
Re: I elect that this thread be closed
Quote:
AKA2D initially opened this thread for anyone to post, as there were no disclaimers in the opening post. Later, some non-Greeks post their views and was chastised by 2D b/c they were non-Greeks and they have not experienced Greek life. THAT was why the thread got off-topic. Taking it a step further, few, if any Greeks posting in this thread has experienced disgruntlement with their organization to the point of permanent separation (if they have, they have been silent). Therefore, if the only qualified posters of any thread should be those who directly experience something, then it begs the question of why are Greeks any more qualified then non-Greeks to speak on something they have not experienced. I have nothing but love for any GCers, but in all fairness I think 2D was wrong for restricting the thread to Greeks when on the very nature of the subject she (and a lot of other Greeks) was an outsider herself. I humbly ask that in light of the above, that the thread either be open for non-Greeks to post, or to close it entirely. Thank you RM |
why close it? Just ignore it...like ME! :D
Quote:
Where did I say that? :confused: BTW... Welcome back, we haven't seen you around here in a few minutes. I'm glad you found something you wanted to "discuss"... ;) What I did do is ask how can one who is a MEMBER of ABC say they don't want to be ABC anymore. THAT'S WHAT I DID. Therefore, If you are not a member, you cannot answer. And contrary to what you said, MEMBERS of organizations have more similarities than differences as someone said. Therefore, MEMBERS can question another MEMBER'S rationale. We are in the SAME boat basically, so yes, WE CAN QUESTION. If a Delta goes to their forum asks why doesn't their soror not want to attend sorority meeting, WHY IN THE HECK should I go over there and answer? (Just using it as an example) Another example...If I have sorority meeting at abc place and it starts at 5 (which I do...lol) and a non-member rolls up to the place at 5, ummmmmm someone is out of order. There aren't any disclaimers or signs that says that this is an AKA meeting. But anyone NOT a member or member of the chapter cannot attend IT'S THE SAME SCRIPT... DIFFERNT CAST. One does not have to ALL THE TIME say, this is for one or this is not for one to respond. One should know where to tread and not tread. Now, when I or if I ask, why or why not a NON-MEMBER thinks like this or that, then you may answer, otherwise....poof be gone! Like I said before, since folks can't read between lines, I'll have to SPECIFY who can and CANNOT post. If you post and it specifically says who can't, then your post is DELETED! If I've already made it clear when the chit started, then why must those who are not members continue to post? Sorors and other greeks you all can continue to post, but as far as I'm concerned, it's..... ;) Skee ya'll! :D |
Re: why close it? Just ignore it...like ME! :D
Quote:
AKA2D: BTW... Welcome back, we haven't seen you around here in a few minutes. I'm glad you found something you wanted to "discuss"... ;) RM: Thank you. I have been posting from time to time, it's just few have been responding. But thanx nonetheless. AKA2D: What I did do is ask how can one who is a MEMBER of ABC say they don't want to be ABC anymore. THAT'S WHAT I DID. Therefore, If you are not a member, you cannot answer. And contrary to what you said, MEMBERS of organizations have more similarities than differences as someone said. Therefore, MEMBERS can question another MEMBER'S rationale. We are in the SAME boat basically, so yes, WE CAN QUESTION. RM: As Unicron would say, "Your bargaining posture is highly dubious, but very well" Just keep in mind that Greeks and non-Greeks are people first and therefore in the SAME boat being that they all have spirits, souls, and opinions. AKA2D: If a Delta goes to their forum asks why doesn't their soror not want to attend sorority meeting, WHY IN THE HECK should I go over there and answer? (Just using it as an example) RM: Hey, different strokes for different folks. As long as they (or any GLO) know that they are in a public forum, there are only so many safeguards that can be put into play to keep outsiders from answering. That is an inherent risk you take when posting on GC. 2D: Another example...If I have sorority meeting at abc place and it starts at 5 (which I do...lol) and a non-member rolls up to the place at 5, ummmmmm someone is out of order. There aren't any disclaimers or signs that says that this is an AKA meeting. But anyone NOT a member or member of the chapter cannot attend IT'S THE SAME SCRIPT... DIFFERNT CAST. One does not have to ALL THE TIME say, this is for one or this is not for one to respond. One should know where to tread and not tread. RM My question to you would be: How the heck did the nonmember find out about the meeting if it was to be private to begin with? It seems to me that with both the examples you gave that some BGLOers don't practice what they preach. Namely, DISCRETION! 2D: Now, when I or if I ask, why or why not a NON-MEMBER thinks like this or that, then you may answer, otherwise....poof be gone! Like I said before, since folks can't read between lines, I'll have to SPECIFY who can and CANNOT post. If you post and it specifically says who can't, then your post is DELETED! RM: That was NOT the case here, at least not initially. And still, it begs the question: Since Greeks here have not EXPERIENCED denouncement from their GLO, just as non-Greeks have not EXPERIENCED a GLO ritual initiation, what makes a Greek any more qualified to speak on a subject s/he has not experienced any more that a non-Greek? Let's be honest, a ritual initiation should not be used for a be-all, end-all tool for discussions. I think in this case, it is just a weak excuse to shove their letters in non-Greeks' face. 2D: If I've already made it clear when the chit started, then why must those who are not members continue to post? Sorors and other greeks you all can continue to post, but as far as I'm concerned, it's..... ;) RM: 2D, if you are really that concerned about what non-Greeks can or cannot post to, you might want to see if there can be a sub-forum in this website that only members can post to certain topics. Otherwise, I guarantee you that a lot of insightful Greek-related threads will be sidetracked into flame wars b/t non-Greeks and Greeks. I already see a LOT of that in this forum and is just now saying something about it. But pulling letters (as in the term "pulling rank") on non-Greeks is not the answer, as you can see. Skee ya'll! :D [/B][/QUOTE] Likewise, RM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.