:) You are confusing the topic. We are no longer discussing whether or not his comments were bigoted. People will think of that what they will.

We are discussing your contention that "one's feelings are one's feelings and simply stating them does not a bigot make." Bigotry is rooted in feelings and opinions. Simply stating them is what outward expressions of bigotry are all about. That doesn't mean that every feeling and expression of feelings is bigotry. It means that feelings are not neutral and are not automatically awesome just because they are your feelings. Once you choose to express your feelings, you are opening them up to being processed and responded to by others.

If people want to go on and on about Free Speech and political correctness, also be able to accept how others process and respond to your expressions.

I really like and respect Shepard Smith. This is just one more feather in his cap.

I also like Shepard Smith.

As funnily in your face as Joy Behar tends to be, Smith was so unmoved that they couldn't get him to talk trash about anyone or anything.

Funny how that journalistic integrity works out for him. It's like... like his point was made without him ever even needing to say it.

I once took a wrong turn in Torrance, CA and ended up in a rough looking side of LA. On a street corner there were several black teens/men wearing a particular blue color. I presumed they were gang members. I was concerned and afraid. In hindsight they could have been a local basketball team but I was afraid. Now that I have shared how I felt with all of you I need to know if I am a bigot? If so, I guarantee that many of you are also bigots because fear and being afraid are emotions. Sometimes you can't help but have fear and concerns be they irrational or not.

If it is the perception of those who hear ones feelings and opinions that makes a bigot then I really guess that it will always come down to which end of the political spectrum one is speaking from. I now understand that the bottom line is a bigot is one who is perceived to be a bigot by certain others. It has nothing to do with ones actions and/or character.

The Point
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
Ghostwriter

Your experience just isn't relevant here - if you want me to enumerate the reasons I can, but you likely know better (hint: apples/oranges w/re/to context clues).

It isn't "perception". You were SO QUICK to define bigotry, and now you're just ignoring those definitions?

It's simple: prejudice against a group and an unwillingness to be open-minded against that prejudice (which should be our working definition of "intolerant" here) makes you bigoted. That has nothing to do with politics, until you start assigning motive to some nebulous "Liberal Media" that may or may not exist in the form you require it.

Actions and character matter. So does prejudice and intolerance. They are intertwined, not separate.

Also, actions? Like speaking stupid shit out of your face on national TV? Or character? Like acting indignant when others call out stupid shit? This can't be discussed in TheoryWorld, because it really happened and there is existing context.

It's fine if you don't feel that Williams deserved to be fired - I think that's a fair argument to have, even if I feel his employer had nearly no choice and thus disagree. But instead of being polemic, attempting to make some global observation about race relations is just silly onanism masquerading as discourse - it's short-sighted, borderline masturbatory, and 100% non sequitur.

I don't really know what this means but it gave me chills. LOL.

You used Onanism.

You're my hero.

You used masturbatory.

You're my hero.

Those are pretty good back-to-back - I got a giggle out of it.

Non sequitur?

Stuff?

[QUOTE=DrPhil;1998117]Match: KSig RC.

OMG - Congratulations we have found our new OSWALD BATES.

Typical liberal quasi"intelectualism". You don't like someone disagreeing with you. Now that you have proved that you know big words, I submit that you are a bigot. Your post shows an opinion based in intolerance for an opposing viewpoint. Your comments were at best meanspirited and at worse inflamatory. But what is to be expected from a panty waist liberal know it all who feels the need to use sophistry and invectives when reasonable discourse is called for.

If you are a Kappa Sig, and I hope and pray you are not, you definitely do not understand the meaning of "a gentlemen and a man of honor". Grow up and STFU. I am ashamed to call you a brother.

"I said my piece and counted to 3." Penny McGill

Bold = Irony at its finest

And LOL @ dissenting opinions = bad brotherhood :rolleyes: GTFOHWTBS